Managing the Impact of Immunogenicity in an Era of Immunotherapy: From Bench to Bedside

Workshop report: A study roadmap to evaluate the safety of recombinant human lactoferrin expressed in Komagataella phaffii intended as an ingredient in conventional foods - Recommendations of a scientific expert panel

Human milk lactoferrin (hmLF) is a glycoprotein with well-known effects on immune function. Helaina Inc. has used a glycoengineered yeast, Komatagaella phaffii, to produce recombinant human lactoferrin (Helaina rhLF, Effera™) that is structurally similar to hmLF with intended uses as a food ingredient. However, earlier FDA reviews of rhLF were withdrawn due to insufficient safety data and unanswered safety questions the experts and FDA raised about the immunogenicity/immunotoxicity risks of orally ingested rhLF. Helaina organized a panel of leading scientists to build and vet a safety study roadmap containing the studies and safety endpoints needed to address these questions. Panelists participated in a one-day virtual workshop in June 2023 and ensuing discussions through July 2023. Relevant workshop topics included physicochemical properties of LF, regulatory history of bovine LF and rhLF as food ingredients in the FDA's generally recognized as safe (GRAS) program, and synopses of publicly available studies on the immunogenicity/alloimmunization, immunotoxicology, iron homeostasis, and absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of rhLF. Panelists concluded that the safety study roadmap addresses the unanswered safety questions and the intended safe use of rhLF as a food ingredient for adults and agreed on broad applications of the roadmap to assess the safety and support GRAS of other recombinant milk proteins with immunomodulatory functions.

A review of the safety evidence on recombinant human lactoferrin for use as a food ingredient

Published studies on the glycosylation, absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and safety outcomes of orally ingested recombinant human lactoferrin (rhLF) were reviewed in the context of unanswered safety questions, including alloimmunization, allergenicity, and immunotoxicity potential of rhLF during repeated exposure. The primary objective was to summarize current safety data of rhLF produced in transgenic host expression systems. Overall, results from animal and human studies showed that rhLF was well tolerated and safe. Animal data showed no significant toxicity-related outcomes among any safety or tolerability endpoints. The no observed adverse effect levels (NOAEL) were at the highest level tested in both iron-desaturated and -saturated forms of rhLF. Although one study reported outcomes of rhLF on immune parameters, no animal studies directly assessed immunogenicity or immunotoxicity from a safety perspective. Data from human studies were primarily reported as adverse events (AE). They showed no or fewer rhLF-related AE compared to control and no evidence of toxicity, dose-limiting toxicities, or changes in iron status in various subpopulations. However, no human studies evaluated the immunomodulatory potential of rhLF as a measure of safety. Following this review, a roadmap outlining preclinical and clinical studies with relevant safety endpoints was developed to address the unanswered safety questions.

Obinutuzumab Pretreatment as a Novel Approach to Mitigate Formation of Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Cergutuzumab Amunaleukin in Patients with Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

The immunocytokine cergutuzumab amunaleukin (CEA-IL2v) showed manageable safety and favorable pharmacodynamics in phase I/Ib trials in patients with advanced/metastatic carcinoembryonic antigen-positive (CEA+) solid tumors, but this was accompanied by a high incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). We examined B-cell depletion with obinutuzumab as a potential mitigation strategy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Preclinical data comparing B-cell depletion with rituximab versus obinutuzumab are summarized. Substudies of phase I/Ib trials investigated the effect of obinutuzumab pretreatment on ADA development, safety, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of CEA-IL2v ± atezolizumab in patients with advanced/metastatic or unresectable CEA+ solid tumors who had progressed on standard of care.

RESULTS

Preclinical data showed superior B-cell depletion with obinutuzumab versus rituximab. In clinical studies, patients received CEA-IL2v monotherapy with (n = 16) or without (n = 6) obinutuzumab pretreatment (monotherapy study), or CEA-IL2v + atezolizumab + obinutuzumab pretreatment (n = 5; combination study). In the monotherapy study, after four cycles (every 2 weeks treatment), 0/15 evaluable patients administered obinutuzumab pretreatment had ADAs versus 4/6 patients without obinutuzumab. Obinutuzumab pretreatment with CEA-IL2v monotherapy showed no new safety signals and pharmacodynamic data suggested minimal impact on T cells and natural killer cells. Conversely, increased liver toxicity was observed in the combination study (CEA-IL2v + atezolizumab + obinutuzumab pretreatment).

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary findings suggest that obinutuzumab pretreatment before CEA-IL2v administration in patients with CEA+ solid tumors may be a feasible and potent ADA mitigation strategy, with an acceptable safety profile, supporting broader investigation of obinutuzumab pretreatment for ADA mitigation in other settings.

Phase 1, first-in-human study of TYRP1-TCB (RO7293583), a novel TYRP1-targeting CD3 T-cell engager, in metastatic melanoma: active drug monitoring to assess the impact of immune response on drug exposure

Introduction

Although checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have improved outcomes for patients with metastatic melanoma, those progressing on CPIs have limited therapeutic options. To address this unmet need and overcome CPI resistance mechanisms, novel immunotherapies, such as T-cell engaging agents, are being developed. The use of these agents has sometimes been limited by the immune response mounted against them in the form of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), which is challenging to predict preclinically and can lead to neutralization of the drug and loss of efficacy.

Methods

TYRP1-TCB (RO7293583; RG6232) is a T-cell engaging bispecific (TCB) antibody that targets tyrosinase-related protein 1 (TYRP1), which is expressed in many melanomas, thereby directing T cells to kill TYRP1-expressing tumor cells. Preclinical studies show TYRP1-TCB to have potent anti-tumor activity. This first-in-human (FIH) phase 1 dose-escalation study characterized the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose/optimal biological dose, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of TYRP1-TCB in patients with metastatic melanoma (NCT04551352).

Results

Twenty participants with cutaneous, uveal, or mucosal TYRP1-positive melanoma received TYRP1-TCB in escalating doses (0.045 to 0.4 mg). All participants experienced ≥1 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE); two participants experienced grade 3 TRAEs. The most common toxicities were grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and rash. Fractionated dosing mitigated CRS and was associated with lower levels of interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Measurement of active drug (dual TYPR1- and CD3-binding) PK rapidly identified loss of active drug exposure in all participants treated with 0.4 mg in a flat dosing schedule for ≥3 cycles. Loss of exposure was associated with development of ADAs towards both the TYRP1 and CD3 domains. A total drug PK assay, measuring free and ADA-bound forms, demonstrated that TYRP1-TCB-ADA immune complexes were present in participant samples, but showed no drug activity in vitro.

Discussion

This study provides important insights into how the use of active drug PK assays, coupled with mechanistic follow-up, can inform and enable ongoing benefit/risk assessment for individuals participating in FIH dose-escalation trials. Translational studies that lead to a better understanding of the underlying biology of cognate T- and B-cell interactions, ultimately resulting in ADA development to novel biotherapeutics, are needed.

In vivo study of newly developed albumin-conjugated urate oxidase for gout treatment

BACKGROUND

Exogenously providing engineered Uox with enhanced half-life is one of the important urate-lowering treatments for gout. The potential of PAT101, a recombinant human albumin (rHA)-conjugated variant, was evaluated and compared as a novel gout treatment through various in vivo studies with PAT101 and competing drugs.

METHODS

PAT101 was produced by site-specific conjugation of rHA and Aspergillus flavus Uox (AfUox-rHA) through clickable non-natural amino acid (frTet) and Inverse electron demand Diels-Alder (IEDDA) reaction. In vivo pharmacokinetics, efficacy tests and in vitro immunogenetic assay were performed after single or multiple doses of PAT101 and its competitors in BALB/c mice, transgenic (TG) mice, Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, and non-human primate (NHP).

RESULTS

The half-life of PAT101 in single-dose treated TG mice was more than doubled compared to pegloticase. In SD rats with 4 weeks of repeated administration of rasburicase, only 24% of Uox activity remained, whereas in PAT101, it was maintained by 86%. In the Uox KO model, the survival rate of PAT101 was comparable to that of pegloticase. In addition, human PBMC-based CD4+/CD8+ T-cell activation analysis demonstrated that PAT101 has a lower immune response compared to the original drug, rasburicase.

CONCLUSION

All results suggest that this rHA-conjugated AfUox, PAT101, can be provided as a reliable source of Uox for gout treatment.

Characterization and root cause analysis of immunogenicity to pasotuxizumab (AMG 212), a prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeting bispecific T-cell engager therapy

Introduction

In oncology, anti-drug antibody (ADA) development that significantly curtails response durability has not historically risen to a level of concern. The relevance and attention ascribed to ADAs in oncology clinical studies have therefore been limited, and the extant literature on this subject scarce. In recent years, T cell engagers have gained preeminence within the prolific field of cancer immunotherapy. These drugs whose mode of action is expected to potently stimulate anti-tumor immunity, may potentially induce ADAs as an unintended corollary due to an overall augmentation of the immune response. ADA formation is therefore emerging as an important determinant in the successful clinical development of such biologics.

Methods

Here we describe the immunogenicity and its impact observed to pasotuxizumab (AMG 212), a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting bispecific T cell engager (BiTE®) molecule in NCT01723475, a first-in-human (FIH), multicenter, dose-escalation study in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). To explain the disparity in ADA incidence observed between the SC and CIV arms of the study, we interrogated other patient and product-specific factors that may have explained the difference beyond the route of administration.

Results

Treatment-emergent ADAs (TE-ADA) developed in all subjects treated with at least 1 cycle of AMG 212 in the subcutaneous (SC) arm. These ADAs were neutralizing and resulted in profound exposure loss that was associated with contemporaneous reversal of initial Prostate Surface Antigen (PSA) responses, curtailing durability of PSA response in patients. Pivoting from SC to a continuous intravenous (CIV) administration route remarkably yielded no subjects developing ADA to AMG 212. Through a series of stepwise functional assays, our investigation revealed that alongside a more historically immunogenic route of administration, non-tolerant T cell epitopes within the AMG 212 amino acid sequence were likely driving the high-titer, sustained ADA response observed in the SC arm.

Discussion

These mechanistic insights into the AMG 212 ADA response underscore the importance of performing preclinical immunogenicity risk evaluation as well as advocate for continuous iteration to better our biologics.

Expanding the MAPPs Assay to Accommodate MHC-II Pan Receptors for Improved Predictability of Potential T Cell Epitopes

A critical step in the immunogenicity cascade is attributed to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) II presentation triggering T cell immune responses. The liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II-associated peptide proteomics (MAPPs) assay is implemented during preclinical risk assessments to identify biotherapeutic-derived T cell epitopes. Although studies indicate that HLA-DP and HLA-DQ alleles are linked to immunogenicity, most MAPPs studies are restricted to using HLA-DR as the dominant HLA II genotype due to the lack of well-characterized immunoprecipitating antibodies. Here, we address this issue by testing various commercially available clones of MHC-II pan (CR3/43, WR18, and Tü39), HLA-DP (B7/21), and HLA-DQ (SPV-L3 and 1a3) antibodies in the MAPPs assay, and characterizing identified peptides according to binding specificity. Our results reveal that HLA II receptor-precipitating reagents with similar reported specificities differ based on clonality and that MHC-II pan antibodies do not entirely exhibit pan-specific tendencies. Since no individual antibody clone is able to recover the complete HLA II peptide repertoire, we recommend a mixed strategy of clones L243, WR18, and SPV-L3 in a single immunoprecipitation step for more robust compound-specific peptide detection. Ultimately, our optimized MAPPs strategy improves the predictability and additional identification of T cell epitopes in immunogenicity risk assessments.

Method validation of a bridging immunoassay in combination with acid-dissociation and bead treatment for detection of anti-drug antibody

Anti-drug antibody (ADA) positivity is correlated with disease relapse risk when treated with monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics. ADA evaluation can assist with interpreting pharmacokinetic, pharmacological, and toxicology results. Here, we established an ADA assay based on two steps of acid dissociation combined with a bridging immunoassay to provide a comprehensive validation strategy. The three-tiered sample analysis process included screening, confirmation, and titration assays using therapeutic HLX26 (targeting lymphocyte activation gene-3 [LAG-3]) as an example. The cut points were determined by testing 50 individual normal human serum samples, including screening cut point (SCP) (SNR: 1.08), confirmatory cut point (CCP) (% inhibition: 12.65), and titration cut point (TCP) (sample-to-noise ratio [SNR]: 1.17). The assay sensitivity, low positive control (LPC), and high positive control (HPC) titer acceptable range were also set up as 33.0 ng/mL, 41.0 ng/mL, and 320-1280, respectively. After full validation, both the intra-assay and inter-assay precision testing passed with coefficient of variations (CVs) < 20%. The assay enabled excellent drug tolerance up to 768.0 μg/mL at the HPC level and 291.0 μg/mL at the LPC level, while the tolerance of target interference was up to 74.0 ng/mL of soluble LAG3. Moreover, no false-positive results were observed in the presence of 5% hemolyzed serum samples and 150 mg/dL of triglyceride in the serum samples, no hook effect was observed, and the stability performed normally under room temperature for 24 h, 2-8 °C for 7 d, and six freeze/thaw cycles. In summary, this ADA assay is feasible and could be used for evaluating the immunogenicity of HLX26 in clinical trials.

Pharmacokinetics of a proposed tocilizumab biosimilar (MSB11456) versus US-licensed tocilizumab: results of a randomized, double-blind, single-intravenous dose study in healthy adults

BACKGROUND

Tocilizumab, a recombinant monoclonal immunoglobulin G, targets the interleukin-6 receptor. MSB11456 is a proposed tocilizumab biosimilar.

OBJECTIVES

To assess pharmacokinetic equivalence of intravenous MSB11456 to US-licensed tocilizumab.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this double-blind, parallel-group, single-dose study, 128 healthy adults were randomized to a single one-hour 8 mg/kg IV infusion of either MSB11456 or US-licensed tocilizumab. Blood samples were collected pre-dose and at regular intervals up to day 48 post-dose. The primary endpoint pharmacokinetic parameter was analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) model on the natural logarithm of the endpoint (AUC_0-last), with treatment as a fixed effect. Immunogenicity and safety data were summarized descriptively.

RESULTS

Subjects received either MSB11456 (N = 62) or US-licensed tocilizumab (N = 66). Pharmacokinetic bioequivalence, defined as 90% confidence intervals for the geometric least squares mean ratio entirely contained within the 80.00% to 125.00% equivalence limits, was demonstrated between MSB11456 and US-licensed tocilizumab for the primary and secondary pharmacokinetic endpoints. Anti-drug antibody responses, frequency of neutralizing antibodies against tocilizumab, and safety profiles showed no notable between-treatment differences. Safety was comparable between treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacokinetic similarity of MSB11456 and US-licensed tocilizumab was demonstrated, with comparable immunogenicity and safety profiles, supporting MSB11455 as a biosimilar to US-licensed tocilizumab. The trial is registered at EudraCT, number 2019-003484-22.

Validation of a Dendritic Cell and CD4+ T Cell Restimulation Assay Contributing to the Immunogenicity Risk Evaluation of Biotherapeutics

Immunogenicity, defined as the ability to provoke an immune response, can be either wanted (i.e., vaccines) or unwanted. The latter refers to an immune response to protein or peptide therapeutics, characterized by the production of anti-drug antibodies, which may affect the efficacy and/or the safety profiles of these drugs. Consequently, evaluation of the risk of immunogenicity early in the development of biotherapeutics is of critical importance for defining their efficacy and safety profiles. Here, we describe and validate a fit-for-purpose FluoroSpot-based in vitro assay for the evaluation of drug-specific T cell responses. A panel of 24 biotherapeutics with a wide range of clinical anti-drug antibody response rates were tested in this assay. We demonstrated that using suitable cutoffs and donor cohort sizes, this assay could identify most of the compounds with high clinical immunogenicity rates (71% and 78% for sensitivity and specificity, respectively) while we characterized the main sources of assay variability. Overall, these data indicate that the dendritic cell and CD4+ T cell restimulation assay published herein could be a valuable tool to assess the risk of drug-specific T cell responses and contribute to the selection of clinical candidates in early development.

Learn-confirm in model-informed drug development: Assessing an immunogenicity quantitative systems pharmacology platform

Immunogenicity against therapeutic proteins frequently causes attrition owing to its potential impact on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety. Predicting immunogenicity is complex because of its multifactorial drivers, including compound properties, subject characteristics, and treatment parameters. To integrate these, the Immunogenicity Simulator was developed using published, predominantly late-stage trial data from 15 therapeutic proteins. This single-blinded evaluation with subject-level data from 10 further monoclonals assesses the Immunogenicity Simulator's credibility for application during the drug development process.

A humanized minipig model for the toxicological testing of therapeutic recombinant antibodies

The safety of most human recombinant proteins can be evaluated in transgenic mice tolerant to specific human proteins. However, owing to insufficient genetic diversity and to fundamental differences in immune mechanisms, small-animal models of human diseases are often unsuitable for immunogenicity testing and for predicting adverse outcomes in human patients. Most human therapeutic antibodies trigger xenogeneic responses in wild-type animals and thus rapid clearance of the drugs, which makes in vivo toxicological testing of human antibodies challenging. Here we report the generation of Göttingen minipigs carrying a mini-repertoire of human genes for the immunoglobulin heavy chains γ1 and γ4 and the immunoglobulin light chain κ. In line with observations in human patients, the genetically modified minipigs tolerated the clinically non-immunogenic IgG1κ-isotype monoclonal antibodies daratumumab and bevacizumab, and elicited antibodies against the checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab and the engineered interleukin cergutuzumab amunaleukin. The humanized minipigs can facilitate the safety and efficacy testing of therapeutic antibodies.

Enhanced immunogenic potential of cancer immunotherapy antibodies in human IgG1 transgenic mice

ABBREVIATIONS

ADA Anti-Drug Antibodies; BCR B Cell Receptor; BId Idiotype-specific B Cell; BiTE Bispecific T cell Engager; BMC Bone Marrow Chimeric Mice; BSA Bovine Serum Albumin; CDR Complementary Determining Region; CEA Carcinoembryonic Antigen; CIT Cancer Immunotherapy; CitAbs Cancer Immunotherapy Antibodies; DC Dendritic Cell; ELISA Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; FcRn Neonatal Fc Receptor; FcyR Fc gamma Receptor; GM-CSF Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor; gMFI Geometric Mean Fluorescence Intensity; H Heavy Chain; IC Immune Complex; Id Idiotype; IgA Immunoglobulin alpha; IgG1 Immunoglobulin gamma 1; IL-2 Interleukin 2; IL-2R Interleukin 2 Receptor; IL2v Interleukin 2 Variant; IVIG1 Intravenous Immunoglobulin 1; KLH Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin; L Light Chain; MAPPs MHC-associated Peptide Proteomics; MHC Major Histocompatibility Complex; PBMC Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells; PBS Phosphate Buffered Saline; SHM Somatic Hypermutation; scFv Single-chain Variable Fragment; TCR T cell Receptor; TFc Fc-specific T cell; TId Id-specific T cell; UV Ultraviolet; V Variable.

Comparability study of monocyte derived dendritic cells, primary monocytes, and THP1 cells for innate immune responses

Immunogenicity is one major challenge to the successful development of biotherapeutics because it could adversely affect PK/PD, safety, and efficacy. Preclinical immunogenicity risk assessment strategies and assays have been developed and implemented to screen and optimize discovery molecules. Internalization by antigen presenting cells (APC) and innate immune activation are initial prerequisite steps in eliciting immune responses to biotherapeutics. Dendritic cells (DC)- and monocyte-based assays are employed to interrogate such risks, and their value has been well documented in the literature. However, these assays have limited throughput, exhibit higher variability, and entail lengthy and complex procedures as they are based on primary cells such as peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from individual donors. Herein, we investigated THP1 cells as surrogate cells to study APC internalization and innate immune activation. Comparability studies showed that THP1 cells could resemble innate immune responses of monocyte-derived DC and primary CD14+ monocytes using a panel of therapeutic antibodies. In addition, an automated high throughput THP1 internalization assay was qualified to enable risk assessment at pre‑lead stages. The results demonstrated that THP1 cells can be utilized to assess immunogenicity risk in a high throughput manner.