Seizure outcomes of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and correlations with electroencephalographic changes

Prognosis and management of acute symptomatic seizures: a prospective, multicenter, observational study

BACKGROUND

Acute symptomatic epileptic seizures are frequently seen in neurocritical care. To prevent subsequent unprovoked seizures, long-term treatments with antiseizure medications are often initiated although supporting evidence is lacking. This study aimed at prospectively assessing the risk of unprovoked seizure relapse with respect to the use of antiseizure medications. It was hypothesized that after a first acute symptomatic seizure of structural etiology, the cumulative 12-month risk of unprovoked seizure relapse is ≤ 25%.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 and acute symptomatic first-ever epileptic seizure; patients with status epilepticus were excluded. Using telephone and mail interviews, participants were followed for 12 months after the acute symptomatic first seizure. Primary endpoint was the occurrence and timing of a first unprovoked seizure relapse. In addition, neuro-intensivists in Germany were interviewed about their antiseizure treatment strategies through an anonymous online survey.

RESULTS

Eleven of 122 participants with structural etiology had an unprovoked seizure relapse, resulting in a cumulative 12-month risk of 10.7% (95%CI, 4.7%-16.7%). None of 19 participants with a non-structural etiology had a subsequent unprovoked seizure. Compared to structural etiology alone, combined infectious and structural etiology was independently associated with unprovoked seizure relapse (OR 11.1; 95%CI, 1.8-69.7). Median duration of antiseizure treatment was 3.4 months (IQR 0-9.3). Seven out of 11 participants had their unprovoked seizure relapse while taking antiseizure medication; longer treatment durations were not associated with decreased risk of unprovoked seizure relapse. Following the non-representative online survey, most neuro-intensivists consider 3 months or less of antiseizure medication to be adequate.

CONCLUSIONS

Even in case of structural etiology, acute symptomatic seizures bear a low risk of subsequent unprovoked seizures. There is still no evidence favoring long-term treatments with antiseizure medications. Hence, individual constellations with an increased risk of unprovoked seizure relapse should be identified, such as central nervous system infections causing structural brain damage. However, in the absence of high-risk features, antiseizure medications should be discontinued early to avoid overtreatment.

Long-term risk of seizure after posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Patients with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) can develop seizures during the acute phase. We sought to determine the long-term risk of seizure after PRES.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using statewide all-payer claims data from 2016-2018 from nonfederal hospitals in 11 US states. Adults admitted with PRES were compared to adults admitted with stroke, an acute cerebrovascular disorder associated with long-term risk of seizure. The primary outcome was seizure diagnosed during an emergency room visit or hospital admission after the index hospitalization. The secondary outcome was status epilepticus. Diagnoses were determined using previously validated ICD-10-CM codes. Patients with seizure diagnoses before or during the index admission were excluded. We used Cox regression to evaluate the association of PRES with seizure, adjusting for demographics and potential confounders.

RESULTS

We identified 2095 patients hospitalized with PRES and 341,809 with stroke. Median follow-up was 0.9 years (IQR, 0.3-1.7) in the PRES group and 1.0 years (IQR, 0.4-1.8) in the stroke group. Crude seizure incidence per 100 person-years was 9.5 after PRES and 2.5 after stroke. After adjustment for demographics and comorbidities, patients with PRES had a higher risk of seizure than patients with stroke (HR, 2.9; 95% CI, 2.6-3.4). Results were unchanged in a sensitivity analysis that applied a two-week washout period to mitigate detection bias. A similar relationship was observed for the secondary outcome of status epilepticus.

INTERPRETATION

PRES was associated with an increased long-term risk of subsequent acute care utilization for seizure compared to stroke.

Application of Machine Learning Methods for Epilepsy Risk Ranking in Patients with Hematopoietic Malignancies Using

Machine learning methods to predict the risk of epilepsy, including vascular epilepsy, in oncohematological patients are currently considered promising. These methods are used in research to predict pharmacoresistant epilepsy and surgical treatment outcomes in order to determine the epileptogenic zone and functional neural systems in patients with epilepsy, as well as to develop new approaches to classification and perform other tasks. This paper presents the results of applying machine learning to analyzing data and developing diagnostic models of epilepsy in oncohematological and cardiovascular patients. This study contributes to solving the problem of often unjustified diagnosis of primary epilepsy in patients with oncohematological or cardiovascular pathology, prescribing antiseizure drugs to patients with single seizure syndromes without finding a disease associated with these cases. We analyzed the hospital database of the V.A. Almazov Scientific Research Center of the Ministry of Health of Russia. The study included 66,723 treatment episodes of patients with vascular diseases (I10–I15, I61–I69, I20–I25) and 16,383 episodes with malignant neoplasms of lymphoid, hematopoietic, and related tissues (C81–C96 according to ICD-10) for the period from 2010 to 2020. Data analysis and model calculations indicate that the best result was shown by gradient boosting with mean accuracy cross-validation score = 0.96. f1-score = 98, weighted avg precision = 93, recall = 96, f1-score = 94. The highest correlation coefficient for G40 and different clinical conditions was achieved with fibrillation, hypertension, stenosis or occlusion of the precerebral arteries (0.16), cerebral sinus thrombosis (0.089), arterial hypertension (0.17), age (0.03), non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (0.07), atrial fibrillation (0.05), delta absolute neutrophil count (0.05), platelet count at discharge (0.04), transfusion volume for stem cell transplantation (0.023). From the clinical point of view, the identified differences in the importance of predictors in a broader patient model are consistent with a practical algorithm for organic brain damage. Atrial fibrillation is one of the leading factors in the development of both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. At the same time, brain infarction can be accompanied both by the development of epileptic seizures in the acute period and by unprovoked epileptic seizures and development of epilepsy in the early recovery and in a longer period. In addition, a microembolism of the left heart chambers can lead to multiple microfocal lesions of the brain, which is one of the pathogenetic aspects of epilepsy in elderly patients. The presence of precordial fibrillation requires anticoagulant therapy, the use of which increases the risk of both spontaneous and traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.

Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy in Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy: Experience from a Single Center

BACKGROUND

Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is frequently encountered in sepsis and is often accompanied by neuroimaging findings indicating ischemia, hemorrhage, and edema. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) has been vastly underrecognized in previously reported cohorts of patients with sepsis and SAE. Our aim was to determine the prevalence and distinguishing clinical, neuroimaging, and electroencephalography features of PRES in SAE.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, patients with radiologically identified PRES were selected from a consecutively enrolled cohort of 156 patients with SAE and assessed for neurological outcome using the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale for 12 months. Patients with SAE and PRES and other types of brain lesions were compared in terms of clinical and diagnostic workup features.

RESULTS

Fourteen of 156 patients (8.9%) were determined to be radiologically compatible with PRES, whereas 48 patients displayed other types of acute brain lesions. Patients with PRES often showed lesions in atypical regions, including frontal lobes, the corpus callosum, and the basal ganglia. Source of infection was mostly gram-negative bacteria originating from pneumonia or intraabdominal infections. Patients with PRES were not different from other patients with SAE with brain lesions in terms of features of sepsis and neurological outcome. However, patients with PRES showed increased prevalence of seizures and intraabdominal source of infection.

CONCLUSIONS

PRES is highly prevalent in SAE, often encompasses unusual brain regions, and usually presents with generalized seizures. Patients with SAE and PRES do not appear to have distinguishing clinical and diagnostic workup features. However, generalized seizures may serve as warning signs for presence of PRES in patients with SAE.

Mesial Temporal Sclerosis as Late Consequence of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome in Pediatric Hemato-oncologic Patients

OBJECTIVES

Drug resistant epilepsy has rarely been reported following posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), with few cases of mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS). The aim of this study was to report clinical and neuroimaging features of MTS subsequent to PRES in hemato-oncologic/stem cell transplanted children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among 70 children treated in 2 pediatric hemato-oncologic Italian centers between 1994 and 2018 and presenting an episode of PRES, we retrospectively identified and analyzed a subgroup of patients who developed epilepsy and MTS.

RESULTS

Nine of 70 patients (12.8%) developed post-PRES persistent seizures with magnetic resonance imaging evidence of MTS. One patient died few months after MTS diagnosis, because of hematologic complications; the remaining 8 patients showed unprovoked seizures over time leading to the diagnosis of epilepsy, focal in all and drug resistant in 4. At PRES diagnosis, all patients with further evidence of epilepsy and MTS suffered of convulsive seizures, evolving into status epilepticus in 3. In 3 patients a borderline cognitive level or intellectual disability were diagnosed after the onset of epilepsy, and 2 had behavioral problems impacting their quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

MTS and long-term focal epilepsy, along with potential cognitive and behavioral disorders, are not uncommon in older pediatric patients following PRES.

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome with a special focus on seizures

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a neurological disorder characterized by headache, seizures, confusion and visual disturbances, as well as potentially reversible neuroimaging findings in most patients after proper treatment. Seizures is one of the most common clinical presentations of PRES. This review summarizes the potential pathophysiology and clinical features of PRES, as well as a multimodal approach to imaging and also briefly discusses the phenomenon of seizures in paediatric population.

Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome: Clinical Features and Outcome

Background: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is an acute neurotoxic syndrome that is characterized by a spectrum neurological and radiological feature from various risk factors. Common neurological symptoms includes headache, impairment in level of consciousness, seizures, visual disturbances, and focal neurological deficits. Common triggering factors include blood pressure fluctuations, renal failure, eclampsia, exposure to immunosuppressive or cytotoxic agents and autoimmune disorders. The classic radiographic findings include bilateral subcortical vasogenic edema predominantly affecting the parieto-occipital regions but atypical features include involvement of other regions, cortical involvement, restricted diffusion, hemorrhage, contrast enhancement. This review is aimed to summarize the updated knowledge on the typical and atypical clinical and imaging features, prognostic markers and identify gaps in literature for future research.

Methods: Systematic literature review using PUBMED search from 1990 to 2019 was performed using terms PRES was performed.

Results: While clinical and radiographic reversibility is common, long-standing morbidity and mortality can occur in severe forms. In patients with malignant forms of PRES, aggressive care has markedly reduced mortality and improved functional outcomes. Although seizures were common, epilepsy is rare. Various factors that have been associated with poor outcome include altered sensorium, hypertensive etiology, hyperglycemia, longer time to control the causative factor, elevated C reactive protein, coagulopathy, extensive cerebral edema, and hemorrhage on imaging.

Conclusion: Large prospective studies that accurately predict factors that are associated with poor outcomes, determine the pathophysiology, and targeted therapy are required.

Clinical Correlates of Periodic Discharges and Nonconvulsive Seizures in Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES)

IMPORTANCE

The pathophysiological mechanisms of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) and related seizures remain poorly understood. The prevalence and clinical significance of nonconvulsive seizures (NCSz) and related epileptiform patterns during continuous electroencephalography monitoring (CEEG) in PRES have not been well described.

OBJECTIVE

To report the prevalence, characteristics and risk factors for NCSz and related highly epileptiform patterns in patients with PRES, and to determine their relation to imaging abnormalities and outcome.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

From a prospective CEEG database, we retrospectively identified patients with PRES and reviewed their medical charts. Based on CEEG findings, we designed a retrospective cohort study comparing two groups defined based on the presence or the absence of NCSz and/or periodic discharges (PDs).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The prevalence and risk factors for PDs and NCSz, description of EEG and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities and functional outcome as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Among 37 eligible patients, 23 (62%) had PDs or NCSz. The presence of NCSz was associated with the presence of PDs (15/22 vs. 1/15; p = 0.0002). NCSz and PDs were usually either lateralized or bilateral independent and predominated in the posterior regions. No clinical features were associated with the occurrence of PDs or NCSz. Cortical restricted diffusion on MRI was more frequent in the PDs/NCSz group (17/23 vs. 1/14; p < 0.001). PDs/NCSz were associated with worse outcome, with 3 deaths vs. 0 in the no PDs/NCSz group and fewer cases with low disability (4 vs. 9 cases with GOS = 5, p < 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Our results reveal a high prevalence of NCSz and PDs in critically ill patients with PRES and an association with restricted diffusion and worse outcome, whether treating or preventing these EEG findings can improve outcome requires further research.

EEG Findings in Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome

Introduction. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a relatively common cause of encephalopathy in the hospital setting, and the EEG findings have not been well described. The purpose of this study was to review the EEG findings in a series of patients with PRES. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed our electronic medical record database to identify patients who received a diagnosis of PRES at Tampa General Hospital from January 2016 to October 2017. The diagnosis of PRES was suspected on clinical presentation and confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging. We selected patients with PRES who had received at least 1 EEG. EEGs were interpreted by 2 board-certified electroencephalographers. Results. From January 2016 to October 2017, 19 patients were diagnosed with PRES at Tampa General Hospital. Of those, 10 received at least 1 EEG. Four patients were male, 6 were female. The ages ranged from 21 to 87 (mean was 47). The patients had the following clinical presentations: 5 with encephalopathy, 8 with seizures, 2 with vision changes, and 3 with headache (some patients had more than 1 symptom). EEGs findings were as follows: 3 were normal; 3 showed intermittent generalized slowing; 2 showed continuous generalized slowing; 3 showed background slowing; 1 showed background suppression; 1 showed generalized rhythmic delta activity (GRDA); 1 showed GRDA, plus spike/sharp-wave discharges; 1 showed generalized periodic discharges. The etiologies were as follows: 9 from hypertension, 1 secondary to eclampsia, 3 due to posttransplant immunosuppression, and 1 patient was undergoing chemotherapy (some were multifactorial). Conclusion. EEG findings in PRES are diverse, with no specific or even predominant pattern, based on this small sample size.

Prognostic factors and seizure outcome in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) in children with hematological malignancies and bone marrow failure: A retrospective monocentric study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate seizure outcome in children with hematological malignancies and PRES and to identify prognostic factors that could help manage the syndrome.

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed the report data of 21 patients diagnosed with hematological malignancy or aplastic anemia and PRES between 2008 and 2018. Basic demographic data, oncology treatment, presymptomatic hypertension before PRES manifestation, neurological status, seizure type, and EEG and MRI findings at PRES onset and at the one-year follow-up visit were studied. Patients who developed remote symptomatic seizures or epilepsy were identified.

RESULTS

We included 21 children (11 females and 10 males) in the study. Sixteen patients (76.2%) were diagnosed with ALL and the rest individually with AML, CML, T-lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma, and severe aplastic anemia. Presymptomatic hypertension (PSH) was evaluated in 19 patients and was present in 18 (94.7%). The duration was 9 h and more in 16 patients (88.8%); the severity was grade II in 12 patients (66.7%). Seizures as the initial symptom of PRES were present in 17 patients (80.9%). Four patients (19.0%) were assessed with remote symptomatic seizures. Two of them (9.5%) had ongoing seizures at the one-year follow-up visit and were diagnosed with epilepsy. The presence of gliosis on follow-up MRI indicated worse outcome with development of epilepsy (without statistical significance).

CONCLUSIONS

PRES syndrome has an overall good prognosis and the evolution to epilepsy is rare. The severity and duration of PSH or seizure severity and EEG findings at PRES onsetwere not associated with worse neurological outcomes in this study.

Hypertension, seizures, and epilepsy: a review on pathophysiology and management

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy and hypertension are common chronic conditions, both showing high prevalence in older age groups. This review outlines current experimental and clinical evidence on both direct and indirect role of hypertension in epileptogenesis and discusses the principles of drug treatment in patients with hypertension and epilepsy.

METHODS

We selected English-written articles on epilepsy, hypertension, stroke, and cerebrovascular disease until December, 2018.

RESULTS

Renin-angiotensin system might play a central role in the direct interaction between hypertension and epilepsy, but other mechanisms may be contemplated. Large-artery stroke, small vessel disease and posterior reversible leukoencephalopathy syndrome are hypertension-related brain lesions able to determine epilepsy by indirect mechanisms. The role of hypertension as an independent risk factor for post-stroke epilepsy has not been demonstrated. The role of hypertension-related small vessel disease in adult-onset epilepsy has been demonstrated. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome is an acute condition, often caused by a hypertensive crisis, associated with the occurrence of acute symptomatic seizures. Chronic antiepileptic treatment should consider the risk of drug-drug interactions with antihypertensives.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence from preclinical and clinical studies supports the vision that hypertension may be a cause of seizures and epilepsy through direct or indirect mechanisms. In both post-stroke epilepsy and small vessel disease-associated epilepsy, chronic antiepileptic treatment is recommended. In posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome blood pressure must be rapidly lowered and prompt antiepileptic treatment should be initiated.

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome possibly induced by pemetrexed maintenance therapy for lung cancer: a case report and literature review

Introduction Advances in systemic chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy have extended and improved the quality of life of patients with cancer. However, the central nervous system is very susceptible to complications of systemic cancer and its treatment. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a rare clinical and neuroradiologic entity which has garnered increasing recognition in the past two decades. Cancer patients are generally treated with cytotoxic agents, immunotherapy, molecular targeted therapies or glucosteroids which are more frequently associated with PRES. Case presentation A 59-year old female, known with a relapse of her lung adenocarcinoma, had been treated with 4 cycles of cisplatin (75 mg/m²) and pemetrexed (500 mg/m²). Six weeks after this combination chemotherapy and within 28 h after the administration of pemetrexed maintenance therapy, she developed a generalised epileptic insult. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed bilateral areas of increased signal intensity in the subcortical parietal and frontal white matter. She was treated with a broad spectrum antiseizure drug, levetiracetam 750 mg twice daily and strict control of blood pressure. Discussion Diagnosis of PRES should be considered in all patients with neurologic symptoms who are at risk to develop PRES. It is crucial to establish the diagnosis as soon as possible since there is no specific treatment of PRES other than correction of the underlying risk factors and preventing seizure recurrence. Administration of pemetrexed is a possible risk factor for the development of PRES.

Controversy of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: what have we learnt in the last 20 years?

Over two decades have passed since posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) was first described in 1996. It has becoming increasingly recognised because of improved and more readily available imaging modality. The exact pathophysiological mechanism is not completely understood and remains controversial at present. Precise diagnosis is essential to guide prompt, proper management. Our ability of differentiating it from other acute neurological disorders is likely to improve as we learnt more about the spectrum of this entity in the last 20 years. We emphasise the importance of recognising its diagnostic criteria and biomarker, which would be of great relevance to either outcome evaluation or study design. PRES has a favourable prognosis generally, but neurological sequelae and even fatalities can occur, especially in severe forms that might cause substantial morbidity and even mortality, particularly when the syndrome is complicated by intracranial haemorrhage or brain infarction. In this review, the pathophysiology, approach to diagnosis, some controversies as to the prognosis, as well as the future research direction of PRES are described.

Anti-Angiogenic Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Reversible Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome: Could Hypomagnesaemia Be the Trigger?

Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome (RPLS), also known frequently as posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), is a characteristic acute neuro-radiology syndrome with clinical presentation that typically includes acute hypertension, seizures and other neurological symptoms and signs. Many patients with RPLS have (a history of) pre-existing hypertension and in receipt of diuretics. It is being diagnosed more frequently and in association with an increasing number of morbidities and medications. Drugs most frequently implicated are immunosuppressant drugs and anticancer agents, including a number of anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Hypomagnesaemia is a frequent finding at presentation in RPLS patients, which is known to lead to or aggravate hypertension. Pre-eclampsia, a variant of RPLS, responds effectively to intravenous magnesium. Cyclosporin, tacrolimus and some TKIs that induce RPLS are also known to give rise to both hypertension and hypomagnesaemia. This raises an interesting hypothesis that hypomagnesaemia may play a contributory role in triggering RPLS in some patients by acutely raising the blood pressure further. Additional systematic studies are required to test this hypothesis. If the hypothesis is confirmed, hypomagnesaemia offers an effective target for risk mitigation and prevention of RPLS in patients identified at risk.

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome

The posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a neurological disorder of (sub)acute onset characterized by varied neurological symptoms, which may include headache, impaired visual acuity or visual field deficits, disorders of consciousness, confusion, seizures, and focal neurological deficits. In a majority of patients the clinical presentation includes elevated arterial blood pressure up to hypertensive emergencies. Neuroimaging, in particular magnetic resonance imaging, frequently shows a distinctive parieto-occipital pattern with a symmetric distribution of changes reflecting vasogenic edema. PRES frequently develops in the context of cytotoxic medication, (pre)eclampsia, sepsis, renal disease or autoimmune disorders. The treatment is symptomatic and is determined by the underlying condition. The overall prognosis is favorable, since clinical symptoms as well as imaging lesions are reversible in most patients. However, neurological sequelae including long-term epilepsy may persist in individual cases.

[Research advances of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in children]

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a clinico-neuroradiological entity affecting the posterior brain, i.e. occipital and parietal lobes. The syndrome are characterized by headaches, altered mental status, seizures, and visual disturbances. Although the pathogenesis remains unclear, endothelial dysfunction may be a key factor. The basic disease may play a crucial role in the incidence of PRES. In most cases, PRES resolves spontaneously and patients show both clinical and radiological improvements. In severe forms, PRES might cause substantial morbidity with sequel and even mortality, as a result of acute hemorrhage or massive posterior fossa edema causing obstructive hydrocephalus or brainstem compression. Early identification, active and appropriate treatment is very important.

Predictors of seizures in patients with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome

PURPOSE

Although seizures are common in patients with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), epilepsy is rare. Our objective was to identify predictors and impact of seizures in patients with PRES.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the clinical and radiological parameters of all patients diagnosed with PRES from 2007 to 2014 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the occurrence of PRES-related seizures at presentation or during their hospital course. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors associated with the occurrence of PRES-related seizures.

RESULTS

Of 100 patients, 70% experienced at least one seizure from PRES. On univariate analysis, the factors associated with seizures were the following: high Charlson comorbidity index (4.16±2.89 vs. 2.87±2.20, p=0.03), systemic malignancy (41.4% vs. 16.7%, p=0.02), occipital lobe involvement (97.1% vs. 83.3%, p=0.02), more lobes involved (4.6±1.48 vs. 3.9±1.32, p=0.03) but less likely in patients with visual disturbances (15.7% vs. 46.7%, p=0.005), and facial droop (12.9% vs. 16.7%, p=0.002). On multivariate analysis, only occipital lobe involvement was significantly (odds ratio: 9.63, 95% CI: 1.45-64.10, p=0.02) associated with the occurrence of PRES-related seizures. Despite the occurrence of seizures, they were less likely to require a nursing home placement upon hospital discharge (odds ratio: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.03-0.91, p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that seizures are common in patients with occipital lobe involvement from PRES.

Development of epilepsy after posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome

PURPOSE

This study was intended to describe the risk of epilepsy subsequent to posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) and the clinical features of post-PRES epilepsy.

METHOD

We retrospectively identified all patients with PRES who were admitted to Severance Hospital and consulted with the Department of Neurology between 2001 and 2013 and the subgroup of these patients who subsequently developed epilepsy. We also describe clinical features of patients who were not treated with PRES as inpatients at our center but who presented later with post-PRES epilepsy during the study period. We studied clinical characteristics during the acute symptomatic phase of PRES and after the development of epilepsy.

RESULTS

During the study period 102 patients were treated at our center during the acute phase of PRES. Four of these patients (3.9%) subsequently developed epilepsy. Two additional patients with a history of PRES presented to our hospital after the acute phase of their illness with post-PRES epilepsy. During the acute phase, five of six patients had acute symptomatic seizures and four had convulsive or nonconvulsive status epilepticus (SE). Acute phase MRI showed cytotoxic edema in five patients, and follow-up MRI showed focal atrophic changes including hippocampal sclerosis in four. Presumptive epileptogenic foci were located in the left-side temporal, parietal and occipital lobes, corresponding to the regions that showed cytotoxic edema or severe vasogenic edema as well as with the location or lateralization of EEG abnormalities during the acute phase.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate a small but not insignificant risk for the development of epilepsy after PRES. The presence of cytotoxic edema and severe, acute symptomatic seizures, such as SE suggests irreversible brain damage and may predict the development of epilepsy.