Epileptic negative myoclonus: SPECT, PET, and video/EEG studies and the dramatic effects of levetiracetam

Epileptic Negative Myoclonus as the First and Only Symptom in a Challenging Diagnosis of Benign Epilepsy With Centrotemporal Spikes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical and neurophysiological characteristics of epileptic negative myoclonus as the first and only ictal symptom of benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes.

METHODS

Electrophysiological evaluations included polygraphic recordings with simultaneous video electroencephalogram monitoring and tests performed with patient's upper limb outstretched in standing posture. Epileptic negative myoclonus manifestations, electrophysiological features, and responses to antiepileptic drugs were analyzed.

RESULTS

The authors report 2 patients with benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes, who had epileptic negative myoclonus as the first and only seizure type. Video electroencephalogram monitoring results showed that their negative myoclonus seizures were emanating from the contralateral central and the parietal regions. Epileptic negative myoclonus was controlled by administration of valproate and levetiracetam.

CONCLUSION

Epileptic negative myoclonus can be the first and only seizure type of benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes, and long-term follow-up monitoring should be the care for the recurrence and/or presence of other types of seizures.

An analysis of epileptic negative myoclonus by magnetoencephalography

PURPOSE

To clarify the neurophysiologic mechanism of epileptic negative myoclonus (ENM), we analyzed the magnetoencephalography (MEG) of a patient with ENM.

METHODS

The 52-year-old right-handed male had frequent ENM in the right upper limb during awake and monthly seizures with sudden tonic stiffening of the right forearm during sleep. MRI demonstrated a focal cortical dysplasia in the cortex of the posterior portion of the left superior frontal sulcus. Whole-head type MEG, electroencephalography and electromyography were simultaneously recorded during ENM. Single equivalent currents dipoles (ECDs) were calculated for each spike component followed by silent period (SP) in the right deltoid muscle. These MEG spike components were averaged with respect to their peaks, and single ECD was also calculated for the averaged spike component. Furthermore, we analyzed the MEG with the silent-period-locked-averaging (SPLA) method. Twenty MEG signal data were averaged with respect to the onset of SP. Twenty epochs in each of five separate periods of recording were repeatedly averaged. ECDs were calculated for spike components observed in each averaged epoch.

RESULTS

ECDs of each spike followed by SP were clustered near the cortex of the left central sulcus. In MEG spike averaging and SPLA method, ECDs at the peak of spike components were located near the right shoulder division of the primary sensorimotor cortex reproducibly. ECDs on the ascending phase before the peak were located lateral to the above ECD location in MEG spike averaging method.

CONCLUSIONS

ENM was produced by an inhibitory action on the primary sensorimotor cortex corresponding to the body segment in which ENM occurs.

Outcome of lesionectomy in medically refractory epilepsy due to non-mesial temporal sclerosis (non-MTS) lesions

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the seizure outcome of lesionectomy for refractory epilepsy secondary to non-mesial temporal sclerosis (non-MTS) lesions.

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients with non-MTS lesions (M:F=42:26; age at onset: 11.7±9.6 years; age at surgery: 21.1±9.4 years), who underwent lesionectomy for refractory epilepsy were analyzed. The age at onset, frequency/type of seizure, MRI findings, video-EEG, histopathology and Engel's grading at 1 year/last follow up were recorded.

RESULTS

The duration of epilepsy at surgery was 9.9±6.9 years. The location of lesions were: temporal: 41 (60.3%); frontal: 21 (30.9%); parietal: 6 (8.8%). The type of lesionectomies performed were temporal 41 (60.3%), extra-temporal: 25 (36.8%), temporo-frontal and temporo-parietal: 1 (1.5%) patient each. The histopathological diagnosis were neoplastic: 32 (47.1%), cortical dysplasia: 19 (27.9%), other focal lesions: 17 (25%). At mean follow up of 2.9±2.1 years (median: 2.6 years), outcome was - Engel's class I: 43 (63.2%), IIa: 14 (20.6%), III: 7 (10.3%), IV: 4 (5.9%). Good seizure control (Engel's class I/IIa) was achieved in 57 (83.8%) patients. The good prognostic markers included temporal seizures, extended lesionectomy and AEDs after surgery while poor prognostic marker was gliotic lesion on histopathology.

CONCLUSION

Following lesionectomy due to non-MTS lesions, seizure freedom (Engel I) was noted in about 63.2% of patients, which is comparable to other series and reiterates the effectiveness of lesionectomy for seizure control.