Behavioral effects and somnolence due to levetiracetam versus oxcarbazepine - a retrospective comparison study of North Indian patients with refractory epilepsy

Epilepsy and psychiatric comorbidities: A bidirectional mendelian randomization study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Psychiatric comorbidities are relatively common among patients with epilepsy; however, the underlying mechanisms of this association remain largely unknown. The objective of this Mendelian randomization (MR) study was to analyze the genetic correlations and causality underlying these reciprocal associations.

METHODS

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with epilepsy (29,677 controls and 15,212 cases) and seven psychiatric comorbidities (485,436 controls and 269,495 cases) were identified from genome-wide association studies. Causal significance was estimated using inverse variance weighting. Sensitivity analyses included the weighted median, MR-Egger, and MR-PRESSO. The psychiatric comorbidities analyzed in this study included attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and anorexia nervosa.

RESULTS

Both forward and reverse genetic associations were observed for the selected psychiatric disorders. Notably, ADHD was significantly associated with an increased risk of generalized epilepsy (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.18; p = 0.013). However, MR-PRESSO detected the existence of pleiotropy (p = 0.001). Additionally, focal epilepsy was significantly associated with a higher risk of OCD (OR, 1.44; 95 % CI, 1.08-1.92; p = 0.013), and all sensitivity tests yielded favorably nonsignificant results. There was no significant genetic association between epilepsy and other examined psychiatric disorders. However, due to the detection of pleiotropy by MR-Egger and considerations related to the threshold for genetic instruments, a cautious approach is warranted in interpreting some of the results.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed significant genetic causality between focal epilepsy and OCD, as well as between ADHD and generalized epilepsy. However, no casual significance was observed with other psychiatric comorbidities examined. Considering the inherent limitations of MR studies, further research is warranted to definitively clarify these genetic causal associations.

Antiseizure medication-induced obsessive-compulsive disorder and tic disorder: a pragmatic review

INTRODUCTION

With a lifetime prevalence of 2.3%, obsessive compulsive disorder is a chronic, disabling condition that is associated with significant social and occupational impairment. Up to 30% of individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder have a lifetime diagnosis of tic disorders. Antiseizure medication is increasingly used for a variety of physical and psychiatric illnesses. Clarification of the relationship between these symptoms/disorders and use of antiseizure medication is critically important for diagnostic and treatment purposes.

AREAS COVERED

Studies on antiseizure-induced obsessive-compulsive disorder and tic disorders are reviewed. The literature search strategy identified 89 articles. Twenty-nine articles were included in the final results. Of these, 24 are case reports or case studies, 2 cross-sectional studies, 1 chart review, 1 population-based case-control study and 1 observational prospective study assessing lamotrigine, levetiracetam, topiramate, zonisamide, and carbamazepine.

EXPERT OPINION

This study highlighted the temporal relationship of antiseizure medication use and onset of obsessive-compulsive symptoms and tics. Monitoring for medication-induced obsessive compulsions or tics should be undertaken when prescribing antiseizure medication for treatment of mood disorders or epilepsy. Further research identifying the causal relationship between antiseizure medication and de novo onset of obsessive-compulsive symptoms, obsessive-compulsive disorder and tic disorder is required.

Cosmetic adverse effects of antiseizure medications; A systematic review

BACKGROUND

We systematically reviewed the existing literature on the cosmetic adverse effects of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in order to depict a clear picture of these unwanted side effects of ASMs with a particular attention to hair loss, hirsutism, acne, and gingival hyperplasia.

METHODS

This systematic review was prepared according to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Scopus, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar from the inception to 25 March, 2021 were systematically searched. These key words (title/abstract) were used: "hair loss" OR "hirsutism" OR "acne" OR "gingival hyperplasia" AND "seizure" OR "epilepsy" OR "anriseizure" OR "antiepileptic". The exclusion criteria included: non-original studies, articles not in English, and animal studies.

RESULTS

The primary search yielded 3938 studies; 127 studies were related to the topic and were included in the current systematic review. The most robust evidence on cosmetic adverse effects of ASMs were related to phenytoin (causing gingival hyperplasia, hirsutism, and acne) and valproate (causing hair loss and hirsutism); however, many other ASMs were also implicated in causing these cosmetic adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Antiseizure medications may be associated with various cosmetic adverse effects. Phenytoin and valproate are the most notorious ASMs in this regard; but, other ASMs have also been implicated in causing hair loss, hirsutism, acne, and gingival hyperplasia. Physicians should pay more attention to these significant adverse effects that may affect a patient's facial attractiveness, quality of life, and emotional state.

Behavioral alterations associated with levetiracetam in pediatric epilepsy

Levetiracetam (LEV) has an improved pharmacological profile and is one of the most commonly used antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). However, associations between this pharmacological profile and behavioral side effects have been extensively reported in pediatric populations. We assessed behavioral changes after initiation of LEV, prescribed by the treating neurologist, in Chilean patients with epilepsy aged 4-15 years. A behavioral questionnaire was applied at baseline and at two, four, and twelve weeks of treatment. Thirty patients were enrolled: 16 males, 14 females, average age 8 years (range: 4-14). By week four, 23.3% of patients showed significant behavioral alterations that persisted throughout the observation period. No significant alterations emerged after four weeks in the remaining patients. Family history of psychiatric disease and prior behavioral difficulties were predisposing factors for adverse behavioral effects. Although previous studies associated adverse behavioral effects with LEV in pediatric patients with epilepsy, we believe that this is the first study to use a prospective methodology and standardized tools to quantify the symptomatology. Adverse behavioral effects may significantly affect quality of life for patients and families, diminishing the tolerability of treatment. To ensure successful therapy and improve medical decision-making, it is essential to consider predisposing factors for drug-related adverse effects and to regularly assess for behavioral alterations during treatment.

Preliminary evidence about irritability in patients with epilepsy treated by perampanel as first add-on therapy compared to levetiracetam and valproic acid

Aims

Irritability has been described as a frequent adverse event in patients affected by epilepsy and treated with perampanel (PER), levetiracetam (LEV), and less frequently with valproic acid (VPA). Since the questionnaire for irritability (I‐EPI) is a validated instrument to measure this psychiatric manifestation in patients affected by epilepsy, in this study we aimed at investigating the effect of PER as first add‐on therapy on I‐EPI. Moreover, we compared the effectiveness and I‐EPI scores obtained at 12‐month follow‐up visits in patients treated by PER, LEV, or VPA in order to measure irritability as a consequence of these treatments.

Methods

We collected data from 17 patients treated by PER, 16 patients treated by LEV, and 16 patients under VPA treatment followed for 12 months.

Results

We did not document significant changes of I‐EPI questionnaire between baseline and follow‐up in the PER group. As concerning the comparison of I‐EPI among PER, LEV, and VPA groups, we documented lower global scores in PER than both LEV (P < 0.05) and VPA (P < 0.05) groups. Moreover, patients under PER treatment showed lower scores than LEV and VPA (P < 0.05) in I‐EPI items measuring the gentle personality, anxiety of having epileptic seizures in front of others, and irritability in thinking that they can have an epileptic seizure.

Conclusions

This retrospective study described a stable and possibly lower degree of irritability in patients starting PER than LEV and VPA treatments, although we documented the comparable effectiveness of PER, LEV, and VPA as first add‐on treatments in patients affected by uncontrolled epileptic seizures. However, the small sample of patients included in this study and the absence of I‐EPI scores obtained at baseline visits in LEV and VPA groups require further investigations to confirm this preliminary evidence.

Cognitive, behavioural and sleep-related adverse effects on introduction of levetiracetam versus oxcarbazepine for epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

There is limited literature on cognitive, behaviour and sleep-related adverse effects of levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine among adult epilepsy patients, except for what is available from the initial efficacy trials. This study was initiated with the aim to evaluate the incidence and prevalence of various cognitive, behaviour and sleep-related adverse effects of levetiracetam versus oxcarbazepine among people with epilepsy.

METHODS

The study was conducted in two parts: part A was a cross-sectional study, and part B was a longitudinal study. Trail making test A & B, digit symbol substitution test, Stroop colour and word test, controlled oral word association test and PGI memory scale, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, sleep log and ESS-I were used for assessment of cognitive, behaviour and sleep-related adverse effects.

RESULTS

In the cross-sectional as well as prospective study, no significant difference was observed in the cognitive performance of patients in levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine group in any of the cognitive assessment. Among 120 patients enrolled in the cross-sectional study, significantly higher number of patients in the levetiracetam group compared to the oxcarbazepine group,had agitation/aggression (20% vs10%, p =  0.047) and irritability (26.7% vs 3.3%, p = 0.007).Among 132 patients enrolled in the prospective study, significantly higher increase in the domain score of agitation/aggression (14.5% vs 1.6%, p = 0.028) and irritability (17.7% vs 1.6%, p =  0.018) was observed in the levetiracetam group compared to oxcarbazepine group. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the oxcarbazepine group had hypersomnolence (11.3% vs 1.6%, p =  0.026), as compared to the levetiracetam group.

SIGNIFICANCE

On cross-sectional as well as on longitudinal assessment, nearly one-fifth of patients on levetiracetam have behaviour related adverse effects, with dose modification required for half among these. Nearly 11% of patients on oxcarbazepine reported sleep-related adverse effects (higher total sleep duration per 24 h).

Mechanisms Underlying Aggressive Behavior Induced by Antiepileptic Drugs: Focus on Topiramate, Levetiracetam, and Perampanel

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are effective against seizures, but their use is often limited by adverse effects, among them psychiatric and behavioral ones including aggressive behavior (AB). Knowledge of the incidence, risk factors, and the underlying mechanisms of AB induced by AEDs may help to facilitate management and reduce the risk of such side effects. The exact incidence of AB as an adverse effect of AEDs is difficult to estimate, but frequencies up to 16% have been reported. Primarily, levetiracetam (LEV), perampanel (PER), and topiramate (TPM), which have diverse mechanisms of action, have been associated with AB. Currently, there is no evidence for a specific pharmacological mechanism solely explaining the increased incidence of AB with LEV, PER, and TPM. Serotonin (5-HT) and GABA, and particularly glutamate (via the AMPA receptor), seem to play key roles. Other mechanisms involve hormones, epigenetics, and “alternative psychosis” and related phenomena. Increased individual susceptibility due to an underlying neurological and/or a mental health disorder may further explain why people with epilepsy are at an increased risk of AB when using AEDs. Remarkably, AB may occur with a delay of weeks or months after start of treatment. Information to patients, relatives, and caregivers, as well as sufficient clinical follow-up, is crucial, and there is a need for further research to understand the complex relationship between AED mechanisms of action and the induction/worsening of AB.