Possible Extraction of Drugs from Lung Tissue During Broncho-alveolar Lavage Suggest Uncertainty in the Procedure's Utility for Quantitative Assessment of Airway Drug Exposure

Translational PK/PD for the Development of Novel Antibiotics-A Drug Developer's Perspective

Antibiotic development traditionally involved large Phase 3 programs, preceded by Phase 2 studies. Recognizing the high unmet medical need for new antibiotics and, in some cases, challenges to conducting large clinical trials, regulators created a streamlined clinical development pathway in which a lean clinical efficacy dataset is complemented by nonclinical data as supportive evidence of efficacy. In this context, translational Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) plays a key role and is a major contributor to a "robust" nonclinical package. The classical PK/PD index approach, proven successful for established classes of antibiotics, is at the core of recent antibiotic approvals and the current antibacterial PK/PD guidelines by regulators. Nevertheless, in the case of novel antibiotics with a novel Mechanism of Action (MoA), there is no prior experience with the PK/PD index approach as the basis for translating nonclinical efficacy to clinical outcome, and additional nonclinical studies and PK/PD analyses might be considered to increase confidence. In this review, we discuss the value and limitations of the classical PK/PD approach and present potential risk mitigation activities, including the introduction of a semi-mechanism-based PK/PD modeling approach. We propose a general nonclinical PK/PD package from which drug developers might choose the studies most relevant for each individual candidate in order to build up a "robust" nonclinical PK/PD understanding.

Assessment of Epithelial Lining Fluid Partitioning of Systemically Administered Monoclonal Antibodies in Rats

For systemically administered monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with pharmacological targets in the epithelial lining fluid (ELF), information on the partitioning of mAb between plasma and ELF is instrumental for dose predictions. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) combined with measurements of urea as indicator of sample dilution is often used to estimate ELF concentrations of a drug. However, unbalanced extraction of mAb and urea could potentially lead to a systematic bias in the back-calculated ELF concentration. In the present study 0.5, 1, or 4 mL phosphate-buffered saline was instilled to lungs of rats to obtain lavage samples after systemic dosing of mAb and tool small molecule (n≥4/group). Furthermore, extraction of urea, mAb and the small molecule was assessed by repeatedly lavaging the lung (n = 4). There was no statistically significant difference in the calculated partitioning into ELF between the evaluated instillation volumes. Repeated BAL demonstrated that urea and the small molecule were extracted from other sources than the ELF. In contrast, there was limited to none in-flow of mAb into the lavage fluid. The unbalanced extraction of urea and mAb could theoretically result in underestimated ELF concentrations and the calculated partitioning of 0.17±0.062 might therefore constitute a lower boundary for the true partitioning.

Understanding the suitability of established antibiotics for oral inhalation from a pharmacokinetic perspective: an integrated model-based investigation based on rifampicin, ciprofloxacin and tigecycline in vivo data

BACKGROUND

Treating pulmonary infections by administering drugs via oral inhalation represents an attractive alternative to usual routes of administration. However, the local concentrations after inhalation are typically not known and the presumed benefits are derived from experiences with drugs specifically optimized for inhaled administration.

OBJECTIVES

A physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) model was developed to elucidate the pulmonary PK for ciprofloxacin, rifampicin and tigecycline and link it to bacterial PK/PD models. An exemplary sensitivity analysis was performed to potentially guide drug optimization regarding local efficacy for inhaled antibiotics.

METHODS

Detailed pulmonary tissue, endothelial lining fluid and systemic in vivo drug concentration-time profiles were simultaneously measured for all drugs in rats after intravenous infusion. Using this data, a PBPK/PD model was developed, translated to humans and adapted for inhalation. Simulations were performed comparing potential benefits of oral inhalation for treating bronchial infections, covering intracellular pathogens and bacteria residing in the bronchial epithelial lining fluid.

RESULTS

The PBPK/PD model was able to describe pulmonary PK in rats. Often applied optimization parameters for orally inhaled drugs (e.g. high systemic clearance and low oral bioavailability) showed little influence on efficacy and instead mainly increased pulmonary selectivity. Instead, low permeability, a high epithelial efflux ratio and a pronounced post-antibiotic effect represented the most impactful parameters to suggest a benefit of inhalation over systemic administration for locally acting antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

The present work might help to develop antibiotics for oral inhalation providing high pulmonary concentrations and fast onset of exposure coupled with lower systemic drug concentrations.