1
|
Rodriguez IE, Asher ZP, Klingenberg K, Wright FL, Nydam TL, Adams MA, Bababekov YJ, Peltz E, Smith JW, Saben JL, Kennealey P, Pomposelli JJ, Pomfret EA, Moore HB. Phase I clinical trial of the feasibility and safety of direct peritoneal resuscitation in liver transplantation. Am J Surg 2024:115815. [PMID: 39003094 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) is associated with improved outcomes in trauma. Animal models suggest DPR has favorable effects on the liver. We sought to evaluate its safety and assess for improved outcomes in liver transplantation (LT). METHODS LT patients with renal dysfunction and/or obesity were enrolled in a phase-I clinical trial. DPR lasted 8-24 h depending on postoperative disposition. Primary outcome was percent of patients completing DPR. Secondary outcomes evaluated complications. Controls with either obesity (control-1) or both risk factors (obesity + renal dysfunction, control-2) were analyzed. RESULTS Fifteen patients were enrolled (seven with both criteria and eight with obesity alone). DPR was completed in 87 % of patients, with one meeting stopping criteria. Controls included 45 (control-1) and 24 (control-2) patients. Return to operating room, graft loss, and late infections were lower with DPR. CONCLUSION DPR appears to be safe in closed abdomens following LT, warranting a follow-up phase-II trial to assess efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan E Rodriguez
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education (CCTCARE), Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Zachary P Asher
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Katherine Klingenberg
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education (CCTCARE), Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Franklin L Wright
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Trevor L Nydam
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education (CCTCARE), Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Megan A Adams
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education (CCTCARE), Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Yanik J Bababekov
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education (CCTCARE), Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Eric Peltz
- Department of Surgery, Logan Health Medical Center, Kalispell, MT, USA
| | - Jason W Smith
- Department of Surgery, University of Louisville Health, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Jessica L Saben
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education (CCTCARE), Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Peter Kennealey
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education (CCTCARE), Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - James J Pomposelli
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education (CCTCARE), Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Pomfret
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education (CCTCARE), Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Hunter B Moore
- AdventHealth Transplant Institute at Porter, Denver, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Serfin J, Dai C, Harris JR, Smith N. Damage Control Laparotomy and Management of the Open Abdomen. Surg Clin North Am 2024; 104:355-366. [PMID: 38453307 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
Management of the open abdomen has been used for decades by general surgeons. Techniques have evolved over those decades to improve control of infection, fluid loss, and improve the ability to close the abdomen to avoid hernia formation. The authors explore the history, indications, and techniques of open abdomen management in multiple settings. The most important considerations in open abdomen management include the reason for leaving the abdomen open, prevention and mitigation of ongoing organ dysfunction, and eventual plans for abdominal closure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Serfin
- Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center, 3600 NW Samaritan Drive Suite H407, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA.
| | - Christopher Dai
- Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center, 3600 NW Samaritan Drive Suite H407, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA
| | - James Reece Harris
- Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center, 3600 NW Samaritan Drive Suite H407, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA
| | - Nathan Smith
- Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center, 3600 NW Samaritan Drive Suite H407, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chin B, Alter N, Wright DD, Arif H, Cruz F, Haddadi M, Hoops H, Elkbuli A. Evaluating the effectiveness and outcomes associated with direct peritoneal resuscitation in damage control surgery patients with and without hemorrhagic shock. Injury 2024; 55:111361. [PMID: 38246013 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This narrative review aims to evaluate the efficacy of adjunct direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) in the treatment of adult damage control surgery (DCS) patients both with and without hemorrhagic shock, and its impact on associated outcomes. METHODS PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, ProQuest, and Cochrane were searched for relevant articles published through April 13th, 2023. Studies assessing the utilization of DPR in adult DCS patients were included. Outcomes included time to abdominal closure, intra-abdominal complications, in-hospital mortality, and ICU length of stay (ICU LOS). RESULTS Five studies evaluating 437 patients were included. In patients with hemorrhagic shock, DPR was associated with reduced time to abdominal closure (DPR 4.1 days, control 5.9 days, p = 0.002), intra-abdominal complications including abscess formation (DPR 27 %, control 47 %, p = 0.04), and ICU LOS (DPR 8 days, control 11 days, p = 0.004). Findings in patients without hemorrhagic shock were conflicting. Closure times were decreased in one study (DPR 5.9 days, control 7.7 days, p < 0.02) and increased in another study (DPR 3.5 days, control 2.5 days, p = 0.02), intra-abdominal complications were decreased in one study (DPR 27 %, control 47 %, p = 0.04) and similar in another, and ICU LOS was decreased in one study (DPR 17 days, control 24 days, p < 0.002) and increased in another (DPR 13 days, control 11.4 days, p = 0.807). CONCLUSION In patients with hemorrhagic shock, adjunct DPR is associated with reduced time to abdominal closure, intra-abdominal complications such as abscesses, fistula, bleeding, anastomotic leak, and ICU LOS. Utilization of DPR in patients without hemorrhagic shock showed promising but inconsistent findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Chin
- University of Hawaii, John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Noah Alter
- NOVA Southeastern University, Kiran Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | - D-Dre Wright
- University of Hawaii, John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Hassan Arif
- NOVA Southeastern University, Kiran Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | - Francis Cruz
- University of Alabama School of Medicine, Alabama, USA
| | - Minna Haddadi
- American University of Antigua College of Medicine, Coolidge, Antigua and Barbuda
| | - Heather Hoops
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Critical Care, and Acute Care Surgery, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Adel Elkbuli
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL, USA; Department of Surgical Education, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Harden Waibel B, Kamien AJ. Resuscitation and Preparation of the Emergency General Surgery Patient. Surg Clin North Am 2023; 103:1061-1084. [PMID: 37838456 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2023]
Abstract
Traditionally, the workflow surrounding a general surgery patient allows for a period of evaluation and optimization of underlying medical issues to allow for risk modification; however, in the emergency, this optimization period is largely condensed because of its time-dependent nature. Because the lack of optimization can lead to complications, the ability to rapidly resuscitate the patient, proceed to procedural intervention to control the situation, and manage common medical comorbidities is paramount. This article provides an overview on these subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett Harden Waibel
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 983280 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-3280, USA.
| | - Andrew James Kamien
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 983280 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-3280, USA
| |
Collapse
|