Correlates of epilepsy self-management in MEW Network participants: From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Managing Epilepsy Well Network

Self-management strategies for people with epilepsy: An overview of reviews

OBJECTIVE

This overview of systematic reviews aimed to appraise evidence regarding self-management strategies on health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, medication compliance, seizure status and psychosocial outcomes compared to usual care for people with epilepsy.

METHODS

Databases were searched until September 2022 using MeSH terms included OVID Medline, Embase and Cochrane. Following application of eligibility criteria, data were extracted and quality of articles was assessed using the AMSTAR2 checklist. A narrative synthesis of evidence included certainty of evidence evaluated using a Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

The 12 selected reviews contained three meta-analyses and 91 unique primary studies. One review considered only epilepsy with intellectual disability and three considered paediatrics. Interventions included technologically-based interventions, small group discussion, or counselling and educational programs. There was high certainty evidence to suggest self-management is associated with improvement in health-related quality of life and moderate certainty evidence to suggest improvement in depression symptoms. There was low certainty evidence to suggest a modest reduction in negative health events and a minimal increase in the satisfaction with life. There was no evidence of benefit favouring self-management on measures of adherence epilepsy self-management, perception of self-efficacy, medication adherence or seizure status.

SIGNIFICANCE

Despite high certainty evidence to suggest that self-management strategies for people with epilepsy improve health-related quality of life, benefits have not been demonstrated for outcomes that would be expected to be associated with these improvements, such as seizure status. These results provide support for self-management strategies to supplement usual care for people with epilepsy.

The Managing Epilepsy Well (MEW) network database: Lessons learned in refining and implementing an integrated data tool in service of a national U.S. Research Collaborative

Epilepsy self-management (ESM) is the summative set of behaviors that people with epilepsy use to cope with seizures and optimize health. This report describes the implementation and evolution of the Managing Epilepsy Well Network Database (MEW DB), an integrated data resource intended to advance knowledge on ESM. The MEW DB utilizes a three-tiered (Tier 1-3) system of data organization, with tiers of data generally increasing in ascending complexity or collection burden. A MEW DB Steering Committee (SC) establishes consensus on planned analyses using a standardized new analysis request template. The data management structure facilitates harmonization and integration of additional data, or to update the database as new data become available. The current MEW DB comprises 1,563 people with epilepsy. Mean age was 39.9 years, 64.9% women (N = 1006), 12.8% African American (N = 170), 22.2% Hispanic (N = 306). On average, individuals have lived with epilepsy since their early 20s and are prescribed between 1 and 2 antiepileptic drugs. The MEW DB spans multiple socio-ecological levels to provide a robust multi-tiered framework for studying ESM. A total of 41 common data elements have been identified through iterative consensus. This integrated database takes advantage of an extensive collective background of archival evidence in ESM and brings together engaged investigators to build a dataset that represents diverse types of individuals with epilepsy, targets health domains important to ESM, and facilitates analyses that would not be possible with sites operating independently. Overall, the MEW DB serves the greater mission of this research collaborative and has potential to advance ESM research.

Design and implementation of electronic health record common data elements for pediatric epilepsy: Foundations for a learning health care system

OBJECTIVE

Common data elements (CDEs) are standardized questions and answer choices that allow aggregation, analysis, and comparison of observations from multiple sources. Clinical CDEs are foundational for learning health care systems, a data-driven approach to health care focused on continuous improvement of outcomes. We aimed to create clinical CDEs for pediatric epilepsy.

METHODS

A multiple stakeholder group (clinicians, researchers, parents, caregivers, advocates, and electronic health record [EHR] vendors) developed clinical CDEs for routine care of children with epilepsy. Initial drafts drew from clinical epilepsy note templates, CDEs created for clinical research, items in existing registries, consensus documents and guidelines, quality metrics, and outcomes needed for demonstration projects. The CDEs were refined through discussion and field testing. We describe the development process, rationale for CDE selection, findings from piloting, and the CDEs themselves. We also describe early implementation, including experience with EHR systems and compatibility with the International League Against Epilepsy classification of seizure types.

RESULTS

Common data elements were drafted in August 2017 and finalized in January 2020. Prioritized outcomes included seizure control, seizure freedom, American Academy of Neurology quality measures, presence of common comorbidities, and quality of life. The CDEs were piloted at 224 visits at 10 centers. The final CDEs included 36 questions in nine sections (number of questions): diagnosis (1), seizure frequency (9), quality of life (2), epilepsy history (6), etiology (8), comorbidities (2), treatment (2), process measures (5), and longitudinal history notes (1). Seizures are categorized as generalized tonic-clonic (regardless of onset), motor, nonmotor, and epileptic spasms. Focality is collected as epilepsy type rather than seizure type. Seizure frequency is measured in nine levels (all used during piloting). The CDEs were implemented in three vendor systems. Early clinical adoption included 1294 encounters at one center.

SIGNIFICANCE

We created, piloted, refined, finalized, and implemented a novel set of clinical CDEs for pediatric epilepsy.

MINDSET: Clinic-based decision support demonstrates longitudinal efficacy for increased epilepsy self-management adherence among Spanish speaking patients

BACKGROUND

MINDSET, a bilingual (Eng./Span.) decision support tool was found feasible for facilitating goal-based epilepsy self-management (ESM) in the clinic.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of MINDSET to increase ESM adherence among Hispanic patients.

METHODS

A RCT was conducted from August 2017 through January 2019. Spanish and English speaking Hispanic adult patients (n=94) with epilepsy in Arizona (n=53) and Texas (n=41) were randomly assigned within 6 neurology clinics to treatment (MINDSET plus Usual Care, hereafter referred to as MINDSET; n=46) and comparison (Usual Care Only; n=48) conditions. Self-reported self-management behavior (assessed through the Epilepsy Self-management scale) were categorized as adherent if performed 'usually' or 'always.' The proportion of adherence was compared between study conditions for 36 individual ESM behaviors and 5 ESM domains using Fischer's exact test.

RESULTS

The average time between visit 1 through 3 was 350+/-79 days with retention at 96.8%. Participants in the treatment condition had more college education and less unemployment. Self-management adherence improved across visits for all self-management behaviors irrespective of study condition. Compared to usual care MINDSET use led to greater ESM adherence for 86.1% behaviors (5 with statistical significance; p<0.05) and to significant improvement in the ESM domain of 'information management' (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of MINDSET within regular neurology visits may assist Hispanic adults with epilepsy to increase their adherence to ESM behaviors and maintain this adherence longitudinally. Replication with a broader demographic population of people with epilepsy is indicated.

Patient, Caregiver, and Provider Perceptions of Transition Readiness and Therapeutic Alliance during Transition from Pediatric to Adult Care in Epilepsy

Transition from pediatric to adult health care is a time of high risk for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with epilepsy. Our aims are to examine patient, caregiver, and provider perceptions of transition readiness and the influence of patient-provider alliance in the context of transition readiness. Our cross-sectional study included 82 AYAs with epilepsy prior to transition. Patients, caregivers, and providers completed questionnaires (e.g., transition readiness and working alliance). Statistical analyses included independent samples and paired t-tests. Participants were 17.3 ± 2.8 years on average, 54% were females, 84% were White (non-Hispanic), and 38% had generalized epilepsy. Caregivers reported significantly higher transition readiness than their AYAs (t (72) = −10.6, p < 0.001). AYAs and providers reported similar alliance scores. Providers who felt patients were ready to transition had higher patient-reported transition readiness and provider-reported alliance scores. These data suggest that patients and providers are well aligned in the transition process, and providers appropriately perceive key areas necessary for transition. Caregivers and patients had discrepant perceptions of transition readiness, highlighting the importance of assessing both unique transition perspectives. Dedicated transition programs are likely to be beneficial in improving transition readiness and increase alignment across patients, caregivers, and providers.

Bridging the divide between epilepsy and mental health to drive solutions

Since its establishment in 2000, Epilepsy & Behavior has published more than 1000 papers on mental health issues among people with epilepsy, including about 200 reviews. These studies on prevalence, treatment, and guidance for future research are important contributions to the field, and they offer great promise. Yet these papers and the multitude published in other journals over the years have failed to result in systematic, scaled changes in how the epilepsy field in the United States addresses mental health issues. The mental health assessment and management gap is especially notable given decades-old, as well as more recent, recommendations from national initiatives on epilepsy, consensus statements, and other expert appeals to reduce psychiatric burden. Selected or comprehensive elements of emerging models and latest approaches from behavioral health (e.g., peer support) and public health (e.g., community-clinical linkages) highlight current opportunities to engage multiple community partners and sectors to bridge the epilepsy and behavioral health fields to implement solutions for improved mental healthcare for people with epilepsy. In honor of the 20th anniversary of Epilepsy & Behavior and its contribution to the literature and the field, we seek to build public health roadmaps to bridge the epilepsy and behavioral health divide-with new epilepsy partners who can expand community-based partnerships that may help facilitate systematic changes to close mental health treatment gaps. Special Issue: Epilepsy & Behavior's 20th Anniversary.

Ethnicity and health outcomes among people with epilepsy participating in an epilepsy self-management RCT

People with epilepsy (PWE) may experience negative health events (NHEs) such as seizures, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations, with ethnic and racial minorities disproportionately affected. Epilepsy self-management may reduce NHEs; however, few reports examine self-management outcomes in racial minorities. Using data from a longitudinal 6-month randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 120 PWE, this analysis compared African-American and Whites at baseline, 10 weeks and 24 weeks after receiving the "Self-management for people with epilepsy (SMART) and a history of NHEs" self-management program. The primary RCT outcome was number of NHEs. At baseline, compared to Whites, African-Americans had less education (p = 0.02) and greater depressive severity (p = 0.04). Both African-American and Whites generally improved with SMART, and there were no racial differences in NHE counts or other outcomes' responses. Given known racial disparities in epilepsy care, it may be particularly important to reach out to minority PWE with self-management programs.

Self-management skills and behaviors, self-efficacy, and quality of life in people with epilepsy from underserved populations

PURPOSE

People with epilepsy (PWE) from underserved populations face significant barriers to epilepsy management and therefore may lack knowledge about epilepsy and self-management (SM) of epilepsy. This paper evaluates SM practices, self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, quality of life, and personal impact of epilepsy in PWE from underserved populations as compared with all PWE.

METHODS

Recruitment for the Managing Epilepsy Well (MEW) Network PAUSE to Learn Your Epilepsy study occurred from October 2015 to March 2019. Participants were assessed at baseline; after SM education intervention; and 6-, 9-, and 15-month postbaseline assessment. Baseline data from 112 PWE were analyzed for this report.

RESULTS

Study population was diverse: 63% were women, 47.3% were non-Hispanic black, 24.1% were Hispanic, and 57.4% had public healthcare coverage. Participants on average had epilepsy for 14 years, and 49.1% reported at least one seizure within the past month, but only 27% reported having used a seizure diary or calendar for seizure tracking. Self-management practices & behaviors were significantly lower among PWE from underserved populations than all PWE, though self-efficacy among PWE from underserved populations was significantly higher.

CONCLUSION

This study identifies the unique epilepsy SM needs of PWE from underserved populations. We discuss the need for a personalized approach for developing SM skills and behaviors among these PWE.

Depression and quality of life among African Americans with epilepsy: Findings from the Managing Epilepsy Well (MEW) Network integrated database

Depression and worse quality of life (QOL) are significantly associated with epilepsy. However, limited descriptive data on depression and quality of life among African Americans with epilepsy are available. This study sought to describe the prevalence of depression among African Americans with epilepsy participating in self-management studies and to examine the relationship between depression and QOL. Using data from the Managing Epilepsy Well (MEW) research network, a subgroup of African Americans with epilepsy were selected for the analytic sample. Descriptive statistics indicated the prevalence of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]) and reports of epilepsy-specific QOL (Quality of Life in Epilepsy-10 [QOLIE-10]) in the sample. Multiple linear regression examined the relationship between depression and QOL while controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and seizure frequency. The prevalence of depression (PHQ-9 ≥; 10) was 47.7%. Quality of life was the only variable significantly associated with depressive symptoms in multivariable analyses, suggesting that depressive symptoms have a stronger relationship with QOL than seizure frequency. With the high levels of depression and the significant relationship with QOL, regular screening of depression is needed among African Americans with epilepsy. Self-management programs that improve mood may also play an important role in improving the lives of African Americans with epilepsy.

MINDSET: Clinical feasibility of utilizing the revised epilepsy self-management tool for Spanish speaking patients

This paper describes the expanded English/Spanish version of the Management Information and Decision Support Epilepsy Tool (MINDSET) as well as the methods and findings from a feasibility study conducted from July 2016 through February 2017 with 43 Spanish and English-speaking Hispanic people living with epilepsy (PWE) in Arizona (n = 23) and Texas (n = 20) over two consecutive regular clinic visits. The expansion of MINDSET added goal setting and strategy selection to improve self-management (S-M) in PWE. The previous study tested the feasibility of English MINDSET, which was designed to facilitate the identification and discussion of S-M issues between the patient and healthcare provider (HCP) during a regular clinic visit. Results indicate MINDSET feasibility for use in the following: 1) identifying S-M issues across several domains; 2) selecting and assessing confidence in tailored S-M goals/strategies for improvement; 3) discussing S-M issues/goals/strategies/confidence with a HCP; and 4) creating an action plan (AP) and tracking achievement during regular clinic visits. Across two visits, 80-90% of patients agreed that the revised version of MINDSET was helpful, understandable, trustworthy, promoted careful thinking about management, was of appropriate duration, and would be helpful in future management and communication with HCP. Participating HCPs agreed that MINDSET improved the ease, thoroughness, and accuracy in identifying patient S-M issues and establishing a plan for improvement.