Assessment of driving outcomes after epilepsy surgery

Factors associated with patients not proceeding with proposed resective epilepsy surgery

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the association between eligible patients not proceeding with resective epilepsy surgery and various demographic, disease-specific, and epilepsy-evaluation variables.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study included patients identified as candidates for resective epilepsy surgery at the Montefiore Medical Center between January 1, 2009 and June 30, 2017. Chi-squared, two-tailed, independent sample t-test, Mann-Whitney U test and logistic regression were utilized to identify variables associated with patients not proceeding with surgery.

RESULTS

Among the 159 potential surgical candidates reviewed over the 8.5-year study period, only 53 ultimately proceeded with surgery (33%). Eighty-seven (55%) out of these 159 patients were identified as appropriate for resective epilepsy surgery during the study period. Thirty-four (39%) of these 87 patients did not proceed with surgery. Variables independently correlated (either positively or negatively) with the patient not proceeding with surgery were: being employed [Odds Ratio (OR) 4.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-15.73], temporal lobe lesion on MRI (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.14-0.84), temporal lobe EEG ictal onsets (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.07-0.62), and temporal lobe epileptogenic zone (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.55).

CONCLUSION

The novel finding in this study is the association between employment status and whether the patient had epilepsy surgery: employed patients were 4.2 times more likely to not proceed with surgery compared to unemployed patients. In addition, patients with a temporal lobe lesion on MRI, temporal lobe EEG ictal onsets, and/or a temporal epileptogenic zone were more likely to proceed with surgery. Future work will be needed to evaluate these findings prospectively, determine if they generalize to other patient populations, explore the decision whether or not to proceed with epilepsy surgery from a patient-centered perspective, and suggest strategies to reduce barriers to this underutilized treatment.

Who is driving and who is prone to have traffic accidents? A systematic review and meta-analysis among people with seizures

INTRODUCTION

Epilepsy influences the ability to drive. We aimed to systematically summarize factors associated with driving, holding a driver's license, and traffic accidents among people with seizures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eight databases were searched (from their inception to 27 June 2018). We included all published observational studies, except for case reports and studies with fewer than 50 participants. Pooled mean differences and pooled risk ratios (pRRs) with corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random effects.

RESULTS

Data were available from 18 studies, reporting a wide range of factors. There were frequent biases associated with cross-sectional study designs, selection bias, poor statistical quality, small samples, and lack of validation of models. The following six variables were consistently associated with driving: male gender (pRR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.23 to 1.64), being in paid work (pRR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.46 to 2.03), married (pRR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.57), older age at seizure onset or diagnosis (pooled mean difference: 4.83; 95% CI: 0.48 to 9.18 years), less frequent seizures (fewer than monthly, pRR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.56), and taking one or no antiepileptic drug (pRR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.63). Lower seizure frequency was also protective for avoiding traffic accidents (pRR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.66).

DISCUSSION

Stable multivariate models to predict driving or traffic accidents among people with seizures have not yet been developed. Current evidence shows that the likelihood of driving is associated with demographic and epilepsy-related factors, while the risk of traffic accidents is associated with seizure frequency.

Psychosocial outcome in epilepsy after extratemporal surgery

OBJECTIVE

Only limited data exist on psychosocial long-term outcome after epilepsy surgery in patients with extratemporal epilepsy. The aim of this study was to investigate psychosocial outcome after extratemporal epilepsy surgery and to assess factors predicting favorable outcome.

METHOD

Sixty-five out of 104 eligible patients who had undergone extratemporal epilepsy surgery at our epilepsy center between 1990 and 2015 (mean age: 42.2. years; 75% of the resections in the frontal lobe) completed a questionnaire asking about seizure status, employment status, marital and living situation, driving status, depressive symptoms, and quality of life (QOL). Follow-up was on average 9.2years after surgery (range: 1-26years).

RESULTS

Thirty-eight (58%) patients were free of disabling seizures (Engel class I), and 28 (43%) have not experienced any seizures after surgery (Engel class IA). Employment rate in the primary labor market remained at 45%, but more patients lost employment (14%) than gained employment (8%). Postoperative employment was predicted by preoperative employment (p=.007), seizure freedom (p=.025), older age at seizure onset (p=.018), younger age at follow-up (p=.035), and female gender (p=.048). Seizure-free patients were more likely to be driving; have a partner, particularly in males; and have lower depressive scores. Quality of life at follow-up was best predicted by employment (p=.012), partnership (p=.025), and seizure freedom (p=.025). In contrast, recurrence of seizures and early seizure onset were associated with poor psychosocial outcome, particularly in men.

CONCLUSION

The study provides support that extratemporal surgery can lead to improved QOL and favorable psychosocial outcome. Seizure freedom is important but not the only determinant of good psychosocial outcome.

Visual field defects following different resective procedures for mesiotemporal lobe epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

One of the most common side effects of mesiotemporal lobe resection in patients with medically intractable epilepsy are visual field defects (VFD). While peripheral defects usually remain unnoticed by patients, extended VFD influence daily life activities and can, in particular, affect driving regulations. This study had been designed to evaluate frequency and extent of VFD following different surgical approaches to the mesiotemporal area with respect to the ability to drive.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study comprises a consecutive series of 366 patients operated at the Epilepsy Center in Freiburg for intractable mesiotemporal lobe epilepsy from 1998 to 2016. The following procedures were performed: standard anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL: n=134; 37%), anterior temporal or keyhole resection (KH: n=53; 15%), and selective amygdalohippocampectomy via the transsylvian (tsAHE: n=145; 40%) and the subtemporal (ssAHE: n=34; 9%) approach. Frequency and extent of postoperative VFD were evaluated in relation to different surgical procedures. According to the German driving guidelines, postoperative VFD were classified as driving-relevant VFD with the involvement of absolute, homonymous central scotoma within 20° and driving-irrelevant VFD with either none or exclusively minor VFD sparing the center.

RESULTS

Postoperative visual field examinations were available in 276 of 366 cases. Postoperative VFD were observed in 202 of 276 patients (73%) and were found to be driving-relevant in 133 of 276 patients (48%), whereas 69 patients (25%) showed VFD irrelevant for driving. Visual field defects were significantly less likely following ssAHE compared with other temporal resections, and if present, they were less frequently driving-relevant (p<0.05), irrespective of the side of surgery.

CONCLUSION

Subtemporal sAHE (ssAHE) caused significantly less frequently and less severely driving-relevant VFD compared with all other approaches to the temporal lobe, irrespective of the side of surgery.