Delay in pediatric epilepsy surgery: A caregiver's perspective

Invasive Epilepsy Monitoring: The Switch from Subdural Electrodes to Stereoelectroencephalography

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) has experienced an explosion in use due to a shifting understanding of epileptic networks and wider application of minimally invasive epilepsy surgery techniques. Both subdural electrode (SDE) monitoring and SEEG serve important roles in defining the epileptogenic zone, limiting functional deficits, and formulating the most effective surgical plan. Strengths of SEEG include the ability to sample difficult to reach, deep structures of the brain without a craniotomy and without disrupting the dura. SEEG is complementary to minimally invasive epilepsy treatment options and may reduce the treatment gap in patients who are hesitant about craniotomy and surgical resection. Understanding the strengths and limitations of SDE monitoring and SEEG allows epileptologists to choose the best modality of invasive monitoring for each patient living with drug-resistant seizures.

Physicians' Perspectives on Presurgical Discussion and Shared Decision-Making in Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery

Objective: To qualitatively explore the approach of pediatric epilepsy providers when counseling regarding surgical options for epilepsy, presenting risks and benefits of surgery, overcoming resistance to surgery, and fostering shared decision making with patients and families. Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews with 11 academic clinicians (5- neurologists, 5- epileptologists, 1- neurosurgeon) from a Level 4 pediatric epilepsy center to explore how physicians communicate and pursue surgical decision-making. Results: A blended inductive-deductive analysis revealed three key themes (with subthemes) of presurgical discussions: (1) Candidate selection and initial discussion about epilepsy surgery (neurologists compared to epileptologists, the timing of the discussion, reluctant families) (2) Detailed individualized counseling about epilepsy surgery (shared decision-making [enablers and barriers] and risk-benefit analysis [balancing risks and benefits, statistical benefit estimation, discussion about SUDEP, prognostication about cognitive and behavioral outcomes, risks of surgery]) (3) Tools to improve decision-making (educational interventions for patients and families and provider- and organization-specific interventions). Significance: Presurgical discussions lack uniformity among physicians who treat epilepsy. Despite general interest in collaborative decision-making, experts raised concern about lack of exposure to communication training and clinical tools for optimizing decision-making, a high number of families who do not feel equipped to share the decision making leaving the decision-making entirely to the physician, and paucity of practical resources for individualized risk-benefit counseling. Clinical practice guidelines should be developed to reduce existing practice variations in presurgical counseling. Further consensus is needed about when and how to initiate the conversation about epilepsy surgery, essential components of the discussion, and the utility of various tools to improve the utilization of epilepsy surgery.

Parental experience and decision-making for epilepsy surgery: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies

OBJECTIVE

In selected children with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), epilepsy surgery is the most effective treatment option, but unfortunately remains highly underutilized. One of the critical obstacles to pursuing surgical therapy is parents/caregivers' decision against surgery or to delay the surgery until no other treatment option exists. Understanding caregiver decision-making around epilepsy surgery can improve patient/caregiver experience and satisfaction while facilitating appropriate decision-making that optimizes clinical outcomes. The current review systematically explores the existing evidence on caregiver experience and the decision-making process toward epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

The study was conducted as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic literature review. Databases (PubMed Ovid, PubMed Medline, Web of Science, CINHAL, PsycInfo) were systematically searched in February 2021 using a defined search strategy and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Total 1304 articles were screened for titles and abstracts, and 54 full-text articles were retrieved for further assessment. We included 14 articles with critical quality assessment using two different tools for qualitative and questionnaire-based studies. A qualitative content analysis was performed to characterize caregiver experience, perception, and decision-making toward favorable or unfavorable opinions of epilepsy surgery.

RESULTS

Four concepts generated from the analysis may act as enablers or barriers to decision-making around epilepsy surgery: 1. Access to knowledge and information, 2. Communication and coordination issues, 3. Caregiver's emotional state, and 4. Socioeconomic effects. Subsequently, we provided a narrative synthesis of practice recommendations and a conceptual framework to adopt multi-pronged interventions to overcome identified diverse barriers to effective caregiver decision-making.

CONCLUSION

Multiple influences impact how caregivers decide about epilepsy surgery for their children, with no single factor identified as the primary driver for or against surgery. However, limited research has explored these influences. Future studies should focus on quantitatively examining factors to identify significant variables most likely to influence caregiver decision-making, ultimately overcoming barriers that limit utilization of epilepsy surgery as a treatment tool.

Epilepsy Surgery: Monitoring and Novel Surgical Techniques

Drug-resistant epilepsy warrants referral to an epilepsy surgery center for consideration of alternative treatments including epilepsy surgery. Advances in technology now allow for minimally invasive neurophysiologic monitoring and surgical interventions, approaches that are attractive to families because large craniotomies and associated morbidity are avoided. This work reviews the presurgical evaluation process and discusses the use of invasive stereo-electroencephalography monitoring to localize seizure onset zones. Minimally invasive surgical techniques are described for the treatment of focal and generalized epilepsies. These approaches have expanded our capacity to palliate and cure epilepsy in the pediatric population.

The Effectiveness of Medical and Surgical Treatment for Children With Refractory Epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Pediatric refractory epilepsy affects quality of life, clinical disability, and healthcare costs for patients and families.

OBJECTIVE

To show the impact of surgical treatment for pediatric epilepsy on healthcare utilization compared to medically treated pediatric epilepsy over 5 yr.

METHODS

The Pediatric Health Information System database was used to conduct a cohort study using 5 published algorithms. Refractory epilepsy patients treated with antiepileptic medications (AEDs) only or AEDs plus epilepsy surgery between 1/1/2008 and 12/31/2014 were included. Healthcare utilization following the index date at 2 and 5 yr including inpatient, emergency department (ED), and all epilepsy-related visits were evaluated. The propensity scores (PS) method was used to match surgically and medically treated patients. PS. SAS® 9.4 and Stata 14.0 were used for data management and statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 2106 (17.1%) and 10186 (82.9%) were surgically and medically treated. A total of 4050 matched cases, 2025 per each treated group, were included. Compared to medically treated patients, utilization was reduced in the surgical group: at 2 and 5 yr postindex date, there was a reduction of 36% to 37% of inpatient visits and 47% to 50% of ED visits. The total number (inpatient, ED, ambulatory visits) of epilepsy-associated visits were reduced by 39% to 43% in the surgical group compared to the medically treated group. In those who had surgery, the average reduction in AEDs was 16% at 2 and 5 yr after treatment.

CONCLUSION

Patients with refractory epilepsy treated with surgery had significant reductions in healthcare utilization compared with patients treated only with medications.

An update on pediatric surgical epilepsy: Part I

Epilepsy affects many children worldwide, with drug-resistant epilepsy affecting 20–40% of all children with epilepsy. This carries a significant burden for patients and their families and is strongly correlated with poor cognitive outcomes, depression, anxiety, developmental delay, and impaired activities of daily living. For this reason, we sought to explore the role of pediatric epilepsy surgery and provide an overview of the factors contributing to epilepsy surgery planning and execution. We review the necessary preoperative evaluations, surgical indications, planning considerations, and surgical options to provide a clear pathway in the evaluation and planning of pediatric epilepsy surgery.