The current treatment of achalasia

Endoscopic and surgical treatments for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although rare, esophageal achalasia is the best described primary esophageal motility disorder. Commonly used treatments are endoscopic botulin toxin injection (EBTI), endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD), and surgical myotomy with or without a fundoplication; however, reported outcomes mostly come from cohort studies.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize and compare the safety and efficacy of endoscopic and surgical treatments for esophageal achalasia.

METHODS

A systematic electronic Medline literature search of articles on esophageal achalasia. Treatment options reviewed included EBTI, EBD, and surgical myotomy using open and minimally invasive techniques. Main outcome measures were frequency of symptom relief, prevalence of post-treatment gastroesophageal reflux (GER), and complications. Outcome probability was estimated using weighted averages of the sample prevalence in each study, with weights equal to the number of patients. Outcomes, within or across studies, were compared using meta-analysis and meta-regression, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 105 articles reporting on 7855 patients were selected, tabulated and reviewed. Symptom relief after EBD was better than after EBTI (68.2% vs. 40.6%; OR 3.4; 95% CI, 1.2-9.8; P = 0.02), and the need for additional therapy was greater for patients receiving EBTI (46.6% vs. 25%; OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.05-6.5; P = 0.04). Laparoscopic myotomy, when combined with an antireflux procedure, provided better symptom relief (90%) than all endoscopic and other surgical approaches and a low complication rate (6.3%). The incidence of postoperative GER was lower when a fundoplication was added to a laparoscopic myotomy (31.5% without a fundoplication vs. 8.8% with; OR, 6.3; 95% CI, 2.0-19.4; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

EBD is superior to EBTI. Laparoscopic myotomy with fundoplication was the most effective surgical technique and can be considered the operative procedure of choice.

Relief of dysphagia after laparoscopic Heller myotomy improves long-term quality of life

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Quality of life (QoL) is getting more attention in the medical literature. Treatment outcomes are now gauged by their effect on the QoL along with their direct effect on the diseases they are targeting. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of residual dysphagia on QoL after laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia.

METHODS

QoL was evaluated using the short-form-36 (SF-36) and postoperative dysphagia was assessed using a dysphagia score. The score (range 0-10) was calculated by combining the frequency of dysphagia (0=never, 1 = < 1 day/wk, 2 = 1 day/wk, 3 = 2-3 days/wk, 4 = 4-6 days/wk, 5=daily) with the severity (0=none, 1=very mild, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=moderately severe, 5=severe). Patients were classified in the Nonresponder group when their dysphagia score was in the upper quartile.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were mailed to 110 patients. The overall response rate was 91% with 100 patients (54 female) returning the questionnaires. The average follow-up was 3.3 years. There was a significative inverse correlation between dysphagia score and mental component (P = 0.0001) and total SF-36 (P = 0.001) scores. According to their postoperative dysphagia scores, 77 patients were assigned to the Responder Group and 23 patients to the Nonresponder Group. The two groups were similar in terms of age, gender, rate of fundoplication, and length of follow-up. Mental component and total SF-36 scores were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the Responder group. Successful relief of dysphagia after Heller myotomy was associated with health-related quality of life scores that were 13 higher in Vitality (P < 0.05), 11 points higher in mental health (P < 0.05), and 12 points higher in General Health (P < 0.05). Overall patient satisfaction with surgical outcome was 92%, with only eight patients not satisfied with the surgery.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy offers excellent long-term relief of achalasia-related symptoms, namely dysphagia, and this was projected on a significant improvement in quality of life and patient satisfaction.

Reversible atrial fibrillation secondary to a mega-oesophagus

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, and it increases in prevalence with advancing age to about 5% in people older than 65 years.

Case presentation

We present a rare case of atrial fibrillation secondary to a mega-oesophagus occurring in an 84-years-old Caucasian woman. The patient had a history of progressive dysphagia and the accumulation of food debris lead to mega-oesophagus.

Conclusion

The diagnosis was made by barium swallow and electrocardiogram; evacuations of 300 ml of the food debris lead to complete resolution of the arrhythmia. The possible aetiology leading to this AF is discussed.

Laparoscopic myotomy for achalasia: predictors of successful outcome after 200 cases

OBJECTIVE

Laparoscopic myotomy is the preferred treatment of achalasia. Our objectives were to assess the long-term outcome of esophageal myotomy and to identify preoperative factors influencing the outcome.

METHODS

Preoperative and long-term outcome data were collected from patients undergoing laparoscopic myotomy for achalasia at our institution. The primary endpoint of the study was the postoperative change (delta) in dysphagia score. This score was calculated by combining the frequency and the severity of dysphagia. Persistent postoperative dysphagia was defined as 1 standard deviation less than the mean delta score of all patients. Logistic regression was used to identify independent preoperative factors associated with successful myotomy.

RESULTS

A total of 200 consecutive patients were included in the study. At a mean follow-up of 42.1 months, the mean delta dysphagia score was 7.1 +/- 2.6; therefore, the myotomy was considered successful when the delta score was >4.5. According to this definition, 170 (85%) patients achieved excellent dysphagia relief (responders). Responders had higher preoperative low esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure than nonresponders: 42.6 +/- 13.1 versus 23.8 +/- 7.0 mm Hg (P = 0.001). High preoperative LES pressure remained an independent predictor of excellent response in the multivariate logistic regression model. Patients with LES pressure >35 mm Hg had an odds ratio of 21.3, making more likely to achieve excellent dysphagia relief after myotomy compared with those with LES pressure < or =35 mm Hg (odds ratio, 21.3; 95% confidence interval, 6.1-73.5, P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic myotomy can durably relieve symptoms of dysphagia. Elevated preoperative LES pressure represents the strongest positive outcome predictor.

Laparoscopic myotomy for achalasia: predictors of successful outcome after 200 cases

OBJECTIVE

Laparoscopic myotomy is the preferred treatment of achalasia. Our objectives were to assess the long-term outcome of esophageal myotomy and to identify preoperative factors influencing the outcome.

METHODS

Preoperative and long-term outcome data were collected from patients undergoing laparoscopic myotomy for achalasia at our institution. The primary endpoint of the study was the postoperative change (delta) in dysphagia score. This score was calculated by combining the frequency and the severity of dysphagia. Persistent postoperative dysphagia was defined as 1 standard deviation less than the mean delta score of all patients. Logistic regression was used to identify independent preoperative factors associated with successful myotomy.

RESULTS

A total of 200 consecutive patients were included in the study. At a mean follow-up of 42.1 months, the mean delta dysphagia score was 7.1 +/- 2.6; therefore, the myotomy was considered successful when the delta score was >4.5. According to this definition, 170 (85%) patients achieved excellent dysphagia relief (responders). Responders had higher preoperative low esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure than nonresponders: 42.6 +/- 13.1 versus 23.8 +/- 7.0 mm Hg (P = 0.001). High preoperative LES pressure remained an independent predictor of excellent response in the multivariate logistic regression model. Patients with LES pressure >35 mm Hg had an odds ratio of 21.3, making more likely to achieve excellent dysphagia relief after myotomy compared with those with LES pressure < or =35 mm Hg (odds ratio, 21.3; 95% confidence interval, 6.1-73.5, P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic myotomy can durably relieve symptoms of dysphagia. Elevated preoperative LES pressure represents the strongest positive outcome predictor.