Seizure-free after surgery in a patient with non-lesional startle epilepsy: a case report

Startle-Induced Epileptic Spasms: A Clinical and Video-EEG Study

Objective

This study aimed to delineate the detailed characteristics of startle-induced epileptic spasms (ES) and explore the brain regions where startle-induced ES originated.

Methods

Among 581 patients with ES registered in our database, 30 were diagnosed with startle-induced ES according to video-electroencephalogram (EEG) and seizure semiology and were included in this study. Patients' clinical characteristics and ictal high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) were analyzed.

Results

Mean age at the onset of startle-induced ES was 28.1 months. Half of the patients had structural etiology, two of whom were diagnosed with co-existing structural and genetic etiologies. The focal neuroimaging abnormalities were predominant in the frontal cortex (9/15, 60.0%). Fifteen patients (50%) had prominent interictal epileptiform discharges in the frontal and anterior temporal. Ictal HFOs counts of the startle-induced ES in the anterior region were significantly higher than those in the posterior regions (p < 0.05). Five patients (16.7%) became seizure-free ≥6 months, and ten (33.3%) showed startle-induced ES cessation ≥6 months. All patients except one had mild to severe psychomotor developmental delay after the onset of seizures.

Conclusion

Patients with startle-induced ES typically had brain lesions and showed drug-resistant. The neuroimaging and EEG findings, including ictal HFOs, support that startle-induced ES often originates from the frontal cortex.

Reflex epileptic features in patients with focal epilepsy of unknown cause

OBJECTIVES

There is a gap of knowledge regarding reflex seizures in patients with focal epilepsy of unknown cause (FEUC). We aimed to evaluate the prevalence, demographic and clinical characteristics of reflex seizures in patients with FEUC to provide an insight to the underlying ictogenic mechanisms and to draw attention to this important but under-investigated topic.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After carefully questioning for reflex triggers, 186 patients diagnosed according to ILAE criteria and followed-up for a minimum of 5 years were included. The demographic and clinical properties as well as electrophysiological and neuroimaging data of these patients were reevaluated and compared to the patients without reflex seizures.

RESULTS

The reflex seizure rate was 6.5 % in patients with FEUC. Patients with reflex features had lower monotherapy rates (p = 0.005) and higher major depression rates (p = 0.001) than patients without reflex features. The distribution of the patients according to their reflex triggers were as follows: hot-water induced (n = 3, 25 %), photosensitive (n = 2, 16.7 %), eating- induced (n = 2, 16.7 %), musicogenic (n = 2, 16.7 %), startle induced (n = 2, 16.7 %) and both musicogenic and startle type (n = 1, 8.3 %) respectively. The drug resistance rate of patients with reflex seizures was 25 % (n = 3). One patient with drug resistant reflex seizures showed benefit from epilepsy surgery and became seizure-free during last 3 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

A careful and thoroughly history taking specifically questioning and focusing on seizure inducing factors in patients with FEUC is needed to confirm the presence of reflex seizures in patients with FEUC, who had higher rates of polytherapy and major depression. Elaborative evaluation of reflex features in FEUC might contribute to effective seizure control, ensure new therapeutic approaches, enlighten the obscurity and the resulting anxiety of having a diagnosis of FEUC in epilepsy patients.