Fluid Restriction During Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Is It Effective in Reducing Postoperative Complications?

Restrictive Versus Liberal Fluid Regimens in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with significant morbidity and mortality which may be influenced by perioperative fluid management. It remains unclear whether liberal and restrictive fluid regimens impact mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for studies comparing restrictive and liberal perioperative fluids in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Both prospective and retrospective studies in those undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy were eligible for inclusion where the patient outcomes were stratified to restrictive and liberal perioperative fluid management regimens, with mortality as the primary outcome. Following study identification, a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis was completed.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies including five prospective trials and eight retrospective analyses totalling 3062 patients were included. Restrictive fluid regimens were associated with a significant reduction in mortality compared to liberal fluid regimens for the overall cohort (odds ratio 0.54; 95% CI 0.31-0.94, p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in complication profile. Subgroup analysis revealed this result was contributed to significantly by retrospective studies. The results of the trial sequential analysis suggest this mortality benefit may be due to a type I statistical error and that further patient numbers are required for definitive conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Restrictive fluid regimens are associated with a reduction in mortality following pancreaticoduodenectomy. The clinical relevance of this finding needs to be interpreted pragmatically given the lack of association with significant causes of morbidity and in considering the results of the recently published RELIEF study.

Postoperative Visceral Tissue Edema Assessed by Computed Tomography Is a Predictor for Severe Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

In pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), the adverse impact of tissue edema owing to intraoperative fluid overload remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate how visceral tissue edema due to fluid overload affects severe postoperative complications after PD. It aims to clarify the usefulness of assessment by computed tomography (CT) of postoperative tissue edema.

METHODS

We classified 200 patients who underwent PD as either liberal fluid management (LFM) group (n = 100) or goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) group (n = 100), based on intraoperative fluid management. We assessed postoperative tissue edema by cross section of the body trunk area using pre- and postoperative CT.

RESULTS

Severe complication (Clavien-Dindo more than grade III) rate was significantly higher in LFM group than GDFT group (37 vs. 17%, P = 0.001). Independent risk factors of severe complications after PD included diameter of main pancreatic duct ≤ 3 mm at the cut surface (P = 0.041; OR 2.274; 95% CI 1.034-5.001), LFM (P = 0.005; OR 2.720; 95% CI 1.355-5.462), and increased rate of body trunk area ≥ 20% (P < 0.001; OR 3.448; 95% CI 1.723-5.462). In subgroup analysis of patients with no transfusion, LFM and increased rate of body trunk area ≥ 20% were independent risk factors of severe postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Visceral tissue edema evaluation is a valuable method to predict severe complications after PD.