Evaluation of the "non-epileptic" patient in a tertiary center epilepsy clinic

Diagnostic utility of prolonged ambulatory video-electroencephalography monitoring

OBJECTIVES

Ambulatory video-electroencephalography (video-EEG) represents a low-cost, convenient and accessible alternative to inpatient video-EEG monitoring, however few studies have examined their diagnostic yield. In this large-scale retrospective study conducted in Australia, we evaluated the efficacy of prolonged ambulatory video-EEG recordings in capturing diagnostic events and resolving the referring question.

METHODS

Sequential adult and paediatric ambulatory video-EEG reports from April 2020 to June 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Data collection included patient demographics, clinical information, and details of events and EEG abnormalities. Clinical utility was assessed by examining i) time to first diagnostic event, and ii) ability to resolve the referring questions - seizure localisation, quantification, classification, and differentiation (differentiating seizures from non-epileptic events).

RESULTS

Of the 600 reports analysed, 49 % captured at least one event, and 45 % captured interictal abnormalities (epileptiform or non-epileptiform). Seizures, probable psychogenic events (mostly non-convulsive), and other non-epileptic events occurred in 13 %, 23 % and 21 % of recordings respectively, with overlap. Unreported events were captured in 53 (9 %) recordings, and unreported seizures represented more than half of all seizures captured (51 %, 392/773). Nine percent of events were missing clinical, video or electrographic data. A diagnostic event occurred in 244 (41 %) recordings, of which 14 % were captured between the fifth and eighth day of recording. Reported event frequency ≥ 1/week was the only significant predictor of diagnostic event capture. In recordings with both seizures and psychogenic events, unrecognized seizures were frequent, and seizures may be missed if recording is terminated early. The referring question was resolved in 85 % of reports with at least one event, and 53 % of all reports. Specifically, this represented 46 % of reports (235/512) for differentiation of events, and 75 % of reports (27/36) for classification of seizures.

CONCLUSION

Ambulatory video-EEG recordings are of high diagnostic value in capturing clinically relevant events and resolving the referring clinical questions.

Evaluation of the Patient With Paroxysmal Spells Mimicking Epileptic Seizures

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic issue of paroxysmal spells, including epileptic seizure (ES) mimics, is one that neurologists frequently encounter. This review provides an up-to-date overview of the most common causes of ES mimics encountered in the outpatient setting.

REVIEW SUMMARY

Paroxysmal spells are characterized by changes in awareness, attention, perception, or abnormal movements. These can be broadly classified as ES and nonepileptic spells (NES). NES mimics ES but are distinguished by their symptomatology and lack of epileptiform activity on electroencephalography. NES may have psychological or physiological underpinnings. Psychogenic non-ES are the most common mimics of ES. Physiological causes of NES include syncope, cerebrovascular, movement, and sleep-related disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Distinguishing NES from ES at times may be challenging even to the most experienced clinicians. However, detailed history with an emphasis on the clinical clues, including taking a moment-by-moment history of the event from the patient and observers and physical examination, helps create an appropriate differential diagnosis to guide further diagnostic testing. An accurate diagnosis of NES prevents iatrogenic harm, including unnecessary exposure to antiseizure medications and overuse of health care resources. It also allows for the correct specialist referral and appropriate treatment.

[Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures]

The review provides epidemiological data and discuss the associated burden of non-epileptic seizures (PNES). Data on the prevalence, socio-demographic and clinical risk factors for the development of PNES are presented. The hypotheses of the PNES origin, including the contribution of psychological trauma, are considered. We also describe contemporary methods for differential diagnosis of epileptic seizures and PNES, including biomarkers and the use of diagnostic questionnaires. Special attention is given to the issues of the psychiatric comorbidity of PNES.

Experimental Therapeutic Strategies in Epilepsies Using Anti-Seizure Medications

Epilepsies are among the most common neurological problems. The disease burden in patients with epilepsy is significantly high, and epilepsy has a huge negative impact on patients' quality of life with epilepsy and their families. Anti-seizure medications are the mainstay treatment in patients with epilepsy, and around 70% of patients will ultimately control with a combination of at least two appropriately selected anti-seizure medications. However, in one-third of patients, seizures are resistant to drugs, and other measures will be needed. The primary goal in using experimental therapeutic medication strategies in patients with epilepsy is to prevent recurrent seizures and reduce the rate of traumatic events that may occur during seizures. So far, various treatments using medications have been offered for patients with epilepsies, which have been classified according to the type of epilepsy, the effectiveness of the medications, and the adverse effects. Medications such as Levetiracetam, valproic acid, and lamotrigine are at the forefront of these patients' treatment. Epilepsy surgery, neuro-stimulation, and the ketogenic diet are the main measures in patients with medication-resistant epilepsies. In this paper, we will review the therapeutic approach using anti-seizure medications in patients with epilepsy. However, it should be noted that some of these patients still do not respond to existing treatments; therefore, the limited ability of current therapies has fueled research efforts for the development of novel treatment strategies. Thus, it seems that in addition to surgical measures, we should look for more specific agents that have less adverse events and have a greater effect in stopping seizures.

Syncopal attacks in children: Is it cardiac or epilepsy related?

BACKGROUND

Transient loss of consciousness (TLOC) may be mistaken for other disorders like epilepsy. Our objectives were to identify symptoms that could help differentiate epilepsy from syncope among children with TLOC and to validate previously suggested criteria.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients aged 18 years or younger who presented with TLOC attacks from January 2008 to December 2018 at King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Symptoms from which epilepsy and syncope could be predicted with high accuracy were included in the previously suggested criteria. The discriminative abilities of current and previous criteria were examined in receiver-operating characteristic analyses.

RESULTS

Data from 46 patients, 32 with confirmed epilepsy and 14 with syncope, were included in this analysis. The mean age was 12.1 years (S.D., 4.3 years), and 60.9% of the patients were girls. According to our proposed criteria, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of symptoms in predicting epilepsy were 68.8%, 85.7%, and 73.9%, respectively, and the area under the curve was 0.814 (confidence interval 0.686 to 0.941, P = 0.001). According to previously suggested criteria, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of symptoms in predicting epilepsy were 63.2%, 62.5%, and 63.0%, respectively, and the area under the curve was 0.730 (confidence interval 0.541 to 0.92, P = 0.063).

CONCLUSIONS

A number of self-reported/observed symptoms can be used to distinguish epilepsy from syncope with high discriminative ability. The current findings still need to be validated in larger, preferably multiple populations before they can be safely relied upon.

The first-line management of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) in adults in the emergency: a practical approach

Distinguishing non-epileptic events, especially psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES), from epileptic seizures (ES) constitutes a diagnostic challenge. Misdiagnoses are frequent, especially when video-EEG recording, the gold-standard for PNES confirmation, cannot be completed. The issue is further complicated in cases of combined PNES with ES. In emergency units, a misdiagnosis can lead to extreme antiepileptic drug escalade, unnecessary resuscitation measures (intubation, catheterization, etc.), as well as needless biologic and imaging investigations. Outside of the acute window, an incorrect diagnosis can lead to prolonged hospitalization or increase of unhelpful antiepileptic drug therapy. Early recognition is thus desirable to initiate adequate treatment and improve prognosis. Considering experience-based strategies and a thorough review of the literature, we aimed to present the main clinical clues for physicians facing PNES in non-specialized units, before management is transferred to epileptologists and neuropsychiatrists. In such conditions, patient recall or witness-report provide the first orientation for the diagnosis, recognizing that collected information may be inaccurate. Thorough analysis of an event (live or based on home-video) may lead to a clinical diagnosis of PNES with a high confidence level. Indeed, a fluctuating course, crying with gestures of frustration, pelvic thrusting, eye closure during the episode, and the absence of postictal confusion and/or amnesia are highly suggestive of PNES. Moreover, induction and/or inhibition tests of PNES have a good diagnostic value when positive. Prolactinemia may also be a useful biomarker to distinguish PNES from epileptic seizures, especially following bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. Finally, regardless the level of certainty in the diagnosis of the PNES, it is important to subsequently refer the patient for epileptological and neuropsychiatric follow-up.