The Opioid Crisis: The Surgeon's Role

Implementation of Guidelines Limiting Postoperative Opioid Prescribing at a Children's Hospital

OBJECTIVES

Variability in opioid-prescribing practices after common pediatric surgical procedures at our institution prompted the development of opioid-prescribing guidelines that provided suggested dose limitations for narcotics. The aims of this study were to improve opioid prescription practices through implementation of the developed guidelines and to assess compliance and identify barriers preventing guideline utilization.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center cohort study of all children who underwent the most common outpatient general surgery procedures at our institution from August 1, 2018, to February 1, 2020. We created guidelines designed to limit opioid prescription doses based on data obtained from standardized postoperative telephone interviews. Three 6-month periods were evaluated: before guideline implementation, after guideline initiation, and after addressing barriers to guideline compliance. Targeted interventions to increase compliance included modification of electronic medical record defaults and provider educations. Differences in opioid weight-based doses prescribed, filled, and taken, as well as protocol adherence between the 3 timeframes were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 1033 children underwent an outpatient procedure during the 1.5-year time frame. Phone call response rate was 72.22%. There was a significant sustained decrease in opioid doses prescribed ( P < 0.0001), prescriptions filled ( P = 0.009), and opioid doses taken ( P = 0.001) after implementation, without subsequent increase in reported pain on postoperative phone call ( P = 0.96). Protocol compliance significantly improved (62.39% versus 83.98%, P < 0.0001) after obstacles were addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a protocol limiting opioid prescribing after frequently performed pediatric general surgery procedures reduced opioids prescribed and taken postoperatively. Interventions that addressed barriers to application led to increased protocol compliance and sustained decreases in opioids prescribed and taken without a deleterious effect on pain control.

Understanding the Orthopedic Conditions for Which Patients Are Seeking Medical Cannabis Certification

BACKGROUND

Amid the ongoing national crisis of opioid misuse in the United States, medical cannabis (MC) has emerged as a potential alternative for chronic pain conditions. This study was performed to understand which orthopedic conditions patients are seeking MC certification for.

METHODS

This prospective study was conducted at the Department of Medical Cannabis, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA. It included consecutive patients with chronic musculoskeletal noncancer pain who were certified for MC, following the Pennsylvania state certification process. Data collected included demographic data, diagnoses, anatomic site of pain, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) global health scale. The outcome measures from the PROMIS global health scale were used to generate Global Physical Health (GPH) quality of life (QoL) T scores and Global Mental Health (GMH) QoL T scores.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients were available for analysis following initial MC certification, with 50 (64%) being female and 28 (36%) male. The average age was 63 years with 60% of patients in the 65+ age group. Ethnically, 73 (92%) identified as White, and 70 (90%) were not of Hispanic or Latino origin. The most common reason for seeking MC certification was low back pain (56%), followed by neck pain (21%) and then extremity complaints. The mean GPH QoL T score was 43.71 with a standard deviation of ± 9.86 (p-value = 0.001), while the mean GMH QoL T score was 46.85 with a standard deviation of 8.28 (p-value = 0.0015).

CONCLUSION

MC cannabis certification was more often sought by women than men and most common for spinal complaints, specifically lower back followed by cervical spine concerns.. This cohort of patients had lower GPH QoL and GMH QoL T scores compared the US general population, representing a significant reduction in the overall physical and mental health.

Narcotic Requirements before and after Implementation of Buccal Nerve Blocks for Buccal Mucosa Graft Harvest: Technique and Retrospective Review

The reduction in opioid use has become a public health priority. We aimed to assess if performing buccal nerve blocks (BNB) at the time of buccal mucosa graft (BMG) harvest impacts post-operative narcotic usage in the inpatient setting. We retrospectively reviewed clinical characteristics and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) received for all patients that underwent a BMG urethroplasty at our institution. The primary outcome measure was post-operative MMEs for patients before and after implementing the BNB. We identified 74 patients that underwent BMG urethroplasty, 37 of which were before the implementation of the BNB and 37 of which were after. No other changes were made to the peri-operative pathway between these time points. The mean total MMEs per day, needed post-operatively, was lower in the BNB group (8.8 vs. 5.0, p = 0.12). A histogram distribution of the two groups, categorized by number of MMEs received, showed no significant differences between the two groups. In this retrospective analysis, we report our experience using BNBs at the time of buccal mucosa graft harvest. While there were no significant differences between the number of MMEs received before and after implementation, further research is needed to assess the blocks’ impact on pain scores.

Opioid Claims Prior to Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty and Risk of Prolonged Postoperative Opioid Claims

INTRODUCTION

The United States is experiencing a national opioid epidemic. This study seeks to analyze recent trends in opioid claims after elective total joint arthroplasty and quantify the effect of preoperative opioid use on risk of prolonged postoperative claim rates.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PearlDiver database to track annual trends in opioid claims after elective total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Trend analysis of opioid claim rates was done with the Cochran-Armitage test. Rates of postoperative opioid claims were compared between opioid-naïve patients versus patients with opioid claims in the preoperative year through multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

In total, 105,860 procedures were included. For all procedures, the proportion of patients filing an opioid claim within 30 days postoperatively trended upward from 2011 to 2017 (all P < 0.001). Patients with one to three opioid claims in the year before arthroplasty were more likely to file an opioid claim within 30 days after arthroplasty (THA: odds ratio [OR], 2.61; TKA: OR, 3.04; and TSA: OR, 4.83), between 31 and 90 days (THA: OR, 2.76; TKA: OR, 2.87; and TSA: OR, 3.22), and between 91 days and 6 months (THA: OR, 4.83; TKA: OR, 4.07; and TSA: OR, 3.77). Patients with more than three prior opioid claims were more likely to file an opioid claim within 30 days (THA: OR, 6.15; TKA: OR, 6.79; and TSA: OR, 8.68), between 31 and 90 days (THA: OR, 20.99; TKA: OR, 14.00; and TSA: OR, 28.40), and between 91 days and 6 months (THA: OR, 46.31; TKA: OR, 33.93; and TSA: OR, 59.06).

CONCLUSION

Opioid claims in the preoperative year markedly increase risk of prolonged postoperative opioid claims after arthroplasty. Surgeons should look further before the acute preoperative period when evaluating opioid exposure and assessing risk of chronic opioid dependence after elective arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Selective scalp block decreases short term post-operative pain scores and opioid use after craniotomy: A case series

There is no consensus on the management of post-craniotomy pain. Several randomized controlled trials have examined the use of a regional scalp block for post-craniotomy pain. We aim to investigate whether scalp block affected short or long-term pain levels and opioid use after craniotomy. This study prospectively administered selective scalp blocks (lesser occipital, preauricular nerve block + pin site block) in 20 consecutive patients undergoing craniotomy for semicircular canal dehiscence. Anesthesia, pain, and opioid outcomes in these patients were compared to 40 consecutive historic controls. There was no significant difference in patient demographics between the two groups and no complications related to selective scalp block. The time between the end of procedure and end of anesthesia decreased in the scalp block group (16 vs 21 min, P = 0.047). Pain scores were significantly less in the scalp block group for the first 4 h, after which there was no statistically significant difference. Time to opioid rescue was longer in the scalp block group (3.6 vs 1.8 h, HR 0.487, P = 0.0361) and opioid use in the first 7 h was significantly less in the scalp block group. Total opioid use, outpatient opioid use, and length of stay did not differ. Selective scalp block is a safe and effective tool for short-term management of postoperative pain after craniotomy and decreases the medication requirement during emergence and recovery. Selective scalp block can speed up OR turnover but is not efficacious in the treatment of postoperative pain beyond this point.

Untargeted Metabolomics in Forensic Toxicology: A New Approach for the Detection of Fentanyl Intake in Urine Samples

The misuse of fentanyl, and novel synthetic opioids (NSO) in general, has become a public health emergency, especially in the United States. The detection of NSO is often challenged by the limited diagnostic time frame allowed by urine sampling and the wide range of chemically modified analogues, continuously introduced to the recreational drug market. In this study, an untargeted metabolomics approach was developed to obtain a comprehensive "fingerprint" of any anomalous and specific metabolic pattern potentially related to fentanyl exposure. In recent years, in vitro models of drug metabolism have emerged as important tools to overcome the limited access to positive urine samples and uncertainties related to the substances actually taken, the possible combined drug intake, and the ingested dose. In this study, an in vivo experiment was designed by incubating HepG2 cell lines with either fentanyl or common drugs of abuse, creating a cohort of 96 samples. These samples, together with 81 urine samples including negative controls and positive samples obtained from recent users of either fentanyl or "traditional" drugs, were subjected to untargeted analysis using both UHPLC reverse phase and HILIC chromatography combined with QTOF mass spectrometry. Data independent acquisition was performed by SWATH in order to obtain a comprehensive profile of the urinary metabolome. After extensive processing, the resulting datasets were initially subjected to unsupervised exploration by principal component analysis (PCA), yielding clear separation of the fentanyl positive samples with respect to both controls and samples positive to other drugs. The urine datasets were then systematically investigated by supervised classification models based on soft independent modeling by class analogy (SIMCA) algorithms, with the end goal of identifying fentanyl users. A final single-class SIMCA model based on an RP dataset and five PCs yielded 96% sensitivity and 74% specificity. The distinguishable metabolic patterns produced by fentanyl in comparison to other opioids opens up new perspectives in the interpretation of the biological activity of fentanyl.

Virtual reality can reduce anxiety during office-based great saphenous vein radiofrequency ablation

OBJECTIVE

Office-based treatment of venous pathology is common and frequently involves the use of anxiolytic medication to reduce anxiety. Virtual reality (VR) has been shown to effectively reduce pain and anxiety in a variety of settings. The objective of the present study was to determine whether VR could be smoothly integrated into office-based vascular procedures and to ascertain whether VR could reduce procedural pain or anxiety.

METHODS

A total of 40 patients undergoing an office-based endovenous radiofrequency ablation were included in the present study. Of the 40 patients, 20 were randomized to the VR group and 20 to the control group. The patients in the VR group were equipped with a Samsung GearVR headset and headphones (Samsung, Suwon, South Korea) running AppliedVR software (AppliedVR Inc, Los Angeles, Calif), which ran throughout the duration of the procedure. All 40 patients underwent unilateral great saphenous vein radiofrequency ablation. After the procedure, the patients were surveyed regarding their preprocedure anxiety and their pain and anxiety during the procedure using the Wong-Baker scale.

RESULTS

All procedures were successfully completed, and all patients were generally satisfied with their treatment. The average procedure time was not significantly different. No statistically significant differences were present in preprocedure anxiety or procedural pain between the two groups. The anxiety level during the procedure, however, was 4.09 of 10 in the control group vs 2.95 of 10 in the VR group, statistically significant difference using a paired t test. Furthermore, the anxiety level for the control group had increased during the procedure but that of the VR group had decreased. Finally, 85% of the patients in the VR group would recommend using VR to someone undergoing a similar procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

VR can be safely and efficiently integrated into office-based vascular procedures. VR was generally well liked and recommended by those who used it. Most importantly, our findings suggest that VR can decrease procedural anxiety. Further research should examine whether this might obviate the need for anxiolytic medication.