Acceptance of epilepsy surgery in the pediatric age - what the parents think and what the doctors can do

Delays in the diagnosis and surgical treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy: A cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Delay in referral for epilepsy surgery of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is associated with decreased quality of life, worse surgical outcomes, and increased risk of sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Understanding the potential causes of delays in referral and treatment is crucial for optimizing the referral and treatment process. We evaluated the treatment intervals, demographics, and clinical characteristics of patients referred for surgical evaluation at our level 4 epilepsy center in the U.S. Intermountain West.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent surgery for DRE between 2012 and 2022. Data collected included patient demographics, DRE diagnosis date, clinical characteristics, insurance status, distance from epilepsy center, date of surgical evaluation, surgical procedure, and intervals between different stages of evaluation.

RESULTS

Within our cohort of 185 patients with epilepsy (99 female, 53.5%), the mean ± standard deviation (SD) age at surgery was 38.4 ± 11.9 years. In this cohort, 95.7% of patients had received definitive epilepsy surgery (most frequently neuromodulation procedures) and 4.3% had participated in phase 2 intracranial monitoring but had not yet received definitive surgery. The median (1st-3rd quartile) intervals observed were 10.1 (3.8-21.5) years from epilepsy diagnosis to DRE diagnosis, 16.7 (6.5-28.4) years from epilepsy diagnosis to surgery, and 1.4 (0.6-4.0) years from DRE diagnosis to surgery. We observed significantly shorter median times from epilepsy diagnosis to DRE diagnosis (p < .01) and epilepsy diagnosis to surgery (p < .05) in patients who traveled further for treatment. Patients with public health insurance had a significantly longer time from DRE diagnosis to surgery (p < .001).

SIGNIFICANCE

Both shorter distance traveled to our epilepsy center and public health insurance were predictive of delays in diagnosis and treatment intervals. Timely referral of patients with DRE to specialized epilepsy centers for surgery evaluation is crucial, and identifying key factors that may delay referral is paramount to optimizing surgical outcomes.

Tailored Hemispherotomy Using Tractography-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy

BACKGROUND

Medically refractory hemispheric epilepsy is a devastating disease with significant lifetime costs and social burden. Functional hemispherotomy is a highly effective treatment for hemispheric epilepsy but is associated with significant complication rates. Percutaneous hemispherotomy through laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) based on morphological MRI has been recently described in a single patient but not replicated in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the first 2 cases of tractography-guided interstitial laser hemispherotomy and their short-term outcomes.

METHODS

Two 11-year-old male patients with medically refractory epilepsy secondary to perinatal large vessel infarcts were referred for hemispherotomy. Both patients underwent multitrajectory LITT to disconnect the remaining pathological hemisphere, using tractography to define targets and assess structural outcomes.

RESULTS

Both cases had minor complication of small intraventricular/subarachnoid hemorrhage not requiring additional intervention. Both patients remain seizure-free at all follow-up visits.

CONCLUSION

LITT hemispherotomy can produce seizure freedom with short hospitalization and recovery. Tractography allows surgical planning to be tailored according to individual patient anatomy, which often is distorted in perinatal stroke. Minimally invasive procedures offer the greatest potential for seizure freedom without the risks of an open hemispherotomy.

Family risk communication preferences in pediatric surgery: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Effective patient-surgeon communication is vital in pediatric surgical practice. However, family (including child) preferences for the format and content of risk communication information are largely unknown. In order to optimize the shared-decision making process, this scoping review explored the family-preferred methods for risk communication in pediatric surgery.

METHODS

A search was conducted in 7 databases from inception until June 2020 to identify family risk communication preferences in pediatric surgical patients, with language restricted to English and French. Two independent reviewers completed the screening in Rayyan software following PRISMA protocol. Included publications were reviewed for data extraction, analyzed, and assessed for risk of bias using standardized instruments.

RESULTS

A total of 6370 publications were retrieved, out of which 70 were included. Studies were predominantly from ENT (30.0%), general surgery (15.7%), and urology (11.4%). Family-preferred risk communication methods were classified as visual, verbal, technology-based, written, decision aids or other. Technological (32.4%) and written tools (29.7%) were most commonly chosen by families as their preferred risk communication methods. Written tools were frequently used in general surgery and urology, while technology-based tools were widely used in ENT. Most studies were cross-sectional and had a significant risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

Eliciting families' preferences for risk communication methods is critical for the implementation of shared decision-making. Different risk communication media appear to be preferred within specific surgical domains. To further improve shared-decision making in pediatric surgery, the development and usage of robust, validated risk communication tools are necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV (Scoping Review).

Surgical decision-making among patients with uncontrolled epilepsy: "Making important decisions about my brain, which I happen to love"

OBJECTIVE

To explore decision-making from patients' perceptions of risks and benefits of epilepsy surgery for refractory focal seizures.

METHODS

Using constructivist grounded theory, in-person interviews were conducted with 35 adults with refractory focal epilepsy who were undergoing a pre-surgical evaluation or who had consented for surgery.

RESULTS

For this sample of participants decision-making about surgery was complex, centering on the meaning of illness for the self and the impact of epilepsy and its treatment for significant others. Two interrelated categories crystalized from our data: the unique context of brain surgery and how the decisional counterweights of risks and benefits were considered.

DISCUSSION

Exploring components of decision-making from the patients' perspective afforded an opportunity to describe thought processes intrinsic to how people with drug-resistant epilepsy weighed their treatment options. Tensions were evident in how decisions were made. We use the analogy of an imaginary tightrope-walker to create a visual image of what patients face as they consider the illness experience (past and present), their hopes for the future, and the simultaneous uncertainty centered around balancing the counterweights of treatment risks and benefits.

Physicians' Perspectives on Presurgical Discussion and Shared Decision-Making in Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery

Objective: To qualitatively explore the approach of pediatric epilepsy providers when counseling regarding surgical options for epilepsy, presenting risks and benefits of surgery, overcoming resistance to surgery, and fostering shared decision making with patients and families. Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews with 11 academic clinicians (5- neurologists, 5- epileptologists, 1- neurosurgeon) from a Level 4 pediatric epilepsy center to explore how physicians communicate and pursue surgical decision-making. Results: A blended inductive-deductive analysis revealed three key themes (with subthemes) of presurgical discussions: (1) Candidate selection and initial discussion about epilepsy surgery (neurologists compared to epileptologists, the timing of the discussion, reluctant families) (2) Detailed individualized counseling about epilepsy surgery (shared decision-making [enablers and barriers] and risk-benefit analysis [balancing risks and benefits, statistical benefit estimation, discussion about SUDEP, prognostication about cognitive and behavioral outcomes, risks of surgery]) (3) Tools to improve decision-making (educational interventions for patients and families and provider- and organization-specific interventions). Significance: Presurgical discussions lack uniformity among physicians who treat epilepsy. Despite general interest in collaborative decision-making, experts raised concern about lack of exposure to communication training and clinical tools for optimizing decision-making, a high number of families who do not feel equipped to share the decision making leaving the decision-making entirely to the physician, and paucity of practical resources for individualized risk-benefit counseling. Clinical practice guidelines should be developed to reduce existing practice variations in presurgical counseling. Further consensus is needed about when and how to initiate the conversation about epilepsy surgery, essential components of the discussion, and the utility of various tools to improve the utilization of epilepsy surgery.

The Missed Value of Underutilizing Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery: A Systematic Review

Pediatric epilepsy surgery is underutilized. Only 1%-11% of children with drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) undergo surgical treatment, or less than half of those estimated to benefit. We conducted a systematic review of articles published in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science in order to study the factors related to surgery underutilization as well as the impact on both the individual and the healthcare system. Our review demonstrates multiple factors leading to underutilization, including family misconceptions about epilepsy surgery, lack of provider knowledge, as well as systemic health disparities. While the upfront cost of epilepsy surgery is significant, the long-term financial benefits and reduced health resource utilization tilt the economic advantage in favor of surgery in children with DRE. Additionally, timely interventions improve seizure and cognitive outcomes with low risk of complications. Further interventions are needed at the levels of family, provider, and the healthcare system to increase access to pediatric epilepsy surgery.

Parental experience and decision-making for epilepsy surgery: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies

OBJECTIVE

In selected children with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), epilepsy surgery is the most effective treatment option, but unfortunately remains highly underutilized. One of the critical obstacles to pursuing surgical therapy is parents/caregivers' decision against surgery or to delay the surgery until no other treatment option exists. Understanding caregiver decision-making around epilepsy surgery can improve patient/caregiver experience and satisfaction while facilitating appropriate decision-making that optimizes clinical outcomes. The current review systematically explores the existing evidence on caregiver experience and the decision-making process toward epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

The study was conducted as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic literature review. Databases (PubMed Ovid, PubMed Medline, Web of Science, CINHAL, PsycInfo) were systematically searched in February 2021 using a defined search strategy and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Total 1304 articles were screened for titles and abstracts, and 54 full-text articles were retrieved for further assessment. We included 14 articles with critical quality assessment using two different tools for qualitative and questionnaire-based studies. A qualitative content analysis was performed to characterize caregiver experience, perception, and decision-making toward favorable or unfavorable opinions of epilepsy surgery.

RESULTS

Four concepts generated from the analysis may act as enablers or barriers to decision-making around epilepsy surgery: 1. Access to knowledge and information, 2. Communication and coordination issues, 3. Caregiver's emotional state, and 4. Socioeconomic effects. Subsequently, we provided a narrative synthesis of practice recommendations and a conceptual framework to adopt multi-pronged interventions to overcome identified diverse barriers to effective caregiver decision-making.

CONCLUSION

Multiple influences impact how caregivers decide about epilepsy surgery for their children, with no single factor identified as the primary driver for or against surgery. However, limited research has explored these influences. Future studies should focus on quantitatively examining factors to identify significant variables most likely to influence caregiver decision-making, ultimately overcoming barriers that limit utilization of epilepsy surgery as a treatment tool.

Underrepresented Populations in Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery

As awareness of pediatric epilepsy increases, accompanied by advancements in technology and research, it is important to identify certain types of patients that are overlooked for surgical management of epilepsy. Identifying these populations will allow us to study and elucidate the factors contributing to the underutilization and/or delayed application of surgical interventions. Demographically, African-American and Hispanic patients, as well as patients of certain Asian ethnicities, have relatively lower rates of undergoing epilepsy surgery than non-Hispanic and white patients. Among patients with epilepsy, those with higher odds of seizure-freedom following surgery are more likely to be referred for surgical evaluation by their neurologists, with the most common diagnosis being lesional focal epilepsy. However, patients with multifocal or generalized epilepsy, genetic etiologies, or normal (non-lesional) brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are less likely be to referred for evaluation for resective surgery. With an increasing number of high-quality imaging modalities to help localize the epileptogenic zone as well as new techniques for both curative and palliative epilepsy surgery, there are very few populations of patients and/or types of epilepsy that should be precluded from evaluation to determine the suitability of epilepsy surgery. Ultimately, a clearer understanding of the populations who are underrepresented among those considered for epilepsy surgery, coupled with further study of the underlying reasons for this trend, will lead to less disparity in access to this critical treatment among patients with epilepsy.

Choice and Trade-offs: Parent Decision Making for Neurotechnologies for Pediatric Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

This qualitative study investigated factors that guide caregiver decision making and ethical trade-offs for advanced neurotechnologies used to treat children with drug-resistant epilepsy. Caregivers with affected children were recruited to semi-structured focus groups or interviews at one of 4 major epilepsy centers in Eastern and Western Canada and the USA (n = 22). Discussions were transcribed and qualitative analytic methods applied to examine values and priorities (eg, risks, benefits, adherence, invasiveness, reversibility) of caregivers pertaining to novel technologies to treat drug-resistant epilepsy. Discussions revealed 3 major thematic branches for decision making: (1) features of the intervention-risks and benefits, with an emphasis on an aversion to perceived invasiveness; (2) decision drivers-trust in the clinical team, treatment costs; and (3) quality of available information about neurotechnological options. Overall, caregivers' definition of treatment success is more expansive than seizure freedom. The full involvement of their values and priorities must be considered in the decision-making process.

Underutilization of epilepsy surgery: Part I: A scoping review of barriers

One-third of persons with epilepsy have seizures despite appropriate medical therapy. Drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) is associated with neurocognitive and psychological decline, poor quality of life, increased risk of premature death, and greater economic burden. Epilepsy surgery is an effective and safe treatment for a subset of people with DRE but remains one of the most underutilized evidence-based treatments in modern medicine. The reasons for this quality gap are insufficiently understood. In this comprehensive review, we compile known significant barriers to epilepsy surgery, originating from both patient/family-related factors and physician/health system components. Important patient-related factors include individual and epilepsy characteristics which bias towards continued preferential use of poorly effective medications, as well as patient perspectives and misconceptions of surgical risks and benefits. Health system and physician-related barriers include demonstrable knowledge gaps among physicians, inadequate access to comprehensive epilepsy centers, complex presurgical evaluations, insufficient research, and socioeconomic bias when choosing appropriate surgical candidates.

Underutilization of epilepsy surgery: Part II: Strategies to overcome barriers

Interventions focused on utilization of epilepsy surgery can be divided into groups: those that improve patients' access to surgical evaluation and those that facilitate completion of the surgical evaluation and treatment. Educational intervention, technological innovation, and effective coordination and communication can significantly improve patients' access to surgery. Patient and public facing, individualized (analog and/or digital) communication can raise awareness and acceptance of epilepsy surgery. Educational interventions aimed at providers may mitigate knowledge gaps using practical and concise consensus statements and guidelines, while specific training can improve awareness around implicit bias. Innovative technology, such as clinical decision-making toolkits within the electronic medical record (EMR), machine learning techniques, online decision-support tools, nomograms, and scoring algorithms can facilitate timely identification of appropriate candidates for epilepsy surgery with individualized guidance regarding referral appropriateness, postoperative seizure freedom rate, and risks of complication after surgery. There are specific strategies applicable for epilepsy centers' success: building a multidisciplinary setup, maintaining/tracking volume and complexity of cases, collaborating with other centers, improving surgical outcome with reduced complications, utilizing advanced diagnostics tools, and considering minimally invasive surgical techniques. Established centers may use other strategies, such as multi-stage procedures for multifocal epilepsy, advanced functional mapping with tailored surgery for epilepsy involving the eloquent cortex, and generation of fresh hypotheses in cases of surgical failure. Finally, improved access to epilepsy surgery can be accomplished with policy changes (e.g., anti-discrimination policy, exemption in transportation cost, telehealth reimbursement policy, patient-centered epilepsy care models, pay-per-performance models, affordability and access to insurance, and increased funding for research). Every intervention should receive regular evaluation and feedback-driven modification to ensure appropriate utilization of epilepsy surgery.

Parents' and children's decision-making and experiences in pediatric epilepsy surgery

BACKGROUND

In pediatric epilepsy surgery, little research has been conducted on parents' decision-making for or against surgery, their satisfaction with the surgical outcome, as well as their children's personal experiences with the process.

OBJECTIVE

This study explores (1) factors that may influence parents' decision-making, (2) factors associated with their postoperative satisfaction, and (3) their children's involvement in decision-making and their experiences with epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

Self-developed questionnaires were provided to parents and their children in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Clinical and psychosocial differences between parents who decided for or against surgery, as well as associations between postoperative factors and the parents' satisfaction were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-one questionnaires (42 parent and nine patient questionnaires) were evaluated. Parents who decided for epilepsy surgery reported significantly more frequently to have received a good medical consultation and a consistent recommendation. They made significantly less use of information websites, internet forums, and patient organizations. Their children were classified as more intelligent and resisted surgery less. Most of the parents were satisfied with the surgical outcome (83%). Parents were significantly more satisfied when their children had fewer medication side effects, their memory or concentration had improved, their character or behavior had changed in a positive direction, or when their children were more independent or less excluded. They were also significantly more content when they had more free time to themselves and their professional situation or their relationship with their children, friends, or other family members had improved. However, no significant association was found between parental satisfaction and reduced number of medications or improved seizure outcome. Although the children were reported to have been minimally involved in the decision-making process, they were satisfied with their involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

A good medical consultation that involves the children and considers the family's living conditions is a crucial factor for parents' decision-making on pediatric epilepsy surgery. For parents' satisfaction, a positive change in their child's character or behavior and an improved psychosocial situation of the family are more important than postoperative seizure frequency or number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Therefore, the medical consultation should not only focus on clinical factors, but also point out psychosocial and behavioral changes that may occur after the surgical treatment.

Unexpected marked seizure improvement in paediatric epilepsy surgery candidates

PURPOSE

Epilepsy surgery is performed based on the assumption that medical refractory epilepsy will continue. Rarely seizure freedom occurs before surgery is performed, while the patient is being evaluated as an epilepsy surgery candidate. The aim of this study was to describe the number of children withdrawn from an epilepsy surgery programme due to unexpected seizure improvement.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 173 children under 18 years with medical refractory epilepsy referred for epilepsy surgery between 1996 and 2010. Medical records were reviewed in 2012 and 2015.

RESULTS

At the first evaluation point in 2012, 13 patients were withdrawn from the epilepsy surgery programme due to unexpected marked improvement. In 2015, 6 of them were still seizure free. They had unexpected seizure freedom due to change in AED treatment (n=3) or after a febrile episode (n=3). The mean number of years they had had seizures was 3.4 years (range 0.6-6.2 years) and the number of seizures at inclusion was 209 per month (range 6-750 per month). The duration of follow-up was 6.6 years after inclusion into the epilepsy surgery programme (range 4.0-13.0 years). The aetiology of the epilepsy for these patients was heterotopia (n=1), focal cortical dysplasia (n=3), infarction (n=1) and unknown, with normal MRI (n=1). They all had an IQ in the normal range. Two of the remaining 7 children were operated later.

CONCLUSION

Unexpected seizure control may occur during epilepsy surgery evaluation.

"It was five years of hell": Parental experiences of navigating and processing the slow and arduous time to pediatric resective epilepsy surgery

OBJECTIVE

Children with medically refractory epilepsy stand to benefit from surgery and live a life free of seizures. However, a large proportion of potentially eligible children do not receive a timely referral for a surgical evaluation. We aimed to describe experiences during the arduous time before the referral and the parent-reported facilitators that helped them move forward through this slow time.

METHODS

Individual semi-structured interviews with 37 parents of children who had previously undergone epilepsy surgery at UCLA (2006-2011) were recorded, transcribed, and systematically analyzed by two independent coders using thematic analysis. Clinical data were extracted from medical records.

RESULTS

Parents, 41.3years of age on average, were mostly Caucasian, English-speaking, mothers, married, and employed. The mean age at surgery for children was 8.2years with a mean time from epilepsy onset to surgery of 5.4years. Parental decision-making was facilitated when parents eventually received a presurgical referral and navigated to a multidisciplinary team that they trusted to care for their child with medically refractory epilepsy. Four themes described the experiences that parents used to feel a sense of moving forward. The first theme, processing, involved working through feelings and was mostly done alone. The second theme, navigating the complex unknowns of the health-care system, was more active and purposeful. Processing co-occurred with navigating in a fluid intersection, the third theme, which was evidenced by deliberate actions. The fourth theme, facilitators, explained helpful ways of processing and navigating; parents utilized these mechanisms to turn vulnerable times following the distress of their child's diagnosis into an experience of productivity.

SIGNIFICANCE

To limit parental distress and remediate the slow and arduous journey to multidisciplinary care at a comprehensive epilepsy center for a surgical evaluation, we suggest multi-pronged interventions to modify barriers associated with parents, providers, and health-care systems. Based on the facilitators that moved parents of our sample forward, we provide practical suggestions such as increased peer support, developing the role of patient navigators and communication strategies with parents before, during, and after referral to a comprehensive epilepsy center and presurgical evaluation.

Putting children forward for epilepsy surgery: A qualitative study of UK parents' and health professionals' decision-making experiences

BACKGROUND

Against a backdrop of recommendations for increasing access to and uptake of early surgical intervention for children with medically intractable epilepsy, it is important to understand how parents and professionals decide to put children forward for epilepsy surgery and what their decisional support needs are.

AIM

The aim of this study was to explore how parents and health professionals make decisions regarding putting children forward for pediatric epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

Individual interviews were conducted with nine parents of children who had undergone pediatric epilepsy surgery at a specialist children's hospital and ten healthcare professionals who made up the children's epilepsy surgery service multidisciplinary healthcare team (MDT). Three MDT meetings were also observed. Data were analyzed thematically.

FINDINGS

Four themes were generated from analysis of interviews with parents: presentation of surgery as a treatment option, decision-making, looking back, and interventions. Three themes were generated from analysis of interviews/observations with health professionals: triangulating information, team working, and patient and family perspectives.

DISCUSSION

Parents wanted more information and support in deciding to put their child forward for epilepsy surgery. They attempted to balance the potential benefits of surgery against any risks of harm. For health professionals, a multidisciplinary approach was seen as crucial to the decision-making process. Advocating for the family was perceived to be the responsibility of nonmedical professionals.

CONCLUSION

Decision-making can be supported by incorporating families into discussions regarding epilepsy surgery as a potential treatment option earlier in the process and by providing families with additional information and access to other parents with similar experiences.

Socioeconomic status influences time to surgery and surgical outcome in pediatric epilepsy surgery

The aims of this study were to evaluate the influence of socioeconomic status (SES) on time-to-surgery (TTS) and surgical outcome in children with treatment-resistant epilepsy in a universal health care system. The cohort consisted of children who had undergone resective epilepsy surgery between 2001 and 2013 in Canada. The patients' postal codes were linked to Statistics Canada National Household Survey data to obtain dissemination area income, which was used to infer SES. Time-to-surgery was defined as the interval from date of epilepsy onset to date of surgery. Seizure outcome was classified using ILAE classification. The associations between SES and TTS, as well as SES and surgical outcome, were assessed. Two hundred eighty-four children who had epilepsy surgery were included. Patients in the lowest income quintile had a significantly higher TTS relative to the highest income quintile (β=0.121, p=0.044). There were no significant associations between income quintiles and seizure-free surgical outcome (odds ratio (OR)=0.746-1.494, all p>0.05). However, patients in the lowest income quintile had a significantly lower odds of an improvement in seizure frequency relative to the highest income quintile (OR=0.262, p=0.046). The TTS was not uniform across SES in spite of the existence of a universal health care system. This finding highlights the need to address social and economic barriers for epilepsy surgery to improve access to this potentially curative treatment. Those with lower SES had lower likelihood of improvement in seizure control following epilepsy surgery and may require additional support including social and financial support to mitigate the discrepancies in seizure control following surgery between SES levels.

[Surgical management of epilepsy]

Epilepsy surgery raises hopes, but still remains reserved for a small number of cases of epilepsy resistant to medical treatments. It requires the involvement of multidisciplinary medical and allied health teams with expertise in this field. From the patient's admission through to their discharge, the nurse and the electroencephalogram technician have an essential role to play.

"A journey around the world": Parent narratives of the journey to pediatric resective epilepsy surgery and beyond

OBJECTIVE

Although shorter time to pediatric resective epilepsy surgery is strongly associated with greater disease severity, other nonclinical diagnostic and sociodemographic factors also play a role. We aimed to examine parent-reported barriers to timely receipt of pediatric epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

We conducted 37 interviews of parents of children who previously had resective epilepsy surgery at University of California Los Angeles (UCLA; 2006-2011). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and systematically coded using thematic analysis by two independent coders, and subsequently checked for agreement. Clinical data, including "time to surgery" (age of epilepsy onset to surgery) were abstracted from medical records.

RESULTS

The mean time to surgery was 5.3 years (standard deviation [SD] 3.8); surgery types included 32% hemispherectomy, 43% lobar/focal, and 24% multilobar. At surgery, parents were on average 38.4 years (SD 6.6) and children were on average 8.2 years (SD 4.7). The more arduous and longer aspect of the journey to surgery was perceived by parents to be experienced prior to presurgical referral. The time from second antiepileptic drug failure to presurgical referral was ≥ 1 year in 64% of children. Thematic analysis revealed four themes (with subthemes) along the journey to surgery and beyond: (1) recognition--"something is wrong" (unfamiliarity with epilepsy, identification of medical emergency); (2) searching and finding--"a circuitous journey" (information seeking, finding the right doctors, multiple medications, insurance obstacles, parental stress); (3) surgery is a viable option--"the right spot" (surgery as last resort, surgery as best option, hoping for candidacy); and (4) life now--"we took the steps we needed to" (a new life, giving back).

SIGNIFICANCE

Multipronged interventions targeting parent-, provider-, and system-based barriers should focus on the critical presurgical referral period; such interventions are needed to remediate delays and improve access to subspecialty care for children with medically refractory epilepsy and potentially eligible for surgery.

Perceptions of epilepsy surgery: a systematic review and an explanatory model of decision-making

BACKGROUND

Clear evidence supports the benefits of surgery over medical therapy for patients with refractory focal epilepsy. Surgical procedures meet the needs of fewer than 2% of those eligible. Referral to a tertiary epilepsy center early in the course of disease is recommended; however, patients live with disabling and life-threatening seizures for an average of 22years before considering surgical treatment. Reasons for this treatment gap are unclear.

PURPOSE

A critical analysis of the literature addressing perceptions of surgical treatment for epilepsy is placed in the context of a brief history and current treatment guidelines. Common conceptual themes shaping perceptions of epilepsy surgery are identified.

DATA SOURCES

Data sources used for this study were PubMed-MEDLINE and PsycINFO from 2003 to December 2013; hand searches of reference lists.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Nine papers that addressed patient perceptions of surgery for epilepsy and three papers addressing physician attitudes were reviewed. Treatment misperceptions held by both patients and physicians lead to undertreatment and serious health consequences. Fear of surgery, ignorance of treatment options, and tolerance of symptoms emerge as a triad of responses central to weighing treatment risks and benefits and, ultimately, to influencing treatment decision-making. Our novel explanatory framework serves to illustrate and explain relationships among contributory factors.

LIMITATION

Comparisons across studies are limited by the heterogeneity of study populations and by the fact that no instrument has been developed to consistently measure disability in refractory focal epilepsy.

CONCLUSION

Exploring the components of decision-making for the management of refractory focal epilepsy from the patient's perspective presents a new angle on a serious contemporary challenge in epilepsy care and may lead to explanation as to why there is reluctance to embrace a safe and effective treatment.