Postictal headache

Seizure semiology: ILAE glossary of terms and their significance

This educational topical review and Task Force report aims to address learning objectives of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) curriculum. We sought to extract detailed features involving semiology from video recordings and interpret semiological signs and symptoms that reflect the likely localization for focal seizures in patients with epilepsy. This glossary was developed by a working group of the ILAE Commission on Diagnostic Methods incorporating the EEG Task Force. This paper identifies commonly used terms to describe seizure semiology, provides definitions, signs and symptoms, and summarizes their clinical value in localizing and lateralizing focal seizures based on consensus in the published literature. Video-EEG examples are included to illustrate important features of semiology in patients with epilepsy.

Relationships between migraine and epilepsy: Pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical implications

Migraine and epilepsy are distinct neurological diseases with specific clinical features and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. However, numerous studies have highlighted the complex and multifaceted relationships between the two conditions. The relationships between headache and epilepsy manifest themselves in different ways. Firstly, the clinical diagnosis of these disorders may be challenging in view of possible overlapping. While post-ictal headache is a frequent condition, ictal epileptic headache is a rare but challenging diagnosis. Both situations raise the question of the pathophysiological mechanism of headache triggered by seizures. Migraine aura and epilepsy can also exhibit overlapping symptoms leading to their misdiagnosis, in particular in the case of visual aura. Secondly, migraine with aura and epilepsy can occur as a co-morbid condition, particularly in familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM). From a pathophysiological perspective, the identification of genetic mutations in FHM has brought significant advances in the understanding of dysfunctions of neuronal networks leading to hyperexcitability. The purpose of this review is to present clinical situations encompassing headache and epilepsy that can be challenging in neurological practice and to discuss the underlying pathophysiological mechanism of such interactions.

Borderlands of Migraine and Epilepsy

Background

The complex relationship between migraine and epilepsy has frequently been described to represent a clinical and electrographic "borderland." These two conditions share clinical expressions such as paroxysmal and chronic nature, as well as semiology, particularly visual phenomenon.

Objective

We aimed to review the current literature on the overlapping phenomena of migraine and epilepsy.

Materials and Methods

We searched the PubMed for relevant literature and conducted a narrative review on migraine and epilepsy.

Results

Migraine and epilepsy share a complex and pathophysiologically intriguing relationship. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3^rd edition (ICHD-3) makes diagnostic provisions for migraine aura-triggered seizures (Subchapter 1.4.4) and headache attributed to epileptic seizure (Subchapter 7.6), the latter being further categorized as 7.6.1 Ictal epileptic headache, and 7.6.2  post-ictal headache. Neurological conditions such as certain channelopathies and epilepsy syndromes exhibit both conditions within their phenotypic spectrum, suggesting shared genetic and molecular underpinnings. Diagnostic confusion may arise, particularly between occipital epilepsy and the visual aura of migraine. Antiseizure medications may be effective for the treatment of migraines that occur in concert with epilepsy.

Conclusions

Migraine and epilepsy share several clinical features and have intertwined genetic and molecular underpinnings, which may contribute to common pathogenesis. Electroencephalography may be useful as a diagnostic tool in selected cases.

Treatment of postictal headache: a systematic review and future directions

BACKGROUND

Postictal headache (PIH) is a common complaint among patients with epilepsy. The prevalence of PIH is 43%. In the current endeavor, we systematically reviewed the existing treatment options for PIH in order to depict the state of the field and also to propose a research agenda to advance this topic.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase from the inception to 4 February, 2021 were systematically searched for related published articles. In all electronic databases, the following search strategy was implemented and these key words (in all fields) were used: "post-ictal" AND "Headache" AND "Treatment".

RESULTS

The primary search yielded 626 studies; only five studies were related to the topic and were included in the current systematic review. None of these studies provided a good class of evidence. These studies suggested that flunarizine and sumatriptan may help patients with PIH.

CONCLUSION

While PIH is a common and disabling condition, its treatment is overlooked by the epilepsy society. Flunarizine and sumatriptan can be good candidates to be used in future clinical trials of the treatment of PIH. To obtain the desired evidence on the efficacy of either flunarizine or sumatriptan in treating PIH in patients with epilepsy, we need well-designed, randomized controlled trials.

The postictal state - What do we know?

This narrative review provides a broad and comprehensive overview of the most important discoveries on the postictal state over the past decades as well as recent developments. After a description and definition of the postictal state, we discuss postictal sypmtoms, their clinical manifestations, and related findings. Moreover, pathophysiological advances are reviewed, followed by current treatment options.

Lamotrigine in the Prevention of Migraine With Aura: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Lamotrigine is not recommended in the prevention of migraine in general but some reports suggest that it might be effective for treating specifically migraine with aura (MA). This review aims to summarize the related data from the literature and to better understand this discrepancy.

METHODS

All reports from the literature related to the use of lamotrigine in migraine with or without aura published prior to February 2019 found using PUBMED and the 2 keywords "migraine" AND "lamotrigine" were reviewed. Original studies, published in full, systematic reviews, and all case reports were synthetized. We also examined the risk profile, pharmacokinetics, and mode of action of lamotrigine in view of the presumed mechanism of MA.

RESULTS

Lamotrigine was tested in different populations of migraineurs, but previous studies had small sample sizes (n < 35) and might not have been powered enough for detecting a potential benefit of lamotrigine in MA. Accumulating data suggest that the drug can reduce both the frequency and severity of aura symptoms in multiple conditions and is well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Lamotrigine appears promising for treating attacks of MA and related clinical manifestations because of its high potential of efficacy, low-risk profile, and cost. Additional studies are needed for testing lamotrigine in patients with MA.

Comorbidity of Migraine and Epilepsy in Pediatrics: A Review

Migraine and epilepsy are classified as chronic paroxysmal neurologic disorders sharing many clinical features, as well as possible treatment options. This review highlights the similarities between migraine and epilepsy in pediatrics, focusing on epidemiologic, pathophysiological, genetic, clinical, and pharmacologic aspects. Despite the fact that several syndromes share symptoms of both migraine and epilepsy, further research is needed to clarify the pathophysiological and genetic basis of their comorbidity. Drugs used for prophylactic therapy of migraine and epilepsy have similar pharmacologic properties. The role of epileptic pharmacotherapy in the prophylaxis of migraine is assessed, including the use of conventional antiepileptic drugs, calcium channel blockers, and nonpharmacologic methods such as dietary therapy, supplements, and vagal nerve stimulation. Further randomized, controlled clinical trials assessing pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic methods for the treatment of both disorders are essential, in order to initiate new therapeutic approaches.

Pathophysiological mechanisms of migraine and epilepsy: Similarities and differences

Migraine and epilepsy are episodic disorders with distinct features, but they have some clinical and pathophysiological overlaps. We review here clinical overlaps between seizures and migraine attacks, activities of neuronal networks observed during seizures and migraine attacks, and molecular and cellular mechanisms of migraine identified in genetic forms, focusing on genetic variants identified in hemiplegic migraine and their functional effects. Epilepsy and migraine can be generated by dysfunctions of the same neuronal networks, but these dysfunctions can be disease-specific, even if pathogenic mutations target the same protein. Studies of rare monogenic forms have allowed the identification of some molecular/cellular dysfunctions that provide a window on pathological mechanisms: we have begun to disclose the tip of the iceberg.

Epilepsy and headaches: Further evidence of a link

OBJECTIVE

Epilepsy and primary headaches are two of the most common neurologic conditions that share some common clinical characteristics, and can affect individuals of all age groups around the world. In recent years, the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms potentially common to both headaches and epileptic seizures have been the subject of scrutiny. The objective of this study was to determine the frequencies and types of headaches in patients with epilepsy, and evaluate any temporal relationship with epileptic seizures.

METHOD

Demographic data, epilepsy durations, seizure frequencies, seizure types and antiepileptic medications used were captured of 349 patients who were followed up at our epilepsy outpatient clinic. Patients who experienced headaches were grouped based on the type of headaches and on whether their headaches occurred in the preictal, postictal or interictal period.

RESULT

Three hundred forty-nine patients (190 females, 159 males) were enrolled in the study. The patients' average age was 30.9±13.1 years, and average epilepsy duration was 13.5±10.9 years. The types of epileptic seizures were partial in 19.8% of patients, generalized in 57.9%, and secondary generalized in 20.3% of patients. Some 43.6% of the patients did not experience headaches, and 26.9% had migraine and 17.2% tension-type headaches. Headaches could not be classified in 12.3% of patients. The headaches occurred preictally in 9.6%, postictally in 41.6% and interictally in 8.6% of patients. The ratio of headaches was lower in male patients compared with females, and females experienced migraine-type headaches more frequently compared with males (p=0.006). Migraine-type headaches were less frequent a mong patients who experienced less than one seizure per year, but more frequent (p=0.017) among those who experienced more than one seizure per month, but less than one seizure per week. Migraine-type headaches were significantly more frequent (p=0.015) among patients receiving polytherapy compared with patients receiving monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that headaches, particularly migraine-type headaches, were frequently experienced by patients with epilepsy, postictal headaches were more common, and the frequency of migraine attacks could be linked with seizure frequency and the type of treatment.

Correlation between headaches and affective symptoms in patients with epilepsy

Headaches are a neglected entity in patients with epilepsy (PWE), although PWE have a high chance of suffering from seizure-related as well as seizure-unrelated headaches. We aimed to identify the prevalence and characteristics of headaches and investigate the correlation between headaches and affective symptoms in PWE. Consecutive PWE who visited our tertiary outpatient clinic were interviewed about headaches and epilepsy. Affective symptoms were evaluated using the Korean version of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and suicidality portion of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. We classified headaches as interictal or seizure-related headaches (SRHs; pre- and postictal). Tension-type headache and migraine were defined based on International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria. From the initial cohort of 177 patients (92 men, mean age: 37.1years), 73 (41.2%) reported suffering from interictal (N=34, 19.2%), preictal (N=3, 1.7%), and postictal (N=48, 27.1%) headaches. Univariate analysis revealed significantly higher BDI and BAI scores in the headache group. Tension-type headaches were the most frequent, and half of the interictal headaches and most of the SRHs were untreated. Spearman's partial correlation analyses showed that headaches overall were significantly related with depression and anxiety. Interictal headaches were correlated with depression only, and postictal headaches were correlated with depression as well as suicidality, separately. These results show that investigating and controlling headaches may relieve affective symptoms and ultimately improve the quality of life of PWE.

Headache in epilepsy: prevalence and clinical features

BACKGROUND

Headache and epilepsy are two relatively common neurological disorders and their relationship is still a matter of debate. Our aim was to estimate the prevalence and clinical features of inter-ictal (inter-IH) and peri-ictal headache (peri-IH) in patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

All patients aged ≥ 17 years referring to our tertiary Epilepsy Centre were consecutively recruited from March to May 2011 and from March to July 2012. They underwent a semi-structured interview including the International Classification Headache Disorders (ICHD-II) criteria to diagnose the lifetime occurrence of headache.χ(2)-test, t-test and Mann-Whitney test were used to compare clinical variables in patients with and without inter-IH and peri-IH.

RESULTS

Out of 388 enrolled patients 48.5 % had inter-IH: migraine in 26.3 %, tension-type headache (TTH) in 19.1 %, other primary headaches in 3.1 %. Peri-IH was observed in 23.7 %: pre-ictally in 6.7 %, ictally in 0.8 % and post-ictally in 19.1 %. Comparing patients with inter-ictal migraine (102), inter-ictal TTH (74) and without inter-IH (200), we found that pre-ictal headache (pre-IH) was significantly represented only in migraineurs (OR 3.54, 95 % CI 1.88-6.66, P < 0.001). Post-ictal headache (post-IH) was significantly associated with both migraineurs (OR 2.60, 95 % CI 1.85-3.64, P < 0.001) and TTH patients (OR 2.05, 95 % CI 1.41-2.98, P < 0.001). Moreover, post-IH was significantly associated with antiepileptic polytherapy (P < 0.001), high seizure frequency (P = 0.002) and tonic-clonic seizures (P = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Migraine was the most represented type of headache in patients with epilepsy. Migraineurs are more prone to develop pre-IH, while patients with any inter-IH (migraine or TTH) are predisposed to manifest a post-IH after seizures.

High prevalence of headaches in patients with epilepsy

Background

To examine the association between headaches and epilepsy.

Methods

Consecutive adult epileptic patients who went to the outpatient clinic of the Epilepsy Center of PLA General Hospital between February 01, 2012, and May 10, 2013, were recruited into this study. A total of 1109 patients with epilepsy completed a questionnaire regarding headaches.

Results

Overall, 60.1% of the patients (male: 57.2%; female: 63.8%) reported headaches within the last year. The age-weighted prevalence of interictal migraine was 11.7% (male 8.9%, female 15.3%), which is higher than that reported in a large population-based study (8.5%, male 5.4%, female 11.6%) using the same screening questions. The prevalence of postictal headaches was 34.1% (males 32.7%, females 35.2%), and the presence of preictal headaches was 4.5% (males 4.3%, females 5.2%). The prevalence of headache yesterday in the general population was 4.8% (male 3.0%, female 6.6%). Thus, the prevalence of headaches, including migraine, is higher in epileptic patients in China.

Conclusions

The high prevalence of postictal headaches confirms the frequent triggering of a headache by a seizure. A much lower frequency of preictal headaches, a condition in which the real triggering effect of the headache on the seizure might be difficult to prove.

Dosing feasibility and tolerability of intranasal diazepam in adults with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility of administering a diazepam nasal spray formulation (diazepam-NS) to adults with epilepsy during a generalized tonic-clonic seizure or in the postictal period following a tonic-clonic or other seizure type, to assess pharmacokinetics and to assess tolerability.

METHODS

An open-label study was conducted in patients admitted to the epilepsy monitoring unit. Eligible patients received a single dose of diazepam-NS approximating 0.2 mg/kg. Plasma diazepam concentrations were measured serially up to 12 h postdose, and maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax ); time to maximum concentration (Tmax ); and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve for time zero to last sampling time (AUC0-12 ) were estimated and dose-normalized. Pharmacodynamic assessments included Kaplan-Meier analysis to determine the time-to-next seizure. Safety and tolerability were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 78 patients who consented, 30 had treatment and pharmacokinetic data. Ten patients were treated during a convulsive tonic-clonic seizure, seven within 5 min following the last clonic jerk, and 13 in the postictal period ≥ 5 min after a tonic-clonic or following other seizure-types. Diazepam median Tmax was 45 min. Dose-normalized mean Cmax and AUC0-12 values of diazepam were comparable among patients regardless of the timing of diazepam-NS administration in relation to seizure. Of those treated, 65% were seizure-free during the 12-h observation period and 35% had post-dose seizures. Treatment was well tolerated, with no unexpected safety findings: 74% had mild and 25% had moderate adverse events. Nasopharyngeal signs were resolved by 12 h postdose.

SIGNIFICANCE

Diazepam can be delivered in effective therapeutic concentrations by a nasal spray device during the convulsive phase of tonic-clonic seizures or in the postictal periods following tonic-clonic or other seizure types.

The role of dorsomedial and ventrolateral columns of the periaqueductal gray matter and in situ 5-HT₂A and 5-HT₂C serotonergic receptors in post-ictal antinociception

The periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) consists in a brainstem structure rich in 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) inputs related to the modulation of pain. The involvement of each of the serotonergic receptor subtypes found in PAG columns, such as the dorsomedial (dmPAG) and the ventrolateral (vlPAG) columns, regarding post-ictal antinociception have not been elucidated. The present work investigated the participation of the dmPAG and vlPAG columns in seizure-induced antinociception. Specifically, we studied the involvement of serotonergic neurotransmission in these columns on antinociceptive responses that follow tonic-clonic epileptic reactions induced by pentylenetetrazole (PTZ), an ionophore GABA-mediated Cl(-) influx antagonist. Microinjections of cobalt chloride (1.0 mM CoCl2 /0.2 µL) into the dmPAG and vlPAG caused an intermittent local synaptic inhibition and decreased post-ictal antinociception that had been recorded at various time points after seizures. Pretreatments of the dmPAG or the vlPAG columns with the nonselective serotonergic receptors antagonist methysergide (5.0 µg/0.2 µL) or intramesencephalic microinjections of ketanserin (5.0 µg/0.2 µL), a serotonergic antagonist with more affinity to 5-HT2A/2C receptors, decreased tonic-clonic seizure-induced antinociception. Both dmPAG and vlPAG treatment with either the 5-HT2A receptor selective antagonist R-96544 (10 nM/0.2 µL), or the 5-HT2C receptors selective antagonist RS-102221 (0.15 µg/0.2 µL) also decrease post-ictal antinociception. These findings suggest that serotonergic neurotransmission, which recruits both 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C serotonergic receptors in dmPAG and vlPAG columns, plays a critical role in the elaboration of post-ictal antinociception.

"Headache and epilepsy"--how are they connected?

The relationship between headache and seizures is a complicated one, since these two conditions are related in numerous ways. Although the nature of this association is unclear, several plausible explanations exist: the two disorders coexist by chance; headache is part (or even the sole ictal phenomenon) of seizures or the post-ictal state; both disorders share a common underlying etiology; and epilepsy mimics the symptoms of migraine (as in benign childhood epilepsy). Seizures and headaches as well as their respective primary syndromes (epilepsy and headache/migraine) share several pathophysiological mechanisms. These mechanisms especially involve neurotransmitter and ion channel dysfunctions. Also, photosensitivity seems to play a role in the connection. In order to improve the care for patients with a clinical connection between migraine and epilepsy, it is necessary to try to understand more accurately the exact pathophysiological point of connection between these two conditions. Both experimental and clinical measures are required to better understand this relationship. The development of animal models, molecular studies defining more precise genotype/phenotype correlations, and multicenter clinical studies with revision of clinical criteria for headache/epilepsy-related disorders represent the start for planning future translational research. In this paper, we review the relationship between migraine and epilepsy in terms of epidemiology and pathophysiology with regard to translational research and clinical correlations and classification.

Links between headaches and epilepsy: current knowledge and terminology

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Headaches (including migraines) and epilepsy have a high level of comorbidity and may be confused during diagnosis. Although physicians have known for centuries that these two conditions are somehow linked, their relationship remains poorly understood. Herein we describe the known associations between them, their underlying physiopathologic and genetic mechanisms, and the treatments recommended for them.

METHOD

We have reviewed the most relevant publication of headache/migraine and epilepsy by using the PubMed data base.

DESCRIPTION

An individual can suffer both from headaches (either migraine and/or other type of headache) and epilepsy, either by chance or because of a common underlying pathology. In these cases, the headache usually occurs at a different moment than the seizure ("interictal headache"). However, headaches sometimes occur simultaneously with, or very close in time to, the seizure: one that occurs at the same time as an epileptic seizure is known as an "ictal epileptic headache" or as "hemicrania epileptica"; one that precedes a seizure is known as a "pre-ictal headache"; and one that follows a seizure is known as a "post-ictal headache". There is a particular type of pre-ictal headache, known as "migralepsy", which occurs during or just after a migraine aura.

CONCLUSIONS

The terminology and concepts employed to describe possible associations between headaches (mainly migraines) and epilepsy have evolved over time with increasing clinical and physiopathogenic knowledge. Some researchers have suggested eliminating the term migralepsy and using the terms ictal epileptic headache and hemicrania epileptica exclusively and uniformly in all classification systems.

Parieto-occipital lobe epilepsy caused by a POLG1 compound heterozygous A467T/W748S genotype

We describe a 16-year-old woman with a rare POLG1 A467T/W748S genotype, with a wide range of neurological manifestations, including focal parieto-occipital lobe seizures, migraine headaches, cerebellar ataxia, sensory-motor axonal neuropathy, and impairment of visual perception and cognitive function. Treatment of epilepsy in patients with a POLG1 compound heterozygous A467T/W748S genotype is very challenging; the epilepsy may preferentially respond to sodium channel blockers. The POLG1-related syndrome has a variable clinical course, and disease morbidity and mortality may be correlated with the genotype.

Should "migralepsy" be considered an obsolete concept? A multicenter retrospective clinical/EEG study and review of the literature

The few reports that have been published on the current International Classification of Headache Disorders, Second Edition (ICHD-II), criteria for migralepsy and hemicrania epileptica have highlighted the considerable confusion regarding this "hot topic" within both headache and epilepsy classifications (ICHD-II and International League Against Epilepsy [ILAE]). Indeed, the ICHD-II describes a migraine-triggered seizure as a rare event in which a seizure occurs during migraine aura; on the other hand, hemicrania epileptica is described as an "ictal headache" that occurs "synchronously" with a partial seizure. To confuse matters even further, neither the term migralepsy nor the term hemicrania epileptica is included in the currently used ILAE classification. On the basis of both a review of "migralepsy" cases in the literature and 16 additional retrospective multicenter cases, we suggest that the term migraine-triggered seizure or migralepsy be deleted from the ICHD-II classification until unequivocal evidence is provided of its existence, and that the term ictal epileptic headache be introduced into the ILAE classification.

Migralepsy, hemicrania epileptica, post-ictal headache and "ictal epileptic headache": a proposal for terminology and classification revision

Despite the fact that migraine and epilepsy are among the commoner brain diseases and that comorbidity of these conditions is well known, only few reports of migralepsy and hemicrania epileptica (HE) have been published according to the current ICHD-II criteria. Particularly, ICHD-II describes "migraine-triggered seizure" (i.e., migralepsy) among complications of migraine at "1.5.5" (as a rare event in which a seizure happens during migrainous aura), while hemicrania epileptica (coded at "7.6.1") and post-ictal headache (coded at "7.6.2") are described among headaches attributed to epileptic seizure. However, to date neither the International Headache Society nor the International League against Epilepsy mention that headache/migraine may be the sole ictal epileptic manifestation. Based on the current knowledge, migralepsy is highly unlikely to exist as such. We, therefore, propose to delete this term until clear evidence its existence is provided. Moreover, we herein propose a revision of terminology and classification criteria to properly represent the migraine/headache relationships. We suggest the term "ictal epileptic headache" in cases in which headache/migraine is the sole ictal epileptic manifestation.