Magnetic source imaging in non-lesional neocortical epilepsy: additional value and comparison with ICEEG

MEG in MRI-Negative Patients with Focal Epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence on the clinical value of magnetic source imaging (MSI) in patients with refractory focal epilepsy without evidence for an epileptogenic lesion on magnetic resonance imaging ("MRI-negative" or "non-lesional MRI").

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search on PUBMED, which was extended by researchrabbit.ai using predefined criteria to identify studies that applied MSI in MRI-negative patients with epilepsy. We extracted data on patient characteristics, MSI methods, localization results, surgical outcomes, and correlation with other modalities.

RESULTS

We included 23 studies with a total of 512 non-lesional epilepsy patients who underwent MSI. Most studies used equivalent current dipole (ECD) models to estimate the sources of interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs). MEG detected IEDs in 32-100% of patients. MSI results were concordant with other modalities, such as EEG, PET, and SPECT, in 3892% of cases. If MSI concordant surgery was performed, 52-89% of patients achieved seizure freedom. MSI contributed to the decision-making process in 28-75% of cases and altered the surgical plan in 5-33% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

MSI is a valuable diagnostic tool for MRI-negative patients with epilepsy, as it can detect and localize IEDs with high accuracy and sensitivity, and provides useful information for surgical planning and predicts outcomes. MSI can also complement and refine the results of other modalities, such as EEG and PET, and optimize the use of invasive recordings. MSI should be considered as part of the presurgical evaluation, especially in patients with non-lesional refractory epilepsy.

Multimodal non-invasive evaluation in MRI-negative epilepsy patients

Presurgical evaluation is still challenging for MRI-negative epilepsy patients. As non-invasive modalities are the easiest acceptable and economic methods in determining the epileptogenic zone, we analyzed the localization value of common non-invasive methods in MRI-negative epilepsy patients. In this study, we included epilepsy patients undergoing presurgical evaluation with presurgical negative MRI. MRI post-processing was performed using a Morphometric Analysis Program (MAP) on T1-weighted volumetric MRI. The relationship between MAP, magnetoencephalography (MEG), scalp electroencephalogram (EEG), and seizure outcomes was analyzed to figure out the localization value of different non-invasive methods. Eighty-six patients were included in this study. Complete resection of the MAP-positive regions or the MEG-positive regions was positively associated with seizure freedom (p = 0.028 and 0.007, respectively). When an area is co-localized by MAP and MEG, the resection of the area was significantly associated with seizure freedom (p = 0.006). However, neither the EEG lateralization nor the EEG localization showed statistical association with the surgical outcome (p = 0.683 and 0.505, respectively). In conclusion, scalp EEG had a limited role in presurgical localization and predicting seizure outcome, combining MAP and MEG results can significantly improve the localization of epileptogenic lesions and have a positive association with seizure-free outcome. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Due to the lack of obvious structure abnormalities on neuroimaging examinations, the identification of epilepsy lesions in MRI-negative epilepsy patients can be difficult. In this study, we intended to use non-invasive examinations to explore the potential epileptic lesions in MRI-negative epilepsy patients and to determine the results accuracy by comparing the neuroimaging results with the epilepsy surgery outcomes. A total of 86 epilepsy patients without obvious structure lesions on MRI were included, and we found that the combinations of different non-invasive examinations and neuroimaging post-processing methods are significantly associated with the seizure freedom results of epilepsy surgery.

Role of magnetoencephalography in predicting the epileptogenic zone and post-operative seizure outcome - A retrospective study

PURPOSE

Study assessed the role of MSI in predicting the post-operative seizure outcome.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent MEG and epilepsy surgery and had a minimum 6 months of postoperative follow-up. Concordance of MEG cluster with post-surgical resection cavity was classified as follows Class I) Concordant and region-specific, Class II) Concordant and region non-specific, Class III) Concordant lateralization only and Class IV) Discordant lateralization. The relationship between MSI concordance and post-operative seizure outcome was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 183 patients (M: F = 109:74) were included. The mean age at onset of seizures: 8.0 ± 6.4 years. The dipoles were frequent in 123(67.2 %). The primary cluster orientation was regular in 59 (32.2 %) and mixed in 124 (67.8 %) patients. Concordance between MEG and resection cavity: Class I - 124 (67.8 %), class II- 30 (16.4 %), class III- 23 (12.6 %), and class IV- 6 (3.3 %). The post-surgically mean duration of follow-up was 19.52 ± 11.27 months. At 6-month follow-up period, 144 (78.7 %) patients had complete seizure freedom out of which 106 (73.6 %) had class I concordance. Concordance of MEG with resection cavity was associated with a good outcome at 6 months (p = 0.001), 1 year (p = 0.001), 2 years (p = 0.0005) and 5 years (p = 0.04). MEG cluster characteristics had no association with seizure outcome except the strength of the cluster and outcome at 3 years (p = 0.02) follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The study supports that the complete resection of the MEG cluster had high chance of seizure-freedom and can be used as a complementary noninvasive presurgical evaluation tool.

Clinical significance of ictal magnetoencephalography in patients undergoing epilepsy surgery

OBJECTIVE

The significance of ictal magnetoencephalography (MEG) is not well appreciated. We evaluated the relationships between ictal MEG, MRI, intracranial electroencephalography (ICEEG), surgery and postoperative seizure outcome.

METHODS

A total of 45 patients (46 cases) with ictal MEG who underwent epilepsy surgery was included. We examined the localization of each modality, surgical resection area and seizure freedom after surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-one (45.7%) out of 46 cases were seizure-free at more than 6 months follow-up. Median duration of postoperative follow-up was 16.5 months. The patients in whom ictal, interictal single equivalent current dipole (SECD) and MRI lesion localization were completely included in the resection had a higher chance of being seizure-free significantly (p < 0.05). Concordance between ictal and interictal SECD localizations was significantly associated with seizure-freedom. Concordance between MRI lesion and ictal SECD, concordance between ictal ICEEG and ictal and interictal SECD, as well as concordance between ictal ICEEG and MRI lesion were significantly associated with seizure freedom.

CONCLUSIONS

Ictal MEG can contribute useful information for delineating the resection area in epilepsy surgery.

SIGNIFICANCE

Resection should include ictal, interictal SECDs and MRI lesion localization, when feasible. Concordant ictal and interictal SECDs on MEG can be a favorable predictor of seizure freedom.

Predictive value of magnetoencephalography in guiding the intracranial implant strategy for intractable epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a useful component of the presurgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy. Due to its high spatiotemporal resolution, MEG often provides additional information to the clinician when forming hypotheses about the epileptogenic zone (EZ). Because of the increasing utilization of stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG), MEG clusters are used to guide sEEG electrode targeting with increasing frequency. However, there are no predefined features of an MEG cluster that predict ictal activity. This study aims to determine which MEG cluster characteristics are predictive of the EZ.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed all patients who had an MEG study (2017-2021) and underwent subsequent sEEG evaluation. MEG dipoles and sEEG electrodes were reconstructed in the same coordinate space to calculate overlap among individual contacts on electrodes and MEG clusters. MEG cluster features-including number of dipoles, proximity, angle, density, magnitude, confidence parameters, and brain region-were used to predict ictal activity in sEEG. Logistic regression was used to identify important cluster features and to train a binary classifier to predict ictal activity.

RESULTS

Across 40 included patients, 196 electrodes (42.2%) sampled MEG clusters. Electrodes that sampled MEG clusters had higher rates of ictal and interictal activity than those that did not sample MEG clusters (ictal 68.4% vs 39.8%, p < 0.001; interictal 71.9% vs 44.6%, p < 0.001). Logistic regression revealed that the number of dipoles (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.14, t = 3.43) and confidence volume (OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.00-0.86, t = -2.032) were predictive of ictal activity. This model was predictive of ictal activity with 77.3% accuracy (sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 74%, C-statistic = 0.81). Using only the number of dipoles had a predictive accuracy of 75%, whereas a threshold between 14 and 17 dipoles in a cluster detected ictal activity with 75.9%-85.2% sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

MEG clusters with approximately 14 or more dipoles are strong predictors of ictal activity and may be useful in the preoperative planning of sEEG implantation.

Diagnostic added value of interictal magnetic source imaging in presurgical evaluation of persons with epilepsy: A prospective blinded study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In presurgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery, information is sourced from various imaging modalities to accurately localize the epileptogenic zone. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a newer noninvasive technique for localization. However, there is limited literature to evaluate if MEG provides additional advantage over the conventional imaging modalities in clinical decision making. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic added value of MEG in decision making before epilepsy surgery.

METHOD

This was a prospective observational study. Patients underwent 3 h of recording in a MEG scanner, and the resulting localizations were compared with other complimentary investigations. Added value of MEG (considered separately from high-density electroencephalography) was defined as the frequency of cases in which (i) the information provided by magnetic source imaging (MSI) avoided implantation of intracranial electrodes and the patient was directly cleared for surgery, and (ii) MSI indicated additional substrates for implantation of intracranial electrodes. Postoperative seizure freedom was used as the diagnostic reference by which to measure the localizing accuracy of MSI.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients underwent epilepsy surgery. MEG provided nonredundant information, which contributed to deciding the course of surgery in 33% of the patients, and prevented intracranial recordings in 19%. A total of 76% of the patients underwent surgical resection in sublobes concordant with MSI localization, and the diagnostic odds ratio for good (Engel I) outcome in these patients was 2.3 (95% confidence interval 0.68, 7.86; p = 0.183) after long-term follow-up of 36 months.

CONCLUSION

Magnetic source imaging yields additional useful information which can significantly alter as well as improve the surgical strategy for persons with epilepsy.

The use of simultaneous stereo-electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography in localizing the epileptogenic focus in refractory focal epilepsy

Both magnetoencephalography and stereo-electroencephalography are used in presurgical epilepsy assessment, with contrasting advantages and limitations. It is not known whether simultaneous stereo-electroencephalography-magnetoencephalography recording confers an advantage over both individual modalities, in particular whether magnetoencephalography can provide spatial context to epileptiform activity seen on stereo-electroencephalography. Twenty-four adult and paediatric patients who underwent stereo-electroencephalography study for pre-surgical evaluation of drug-resistant focal epilepsy, were recorded using simultaneous stereo-electroencephalography-magnetoencephalography, of which 14 had abnormal interictal activity during recording. The 14 patients were divided into two groups; those with detected superficial (n = 7) and deep (n = 7) brain interictal activity. Interictal spikes were independently identified in stereo-electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. Magnetoencephalography dipoles were derived using a distributed inverse method. There was no significant difference between stereo-electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography in detecting superficial spikes (P = 0.135) and stereo-electroencephalography was significantly better at detecting deep spikes (P = 0.002). Mean distance across patients between stereo-electroencephalography channel with highest average spike amplitude and magnetoencephalography dipole was 20.7 ± 4.4 mm. for superficial sources, and 17.8 ± 3.7 mm. for deep sources, even though for some of the latter (n = 4) no magnetoencephalography spikes were detected and magnetoencephalography dipole was fitted to a stereo-electroencephalography interictal activity triggered average. Removal of magnetoencephalography dipole was associated with 1 year seizure freedom in 6/7 patients with superficial source, and 5/6 patients with deep source. Although stereo-electroencephalography has greater sensitivity in identifying interictal activity from deeper sources, a magnetoencephalography source can be localized using stereo-electroencephalography information, thereby providing useful whole brain context to stereo-electroencephalography and potential role in epilepsy surgery planning.

Comparative contribution of magnetoencephalography (MEG) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in pre-operative localization for epilepsy surgery: A prospective blinded study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic value and accuracy of ictal SPECT and inter-ictal magnetoencephalography (MEG) in localizing the site for surgery in persons with drug resistant epilepsy.

METHOD

This was a prospective observational study. Patients expected to undergo epilepsy surgery were enrolled consecutively and the localization results from different imaging modalities were discussed in an epilepsy surgery meet. Odds ratio of good outcome (Engel I) were calculated in patients who underwent surgery in concordance with MEG and SPECT findings. Post-surgical seizure freedom lasting at least 36 months or more was considered the gold standard for determining the diagnostic output of SPECT and MEG.

RESULTS

MEG and SPECT were performed in 101 and 57 patients respectively. In 45 patients SPECT could not be done due to delay in injection or technical factors. The accuracy of MEG and SPECT in localizing the epileptogenic zone was found to be 74.26 % and 78.57 % respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio for Engel I surgical outcome was reported as 2.43 and 5.0 for MEG and SPECT respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio for MEG in whom SPECT was non-informative was found to be 6.57 [95 % CI 1.1, 39.24], although it was not significantly associated with good surgical outcome. MEG was useful in indicating sites for SEEG implantation.

CONCLUSION

SPECT was found to be non-informative for most patients, but reported better diagnostic output than MEG. MEG may be a useful alternative for patients in whom SPECT cannot be done or was non-localizing.

Evidence From Meta-Analysis Supports Ictal Magnetoencephalographic Source Imaging as an Accurate Method in Presurgery Evaluation of Patients With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

BACKGROUND.

Successful epilepsy surgery relies on localization and removal of the brain area responsible for initializing the seizures called the epileptogenic zone (EZ). Intracranial EEG (icEEG) is gold standard of this localization but has several limitations like invasiveness and limited covered area. A noninvasive method with accurate localization precision is therefore desirable. The aim of this article is to investigate the following hypotheses: (1) Ictal onset zone as localized by magnetic source imaging (iMSI) can reliably localize the EZ in focal epilepsy and (2) this localization is as good as that of icEEG.

METHODS.

Six original studies and a total of 59 unique patients were included in a meta-analysis.

RESULTS.

Sensitivity and specificity of iMSI based on surgery outcome were 77% (95% CI 60%-90%) and 75% (95% CI 53%-90%), respectively. Specificity of iMSI was statistically higher than that of icEEG. There was no significant difference between sensitivity of iMSI and icEEG.

CONCLUSION.

The meta-analysis supports that iMSI is an accurate method, achieving similar sensitivity and higher specificity than icEEG. However, at present the use of the method is limited by short recording times. A limitation that might be overcome in the future using technical advances.

Accuracy of Interictal and Ictal Electric and Magnetic Source Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Electric and magnetic source imaging methods (ESI, MSI) estimate the location in the brain of the sources generating the interictal epileptiform discharges (II-ESI, II-MSI) and the ictal activity (IC-ESI, IC-MSI). These methods provide potentially valuable clinical information in the presurgical evaluation of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, evaluated for surgical therapy. In spite of the significant technical advances in this field, and the numerous papers published on clinical validation of these methods, ESI and MSI are still underutilized in most epilepsy centers performing a presurgical evaluation. Our goal was to review and summarize the published evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of interictal and ictal ESI and MSI in epilepsy surgery.

Methods: We searched the literature for papers on ESI and MSI that specified the diagnostic reference standard as the site of resection and the postoperative outcome (seizure-freedom). We extracted data from the selected studies, to calculate the diagnostic accuracy measures.

Results: Our search resulted in 797 studies; 48 studies fulfilled the selection criteria (25 ESI and 23 MSI studies), providing data from 1,152 operated patients (515 for II-ESI, 440 for II-MSI, 159 for IC-ESI, and 38 for IC-MSI). The sensitivity of source imaging methods was between 74 and 90% (highest for IC-ESI). The specificity of the source imaging methods was between 20 and 54% (highest for II-MSI). The overall accuracy was between 50 and 75% (highest for IC-ESI). Diagnostic Odds Ratio was between 0.8 (IC-MSI) and 4.02–7.9 (II-ESI < II-MSI < IC-ESI).

Conclusions: Our systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence for the accuracy of source imaging in presurgical evaluation of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. These methods have high sensitivity (up to 90%) and diagnostic odds ratio (up to 7.9), but the specificity is lower (up to 54%). ESI and MSI should be included in the multimodal presurgical evaluation.

Assessment of the Utility of Ictal Magnetoencephalography in the Localization of the Epileptic Seizure Onset Zone

Importance

Literature on ictal magnetoencephalography (MEG) in clinical practice and the relationship to other modalities is limited because of the brevity of routine studies.

Objective

To investigate the utility and reliability of ictal MEG in the localization of the epileptogenic zone.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective medical record review and prospective analysis of a novel ictal rhythm analysis method was conducted at a tertiary epilepsy center with a wide base of referrals for epilepsy surgery evaluation and included consecutive cases of patients who experienced epileptic seizures during routine MEG studies from March 2008 to February 2012. A total of 377 studies screened. Data were analyzed from November 2011 to October 2015.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Presurgical workup and interictal and ictal MEG data were reviewed. The localizing value of using extended-source localization of a narrow band identified visually at onset was analyzed.

Results

Of the 44 included patients, the mean (SD) age at the time of recording was 19.3 (14.9) years, and 25 (57%) were male. The mean duration of recording was 51.2 minutes. Seizures were provoked by known triggers in 3 patients and were spontaneous otherwise. Twenty-five patients (57%) had 1 seizure, 6 (14%) had 2, and 13 (30%) had 3 or more. Magnetoencephalography single equivalent current dipole analysis was possible in 29 patients (66%), of whom 8 (28%) had no clear interictal discharges. Sublobar concordance between ictal and interictal dipoles was seen in 18 of 21 patients (86%). Three patients (7%) showed clear ictal MEG patterns without electroencephalography changes. Ictal MEG dipoles correlated with the lobe of onset in 7 of 8 patients (88%) who underwent intracranial electroencephalography evaluations. Reasons for failure to identify ictal dipoles included diffuse or poor dipolar ictal patterns, no MEG changes, and movement artifact. Resection of areas containing a minimum-norm estimate of a narrow band at onset, not single equivalent current dipole, was associated with sustained seizure freedom.

Conclusions and Significance

Ictal MEG data can provide reliable localization, including in cases that are difficult to localize by other modalities. These findings support the use of extended-source localization for seizures recorded during MEG.

Magnetoencephalography for epileptic focus localization in a series of 1000 cases

The aim of epilepsy surgery in patients with focal, pharmacoresistant epilepsies is to remove the complete epileptogenic zone to achieve long-term seizure freedom. In addition to a spectrum of diagnostic methods, magnetoencephalography focus localization is used for planning of epilepsy surgery. We present results from a retrospective observational cohort study of 1000 patients, evaluated using magnetoencephalography at the University Hospital Erlangen over the time span of 28 years. One thousand consecutive cases were included in the study, evaluated at the University Hospital Erlangen between 1990 and 2018. All patients underwent magnetoencephalography as part of clinical workup for epilepsy surgery. Of these, 405 underwent epilepsy surgery after magnetoencephalography, with postsurgical follow-ups of up to 20 years. Sensitivity for interictal epileptic activity was evaluated, in addition to concordance of localization with the consensus of presurgical workup on a lobar level. We evaluate magnetoencephalography characteristics of patients who underwent epilepsy surgery versus patients who did not proceed to surgery. In operated patients, resection of magnetoencephalography localizations were related to postsurgical seizure outcomes, including long-term results after several years. In comparison, association of lesionectomy with seizure outcomes was analysed. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated for magnetoencephalography resection and lesionectomy. Sensitivity for interictal epileptic activity was 72% with significant differences between temporal and extra-temporal lobe epilepsy. Magnetoencephalography was concordant with the presurgical consensus in 51% and showed additional or more focal involvement in an additional 32%. Patients who proceeded to surgery showed a significantly higher percentage of monofocal magnetoencephalography results. Complete magnetoencephalography resection was associated with significantly higher chances to achieve seizure freedom in the short and long-term. Diagnostic accuracy was significant in temporal and extra-temporal lobe cases, but was significantly higher in extra-temporal lobe epilepsy (diagnostic odds ratios of 4.4 and 41.6). Odds ratios were also higher in non-lesional versus lesional cases (42.0 versus 6.2). The results show that magnetoencephalography provides non-redundant information, which significantly contributes to patient selection, focus localization and ultimately long-term seizure freedom after epilepsy surgery. Specifically in extra-temporal lobe epilepsy and non-lesional cases, magnetoencephalography provides excellent accuracy.

Utility of stereo-electroencephalography recording guided by magnetoencephalography in the surgical treatment of epilepsy patients with negative magnetic resonance imaging results

Objective: It is challenging for neurosurgeons to perform surgeries on patients without detectable structural lesions. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to explore the outcome of stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) in suspicious areas guided by magnetoencephalography (MEG)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction in MRI-negative epilepsy patients. Methods: This study included 47 patients with negative-MRI epilepsy. Seizure outcome at 24 months was assessed using a modified Engel's classification. Accordingly, class I and II were considered favorable outcomes, whereas classes III and IV were unfavorable. Furthermore, patients were classified into a consistent group if the results of MEG and SEEG indicated the same area of the brain. The relationship between surgical outcome and the concordance of MEG and SEEG was analyzed. Results: A complete seizure-free condition was achieved in 22 (47%) patients. Sex, handedness, age and duration of illness were not significantly associated with seizure-free outcome (p = .187 [Pearson chi-squared test]). The number of patients with favorable outcome (Engle I and II) was as high as 68% at the time of follow-up. Furthermore, more seizure-free patients were found in the SEEG and MEG consistent group. Conclusions: SEEG is a valuable tool in the pre-evaluation for resective epilepsy surgery, particularly in negative-MRI epilepsy patients; MEG greatly facilitates localization for SEEG electrode implantation. However, none of these tools are absolutely sensitive and reliable; therefore, collecting as much information as possible is necessary to achieve satisfactory results in epilepsy surgery.

Diagnostic accuracy of interictal source imaging in presurgical epilepsy evaluation: A systematic review from the E-PILEPSY consortium

OBJECTIVE

Interictal high resolution (HR-) electric source imaging (ESI) and magnetic source imaging (MSI) are non-invasive tools to aid epileptogenic zone localization in epilepsy surgery candidates. We carried out a systematic review on the diagnostic accuracy and quality of evidence of these modalities.

METHODS

Embase, Pubmed and the Cochrane database were searched on 13 February 2017. Diagnostic accuracy studies taking post-surgical seizure outcome as reference standard were selected. Quality appraisal was based on the QUADAS-2 framework.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included: eight MSI (n = 267), three HR-ESI (n = 127) studies. None was free from bias. This mostly involved: selection of operated patients only, interference of source imaging with surgical decision, and exclusion of indeterminate results. Summary sensitivity and specificity estimates were 82% (95% CI: 75-88%) and 53% (95% CI: 37-68%) for overall source imaging, with no statistical difference between MSI and HR-ESI. Specificity is higher when partially concordant results were included as non-concordant (p < 0.05). Inclusion of indeterminate test results as non-concordant lowered sensitivity (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Source imaging has a relatively high sensitivity but low specificity for identification of the epileptogenic zone.

SIGNIFICANCE

We need higher quality studies allowing unbiased test evaluation to determine the added value and diagnostic accuracy of source imaging in the presurgical workup of refractory focal epilepsy.

Surgical Management of Pediatric Epilepsy: Decision-Making and Outcomes

First-line treatment for epilepsy is antiepileptic drug and requires an interdisciplinary approach and enduring commitment and adherence from the patient and family for successful outcome. Despite adherence to antiepileptic drugs, refractory epilepsy occurs in approximately 30% of children with epilepsy, and surgical treatment is an important intervention to consider. Surgical management of pediatric epilepsy is highly effective in selected patients with refractory epilepsy; however, an evidence-based protocol, including best methods of presurgical imaging assessments, and neurodevelopmental and/or behavioral health assessments, is not currently available for clinicians. Surgical treatment of epilepsy can be critical to avoid negative outcomes in functional, cognitive, and behavioral health status. Furthermore, it is often the only method to achieve seizure freedom in refractory epilepsy. Although a large literature base can be found for adults with refractory epilepsy undergoing surgical treatment, less is known about how surgical management affects outcomes in children with epilepsy. The purpose of the review was fourfold: (1) to evaluate the available literature regarding presurgical assessment and postsurgical outcomes in children with medically refractory epilepsy, (2) to identify gaps in our knowledge of surgical treatment and its outcomes in children with epilepsy, (3) to pose questions for further research, and (4) to advocate for a more unified presurgical evaluation protocol including earlier referral for surgical candidacy of pediatric patients with refractory epilepsy. Despite its effectiveness, epilepsy surgery remains an underutilized but evidence-based approach that could lead to positive short- and long-term outcomes for children with refractory epilepsy.

Accuracy of MEG in localizing irritative zone and seizure onset zone: Quantitative comparison between MEG and intracranial EEG

BACKGROUND

We conducted the study to examine accuracy of the magnetoencephalography (MEG) spike source localization in presurgical evaluation of patients with medically refractory focal epilepsy.

METHODS

Ten consecutive patients with refractory focal epilepsy who were candidates for two-stage surgery with long-term intracranial electroencephalography (ICEEG) monitoring were enrolled. Interictal MEG recordings with simultaneous scalp EEG were obtained within 7days before the ICEEG electrode implantation. The location of each MEG spike source was quantitatively compared with ICEEG spike foci (focal area of interictal spikes) and ICEEG ictal foci (earliest cortical origin of seizures). Gyral-width concordance and sublobar concordance were also determined for all MEG spike sources. Gyral-width concordance was defined by distance of 15mm or less between MEG spike sources and ICEEG spike foci or ICEEG ictal foci.

RESULTS

Visual analyses of the MEG traces of all 10 patients revealed 292 spikes (29.2±24.0 per patient). Spike yield of the MEG was similar to the simultaneously recorded scalp EEG. MEG spike sources were closely located with ICEEG spike foci (distance: 9.3±10.8mm). Clustered MEG spike sources were even closer to ICEEG spike foci (distance: 7.3±6.4mm). MEG spike sources, even clustered ones, were less concordant with ICEEG ictal foci and had significant longer distance from ICEEG ictal foci (distance: 21.5±15.6mm for all sources, 19.7±13.7mm for clustered sources). Gyral-width concordance rate and sublobar concordance rate were also higher with ICEEG interictal spike foci than with ICEEG ictal foci. On the other hand, 53.4% of interictal spike foci from ICEEG were not detected by interictal MEG recordings.

CONCLUSIONS

MEG spike sources, especially clustered ones, from interictal recording could localize the irritative zone of ICEEG with a high accuracy. However, MEG spike sources have relatively poor correlation with seizure onset zone and lower sensitivity in identifying all irritative zones of ICEEG. This limitation should be considered in the interpretation of MEG results.

Re-review of MRI with post-processing in nonlesional patients in whom epilepsy surgery has failed

Management of MRI-negative patients with intractable focal epilepsy after failed surgery is particularly challenging. In this study, we aim to investigate whether MRI post-processing could identify relevant targets for the re-evaluation of MRI-negative patients who failed the initial resective surgery. We examined a consecutive series of 56 MRI-negative patients who underwent resective surgery and had recurring seizures at 1-year follow-up. T1-weighted volumetric sequence from the pre-surgical MRI was used for voxel-based MRI post-processing which was implemented in a morphometric analysis program (MAP). MAP was positive in 15 of the 56 patients included in this study. In 5 patients, the MAP+ regions were fully resected. In 10 patients, the MAP+ regions were not or partially resected: two out of the 10 patients had a second surgery including the unresected MAP+ region, and both became seizure-free; the remaining 8 patients did not undergo further surgery, but the unresected MAP+ regions were concordant with more than one noninvasive modality in 7. In the 8 patients who had unresected MAP+ regions and intracranial-EEG before the previous surgery, the unresected MAP+ regions were concordant with ictal onset in 6. Our data suggest that scrutiny of the presurgical MRI guided by MRI post-processing may reveal relevant targets for reoperation in nonlesional epilepsies. MAP findings, when concordant with the patient's other noninvasive data, should be considered when planning invasive evaluation/reoperation for this most challenging group of patients.

Look back to leap forward: The emerging new role of magnetoencephalography (MEG) in nonlesional epilepsy

This review considers accumulating evidence for a new role of MEG/MSI in increasing the diagnostic yield of supposedly negative MRIs, and suggests changes in the use of MEG/MSI in presurgical epilepsy evaluations. Specific alterations in practice protocols for both the MEG practitioner (i.e. physician magnetoencephalographer) and MEG user (i.e. referring physician) are proposed that should further enhance the overall value of MEG/MSI. Although advances in MEG analysis methods will likely become increasingly assisted by computers, interpretive competency and prudent clinical judgment remain irreplaceable.

Voxel-based morphometric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) postprocessing in MRI-negative epilepsies

OBJECTIVE

In the presurgical workup of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-negative (MRI(-) or "nonlesional") pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy (PFE) patients, discovering a previously undetected lesion can drastically change the evaluation and likely improve surgical outcome. Our study utilizes a voxel-based MRI postprocessing technique, implemented in a morphometric analysis program (MAP), to facilitate detection of subtle abnormalities in a consecutive cohort of MRI(-) surgical candidates.

METHODS

Included in this retrospective study was a consecutive cohort of 150 MRI(-) surgical patients. MAP was performed on T1-weighted MRI, with comparison to a scanner-specific normal database. Review and analysis of MAP were performed blinded to patients' clinical information. The pertinence of MAP(+) areas was confirmed by surgical outcome and pathology.

RESULTS

MAP showed a 43% positive rate, sensitivity of 0.9, and specificity of 0.67. Overall, patients with the MAP(+) region completely resected had the best seizure outcomes, followed by the MAP(-) patients, and patients who had no/partial resection of the MAP(+) region had the worst outcome (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that visually identified subtle findings are more likely correct if also MAP(+) . False-positive rate in 52 normal controls was 2%. Surgical pathology of the resected MAP(+) areas contained mainly non-balloon-cell focal cortical dysplasia (FCD). Multiple MAP(+) regions were present in 7% of patients.

INTERPRETATION

MAP can be a practical and valuable tool to: (1) guide the search for subtle MRI abnormalities and (2) confirm visually identified questionable abnormalities in patients with PFE due to suspected FCD. A MAP(+) region, when concordant with the patient's electroclinical presentation, should provide a legitimate target for surgical exploration.

Epileptic focus localization based on resting state interictal MEG recordings is feasible irrespective of the presence or absence of spikes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether epileptogenic focus localization is possible based on resting state connectivity analysis of magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data.

METHODS

A multivariate autoregressive (MVAR) model was constructed using the sensor space data and was projected to the source space using lead field and inverse matrix. The generalized partial directed coherence was estimated from the MVAR model in the source space. The dipole with the maximum information inflow was hypothesized to be within the epileptogenic focus.

RESULTS

Applying the focus localization algorithm (FLA) to the interictal MEG recordings from five patients with neocortical epilepsy, who underwent presurgical evaluation for the identification of epileptogenic focus, we were able to correctly localize the focus, on the basis of maximum interictal information inflow in the presence or absence of interictal epileptic spikes in the data, with three out of five patients undergoing resective surgery and being seizure free since.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary results suggest that accurate localization of the epileptogenic focus may be accomplished using noninvasive spontaneous "resting-state" recordings of relatively brief duration and without the need to capture definite interictal and/or ictal abnormalities.

SIGNIFICANCE

Epileptogenic focus localization is possible through connectivity analysis of resting state MEG data irrespective of the presence/absence of spikes.

Neuroimaging of epilepsy: a review of MRI findings in uncommon etiologies and atypical presentations of seizures

ABSTRACT: 

Imaging patients with seizures presents a challenge to both clinician and radiologist, especially when symptoms or EEG features are atypical, not conforming to established epilepsy syndromes or EEG patterns. Appropriate, directed use of MRI enhances the detection of underlying epileptogenic foci and can evaluate both common and unusual etiologies. This review examines imaging evaluation of epilepsies due to uncommon presentations of common conditions, unusual conditions and atypical seizure presentations. Understanding these uncommon presentations of seizures ensures optimal clinical management and can guide appropriate intervention. Advances in newer imaging methods including diffusion tensor imaging, functional connectivity MRI, magnetic source imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging can further increase sensitivity to detect subtle structural abnormalities causing epilepsy and can also be used to plan more successful epilepsy surgery.

Localisation of epileptic foci using novel imaging modalities

Purpose of review

This review examines recent reports on the use of advanced techniques to map the regions and networks involved during focal epileptic seizure generation in humans.

Recent findings

A number of imaging techniques are capable of providing new localizing information on the ictal processes and epileptogenic zone. Evaluating the clinical utility of these findings has been mainly performed through post-hoc comparison with the findings of invasive EEG and ictal single-photon emission computed tomography, using postsurgical seizure reduction as the main outcome measure. Added value has been demonstrated in MRI-negative cases. Improved understanding of the human ictiogenic processes and the focus vs. network hypothesis is likely to result from the application of multimodal techniques that combine electrophysiological, semiological, and whole-brain coverage of brain activity changes.

Summary

On the basis of recent research in the field of neuroimaging, several novel imaging modalities have been improved and developed to provide information about the localization of epileptic foci.

The pathology of magnetic-resonance-imaging-negative epilepsy

Patients with magnetic-resonance-imaging (MRI)-negative (or 'nonlesional') pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy are the most challenging group undergoing presurgical evaluation. Few large-scale studies have systematically reviewed the pathological substrates underlying MRI-negative epilepsies. In the current study, histopathological specimens were retrospectively reviewed from MRI-negative epilepsy patients (n=95, mean age=30 years, 50% female subjects). Focal cortical dysplasia cases were classified according to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and Palmini et al classifications. The most common pathologies found in this MRI-negative cohort included: focal cortical dysplasia (n=43, 45%), gliosis (n=21, 22%), hamartia+gliosis (n=12, 13%), and hippocampal sclerosis (n=9, 9%). The majority of focal cortical dysplasia were ILAE type I (n=37) or Palmini type I (n=39). Seven patients had no identifiable pathological abnormalities. The existence of positive pathology was not significantly associated with age or temporal/extratemporal resection. Follow-up data post surgery was available in 90 patients; 63 (70%) and 57 (63%) attained seizure freedom at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The finding of positive pathology was significantly associated with seizure-free outcome at 6 months (P=0.035), but not at 12 months. In subgroup analysis, the focal cortical dysplasia group was not significantly correlated with seizure-free outcome, as compared with the negative-pathology groups at either 6 or 12 months. Of note, the finding of hippocampal sclerosis had a significant positive correlation with seizure-free outcome when compared with the negative-pathology group (P=0.009 and 0.004 for 6- and 12-month outcome, respectively). Absence of a significant histopathology in the resected surgical specimen did not preclude seizure freedom. In conclusion, our study highlights the heterogeneity of epileptic pathologies in MRI-negative epilepsies, with focal cortical dysplasia being the most common finding. The existence of positive pathology in surgical specimen may be a good indication for short-term good seizure outcome. There is a small subset of cases in which no pathological abnormalities are identified.

Correlation between magnetoencephalography-based “clusterectomy” and postoperative seizure freedom

Object

During the presurgical evaluation of patients with medically intractable focal epilepsy, a variety of noninvasive studies are performed to localize the hypothetical epileptogenic zone and guide the resection. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is becoming increasingly used in the clinical realm for this purpose. No investigators have previously reported on coregisteration of MEG clusters with postoperative resection cavities to evaluate whether complete “clusterectomy” (resection of the area associated with MEG clusters) was performed or to compare these findings with postoperative seizure-free outcomes.

Methods

The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts and imaging studies of 65 patients undergoing MEG followed by resective epilepsy surgery from 2009 until 2012 at the Cleveland Clinic. Preoperative MEG studies were fused with postoperative MRI studies to evaluate whether clusters were within the resected area. These data were then correlated with postoperative seizure freedom.

Results

Sixty-five patients were included in this study. The average duration of follow-up was 13.9 months, the mean age at surgery was 23.1 years, and the mean duration of epilepsy was 13.7 years. In 30 patients, the main cluster was located completely within the resection cavity, in 28 it was completely outside the resection cavity, and in 7 it was partially within the resection cavity. Seventy-four percent of patients were seizure free at 12 months after surgery, and this rate decreased to 60% at 24 months. Improved likelihood of seizure freedom was seen with complete clusterectomy in patients with localization outside the temporal lobe (extra–temporal lobe epilepsy) (p = 0.04).

Conclusions

In patients with preoperative MEG studies that show clusters in surgically accessible areas outside the temporal lobe, we suggest aggressive resection to improve the chances for seizure freedom. When the cluster is found within the temporal lobe, further diagnostic testing may be required to better localize the epileptogenic zone.