Psychosocial outcome in epilepsy after extratemporal surgery

Resective Epilepsy Surgery, QUality of life and Economic evaluation (RESQUE): the change in quality of life after resective epilepsy surgery-protocol for a multicentre, prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Resective epilepsy surgery is often seen as a last resort when treating drug-resistant epilepsy. Positive results on quality of life (QoL) and economic benefits after surgery argue for a less restrictive attitude towards epilepsy surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy. QoL and economic benefits are country-dependent. The objective of the Resective Epilepsy Surgery, QUality of life and Economic evaluation (RESQUE) trial is to evaluate the change in QoL before and after epilepsy surgery in Dutch people with drug-resistant epilepsy. The results will form part of an economic evaluation of epilepsy surgery in people with epilepsy (PWE) in The Netherlands.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A longitudinal prospective multicentre cohort study involving 100 PWE undergoing epilepsy surgery between 2019 and 2025 is being performed in three Dutch academic hospitals. Excluded are PWE who have a lower level of intelligence (TIQ<70) or who do not master the Dutch language. Before surgery and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery, PWE receive validated online questionnaires (QOLIE-31, EQ-5D, iMCQ and iPCQ) on QoL, cost of care, expectations and satisfaction. Primary outcome is the change in QoL. Secondary outcomes are change in generic QoL, seizure reduction (International League Against Epilepsy Outcome Classification), medical consumption, productivity, the correlation between QoL and seizure reduction and expectation of and satisfaction with the surgery.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study design has been approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee (METC) of Maastricht UMC+ (2019-1134) and the Amsterdam UMC (vu). At the time of writing, UMC Utrecht is in the process of considering approval. The study will be conducted according to the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act and the Declaration of Helsinki. The results will be publicly disclosed and submitted for publication in international peer-reviewed scientific journals. There is no veto on publication by the involved parties.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NL8278; Pre-results.

Decision-making under ambiguity after frontal lobe resection for epilepsy

PURPOSE

Decision-making is crucial to daily life and can impact our society as well as economic conditions. Although the frontal lobes have been identified as important for decision-making, this capacity has only been studied to a limited extent in frontal lobe epilepsy and not at all after frontal lobe resection (FLR) for epilepsy. This study aimed to explore decision-making under ambiguity after FLR for epilepsy.

METHODS

Fourteen patients having undergone FLR for epilepsy completed the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) which is a widely used tool to measure decision-making under ambiguity. Iowa Gambling Task scores included in the analysis were: total net score, separate scores from five blocks across the test, and a change score (last block of IGT minus first block). A group of healthy controls (n = 30) was used as a comparison. Associations between IGT and standardized neuropsychological methods for assessment of executive functions, self-rating questionnaires of mental health, fatigue, and behavior linked to frontal lobe dysfunction were also investigated.

RESULTS

The patient group performed inferior to controls at the final block of the IGT (p =.001).A group difference in IGT change scores was found (p =.005), reflectingthe absence of a positive change in performance over time for the FLR group compared to the control group. Correlations with tests of executive functions as well as self-rating scales were mainly statistically nonsignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that patients having undergone FLR for epilepsy have difficulties with decision-making under ambiguity. The performance illustrated a failure to learn throughout the task. Executive as well as emotional deficits may impact decision-making processes in this patient group and need to be considered in further studies. Prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed.

A procedure for predicting, illustrating, communicating, and optimizing patient-centered outcomes of epilepsy surgery using nomograms and Bayes' theorem

Clinicians have an ethical obligation to obtain and convey relevant information about possible treatment outcomes in a manner that can be comprehended by patients. This contributes to the processes of informed consent and shared prospective decision-making. In epilepsy neurosurgery, there has historically been an emphasis on studying clinician-centered (e.g., seizure- and cognition-related) outcomes and using these data to inform recommendations and, by extension, to frame pre-surgical counseling with respect to patients' decisions about elective neurosurgery. In contrast, there is a relative dearth of available data related to patient-centered outcomes of epilepsy neurosurgery, such as functional (e.g., employment) status, and there is also a lack of methods to communicate these data to patients. Here, illustrated using a hypothetical case scenario, we present a potential solution to the latter of these problems using principles of evidence-based neuropsychology; published data on patient employment status before and after epilepsy neurosurgery; and Bayes' theorem. First, we reviewed existing literature on employment outcomes following epilepsy neurosurgery to identify and extract data relevant to our hypothetical patient, clinical question, and setting. Then, we used the base rate (prior probability) of post-surgical unemployment, contingency tables (to derive likelihood ratios), and Bayes' theorem to compute the conditional (posterior) probability of post-surgical employment status for our hypothetical patient scenario. Finally, we translated this information to an intuitive visual format (Bayesian nomogram) that can support evidence-based pre-surgical counseling. We propose that the application of our patient-centered decision-support process and visual aid will improve clinician-patient communication about prospective risks and benefits of epilepsy neurosurgery and will empower clinicians and patients to make informed decisions about whether or not to pursue elective neurosurgery with a greater degree of confidence and with more realistic and concrete expectations about possible outcomes. We further propose that clinicians and patients would benefit from incorporating this evidence-based framework into a broader sequence of function-focused epilepsy treatment that includes pre-surgical assessments and interventions ("prehabilitation"), neurosurgery, and post-surgical cognitive/vocational rehabilitation.

Heart Rate Variability in Insulo-Opercular Epilepsy

Background: We aimed to evaluate heart rate variability (HRV) changes in insulo-opercular epilepsy (IOE) and after insulo-opercular surgery. Methods: We analyzed 5-min resting HRV of IOE patients before and after surgery. Patients’ SUDEP-7 risk inventory scores were also calculated. Results were compared with age- and sex-matched patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and healthy individuals. Results: There were no differences in HRV measurements between IOE, TLE, and healthy control groups (and within each IOE group and TLE group) in preoperative and postoperative periods. In IOE patients, the SUDEP-7 score was positively correlated with pNN50 (percentage of successive RR intervals that differ by more than 50 ms) (p = 0.008) and RMSSD (root mean square of successive RR interval differences) (p = 0.019). We stratified IOE patients into those whose preoperative RMSSD values were below (Group 1a = 7) versus above (Group 1b = 9) a cut-off threshold of 31 ms (median value of a healthy population from a previous study). In group 1a, all HRV values significantly increased after surgery. In group 1b, time-domain parameters significantly decreased postoperatively. Conclusions: Our results suggest that in IOE, HRV may be either decreased in parasympathetic tone or increased globally in both sympathetic and parasympathetic tones. We found no evidence that insulo-opercular surgeries lead to major autonomic dysfunction when a good seizure outcome is reached. The increase in parasympathetic tone observed preoperatively may be of clinical concern, as it was positively correlated with the SUDEP-7 score.

Experiences of emotional and psychosocial functioning after frontal lobe resection for epilepsy

PURPOSE

Frontal lobe resection (FLR) is the second most common epilepsy surgery procedure in adults. Few studies address neuropsychological consequences after FLR. The aim of this study was to explore patients' and relatives' experiences of cognitive, emotional and social cognitive functioning after frontal lobe epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were held with 14 patients having gone through FLR as adults during the years 2000-2016 and 12 of their relatives. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed with inductive qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Positive as well as negative consequences were described both by patients and relatives. Feelings of relief and an increased capacity to experience emotions of well-being were mainly experienced as related to seizure freedom. A newfound autonomy and a more grown-up identity as opposed to a self-image based on epilepsy was also highlighted. However, results also showed that even for seizure free patients, FLR could give rise to negative experiences, the most prominent of which were mental fatigue, lowered mood and social withdrawal. Coping strategies included planning ahead to avoid mental exhaustion. Over all, respondents considered that the epilepsy surgery had been a risk well worth taking and that positive consequences outweighed the negative ones.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows a range of positive as well as negative outcomes after FLR for epilepsy. The findings indicate that lowered mood and mental fatigue could affect the life situation in a negative way, regardless of seizure outcome. This is important to consider in the preoperative counselling of patients and their families, as well as in the postsurgical follow-up. It is also crucial that the epilepsy surgery team has the possibility to offer rehabilitation and support to families regarding these aspects after surgery.

Psychological status after insulo-opercular resection in patients with epilepsy: Depression, anxiety, and quality of life

Insular epilepsy is increasingly recognized in epilepsy surgery centers. Recent studies suggest that resection of an epileptogenic zone that involves the insula as a treatment for drug-resistant seizures is associated with good outcomes in terms of seizure control. However, despite the existing evidence of a role of the insula in emotions and affective information processing, the long-term psychological outcome of patients undergoing these surgeries remain poorly documented. A group of 27 adults (18 women) who underwent an insulo-opercular resection (in combination with a part of the temporal lobe in 10, and of the frontal lobe in 5) as part of epilepsy surgery at our center between 2004 and 2019 completed psychometric questionnaires to assess depression (Beck Depression Inventory - 2nd edition; BDI-II), anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Trait Version; STAI-T), and quality of life (Patient Weighted Quality of Life In Epilepsy; QOLIE-10-P). Scores were compared to those of patients who had standard temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) surgery with similar socio-demographic and disease characteristics. Seizure control after insular epilepsy surgery was comparable to that observed after TLE surgery, with a majority of patients reporting being seizure free (insular: 63.0%; temporal: 63.2%) or having rare disabling seizures (insular: 7.4%; temporal: 18.4%) at the time of questionnaire completion. Statistical comparisons revealed no significant group difference on scores of depression, anxiety, or quality of life. Hemisphere or extent of insular resection had no significant effect on the studied variables. In the total sample, employment status and seizure control, but not location of surgery, significantly predicted quality of life. Self-reported long-term psychological status after insulo-opercular resection as part of epilepsy surgery thus appears to be similar to that observed after TLE surgery, which is commonly performed in epilepsy surgery centers.