Perampanel in the treatment of status epilepticus: A systematic review of the literature

Use of perampanel oral suspension for the treatment of refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus

INTRODUCTION

Status epilepticus (SE) is a medical emergency associated with a significant risk of disability and death. The treatment of SE follows a step-wise approach, with limited data on ideal antiseizure medications (ASMs) for refractory and super refractory SE (RSE/SRSE). Perampanel (PER), an AMPA receptor antagonist, has shown promise in animal models but still has limited data in humans. This study tried to evaluate optimal dosage and safety of PER in RSE and SRSE patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 17 adult patients with RSE (1) or SRSE (16) treated with PER. Demographic and clinical data, including EEG patterns, ASMs administered, PER dosages, and PER plasma concentrations, were collected. For patients receiving a 24 mg PER loading dose (full dose group), the following treatment regimen was applied: 24 mg per day for 48 h following by 16 mg per day. The response to PER was assessed based on electroencephalographic (EEG) improvement from high to low epileptiform activity or from low to the absence of epileptiform activities. Safety was evaluated monitoring hepatic and renal function.

RESULTS

A response rate of 58.82 % was observed, with significantly higher responses in the full dose group (81.82 %) compared to those receiving PER doses below 24 mg (low dose group) (16.67 %) (p-value = 0.004; OR 0.044, 95 % CI 0.003 to 0.621, p = 0.021). No other clinical factors significantly influenced treatment response. Hepatic enzymes become elevated in most patients (70.59 %) but spontaneously decreased.

DISCUSSION

Our findings suggest that a 24 mg PER dose administered for 48 h may be more effective in managing RSE and SRSE compared to doses below 24 mg, potentially due to pharmacokinetic factors.

CONCLUSION

More robust data on PER in RSE and SRSE, including standardized dosing procedures and plasma level monitoring are needed. PER's potential benefits should be explored further, particularly in patients with RSE and SRSE.

Mammalian models of status epilepticus - Their value and limitations

Status epilepticus (SE) is a medical and neurologic emergency that may lead to permanent brain damage, morbidity, or death. Animal models of SE are particularly important to study the pathophysiology of SE and mechanisms of SE resistance to antiseizure medications with the aim to develop new, more effective treatments. In addition to rodents (rats or mice), larger mammalian species such as dogs, pigs, and nonhuman primates are used. This short review describes and discusses the value and limitations of the most frequently used mammalian models of SE. Issues that are discussed include (1) differences between chemical and electrical SE models; (2) the role of genetic background and environment on SE in rodents; (3) the use of rodent models (a) to study the pathophysiology of SE and mechanisms of SE resistance; (b) to study developmental aspects of SE; (c) to study the efficacy of new treatments, including drug combinations, for refractory SE; (d) to study the long-term consequences of SE and identify biomarkers; (e) to develop treatments that prevent or modify epilepsy; (e) to study the pharmacology of spontaneous seizures; (4) the limitations of animal models of induced SE; and (5) the advantages (and limitations) of naturally (spontaneously) occurring SE in epileptic dogs and nonhuman primates. Overall, mammalian models of SE have significantly increased our understanding of the pathophysiology and drug resistance of SE and identified potential targets for new, more effective treatments. This paper was presented at the 9th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in April 2024.

Perampanel as an Add-On Therapy in Patients with Refractory Status Epilepticus and Postanoxic Encephalopathy: A Real-Life Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Data on the efficacy of perampanel in refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and postanoxic encephalopathy (PAE) are limited; its use in such conditions is currently off-label.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients with RSE, including PAE, exhibiting electroencephalographic patterns indicative of status epilepticus who were treated at our center (January 2018 to December 2022) with assessment of clinical and electroencephalographic outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were included in the study, of whom 29 had nonanoxic RSE and 7 had PAE. Within the nonanoxic RSE subgroup, 45% (13 of 29; 95% confidence interval [CI] 27-63%) of study participants were responders, 34% (10 of 29; 95% CI 17-52%) were partial responders, and 21% (6 of 29; 95% CI 6-35%) were nonresponders. In the PAE subgroup (n = 7), no patients fully responded to perampanel; 43% (3 of 7; 95% CI 6-80%) were partial responders, and 57% (4 of 7; 95% CI 20-95%) were nonresponders. Responder and nonresponder study participants exhibited overlapping baseline characteristics. No significant differences in duration of hospitalization were observed between responders and nonresponders in both subgroups. Responders in the RSE subgroup had a median discharge modified Rankin Scale score of 3 (interquartile range 3-4), and nonresponders had a median discharge modified Rankin Scale score of 5 (interquartile range 5-6).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite limitations from the retrospective design and the small population size, this study suggests that perampanel use in nonanoxic RSE appears to yield promising results at moderate doses, including a tendency toward a better functional outcome at discharge, without significant adverse effects. However, in patients with PAE, the drug seems to show suboptimal performance. Perampanel appears to have promising efficacy as an add-on therapy in nonanoxic RSE. However, in patients with PAE, its efficacy seems to be lower. Further studies are warranted to confirm these observations.

Sustained effort network for treatment of status epilepticus/European academy of neurology registry on adult refractory status epilepticus (SENSE-II/AROUSE)

BACKGROUND

Status Epilepticus (SE) is a common neurological emergency associated with a high rate of functional decline and mortality. Large randomized trials have addressed the early phases of treatment for convulsive SE. However, evidence regarding third-line anesthetic treatment and the treatment of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is scarce. One trial addressing management of refractory SE with deep general anesthesia was terminated early due to insufficient recruitment. Multicenter prospective registries, including the Sustained Effort Network for treatment of Status Epilepticus (SENSE), have shed some light on these questions, but many answers are still lacking, such as the influence exerted by distinct EEG patterns in NCSE on the outcome. We therefore initiated a new prospective multicenter observational registry to collect clinical and EEG data that combined may further help in clinical decision-making and defining SE.

METHODS

Sustained effort network for treatment of status epilepticus/European Academy of Neurology Registry on refractory Status Epilepticus (SENSE-II/AROUSE) is a prospective, multicenter registry for patients treated for SE. The primary objectives are to document patient and SE characteristics, treatment modalities, EEG, neuroimaging data, and outcome of consecutive adults admitted for SE treatment in each of the participating centers and to identify factors associated with outcome and refractoriness. To reach sufficient statistical power for multivariate analysis, a cohort size of 3000 patients is targeted.

DISCUSSION

The data collected for the registry will provide both valuable EEG data and information about specific treatment steps in different patient groups with SE. Eventually, the data will support clinical decision-making and may further guide the planning of clinical trials. Finally, it could help to redefine NCSE and its management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT number: NCT05839418.

Research Status, Synthesis and Clinical Application of Antiepileptic Drugs

According to the 2017 ILAE's official definition, epilepsy is a slow brain disease state characterized by recurrent episodes. Due to information released by ILAE in 2017, it can be divided into four types, including focal epilepsy, generalized epilepsy, combined generalized, and focal epilepsy, and unknown epilepsy. Since 1989, 24 new antiepileptic drugs have been approved to treat different types of epilepsy. Besides, there are a variety of antiepileptic medications under clinical monitoring. These novel antiepileptic drugs have plenty of advantages. Over the past 33 years, there have been many antiepileptic drugs on the mearket, but no one has been found that can completely cure epilepsy. In this paper, the mentioned drugs were classified according to their targets, and the essential information, and clinical studies of each drug were described. The structure-activity relationship of different chemical structures was summarized. This paper provides help for the follow-up research on epilepsy drugs.

Efficacy of Perampanel in Refractory and Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus with Suspected Inflammatory Etiology: A Case Series

(1) Background: Increasing evidence supports the anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective role of perampanel (PER), mediated by decreased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and by interference with apoptosis processes. Therefore, the use of PER to treat status epilepticus (SE) with suspected inflammatory etiology is appealing and deserves further investigation. (2) Methods: We retrospectively analyzed seven patients (five F, two M; median age: 62 years) with refractory and super-refractory SE due to a probable or defined inflammatory etiology and treated with PER. (3) Results: PER was administered as the third (4/7) or fourth drug (3/7), with a median loading dose of 32 mg/day (range: 16-36 mg/day) and a median maintenance dose of 10 mg/day (range: 4-12 mg/day). In five cases, SE was focal, while in two patients, it was generalized. SE was caused by systemic inflammation in three patients, while in the other four subjects, it was recognized to have an autoimmune etiology. SE resolution was observed after PER administration in all cases, particularly within 24 h in the majority of patients (4/7, 57.1%). (4) Conclusions: Our data support the efficacy of PER in treating SE when first- and second-line ASMs have failed and suggest a possible earlier use in SE cases that are due to inflammatory/autoimmune etiology.

The broad-spectrum activity of perampanel: state of the art and future perspective of AMPA antagonism beyond epilepsy

Glutamate is the brain's main excitatory neurotransmitter. Glutamatergic neurons primarily compose basic neuronal networks, especially in the cortex. An imbalance of excitatory and inhibitory activities may result in epilepsy or other neurological and psychiatric conditions. Among glutamate receptors, AMPA receptors are the predominant mediator of glutamate-induced excitatory neurotransmission and dictate synaptic efficiency and plasticity by their numbers and/or properties. Therefore, they appear to be a major drug target for modulating several brain functions. Perampanel (PER) is a highly selective, noncompetitive AMPA antagonist approved in several countries worldwide for treating different types of seizures in various epileptic conditions. However, recent data show that PER can potentially address many other conditions within epilepsy and beyond. From this perspective, this review aims to examine the new preclinical and clinical studies-especially those produced from 2017 onwards-on AMPA antagonism and PER in conditions such as mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, idiopathic and genetic generalized epilepsy, brain tumor-related epilepsy, status epilepticus, rare epileptic syndromes, stroke, sleep, epilepsy-related migraine, cognitive impairment, autism, dementia, and other neurodegenerative diseases, as well as provide suggestions on future research agenda aimed at probing the possibility of treating these conditions with PER and/or other AMPA receptor antagonists.

In the fast lane: Receptor trafficking during status epilepticus

Status epilepticus (SE) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality and often is refractory to standard first-line treatments. A rapid loss of synaptic inhibition and development of pharmacoresistance to benzodiazepines (BZDs) occurs early during SE, while NMDA and AMPA receptor antagonists remain effective treatments after BZDs have failed. Multimodal and subunit-selective receptor trafficking within minutes to an hour of SE involves GABA-A, NMDA, and AMPA receptors and contributes to shifts in the number and subunit composition of surface receptors with differential impacts on the physiology, pharmacology, and strength of GABAergic and glutamatergic currents at synaptic and extrasynaptic sites. During the first hour of SE, synaptic GABA-A receptors containing γ2 subunits move to the cell interior while extrasynaptic GABA-A receptors with δ subunits are preserved. Conversely, NMDA receptors containing N2B subunits are increased at synaptic and extrasynaptic sites, and homomeric GluA1 ("GluA2-lacking") calcium permeant AMPA receptor surface expression also is increased. Molecular mechanisms, largely driven by NMDA receptor or calcium permeant AMPA receptor activation early during circuit hyperactivity, regulate subunit-specific interactions with proteins involved with synaptic scaffolding, adaptin-AP2/clathrin-dependent endocytosis, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention, and endosomal recycling. Reviewed here is how SE-induced shifts in receptor subunit composition and surface representation increase the excitatory to inhibitory imbalance that sustains seizures and fuels excitotoxicity contributing to chronic sequela such as "spontaneous recurrent seizures" (SRS). A role for early multimodal therapy is suggested both for treatment of SE and for prevention of long-term comorbidities.

Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam versus valproate in patients with established status epilepticus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Status epilepticus (SE) is a common neurological emergency that is defined as a prolonged seizure or a series of seizures which often leads to irreversible damage. Levetiracetam (LEV) and valproate (VPA) are second-line anti-seizure drugs that are frequently used in patients with established SE (ESE). This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of LEV and VPA for the treatment of ESE.

Method

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and clinicaltrials.gov were searched by two authors, which identified six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared LEV and VPA for ESE.

Results

The six RCTs included 1213 patients (LEV group, n = 593; VPA group, n = 620). Integrated patient data information display LEV was not superior to VPA in terms of clinical seizure termination (63.55% vs. 64.08%, respectively; relative risk [RR] = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.94-1.11, p = 0.55), with no significant differences between LEV and VPA in terms of good functional outcome at discharge (Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS] = 4 or 5), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, adverse events, and mortality. There was no statistically significant difference between the two drugs in different age groups. Previous multicenter studies have demonstrated that VPA was slightly more effective than LEV, whereas single-center studies showed the opposite results. In addition, LEV and VPA had similar rates of clinical seizure termination, ICU admission, and adverse events between the age subgroups (ages <18 and >18 years).

Conclusions

Levetiracetam (LEV) was not superior to valproate (VPA) in terms of efficacy or safety outcomes. In addition, children (<18 years) and adults (>18 years) might have similar responses to LEV and VPA. Additional RCTs are required to verify our results.

Status Epilepticus in Older Adults: Diagnostic and Treatment Considerations

Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the leading life-threatening neurological emergencies in the elderly population, with significant morbidity and mortality. SE presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in the older population given overlap with other causes of encephalopathy, complicating diagnosis, and the common occurrence of multiple comorbid diseases complicates treatment. First-line therapy involves the use of rescue benzodiazepine in the form of intravenous lorazepam or diazepam, intramuscular or intranasal midazolam and rectal diazepam. Second-line therapies include parenteral levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, valproate and lacosamide, and underlying comorbidities guide the choice of appropriate medication, while third-line therapies may be influenced by the patient's code status as well as the cause and type of SE. The standard of care for convulsive SE is treatment with an intravenous anesthetic, including midazolam, propofol, ketamine and pentobarbital. There is currently limited evidence guiding appropriate therapy in patients failing third-line therapies. Adjunctive strategies may include immunomodulatory treatments, non-pharmacological strategies such as ketogenic diet, neuromodulation therapies and surgery in select cases. Surrogate decision makers should be updated early and often in refractory episodes of SE and informed of the high morbidity and mortality associated with the disease as well as the high probability of subsequent epilepsy among survivors.

The potential of intravenous topiramate for the treatment of status epilepticus

There is considerable clinical evidence that topiramate (TPM) has a high potential in the treatment of refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus (RSE, SRSE). Because TPM is only approved for oral administration, it is applied as suspension via a nasogastric tube for SE treatment. However, this route of administration is impractical in an emergency setting and leads to variable absorption with unpredictable plasma levels and time to peak concentration. Thus, the development of an intravenous (i.v.) solution for TPM is highly desirable. Here we present data on two parenteral formulations of TPM that are currently being developed. One of these solutions is using sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin (SBE-β-CD; Captisol®) as an excipient. A 1% solution of TPM in 10% Captisol® has been reported to be well tolerated in safety studies in healthy volunteers and patients with epilepsy or migraine, but efficacy data are not available. The other solution uses the FDA- and EMA-approved excipient amino sugar meglumine. Meglumine is much more effective to dissolve TPM in water than Captisol®. A 1% solution of TPM can be achieved with 0.5-1% of meglumine. While the use of Captisol®-containing solutions is restricted in children and patients with renal impairment, such restrictions do not apply to meglumine. Recently, first-in-human data were reported for a meglumine-based solution of TPM, indicating safety and efficacy when used as a replacement for oral administration in a woman with epilepsy. Based on the multiple mechanisms of action of TPM that directly target the molecular neuronal alterations that are thought to underlie the loss of efficacy of benzodiazepines and other anti-seizure medications during prolonged SE and its rapid brain penetration after i.v. administration, we suggest that parenteral (i.v.) TPM is ideally suited for the treatment of RSE and SRSE. This paper was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022.

Why won't it stop? The dynamics of benzodiazepine resistance in status epilepticus

Status epilepticus is a life-threatening neurological emergency that affects both adults and children. Approximately 36% of episodes of status epilepticus do not respond to the current preferred first-line treatment, benzodiazepines. The proportion of episodes that are refractory to benzodiazepines is higher in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) than in high-income countries (HICs). Evidence suggests that longer episodes of status epilepticus alter brain physiology, thereby contributing to the emergence of benzodiazepine resistance. Such changes include alterations in GABA_A receptor function and in the transmembrane gradient for chloride, both of which erode the ability of benzodiazepines to enhance inhibitory synaptic signalling. Often, current management guidelines for status epilepticus do not account for these duration-related changes in pathophysiology, which might differentially impact individuals in LMICs, where the average time taken to reach medical attention is longer than in HICs. In this Perspective article, we aim to combine clinical insights and the latest evidence from basic science to inspire a new, context-specific approach to efficiently managing status epilepticus.

Phenobarbital versus valproate for generalized convulsive status epilepticus in adults (2): A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial in China (China 2-P vs. V)

OBJECTIVE

A multicenter study of phenobarbital versus valproate (i.e., the China 2-P vs. V study) was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of phenobarbital and valproate for generalized convulsive status epilepticus (SE) in a multicenter trial design.

METHODS

Three improvements (uniform intravenous pumping, pump speed adjustment according to adverse events and blood drug level monitoring) over a previous study were made regarding an intravenous regimen of phenobarbital and valproate in a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled study. Long-term electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring was performed after initial drug treatment. Termination, relapse, adverse event and poor prognosis rates in patients with generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) were compared.

RESULTS

The rate of GCSE termination within one hour were significantly higher in the phenobarbital group (33 cases) than in the valproate group (36 cases) (84.8 % vs. 63.9 %, P = 0.048), but the rates of nontermination of EEG epileptic discharge within one hour were similar between the two groups (12.1 % vs. 8.3 %, P = 0.702). The relapse and adverse event rates were not significantly different between groups, but 3 hypoventilation events and 1 hypotension event occurred in the phenobarbital group compared to 0 in the valproate group. There were no cases of epileptiform EEG discharge relapse in the phenobarbital group, compared to 1 case in the valproate group.

CONCLUSIONS

The phenobarbital regimen evaluated in this study has a higher GCSE termination rate than the valproate regimen, indicating that the former is suitable for countries, regions and individuals with limited access to new antiepileptic drugs or limited economic means.

PERMIT study: a global pooled analysis study of the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel in routine clinical practice

The PERaMpanel pooled analysIs of effecTiveness and tolerability (PERMIT) study was a pooled analysis of data from 44 real-world studies from 17 countries, in which people with epilepsy (PWE; focal and generalized) were treated with perampanel (PER). Retention and effectiveness were assessed after 3, 6, and 12 months, and at the last visit (last observation carried forward). Effectiveness assessments included 50% responder rate (≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline) and seizure freedom rate (no seizures since at least the prior visit); in PWE with status epilepticus, response was defined as seizures under control. Safety and tolerability were assessed by evaluating adverse events (AEs) and discontinuation due to AEs. The Full Analysis Set included 5193 PWE. Retention, effectiveness and safety/tolerability were assessed in 4721, 4392 and 4617, respectively. Retention on PER treatment at 3, 6, and 12 months was 90.5%, 79.8%, and 64.2%, respectively. Mean retention time on PER treatment was 10.8 months. The 50% responder rate was 58.3% at 12 months and 50.0% at the last visit, and the corresponding seizure freedom rates were 23.2% and 20.5%, respectively; 52.7% of PWE with status epilepticus responded to PER treatment. Overall, 49.9% of PWE reported AEs and the most frequently reported AEs (≥ 5% of PWE) were dizziness/vertigo (15.2%), somnolence (10.6%), irritability (8.4%), and behavioral disorders (5.4%). At 12 months, 17.6% of PWEs had discontinued due to AEs. PERMIT demonstrated that PER is effective and generally well tolerated when used to treat people with focal and/or generalized epilepsy in everyday clinical practice.

Optimal Use of Perampanel in Asian Patients with Epilepsy: Expert Opinion

Perampanel is a once-daily, first-in-class AMPA receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of epilepsy and exhibits broad-spectrum efficacy in a range of seizure types when used as both monotherapy and adjunctive therapy. Clinical studies and real-world evidence have demonstrated the advantages of initiating perampanel at low doses and utilizing a slow titration strategy. Initiating perampanel at an early stage has also been shown to be associated with better patient outcomes. However, the optimal use and place of perampanel in clinical practice has not yet been clearly defined for the Asian patient population. Use of perampanel in clinical practice varies markedly across the Asia region because of variation in knowledge, attitudes, and practice. There is currently no specific guidance on best practices for prescribing perampanel in Asian patients or how to optimize treatment strategies to maximize adherence. A group of epilepsy experts attended a virtual meeting in September 2020 to discuss their experience with using perampanel in the Asian practice setting, including their views regarding appropriate patient populations, optimal starting and maintenance doses, optimal titration regimens, key barriers to adherence, and prevention and management of adverse events. This article summarizes key clinical and real-world evidence for perampanel and consolidates the experts’ opinions on optimization of perampanel prescribing and adherence in real-world practice, providing practical strategies for clinicians to implement to improve outcomes for people with epilepsy in Asia.

Status epilepticus: Practice variation and adherence to treatment guideline in a large community hospital

PURPOSE

To evaluate the treatment of status epilepticus (SE) and adherence to treatment guideline in a large Finnish community hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A consecutive series of 137 patients treated in the emergency department of Kuopio University Hospital. Enrollment took place between March 23 and December 31, 2015. Pediatric patients and postanoxic seizures were excluded. The Finnish Status Epilepticus Current Care Guideline was used as the evaluation benchmark.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients recovered spontaneously. First-line treatment was given to 108 patients with 35.2% efficacy. Second-line treatment was given to 81 patients with 87.7% efficacy. Six patients with refractory SE received successful third-line treatment and four were excluded from intensive care because of futility. The starting dose of a first-line drug was lower than the lowest therapeutic dose in 37.0% of the patients. The escalation from first- to second-line treatment took longer than 60 min in 55.1% of the 70 patients who received both treatments. The first loading dose of a second-line drug was markedly low (<80% of the recommended dose) in 26.2% of the 81 patients treated with second-line drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Prompt and effective pharmacotherapy is the cornerstone of good SE treatment. Subtherapeutic doses of first-line benzodiazepines should be avoided. Benzodiazepine-resistant SE must be recognized early to facilitate rapid treatment escalation. The quality of second-line treatment suffers from excessive delays and inadequate weight-based dosing of antiseizure medications.

Adjunctive Perampanel in Older Patients With Epilepsy: A Multicenter Study of Clinical Practice

Background

Clinical data regarding use of newer antiseizure medications (ASMs) in an older population are limited. In randomized-controlled, placebo-controlled trials, older patients are under-represented, and protocols deviate markedly from routine clinical practice, limiting the external validity of results. Studies performed in a naturalistic setting are a useful complement to characterize the drug profile. Perampanel is a third-generation ASM and the first and only non-competitive alfa-amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionate receptor antagonist.

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive perampanel over a 1‐year period in a population of older patients with epilepsy treated in a real-world setting.

Methods

Older (≥ 65 years of age) patients prescribed add-on perampanel at 12 Italian epilepsy centers were retrospectively identified. Seizure occurrence, adverse events (AEs), and drug withdrawal were analyzed. Effectiveness outcomes included the rates of seizure response (≥ 50% reduction in baseline monthly seizure frequency), seizure freedom, and treatment discontinuation. Safety and tolerability outcomes were the rate of treatment discontinuation due to AEs and the incidence of AEs.

Results

A total of 92 patients with a median age of 69 (range 65–88) years were included. The median daily dose of perampanel at 12 months was 6 mg (interquartile range 4–6 mg). At 12 months, 53 (57.6%) patients were seizure responders, and 22 (23.9%) patients were seizure free. Twenty (21.7%) patients discontinued perampanel; the reasons for treatment withdrawal were insufficient efficacy (n = 6/20; 30.0%), AEs (n = 12/20; 60.0%), and a combination of both (n = 2/20; 10%). The most common AEs included irritability (8.7%), somnolence (4.3%), and dizziness/vertigo (4.3%). The rate of behavioral and psychiatric AEs was higher in patients with history of psychiatric comorbidities (p = 0.044). There were no differences in the occurrence of behavioral and psychiatric AEs according to the concomitant use of levetiracetam (p = 0.776) and history of cognitive decline (p = 0.332).

Conclusions

Adjunctive perampanel was associated with improvement in seizure control and good tolerability in a real-life setting and can represent a viable therapeutic option in older patients with epilepsy.

Efficacy of oral perampanel in status epilepticus and acute repetitive seizures in children at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand

Status epilepticus (SE) and acute repetitive seizure (ARS) are emergency conditions associated with significant morbidity and mortality in children. Anti-seizure medications (ASMs) need to terminate seizures to prevent brain damage and death. Common challenges that delay the management of SE and ARS in children at Phramongkutklao hospital are difficulty in accessing intravenous route for drug administration and inadequate number of intensive care units (which will be required in case of the use of adverse events to anesthetic ASMs). Oral, non-sedating ASMs could be a potential option to terminate seizures effectively in SE and ARS in children and further studies in this aspect are needed. We performed a prospective, descriptive study in children with SE or ARS < 18 years of age who had contraindication to or their seizures were refractory to the second-line ASMs after benzodiazepine and received oral perampanel. Demographic data, efficacy, and adverse effects of treatment were recorded. Fifteen patients with SE (13.3%) and acute repetitive seizure (86.6%) were enrolled. All patients received an oral perampanel loading dose and the maintenance dose depended on their body weight. The average loading and maintenance dose were 0.24 mg/kg/dose and 0.12 mg/kg/day, respectively. At 48 h after administration of loading dose of perampanel, eight of fifteen patients (53.3%) became seizure free, one patient had seizure reduction of >75% from baseline, and three patients had seizure reduction of 25-50% from baseline. No serious side effects were observed. These results indicate that oral perampanel may be potential treatment option for SE and ARS in children.

Ganaxolone treatment for epilepsy patients: from pharmacology to place in therapy

Introduction: Nonsulfated neurosteroids can provide phasic and tonic inhibition through activation of synaptic and extra-synaptic γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)_A receptors, exhibiting a greater potency for the latter. These actions occur by interacting with modulatory sites that are distinct from those bound by benzodiazepines and barbiturates. Ganaxolone (GNX) is a synthetic analog of the endogenous neurosteroid allopregnanolone and a member of a novel class of neuroactive steroids called epalons.Areas covered: The authors review the pharmacology of GNX, summarize the main clinical evidence about its antiseizure efficacy and tolerability, and suggest implications for clinical practice and future research.Expert opinion: The clinical development of GNX is mainly oriented to target unmet needs and focused on status epilepticus and rare genetic epilepsies that have few or no treatment options.The availability of oral and intravenous formulations allows reaching adult and pediatric patients in acute and chronic care settings. Further evidence will complement the understanding of the potentialities of GNX and possibly lead to indications for use in clinical practice.

[S2k guidelines: status epilepticus in adulthood : Guidelines of the German Society for Neurology]

This S2k guideline on diagnosis and treatment of status epilepticus (SE) in adults is based on the last published version from 2021. New definitions and evidence were included in the guideline and the clinical pathway. A seizures lasting longer than 5 minutes (or ≥ 2 seizures over more than 5 mins without intermittend recovery to the preictal neurological state. Initial diagnosis should include a cCT or, if possible, an MRI. The EEG is highly relevant for diagnosis and treatment-monitoring of non-convulsive SE and for the exclusion or diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures. As the increasing evidence supports the relevance of inflammatory comorbidities (e.g. pneumonia) related clinical chemistry should be obtained and repeated over the course of a SE treatment, and antibiotic therapy initiated if indicated.Treatment is applied on four levels: 1. Initial SE: An adequate dose of benzodiazepine is given i.v., i.m., or i.n.; 2. Benzodiazepine-refractory SE: I.v. drugs of 1st choice are levetiracetam or valproate; 3. Refractory SE (RSE) or 4. Super-refractory SE (SRSE): I.v. propofol or midazolam alone or in combination or thiopental in anaesthetic doses are given. In focal non-convulsive RSE the induction of a therapeutic coma depends on the circumstances and is not mandatory. In SRSE the ketogenic diet should be given. I.v. ketamine or inhalative isoflorane can be considered. In selected cased electroconvulsive therapy or, if a resectable epileptogenic zone can be defined epilepsy surgery can be applied. I.v. allopregnanolone or systemic hypothermia should not be used.

Treatment of Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Review

PURPOSE

Super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) presents management challenges due to the absence of randomized controlled trials and a plethora of potential medical therapies. The literature on treatment options for SRSE reports variable success and quality of evidence. This review is a sequel to the 2020 American Epilepsy Society (AES) comprehensive review of the treatment of convulsive refractory status epilepticus (RSE).

METHODS

We sought to determine the effectiveness of treatment options for SRSE. We performed a structured literature search (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL) for studies on reported treatments of SRSE. We excluded antiseizure medications (ASMs) covered in the 2016 AES guideline on the treatment of established SE and the convulsive RSE comprehensive review of the 2020 AES. Literature was reviewed on the effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation, ketogenic diet (KD), lidocaine, inhalation anesthetics, brain surgery, therapeutic hypothermia, perampanel, pregabalin (PGB), and topiramate in the treatment of SRSE. Two authors reviewed each therapeutic intervention. We graded the level of the evidence according to the 2017 classification scheme of the American Academy of Neurology.

RESULTS

For SRSE (level U; 39 class IV studies total), insufficient evidence exists to support that perampanel, PGB, lidocaine, or acute vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is effective. For children and adults with SRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that the KD is effective (level U; 5 class IV studies). For adults with SRSE, insufficient evidence exists that brain surgery is effective (level U, 7 class IV studies). For adults with SRSE insufficient, evidence exists that therapeutic hypothermia is effective (level C, 1 class II and 4 class IV studies). For neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, insufficient evidence exists that therapeutic hypothermia reduces seizure burden (level U; 1 class IV study). For adults with SRSE, insufficient evidence exists that inhalation anesthetics are effective (level U, 1 class IV study) and that there is a potential risk of neurotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

For patients with SRSE insufficient, evidence exists that any of the ASMs reviewed, inhalational anesthetics, ketogenic diet, acute VNS, brain surgery, and therapeutic hypothermia are effective treatments. Data supporting the use of these treatments for SRSE are scarce and limited mainly to small case series and case reports and are confounded by differences in patients' population, and comedications, among other factors.

Management of status epilepticus in patients with liver or kidney disease: a narrative review

Introduction: Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurologic and medical emergency with significant related morbidity and mortality. Hepatic or renal dysfunction can considerably affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs used for SE through a variety of direct or indirect mechanisms.Areas Covered: This review aims to focus on the therapeutic management of SE in patients with hepatic or renal impairment, highlighting drugs' selection and dose changes that may be necessary due to altered drug metabolism and excretion. The references for this review were identified by searches of PubMed and Google Scholar until May 2020.Expert opinion: According to literature evidence and clinical experience, in patients with renal disease, the authors suggest considering lorazepam as the drug of choice in pre-hospital and intra-hospital early-stage SE, phenytoin in definite SE, propofol in refractory or super-refractory SE. In patients with liver disease, the authors suggest the use of lorazepam as drug of choice in pre-hospital and intra-hospital early-stage SE, lacosamide in definite SE, propofol in refractory or super-refractory SE. A list of preferred drugs for all SE stages is provided.

A retrospective, observational study of perampanel in refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus

INTRODUCTION

The outcomes of administration of Perampanel (PER) which is a β-amino-3-(5-methyl-3-oxo-1,2-oxazol-4-yl)propionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and Super-refractory (SRSE) were previously reported in small cohort studies and case reports. We report efficacy and side effect results of an observational cohort of 75 patients treated with PER for RSE and SRSE.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study of patients with RSE admitted to the neurocritical care unit between April 2017 and September 2019 who received treatment with PER. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a definite response to PER, which was defined as clear resolution of the ictal pattern and/or seizures within 72 h of delivery of PER which was the last administered antiseizure medication (ASM). Secondary outcomes included the percentage of patients other response types (partial responder or non-responder), as well as the rate of adverse effects.

RESULTS

A total 75 patients were included in our analysis. PER was initiated as the median sixth ASM at a median initial dose of 12 mg. For the primary outcome, 31 (41.3%; 95% confidence interval 31.0%-53.0%) patients were classified as a definite responder. Seven patients (9.3%) experienced an adverse effect that was attributed to PER, with the most common being sedation in four patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In our retrospective cohort of RSE, we observed a definite response rate of 41.3% within 72 h of PER initiation. PER was well tolerated with few documented adverse effects. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the role of PER in treating patients with RSE.

Levetiracetam versus Phenytoin for the Pharmacotherapy of Benzodiazepine-Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown conflicting results regarding the effectiveness of levetiracetam for treating benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus (SE) compared with phenytoin. Therefore, a meta-analysis was carried out to assess the value of levetiracetam versus phenytoin in the pharmacotherapy of benzodiazepine-refractory SE.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam and phenytoin in the treatment of benzodiazepine-refractory SE.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that had been conducted to evaluate levetiracetam versus phenytoin for benzodiazepine-refractory SE, to April 2020. The data were assessed using Review Manager 5.3 software. The risk ratio (RR) was analyzed using dichotomous outcomes, and calculated using a random-effect model.

RESULTS

We pooled 1850 patients from 12 RCTs. Patients in the levetiracetam group had a significantly higher rate of clinical seizure cessation than in the phenytoin group (75.2% vs. 67.8%; RR 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.25, p = 0.003). Moreover, less adverse events were observed in the levetiracetam group than in the phenytoin group (17.8% vs. 21.4%; RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70-0.97, p = 0.02). In subgroup analysis, clinical seizure cessation was achieved more frequently with a higher dose of levetiracetam (> 30 mg/kg) [RR 1.15, 95% CI 1.00-1.32, p = 0.05]. Furthermore, in the subgroup of children, levetiracetam showed a higher rate of clinical seizure cessation than phenytoin (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.25, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Pharmacotherapy for BZD-refractory SE by LEV is superior to PHT in efficacy and safety outcomes.

Preferential Antiseizure Medications in Pediatric Patients with Convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The optimal choice for first- and second-line antiseizure medications for pediatric patients with convulsive status epilepticus remains ambiguous. The present study aimed to estimate the comparative effect on the efficacy and safety of different antiseizure medications in pediatric patients with status epilepticus and provide evidence for clinical practice.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for eligible randomized controlled trials. Inclusion criteria included: (1) pediatric patients; (2) diagnosis of status epilepticus; and (3) randomized controlled trials. Exclusion criteria were: (1) mixed population without a pediatric subgroup analysis; (2) not status epilepticus; (3) received the study drug prior to admission; (4) sample size fewer than 30; and (5) not randomized controlled trials. Primary outcome was seizure cessation. Secondary outcomes were seizure recurrence within 24 h, respiratory depression, and admission to an intensive care unit. The hierarchy of competing antiseizure medications was presented using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve.

RESULTS

Eight first-line antiseizure medication studies involving 1686 participants and eight second-line antiseizure medication studies involving 1711 participants were eligible for analysis. Midazolam, diazepam, lorazepam, and paraldehyde were administered as first-line antiseizure medications. Valproate, phenobarbital, phenytoin, fosphenytoin, and levetiracetam were investigated as second-line antiseizure medications. No significant differences were observed across first- and second-line antiseizure medications. Midazolam ranked the best for primary and secondary outcomes among the first-line antiseizure medications. Phenobarbital ranked the best for seizure cessation and a lower risk of admission to the intensive care unit. Valproate had superiority in preventing recurrence within 24 h. Levetiracetam had the lowest probability of developing respiratory depression.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the hierarchy of competing interventions. Midazolam could be a better option for first-line treatment. Phenobarbital, levetiracetam, and valproate had their respective superiority in the second-line intervention. This study may provide useful information for clinical decision making under different circumstances.

Allopregnanolone and perampanel as adjuncts to midazolam for treating diisopropylfluorophosphate-induced status epilepticus in rats

Combinations of midazolam, allopregnanolone, and perampanel were assessed for antiseizure activity in a rat diisopropylfluorophosphate (DFP) status epilepticus model. Animals receiving DFP followed by atropine and pralidoxime exhibited continuous high-amplitude rhythmical electroencephalography (EEG) spike activity and behavioral seizures for more than 5 hours. Treatments were administered intramuscularly 40 min after DFP. Seizures persisted following midazolam (1.8 mg/kg). The combination of midazolam with either allopregnanolone (6 mg/kg) or perampanel (2 mg/kg) terminated EEG and behavioral status epilepticus, but the onset of the perampanel effect was slow. The combination of midazolam, allopregnanolone, and perampanel caused rapid and complete suppression of EEG and behavioral seizures. In the absence of DFP, animals treated with the three-drug combination were sedated but not anesthetized. Animals that received midazolam alone exhibited spontaneous recurrent EEG seizures, whereas those that received the three-drug combination did not, demonstrating antiepileptogenic activity. All combination treatments reduced neurodegeneration as assessed with Fluoro-Jade C staining to a greater extent than midazolam alone, and most reduced astrogliosis as assessed by GFAP immunoreactivity but had mixed effects on markers of microglial activation. We conclude that allopregnanolone, a positive modulator of the GABAA receptor, and perampanel, an AMPA receptor antagonist, are potential adjuncts to midazolam in the treatment of benzodiazepine-refractory organophosphate nerve agent-induced status epilepticus.

Therapeutic Options for Patients with Refractory Status Epilepticus in Palliative Settings or with a Limitation of Life-Sustaining Therapies: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) represents a serious medical condition requiring early and targeted therapy. Given the increasing number of elderly or multimorbid patients with a limitation of life-sustaining therapy (LOT) or within a palliative care setting (PCS), guidelines-oriented therapy escalation options for RSE have to be omitted frequently.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review sought to summarize the evidence for fourth-line antiseizure drugs (ASDs) and other minimally or non-invasive therapeutic options beyond guideline recommendations in patients with RSE to elaborate on possible treatment options for patients undergoing LOT or in a PCS.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, focusing on fourth-line ASDs or other minimally or non-invasive therapeutic options was performed in February and June 2020 using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. The search terminology was constructed using the name of the specific ASD or therapy option and the term 'status epilepticus' with the use of Boolean operators, e.g. "(brivaracetam) AND (status epilepticus)". The respective Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and Emtree terms were used, if available.

RESULTS

There is currently no level 1, grade A evidence for the use of ASDs in RSE. The best evidence was found for the use of lacosamide and topiramate (level 3, grade C), followed by brivaracetam, perampanel (each level 4, grade D) and stiripentol, oxcarbazepine and zonisamide (each level 5, grade D). Regarding non-medicinal options, there is little evidence for the use of the ketogenic diet (level 4, grade D) and magnesium sulfate (level 5, grade D) in RSE. The broad use of immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive treatment options in the absence of a presumed autoimmune etiology cannot be recommended; however, if an autoimmune etiology is assumed, steroid pulse, intravenous immunoglobulins and plasma exchange/plasmapheresis should be considered (level 4, grade D). Even if several studies suggested that the use of neurosteroids (level 5, grade D) is beneficial in RSE, the current data situation indicates that there is formal evidence against it.

CONCLUSIONS

RSE in patients undergoing LOT or in a PCS represents a challenge for modern clinicians and epileptologists. The evidence for the use of ASDs in RSE beyond that in current guidelines is low, but several effective and well-tolerated options are available that should be considered in this patient population. More so than in any other population, advance care planning, advance directives, and medical ethical aspects have to be considered carefully before and during therapy.

Molecular insights into the role of AMPA receptors in the synaptic plasticity, pathogenesis and treatment of epilepsy: therapeutic potentials of perampanel and antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) technology

Glutamate is considered as the predominant excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous systems (CNS). Alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors (AMPARs) are the main glutamate-gated ionotropic channels that mediate the majority of fast synaptic excitation in the brain. AMPARs are highly dynamic that constitutively move into and out of the postsynaptic membrane. Changes in the postsynaptic number of AMPARs play a key role in controlling synaptic plasticity and also brain functions such as memory formation and forgetting development. Impairments in the regulation of AMPAR function, trafficking, and signaling pathway may also contribute to neuronal hyperexcitability and epileptogenesis process, which offers AMPAR as a potential target for epilepsy therapy. Over the last decade, various types of AMPAR antagonists such as perampanel and talampanel have been developed to treat epilepsy, but they usually show limited efficacy at low doses and produce unwanted cognitive and motor side effects when administered at higher doses. In the present article, the latest findings in the field of molecular mechanisms controlling AMPAR biology, as well as the role of these mechanism dysfunctions in generating epilepsy will be reviewed. Also, a comprehensive summary of recent findings from clinical trials with perampanel, in treating epilepsy, glioma-associated epilepsy and Parkinson's disease is provided. Finally, antisense oligonucleotide therapy as an alternative strategy for the efficient treatment of epilepsy is discussed.

Perampanel Treatment for Refractory Status Epilepticus in a Neurological Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Perampanel is a novel anti-epileptic drug (AED) which acts as a non-competitive α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor antagonist to reduce glutamate-mediated postsynaptic excitation. Previous animal studies and a few case reports/series have suggested that it may be effective to treat refractory status epilepticus (RSE).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 67 consecutive patients with RSE, of whom 22 received perampanel. The clinical features, epidemiology-based mortality score in status epilepticus, status epilepticus severity score, seizure control, functional outcome, RSE etiology, and electroencephalogram findings were collected. Responder to perampanel was defined as seizure resolution within 4 days of therapy with perampanel being the last AED used plus no recurrence during hospitalization.

RESULTS

Eight of the 22 (36.4%) RSE patients fulfilled the definition of responder to perampanel. An additional 1 patient responded to perampanel after 4 days of treatment. In total, perampanel was the last AED in 9 (40.1%) patients. Among the 8 responders to perampanel, 5 had convulsive SE, 1 had non-convulsive SE, and 2 had focal motor SE. The responders accounted for both of the patients with focal motor SE (100%), 5 (33.3%) of the 15 patients with convulsive SE, and 1 (20%) of the 5 patients with non-convulsive SE. The ictal and inter-ictal activities also decreased after perampanel therapy, and three patients (13.6%) had preferable outcomes at last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Perampanel may be an effective add-on treatment for RSE even in patients who failed multiple AEDs. Our study suggests that perampanel may be more effective for focal motor SE and convulsive SE than non-convulsive SE. As most previous studies have focused on non-convulsive SE, further studies are warranted to clarify the effectiveness of perampanel for different subtypes of SE.

Antiseizure medications in critical care: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Seizures and status epilepticus are very common diagnoses in the critically ill patient and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There is an abundance of research on the utility of antiseizure medications in this setting, but limited randomized-controlled trials to guide the selection of medications in these patients. This review examines the current guidelines and treatment strategies for status epilepticus and provides an update on newer antiseizure medications in the critical care settings.

RECENT FINDINGS

Time is brain applies to status epilepticus, with delays in treatment corresponding with worsened outcomes. Establishing standardized treatment protocols within a health system, including prehospital treatment, may lead to improved outcomes. Once refractory status epilepticus is established, continuous deep sedation with intravenous anesthetic agents should be effective. In cases, which prove highly refractory, novel approaches should be considered, with recent data suggesting multiple recently approved antiseizure medications, appropriate therapeutic options, as well as novel approaches to upregulate extrasynaptic γ-aminobutyric acid channels with brexanolone.

SUMMARY

Although there are many new treatments to consider for seizures and status epilepticus in the critically ill patient, the most important predictor of outcome may be rapid diagnosis and treatment. There are multiple new and established medications that can be considered in the treatment of these patients once status epilepticus has become refractory, and a multidrug regimen will often be necessary.

The Novel Direct Modulatory Effects of Perampanel, an Antagonist of AMPA Receptors, on Voltage-Gated Sodium and M-type Potassium Currents

Perampanel (PER) is a selective blocker of AMPA receptors showing efficacy in treating various epileptic disorders including brain tumor-related epilepsy and also potential in treating motor neuron disease. However, besides its inhibition of AMPA-induced currents, whether PER has any other direct ionic effects in different types of neurons remains largely unknown. We investigated the effects of PER and related compounds on ionic currents in different types of cells, including hippocampal mHippoE-14 neurons, motor neuron-like NSC-34 cells and U87 glioma cells. We found that PER differentially and effectively suppressed the amplitude of voltage-gated Na⁺ currents (I_Na) in mHippoE-14 cells. The IC₅₀ values required to inhibit peak and late I_Na were 4.12 and 0.78 μM, respectively. PER attenuated tefluthrin-induced increases in both amplitude and deactivating time constant of I_Na. Importantly, PER also inhibited the amplitude of M-type K⁺ currents (I_K(M)) with an IC₅₀ value of 0.92 μM. The suppression of I_K(M) was attenuated by the addition of flupirtine or ZnCl₂ but not by L-quisqualic acid or sorafenib. Meanwhile, in cell-attached configuration, PER (3 μM) decreased the activity of M-type K⁺ channels with no change in single-channel conductance but shifting the activation curve along the voltage axis in a rightward direction. Supportively, PER suppressed I_K(M) in NSC-34 cells and I_Na in U87 glioma cells. The inhibitory effects of PER on both I_Na and I_K(M), independent of its antagonistic effect on AMPA receptors, may be responsible for its wide-spectrum of effects observed in neurological clinical practice.

Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus Treated with High Dose Perampanel: Case Series and Review of the Literature

Introduction

Acute symptomatic seizures are frequent in the critically ill patient and can be difficult to treat. The novel anticonvulsant perampanel may be effective in the treatment of status epilepticus considering its mechanism of action of being an AMPA antagonist. We present four cases of super refractory status epilepticus treated with high dose perampanel.

Method

Case report.

Cases

Four patients were treated with perampanel for their refractory status epilepticus. One patient had new onset refractory status epilepticus of unknown etiology. Three other patients had status epilepticus as a result of their cardiac arrest. Two of the cardiac arrest patients had myoclonus. In all patients, the additional of perampanel resulted in a reduction of seizure burden without affecting hemodynamics or hepatic or renal function.

Conclusion

Perampanel may be effective in the treatment of super-refractory status epilepticus of varying etiologies. A larger, prospective study is needed to further assess this therapy.

[Management of refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus]

If status epilepticus continues despite the use of intravenous antiepileptic drugs or narcotics, it is called "refractory" or "super-refractory" status epilepticus (RSE, SRSE). Prolonged seizure activity is associated with neuronal damage, systemic complications and mortality rates of up to 50%, especially in generalized tonic clonic seizure types. In order to terminate the status, several rescue interventions with drugs and other measures are available. However, their evidence base is low because the effectiveness of the measures was almost exclusively derived from case reports and case series. In individual cases, a good outcome is possible even after several months of ongoing SRSE.

Oral Perampanel for the Treatment of Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus

A 72-year-old man presented with a super-refractory partial status epilepticus following evacuation of a right subdural hematoma. He failed to respond to treatment with high doses of intravenous valproic acid, Levetiracetam, Lacosamide, Thiopental, and Midazolam. He was given 4 mg of Perampanel orally via nasogastric tube and the dose was rapidly increased to 8 mg after 12 hours with cessation of clinical and electrical seizures. Other antiepileptic drugs were tapered progressively with an excellent clinical outcome.

Update in status epilepticus

Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency that requires urgent antiepileptic therapies, and a rapid treatment of its cause. In recent years, its definition has been updated to adapt it to all types of SE; this update helps to standardise the treatment. The new definition is based on two times: point t1, after which the event will not spontaneously cease, and period t2, after which neuronal damage may appear. There are three lines of treatment: first, benzodiazepines; second, antiepileptic drugs; and third, intravenous anaesthetics. The application of the different lines of treatment raises still unanswered questions, since the prognosis also depends on the aetiology, age and duration. For this reason, different prognostic scales are being developed to help us to assess its evolution and in turn, adapt the aggressiveness of the treatment to each patient.

Perampanel: A therapeutic alternative in refractory status epilepticus associated with MELAS syndrome

To our knowledge, there are no reports of status epilepticus (SE) associated with mitochondrial diseases and treated with perampanel (PER). We present three cases of patients with refractory SE associated with MELAS syndrome who responded favorably to PER.

All cases were diagnosed as non-convulsive SE (focal without impairment of level of consciousness). After an initial treatment with other anti-seizure drugs, PER was added in all cases (8, 16 and 12 mg) and cessation of SE was observed within the next 4-8 hours. All the cases involved a stroke-like lesion present on brain MRI.

In our patients, PER was an effective option in SE associated with MELAS syndrome.

•

Status epilepticus (SE) in MELAS is associated with a stroke-lesion and it is usually refractory.

•

We present three cases of refractory SE and MELAS who responded favorably to Perampanel.

•

Perampanel (PER) may be an effective option in SE associated with MELAS syndrome.