Extracurricular participation among children with epilepsy in Canada

Family factors associated with participation of children with disabilities: a systematic review

AIM

The aim of this review was to synthesize empirical evidence of family factors associated with participation of children with disabilities aged 5 to 12 years to inform the development of family-centred participation-fostering interventions.

METHOD

A systematic search was performed for articles published in English between 2001 and 2017 in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, and ASSIA following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Quality of evidence was appraised using the Research Triangle Institute Item Bank. Family factors associated with participation were identified and assessed using a multistage 'semi-quantitative' approach.

RESULTS

Thirty studies were included in the review. Four non-modifiable 'status' factors consistently associated with participation were parental ethnicity, parental education, family type, and family socio-economic status. Six modifiable 'process' factors with consistent associations with participation were parental mental and physical health functioning, parental self-efficacy beliefs, parental support, parental time, family preferences, and activity orientation.

INTERPRETATION

Rehabilitation professionals should direct their focus towards modifiable family factors as primary targets for family-centred interventions. Strategies that can improve families' access to information, counselling, and community support services are likely to support children's participation by empowering families and optimizing their health and well-being.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Non-modifiable 'status' and modifiable 'process' factors are important in participation of children with disabilities. Disadvantaged family circumstances shaped by status factors are associated with reduced participation. Key process factors for intervention are parental mental and physical health and parental self-efficacy beliefs. Other important process factors for intervention are parental support and time, family preferences, and activity orientation.

Socioeconomic Status and Pediatric Neurologic Disorders: Current Evidence

Socioeconomic status (SES) is an important risk factor for many neurological disorders and a determinant of health outcomes and quality of life, especially for individuals with neurologic disorders and developmental disabilities. This article focuses on the relationship between SES and pediatric epilepsy, cerebral palsy, autism spectrum disorder, and intellectual disability. Disparities in the prevalence and long-term impact of SES on functioning in persons with disabilities are observed worldwide. Clinicians can use the information presented in the article to target early identification and interventions for improving outcomes in populations most at risk for these disorders and for poor health, social, and economic outcomes.

Patient-reported quality of life and biopsychosocial health outcomes in pediatric epilepsy: An update for healthcare providers

In the 21st century, clinicians are expected to listen to, and understand their patients' views about, their conditions and the effects that these conditions have on their functioning, values, life goals, and welfare. The goals of this review are as follows: (i) to inform, update, and guide clinicians caring for children with epilepsy about developments in the content and new methods of research on patient-reported outcomes, quality of life, and functioning; and (ii) to discuss the value of using these concepts to explore the impact of diverse interventions that are implemented in daily practice. Drawing on the literature and our program of research over the past two decades, we focus on our current understanding of a variety of health concepts and recently acquired knowledge about their significance for the lives of patients and their families. We discuss the advantages of measuring patient-reported outcomes that tell us what is important to patients. We advise on what characteristics to look for when choosing a patient-reported measure, and the relevance of these considerations. In addition, we address gaps in research knowledge and the causes of confusion that have limited their use in our daily clinical practice.