Index-finger pointing in generalized tonic-clonic seizures

Semiologic differences between bilateral tonic-clonic seizures of focal onset and generalized onset

BACKGROUND

Focal semiologies have been described in idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGE) and generalized-onset bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (GBTCS). These focal signs may lead to wrong diagnosis and inappropriate choice of antiseizure medications. We sought to investigate the differences in focal semiologic features between GBTCS and focal-onset bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed video-EEG data of captured GBTCS and FBTCS over a period of five years. The presence or absence of 12 focal signs as well seizure duration and time to head version was tabulated for each seizure. We used the chi-square test for independence and Fisher's exact test to investigate the occurrence of each focal sign in FBTCS compared with GBTCS. Additionally, we used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to explore if the seizure duration and time to head version from the ictal onset can reliably differentiate between FBTCS and GBTCS. Finally, we employed hierarchical cluster analysis to visualize how these focal signs appear in combination.

RESULTS

Head version (p <.001), preceding automatisms (p <.001), eye version (p <.001), unilateral facial clonic activity (p <.001), and mouth deviation (p =.004) were found to be significantly more frequent in FBTCS. Longer seizures were highly in favor of FBTCS whereas shorter time to head version from the ictal onset indicated GBTCS in the ROC curve analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Though focal signs occur in GBTCS, careful evaluation of semiology can help the clinician distinguish FBTCS from GBTCS.

Can semiology differentiate between bilateral tonic-clonic seizures of focal-onset and generalized-onset? A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Bilateral tonic-clonic seizures are encountered in both focal and generalized epilepsies. We reviewed the literature regarding the presence of focal signs in generalized-onset tonic-clonic seizures (GOTCS) and the utility of semiology in differentiating those from focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS).

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search using four electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Psychinfo) and constructed a systematic review in keeping with the Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

We included 13 studies on focal semiological features of GOTCS. These studies included a total of 952 participants. The key focal signs described in GOTCS included: early head version, figure of four sign, asymmetric seizure termination, and a multitude of auras as well as automatisms. Additionally, we reviewed five studies that investigated the use of semiology to differentiate GOTCS from FBTCS; these studies had a total of 289 participants. Asymmetry in clonic phase, side-to-side axial movements, asymmetrical seizure termination, figure of four sign, index finger pointing, and fanning posture of the hand were found to be significantly more frequent in FBTCS compared with GOTCS. Furthermore, combinations of focal semiological features occurring in a single seizure were found to be suggestive of FBTCS rather than GOTCS.

CONCLUSION

Focal signs are often evident in GOTCS. Though the observation of multiple focal signs within a given seizure may be in favor of an FBTCS, our findings caution against differentiating between the two seizure types based on semiology alone due to considerable overlap in focal features.

Hand posture as localizing sign in adult focal epileptic seizures

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify specific ictal hand postures (HPs) as localizing signs of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) in patients with frontal or temporal lobe epilepsy.

METHODS

In this study, we retrospectively analyzed ictal semiology of 489 temporal lobe or frontal lobe seizures recorded over a 6-year period at the Seizure Disorder Center at University of California, Los Angeles in the USA (45 patients) or at the C. Munari Epilepsy Surgery Center at Niguarda Hospital in Milan, Italy (34 patients). Our criterion for EZ localization was at least 2 years of seizure freedom after surgery. We analyzed presence and latency of ictal HP. We then examined whether specific initial HPs are predictive for EZ localization.

RESULTS

We found that ictal HPs were present in 72.5% of patients with frontal and 54.5% of patients with temporal lobe seizures. We divided HPs into 6 classes depending on the reciprocal position of the fingers ("fist," "cup," "politician's fist," "pincer," "extended hand," "pointing"). We found a striking correlation between EZ localization and ictal HP. In particular, fist and pointing HPs are strongly predictive of frontal lobe EZ; cup, politician's fist, and pincer are strongly predictive of temporal lobe EZ.

INTERPRETATION

Our study offers simple ictal signs that appear to clarify differential diagnosis of temporal versus frontal lobe EZ localization. These results are meant to be used as a novel complementary tool during presurgical evaluation for epilepsy. At the same time, they give us important insight into the neurophysiology of hand movements. ANN NEUROL 2019;86:793-800.