1
|
Driessen J, Wammes–van der Heijden E, Verschuure P, Fasen K, Teunissen M, Majoie H. Effectiveness and tolerability of lacosamide in children with drug resistant epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav Rep 2022; 21:100574. [PMID: 36545476 PMCID: PMC9762192 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebr.2022.100574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We retrospectively studied the efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide (LCM) in children with drug-resistant epilepsy in a tertiary care centre in the Netherlands, from 2013 till 2019, with a follow-up of two years. 79 children, aged < 18 years, were included. Retention rate, effectiveness, reason for termination, and side-effects were analysed. Furthermore, prognostic variables for discontinuation as well as the incidence of side-effects were determined. The LCM retention rate and effectiveness of response were analysed at three, twelve and twenty-four months. The retention rate of LCM was respectively 89.9 %, 68.4 % and 54.4 %. LCM gave an effective response in 60.5 %, 67.9 % and 71.4 % of the participants who were still using LCM at the three follow-up periods. Lack of efficacy was most frequently reported as a reason for discontinuation (58.3 %). Side-effects occurred in 50.6 % of the patients, somnolence (18.2 %) being the most common, followed by behavioural changes (15.6 %), headache (9.1 %) and dizziness (9.1 %). Use of ≥ 1 sodium channel blocker (SCB) was associated with an increased risk (OR = 4.038) of side-effects. An increasing number of anti-seizure medications (ASM) was associated with a reduced risk (OR = 0.524) of stopping LCM. To conclude, LCM is an effective ASM with acceptable side-effects in children with drug-resistant epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J.T. Driessen
- Department of Research and Development, Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe, Post address: Sterkselseweg 65, 5591 VE Heeze, The Netherlands,School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - E.A. Wammes–van der Heijden
- Department of Research and Development, Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe, Post address: Sterkselseweg 65, 5591 VE Heeze, The Netherlands,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | - P. Verschuure
- Laboratory for Clinical Chemistry and Pharmacology, Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe, Heeze, The Netherlands
| | - K.C.F.M. Fasen
- Department of Research and Development, Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe, Post address: Sterkselseweg 65, 5591 VE Heeze, The Netherlands,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Anna Hospital, Geldrop, The Netherlands
| | - M.W.A. Teunissen
- Department of Research and Development, Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe, Post address: Sterkselseweg 65, 5591 VE Heeze, The Netherlands
| | - H.J.M. Majoie
- Department of Research and Development, Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe, Post address: Sterkselseweg 65, 5591 VE Heeze, The Netherlands,School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands,MHeNS, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Corresponding author at: Department of Research and Development, Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe, Post address: Sterkselseweg 65, 5591 VE Heeze, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Efficacy and safety of adjunctive cenobamate: post-hoc analysis of study C017 in patients grouped by mechanism of action of concomitant antiseizure medications. Seizure 2022; 96:86-93. [DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2022.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
3
|
Ganorkar SB, Chaudhari SR, Bobade PS, Pawar SM, Shirkhedkar AA. HPLC‐PDA Identification and Resolution of Rufinamide Forced Degradation Impurities: A Congregated Chemometric Expedite Optimization Coupled with Factorials & Desirability. Biomed Chromatogr 2022; 36:e5345. [DOI: 10.1002/bmc.5345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Saurabh B. Ganorkar
- Central Instruments Facility, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, R. C. Patel Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research Shirpur MS India
| | - Suraj R. Chaudhari
- Central Instruments Facility, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, R. C. Patel Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research Shirpur MS India
| | - Preeti S. Bobade
- Department of Quality Assurance, R. C. Patel Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research Shirpur MS India
| | - Sagar M. Pawar
- Central Instruments Facility, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, R. C. Patel Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research Shirpur MS India
| | - Atul A. Shirkhedkar
- Central Instruments Facility, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, R. C. Patel Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research Shirpur MS India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Carona A, Bicker J, Silva R, Fonseca C, Falcão A, Fortuna A. Pharmacology of lacosamide: From its molecular mechanisms and pharmacokinetics to future therapeutic applications. Life Sci 2021; 275:119342. [PMID: 33713668 DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Epilepsy is one of the most common brain disorders, affecting more than 50 million people worldwide. Although its treatment is currently symptomatic, the last generation of anti-seizure drugs is characterized by better pharmacokinetic profiles, efficacy, tolerability and safety. Lacosamide is a third-generation anti-seizure drug that stands out due to its good efficacy and safety profile. It is used with effectiveness in the treatment of partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization, primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures and off-label in status epilepticus. Despite scarcely performed until today, therapeutic drug monitoring of lacosamide is proving to be advantageous by allowing the control of inter and intra-individual variability and promoting a successful personalized therapy, particularly in special populations. Herein, the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical data of lacosamide were reviewed, giving special emphasis to the latest molecular investigations underlying its mechanism of action and therapeutic applications in pathologies besides epilepsy. In addition, the pharmacokinetic characteristics of lacosamide were updated, as well as current literature concerning the high pharmacokinetic variability observed in special patient populations and that must be considered during treatment individualization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreia Carona
- University of Coimbra, Faculty of Pharmacy, Coimbra, Portugal; University of Coimbra, Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Joana Bicker
- University of Coimbra, Faculty of Pharmacy, Coimbra, Portugal; University of Coimbra, Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Rui Silva
- University of Coimbra, Faculty of Pharmacy, Coimbra, Portugal; University of Coimbra, Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Carla Fonseca
- University of Coimbra, Faculty of Pharmacy, Coimbra, Portugal; University of Coimbra, Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Amílcar Falcão
- University of Coimbra, Faculty of Pharmacy, Coimbra, Portugal; University of Coimbra, Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Ana Fortuna
- University of Coimbra, Faculty of Pharmacy, Coimbra, Portugal; University of Coimbra, Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research, Coimbra, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Janmohamed M, Lawn N, Spilsbury K, Chan J, Dunne J. Starting a new anti-seizure medication in drug-resistant epilepsy: Add-on or substitute? Epilepsia 2020; 62:228-237. [PMID: 33236785 DOI: 10.1111/epi.16765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 11/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Randomized studies in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) typically involve addition of a new anti-seizure medication (ASM). However, in clinical practice, if the patient is already taking multiple ASMs, then substitution of one of the current ASMs commonly occurs, despite little evidence supporting this approach. METHODS Longitudinal prospective study of seizure outcome after commencing a previously untried ASM in patients with DRE. Multivariable time-to-event and logistic regression models were used to evaluate outcomes by whether the new ASM was introduced by addition or substitution. RESULTS A total of 816 ASM changes in 436 adult patients with DRE between 2010 and 2018 were analyzed. The new ASM was added on 407 (50.1%) occasions and substituted on 409 (49.9%). Mean patient follow-up was 3.2 years. Substitution was more likely if the new ASM was enzyme-inducing or in patients with a greater number of concurrent ASMs. ASM add-on was more likely if a γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) agonist was introduced or if the patient had previously trialed a higher number of ASMs. The rate of discontinuation due to lack of tolerability was similar between the add-on and substitution groups. No difference between the add-on and substitution ASM introduction strategies was observed for the primary outcome of ≥50% seizure reduction at 12 months. SIGNIFICANCE Adding or substituting a new ASM in DRE has the same influence on seizure outcomes. The findings confirm that ASM alterations in DRE can be individualized according to concurrent ASM therapy and patient characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mubeen Janmohamed
- WA Adult Epilepsy Service, Perth, WA, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | | | - Katrina Spilsbury
- Institute for Health Research, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia
| | | | - John Dunne
- WA Adult Epilepsy Service, Perth, WA, Australia.,School of Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital Unit, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lacosamide in patients with intellectual disability and refractory epilepsy. Acta Neurol Belg 2019; 119:423-430. [PMID: 30840220 DOI: 10.1007/s13760-019-01098-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/13/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of lacosamide (LCM) in residential patients at our epilepsy centre. We assessed retrospectively 80 patients (mean age 36.2 years, range 18-63 years; 29 female) with intellectual disability (ID) and drug-resistant epilepsy using an industry-independent, non-interventional study design based on standardised seizure records. Evaluation, including calculation of retention rate, was carried out for the intervals 3-6, 9-12 and 21-24 months after LCM initiation. The Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI) was used to allow assessment of qualitative changes in seizure severity and clinical status. CGI improved for 61% of the patients. The responder rate was 48%; ten patients (13%) became seizure free. The response was not related to the degree of ID. The retention rates after 12 and 24 months were 71% and 65%, and were significantly lower in patients taking other sodium-channel blockers (SCBs; 76% vs. 55%). The occurrence of adverse events (AEs) was related to the administration of concomitant SCBs (48% with SCBs vs. 26% without). Sedation (15%), ataxia (13%), vertigo (11%), and nausea (9%) were the commonest AEs. While 60% of our patients had concomitant psychiatric diagnosis, we found no relevant effect of this on challenging behaviour. Adjunctive LCM may provide an antiepileptic treatment option for patients with ID with or without additional psychiatric diagnosis. The occurrence of AEs and the LCM retention rate were affected by concomitant SCB use but not by psychiatric comorbidity.
Collapse
|
7
|
Farkas V, Steinborn B, Flamini JR, Zhang Y, Yuen N, Borghs S, Bozorg A, Daniels T, Martin P, Carney HC, Dimova S, Scheffer IE. Efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide in pediatric patients with focal seizures. Neurology 2019; 93:e1212-e1226. [PMID: 31462582 PMCID: PMC6808531 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000008126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 04/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide in children and adolescents with uncontrolled focal (partial-onset) seizures. Methods In this double-blind trial (SP0969; NCT01921205), patients (age ≥4–<17 years) with uncontrolled focal seizures were randomized (1:1) to adjunctive lacosamide/placebo. After a 6-week titration, patients who reached the target dose range for their weight (<30 kg: 8–12 mg/kg/d oral solution; ≥30–<50 kg: 6–8 mg/kg/d oral solution; ≥50 kg: 300–400 mg/d tablets) entered a 10-week maintenance period. The primary outcome was change in focal seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline to maintenance. Results Three hundred forty-three patients were randomized; 306 (lacosamide 152 of 171 [88.9%]; placebo 154 of 172 [89.5%]) completed treatment (titration and maintenance). Adverse events (AEs) were the most common reasons for discontinuation during treatment (lacosamide 4.1%; placebo 5.8%). From baseline to maintenance, percent reduction in focal seizure frequency per 28 days for lacosamide (n = 170) vs placebo (n = 168) was 31.7% (p = 0.0003). During maintenance, median percent reduction in focal seizure frequency per 28 days was 51.7% for lacosamide and 21.7% for placebo. Fifty percent responder rates (≥50% reduction) were 52.9% and 33.3% (odds ratio 2.17, p = 0.0006). During treatment, treatment-emergent AEs were reported by 67.8% lacosamide-treated patients (placebo 58.1%), most commonly (≥10%) somnolence (14.0%, placebo 5.2%) and dizziness (10.5%, placebo 3.5%). Conclusions Adjunctive lacosamide was efficacious in reducing seizure frequency and generally well tolerated in patients (age ≥4–<17 years) with focal seizures. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01921205. Classification of evidence This trial provides Class I evidence that for children and adolescents with uncontrolled focal seizures, adjunctive lacosamide reduces seizure frequency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viktor Farkas
- From the First Department of Pediatrics (V.F.), Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Developmental Neurology (B.S.), Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poland; PANDA Neurology (J.R.F.), Atlanta, GA; UCB Pharma (Y.Z., N.Y., A.B., T.D.), Raleigh, NC; UCB Pharma (S.B.), Slough, UK; UCB Pharma (P.M.), Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium; Evidence Scientific Solutions (H.C.C.), Horsham, UK; UCB Pharma (S.D.), Brussels, Belgium; and Austin Health (I.E.S.), Florey and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Barbara Steinborn
- From the First Department of Pediatrics (V.F.), Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Developmental Neurology (B.S.), Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poland; PANDA Neurology (J.R.F.), Atlanta, GA; UCB Pharma (Y.Z., N.Y., A.B., T.D.), Raleigh, NC; UCB Pharma (S.B.), Slough, UK; UCB Pharma (P.M.), Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium; Evidence Scientific Solutions (H.C.C.), Horsham, UK; UCB Pharma (S.D.), Brussels, Belgium; and Austin Health (I.E.S.), Florey and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - J Robert Flamini
- From the First Department of Pediatrics (V.F.), Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Developmental Neurology (B.S.), Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poland; PANDA Neurology (J.R.F.), Atlanta, GA; UCB Pharma (Y.Z., N.Y., A.B., T.D.), Raleigh, NC; UCB Pharma (S.B.), Slough, UK; UCB Pharma (P.M.), Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium; Evidence Scientific Solutions (H.C.C.), Horsham, UK; UCB Pharma (S.D.), Brussels, Belgium; and Austin Health (I.E.S.), Florey and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ying Zhang
- From the First Department of Pediatrics (V.F.), Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Developmental Neurology (B.S.), Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poland; PANDA Neurology (J.R.F.), Atlanta, GA; UCB Pharma (Y.Z., N.Y., A.B., T.D.), Raleigh, NC; UCB Pharma (S.B.), Slough, UK; UCB Pharma (P.M.), Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium; Evidence Scientific Solutions (H.C.C.), Horsham, UK; UCB Pharma (S.D.), Brussels, Belgium; and Austin Health (I.E.S.), Florey and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nancy Yuen
- From the First Department of Pediatrics (V.F.), Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Developmental Neurology (B.S.), Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poland; PANDA Neurology (J.R.F.), Atlanta, GA; UCB Pharma (Y.Z., N.Y., A.B., T.D.), Raleigh, NC; UCB Pharma (S.B.), Slough, UK; UCB Pharma (P.M.), Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium; Evidence Scientific Solutions (H.C.C.), Horsham, UK; UCB Pharma (S.D.), Brussels, Belgium; and Austin Health (I.E.S.), Florey and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Simon Borghs
- From the First Department of Pediatrics (V.F.), Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Developmental Neurology (B.S.), Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poland; PANDA Neurology (J.R.F.), Atlanta, GA; UCB Pharma (Y.Z., N.Y., A.B., T.D.), Raleigh, NC; UCB Pharma (S.B.), Slough, UK; UCB Pharma (P.M.), Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium; Evidence Scientific Solutions (H.C.C.), Horsham, UK; UCB Pharma (S.D.), Brussels, Belgium; and Austin Health (I.E.S.), Florey and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ali Bozorg
- From the First Department of Pediatrics (V.F.), Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Developmental Neurology (B.S.), Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poland; PANDA Neurology (J.R.F.), Atlanta, GA; UCB Pharma (Y.Z., N.Y., A.B., T.D.), Raleigh, NC; UCB Pharma (S.B.), Slough, UK; UCB Pharma (P.M.), Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium; Evidence Scientific Solutions (H.C.C.), Horsham, UK; UCB Pharma (S.D.), Brussels, Belgium; and Austin Health (I.E.S.), Florey and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Tony Daniels
- From the First Department of Pediatrics (V.F.), Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Developmental Neurology (B.S.), Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poland; PANDA Neurology (J.R.F.), Atlanta, GA; UCB Pharma (Y.Z., N.Y., A.B., T.D.), Raleigh, NC; UCB Pharma (S.B.), Slough, UK; UCB Pharma (P.M.), Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium; Evidence Scientific Solutions (H.C.C.), Horsham, UK; UCB Pharma (S.D.), Brussels, Belgium; and Austin Health (I.E.S.), Florey and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Paul Martin
- From the First Department of Pediatrics (V.F.), Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Developmental Neurology (B.S.), Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poland; PANDA Neurology (J.R.F.), Atlanta, GA; UCB Pharma (Y.Z., N.Y., A.B., T.D.), Raleigh, NC; UCB Pharma (S.B.), Slough, UK; UCB Pharma (P.M.), Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium; Evidence Scientific Solutions (H.C.C.), Horsham, UK; UCB Pharma (S.D.), Brussels, Belgium; and Austin Health (I.E.S.), Florey and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Hannah C Carney
- From the First Department of Pediatrics (V.F.), Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Developmental Neurology (B.S.), Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poland; PANDA Neurology (J.R.F.), Atlanta, GA; UCB Pharma (Y.Z., N.Y., A.B., T.D.), Raleigh, NC; UCB Pharma (S.B.), Slough, UK; UCB Pharma (P.M.), Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium; Evidence Scientific Solutions (H.C.C.), Horsham, UK; UCB Pharma (S.D.), Brussels, Belgium; and Austin Health (I.E.S.), Florey and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Svetlana Dimova
- From the First Department of Pediatrics (V.F.), Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Developmental Neurology (B.S.), Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poland; PANDA Neurology (J.R.F.), Atlanta, GA; UCB Pharma (Y.Z., N.Y., A.B., T.D.), Raleigh, NC; UCB Pharma (S.B.), Slough, UK; UCB Pharma (P.M.), Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium; Evidence Scientific Solutions (H.C.C.), Horsham, UK; UCB Pharma (S.D.), Brussels, Belgium; and Austin Health (I.E.S.), Florey and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ingrid E Scheffer
- From the First Department of Pediatrics (V.F.), Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Developmental Neurology (B.S.), Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poland; PANDA Neurology (J.R.F.), Atlanta, GA; UCB Pharma (Y.Z., N.Y., A.B., T.D.), Raleigh, NC; UCB Pharma (S.B.), Slough, UK; UCB Pharma (P.M.), Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium; Evidence Scientific Solutions (H.C.C.), Horsham, UK; UCB Pharma (S.D.), Brussels, Belgium; and Austin Health (I.E.S.), Florey and Murdoch Children's Research Institute, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reinhardt F, Weber YG, Mayer T, Luef G, Joeres L, Tennigkeit F, Dedeken P, De Backer M, Hellot S, Lauterbach T, Webers T, Arnold S. Changes in drug load during lacosamide combination therapy: A noninterventional, observational study in German and Austrian clinical practice. Epilepsia Open 2019; 4:409-419. [PMID: 31440722 PMCID: PMC6698692 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Revised: 05/12/2019] [Accepted: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Effects of antiepileptic drug (AED) load changes in patients with focal seizures have not been well evaluated. Methods SP1065 (NCT01673282) was a noninterventional, prospective, observational study conducted in a clinical practice setting. Patients (aged ≥18 years) with focal seizures were enrolled within 7 days of being prescribed adjunctive lacosamide. Observation period was ~6 months. Drug load was assessed using percentage change in ratio of actual prescribed dose and World Health Organization defined daily dose (DDD) for concomitant AEDs and all AEDs (including lacosamide). Subgroups were defined for patients with at least one concomitant sodium channel–blocking AED (SCB [+]) and those without (SCB [−]). Results A total of 311 patients were assessed for safety, 302 for measurement of drug load, and 240 for effectiveness. Ratio of AED dose to DDD decreased for concomitant AEDs (−9.6%) and increased for all AEDs (including lacosamide; 15.5%). Median reduction in focal seizure frequency per 28 days was 100% (range: −100, 2275.8). 70.4% and 61.7% of patients had a ≥50% or ≥75% reduction in seizure frequency, respectively; 50.8% became seizure‐free. In the SCB (+) subgroup (n = 149), ratio of AED dose to DDD decreased for concomitant AEDs (−15.0%) and increased for all AEDs (10.7%). In the SCB (−) subgroup (n = 153), ratio of AED dose to DDD decreased for concomitant AEDs (−4.4%) and increased for all AEDs (20.2%). Fifty‐seven patients (18.3%) reported ADRs, most commonly dose >400 mg/d (7.1%). Seventeen patients (5.5%) had ADRs leading to discontinuation. Significance Addition of lacosamide resulted in reduction of concomitant AED drug load regardless of whether concomitant AEDs were SCB (+) or SCB (−). These results indicate that addition of lacosamide in patients with focal seizures could allow clinicians to withdraw or reduce the dose of less well‐tolerated or less effective AEDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fritjof Reinhardt
- NeuroNetwork of Lusatia of the Technical University of Brandenburg Cottbus-Senftenberg Senftenberg Germany
| | - Yvonne G Weber
- Department of Neurology and Epileptology Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany
| | | | - Gerhard Luef
- Department of Neurology Innsbruck Medical University Innsbruck Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Stephan Arnold
- Department of Neurology Schön Klinik Vogtareuth Vogtareuth Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pharmacokinetic Variability and Clinical Use of Lacosamide in Children and Adolescents in Denmark and Norway. Ther Drug Monit 2019; 41:340-347. [DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000000599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
10
|
Ferreira JA, Le Pichon JB, Abdelmoity AT, Dilley D, Dedeken P, Daniels T, Byrnes W. Safety and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide in a pediatric population with focal seizures - An open-label trial. Seizure 2019; 71:166-173. [PMID: 31374487 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2019.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Revised: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 05/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate safety and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide in children with focal seizures. METHODS Patients were eligible for this open-label, fixed-titration trial (SP0847; NCT00938431) if aged 1 month-17 years with focal seizures taking 1-3 antiepileptic drugs. Findings from Cohort 1, aged 5-11 years, who received lacosamide ≤8 mg/kg/day, informed dosing for age-based cohorts 2-5, who then received ≤12 mg/kg/day (≤600 mg/day). Oral lacosamide was initiated at 2 mg/kg/day (1 mg/kg bid) and uptitrated by 2 mg/kg/day/week to the maximum cohort-defined dose (maximum trial duration: 13 weeks). Patients who did not achieve the maximum cohort-defined dose were discontinued. RESULTS Forty-seven patients (aged 6 months-≤17 years) enrolled (≥1 month-<4 years: n = 15; ≥4-<12 years: n = 23; ≥12-≤17 years: n = 9). 24/47 (51.1%) patients completed the trial at the maximum cohort-defined dose and 40/47 (85.1%) continued lacosamide in the extension trial. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 42/47 (89.4%) patients. The most common TEAEs (≥10% of patients) were vomiting (21.3%), diarrhea (14.9%), somnolence (12.8%), irritability, dizziness, and pyrexia (10.6% each). Twenty (42.6%) patients discontinued due to TEAEs, most commonly vomiting (8.5%), gait disturbance, dizziness, and somnolence (6.4% each). Six (12.8%) patients reported serious TEAEs, most commonly status epilepticus (3/47; 6.4%). CONCLUSION This fixed-titration trial supports the safety of adjunctive lacosamide in children (aged 6 months-≤17 years) with focal seizures. The TEAE profile was generally consistent with that observed in trials in adults, and no new safety concerns were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose A Ferreira
- University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Division of Child Neurology, St. Joseph's Children's Hospital, Pediatric Epilepsy and Neurology Specialists (PENS), 508 S. Habana Ave, Suite 340, Tampa, FL 33609, USA.
| | - Jean-Baptiste Le Pichon
- Children's Mercy Hospital, Division of Neurology, 2401 Gillham Rd, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.
| | - Ahmed T Abdelmoity
- Children's Mercy Hospital, Division of Neurology, 2401 Gillham Rd, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.
| | - Deanne Dilley
- UCB Pharma, 8010 Arco Corporate Drive, Raleigh, NC 27617, USA.
| | - Peter Dedeken
- UCB Pharma, Allée de la Recherche 60, 1070 Brussels, Belgium; Heilig Hart Hospitaal, Mechelsestraat 24, 2500 Lier, Belgium.
| | - Tony Daniels
- UCB Pharma, 8010 Arco Corporate Drive, Raleigh, NC 27617, USA.
| | - William Byrnes
- UCB Pharma, 8010 Arco Corporate Drive, Raleigh, NC 27617, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rüegger AD, Freeman JL, Harvey AS. Lacosamide in children with drug-resistant epilepsy. J Paediatr Child Health 2019; 55:194-198. [PMID: 30051539 DOI: 10.1111/jpc.14156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Revised: 05/20/2018] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIM To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of lacosamide in paediatric clinical practice. METHODS A search of our hospital's pharmacy database yielded all children <16 years old dispensed lacosamide for drug-resistant epilepsy between January 2011 and June 2016. Medical records were reviewed for clinical and drug details. Continued treatment for ≥12 months was considered an indicator of effectiveness and tolerability. RESULTS A total of 107 children (61 boys) satisfied inclusion criteria. Median age at lacosamide commencement was 9.9 years (interquartile range 6.7-13.7). Of those children, 57 (53%) children had focal epilepsy, with focal motor or impaired awareness seizures most commonly reported; 50 (47%) children had generalised epilepsy, most with tonic-clonic seizures, tonic seizures or epileptic spasms; 83 (78%) children had an intellectual disability, 24 (22%) had a physical disability and 22 (21%) had an autism spectrum disorder; 69 (65%) children continued lacosamide for ≥12 months. Reasons for discontinuation before 12 months in 38 (35%) children included ineffectiveness in 25 (66%), adverse events in 7 (18%) and worsening of seizures in 2 (5%). The most common adverse events were drowsiness, behavioural changes, unsteadiness, nausea and vomiting. Epilepsy type and comorbidities were not associated with continuation or reasons for discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS Most children continued treatment with lacosamide, suggesting effectiveness and tolerability. Lacosamide may prove to be a useful, 'broad-spectrum' antiepileptic medication in children for focal and generalised epilepsies and in association with comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea D Rüegger
- Department of Neurology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeremy L Freeman
- Department of Neurology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - A Simon Harvey
- Department of Neurology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Baker MD, Abou-Khalil BW, Arain A, Tummala P, Azar NJ, Haas KF, Sonmezturk HH. Lacosamide efficacy and tolerability in clinical practice – Post marketing analysis from a single dedicated epilepsy center. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2018; 171:179-183. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Revised: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
13
|
Efficacy and tolerability of treatment with lacosamide: Postmarketing experience from the Middle East region. Epilepsy Behav 2018; 84:118-121. [PMID: 29778846 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Revised: 04/29/2018] [Accepted: 04/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Lacosamide (LCM) was recently introduced in the Middle East. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of LCM in patients with focal onset seizures and determine if our results are comparable with those derived from Western countries. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis from two medical centers on consecutive patients diagnosed as having focal onset seizures and treated with add-on LCM. The primary efficacy variables were the 50% responder and seizure-free rates, and the secondary outcome variables included the percentages of patients who achieved seizure remission during the last 6-month follow-up period and the percentages of discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or tolerability. RESULTS One hundred four patients with a mean age of 30.9 years and experiencing a mean of 9.4 seizures per month during baseline were included. The 50% responder rates were 69% and 70% at 6- and 24-month follow-ups, respectively. Patients concomitantly treated with a sodium channel blocker were less likely to achieve seizure remission during the last 6-month follow-up period while the early introduction of LCM resulted in a significantly higher likelihood of achieving such a remission. Eighty-eight percent of patients were still maintained on LCM at the last follow-up, and the most common adverse events consisted of dizziness and somnolence, double vision, and nausea/vomiting. CONCLUSIONS Our data show similar efficacy and tolerability to those reported from Western countries. Our results also substantiate the early introduction of LCM and support the dose reduction of baseline AED especially that of sodium channel blockers to minimize adverse events.
Collapse
|
14
|
Neal A, D'Souza W, Hepworth G, Lawn N, Cook M, Nikpour A. Efficacy and tolerability of adjuvant lacosamide: The role of clinical characteristics and mechanisms of action of concomitant AEDs. Epilepsy Behav 2018; 80:25-32. [PMID: 29396359 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2017] [Revised: 11/21/2017] [Accepted: 11/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness and long-term tolerability of adjuvant lacosamide (LCM) in a multicenter cohort. We aim to assess outcomes of LCM-containing antiepileptic drug (AED) combinations based upon 'mechanism of action' (MoA) and patient's clinical features. METHODS Consecutive patients commenced on LCM, with focal epilepsy were identified from three Australian hospitals. The 12-month efficacy endpoints were greater than 50% reduction in seizure frequency (responders) and seizure freedom. Tolerability endpoints were cessation of LCM for any reason, cessation due to side-effects and censoring due to inefficacy. Outcomes were assessed according to concomitant AEDs according to their MoA and the clinical risk factor profile. RESULTS Three hundred ten patients were analyzed and followed for median 17.3months. Two hundred ninety-nine (97%) had drug-resistant epilepsy, and 155 (50%) had tried more than 7 AEDs at LCM commencement. Adjuvant LCM was associated with responder and seizure freedom rate of 29% and 9% respectively at 12months. Lower baseline seizure frequency, a prior 6-month period of seizure freedom at any time since epilepsy diagnosis and being on fewer concomitant AEDs were predictive of 12-month seizure freedom. Previous focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS), lower baseline seizure frequency, and concomitant AED reduction after LCM commencement were associated with improved LCM tolerability. No specific MoA AED combinations offered any efficacy or tolerability advantage. SIGNIFICANCE Adjuvant LCM is associated with seizure freedom rates of 9% at 12months after commencement and is predicted by lower prior seizure frequency, a period of 6months or longer of seizure freedom since diagnosis and fewer concomitant AEDs. While the broad MoA of concomitant AEDs did not influence efficacy or tolerability outcomes, we have provided a framework that may be utilized in future studies to help identify optimal synergistic AED combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Neal
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Australia; Department of Neurology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Wendyl D'Souza
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Australia; Department of Neurology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Australia
| | - Graham Hepworth
- Statistical Consulting Centre, The University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nicholas Lawn
- Western Australian Adult Epilepsy Service, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Mark Cook
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Australia; Department of Neurology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Australia
| | - Armin Nikpour
- Department of Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Böttcher S, Lutz MT, Mayer T. Lacosamide in the treatment of patients with epilepsy and intellectual disabilities: A long-term study of 136 patients. Epilepsia 2017; 58:1749-1754. [DOI: 10.1111/epi.13869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Thomas Mayer
- Saxonian Epilepsy Center at Radeberg; Radeberg Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Coppola G, Iapadre G, Operto FF, Verrotti A. New developments in the management of partial-onset epilepsy: role of brivaracetam. Drug Des Devel Ther 2017; 11:643-657. [PMID: 28293101 PMCID: PMC5345986 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s103468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Currently, a number of novel anticonvulsant drugs, the so-called third generation, are in various stages of development. Several of them are already available or in ongoing clinical trials. These new compounds should take advantage of new insights into the basic pathophysiology of epileptogenesis, drug metabolism and drug interactions. Many of them still need to be further evaluated mainly in real-world observational trials and registries. Among newer anticonvulsant drugs for partial-onset seizures (POSs), rufinamide, lacosamide, eslicarbazepine and perampanel are those new treatment options for which more substantial clinical evidence is currently available, both in adults and, to some extent, in children. Among the newest anticonvulsant drugs, brivaracetam, a high-affinity synaptic vesicle protein 2A ligand, reported to be 10- to 30-fold more potent than levetiracetam, is highly effective in a broad range of experimental models of focal and generalized seizures. Unlike levetiracetam, brivaracetam does not inhibit high-voltage Ca2+ channels and AMPA receptors and appears to inhibit neuronal voltage-gated sodium channels playing a role as a partial antagonist. Brivaracetam has a linear pharmacokinetic profile, is extensively metabolized and is excreted by urine (only 8%-11% unchanged). It does not seem to influence the pharmacokinetics of other antiepileptic drugs. It was approved in the European Union in January 2016 and in the US in February 2016 as an adjunctive therapy for the treatment of POS in patients older than 16 years of age. To date, its clinical efficacy as adjunctive antiepileptic treatment in adults with refractory POS at doses between 50 and 200 mg daily has been extensively assessed in two Phase IIb and four Phase III randomized controlled studies. Long-term extension studies show sustained efficacy of brivaracetam. Overall, the drug is generally well tolerated with only mild-to-moderate side effects. This is true also by intravenous route. Brivaracetam has not yet been evaluated as monotherapy or in comparison with other new anticonvulsant drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giangennaro Coppola
- Unit of Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, Salerno
| | - Giulia Iapadre
- Department of Pediatrics, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Francesca Felicia Operto
- Unit of Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, Salerno
| | - Alberto Verrotti
- Department of Pediatrics, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Effects of lacosamide "a novel antiepileptic drug" in the early stages of chicken embryo development. Childs Nerv Syst 2016; 32:1715-9. [PMID: 27473858 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-016-3181-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2016] [Accepted: 07/05/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are teratogens and confer a risk of congenital malformation. The estimated prevalence of major congenital malformations such as cardiac defects, facial clefts, hypospadias, and neural tube defects in epileptic women is 4-10 %, which represents a two- to fourfold increase in pregnant women compared to the general population. However, there are no clear data for newer drugs. Lacosamide (LCM), a novel AED, is the first of the third-generation AEDs to be approved as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial-onset seizures. There are no data on the pharmacokinetics of LCM during pregnancy, and only some published data have reported on its effects during pregnancy. METHODS In this study, three different doses of LCM (0.12, 0.5, and 1.60 mg in 0.18 mL) were applied under the embryonic disks of specific pathogen-free Leghorn chicken embryos after a 30-h incubation. Incubation was continued for 80 h, at which time all embryos were evaluated macroscopically and microscopically. RESULTS There was growth retardation in all of the LCM-treated groups. Major malformations increased in a dose-dependent manner and were mostly observed in the supratherapeutic group. CONCLUSION Based on our data, LCM may cause growth retardation or major congenital malformations. Nevertheless, more extensive investigations of its reliability are needed.
Collapse
|
18
|
McGinnis E, Kessler SK. Lacosamide use in children with epilepsy: Retention rate and effect of concomitant sodium channel blockers in a large cohort. Epilepsia 2016; 57:1416-25. [DOI: 10.1111/epi.13466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/14/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Emily McGinnis
- Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics; Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; Philadelphia Pennsylvania U.S.A
| | - Sudha Kilaru Kessler
- Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics; Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; Philadelphia Pennsylvania U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|