Cost of status epilepticus (SE): Effects of delayed treatment and SE duration

Clinical impact of carbapenems in critically ill patients with valproic acid therapy: A propensity-matched analysis

Background

Valproic acid (VPA) is one of the most widely used broad-spectrum antiepileptic drugs, and carbapenems (CBPs) remain the drug of choice for severe infection caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria in critically ill patients. The interaction between VPA and CBPs can lead to a rapid depletion of serum VPA level. This may then cause status epilepticus (SE), which is associated with significant mortality. However, the prognostic impact of drug interactions in critically ill patients remains an under-investigated issue.

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the prognosis of critically ill patients treated with VPA and concomitant CBPs or other broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Methods

Adult patients admitted to a medical center intensive care unit between January 2007 and December 2017 who concomitantly received VPA and antibiotics were enrolled. The risk of reduced VPA serum concentration, seizures and SE, mortality rate, length of hospital stay (LOS), and healthcare expenditure after concomitant administration were analyzed after propensity score matching.

Results

A total of 1,277 patients were included in the study, of whom 264 (20.7%) concomitantly received VPA and CBPs. After matching, the patients who received CBPs were associated with lower VPA serum concentration (15.8 vs. 60.8 mg/L; p < 0.0001), a higher risk of seizures (51.2 vs. 32.4%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.19; 95% CI, 1.48–3.24; p < 0.0001), higher risk of SE (13.6 vs. 4.7%; aOR, 3.20; 95% CI, 1.51–6.74; p = 0.0014), higher in-hospital mortality rate (33.8 vs. 24.9%; aOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.03–2.20; p = 0.036), longer LOS after concomitant therapy (41 vs. 30 days; p < 0.001), and increased healthcare expenditure (US$20,970 vs. US$12,848; p < 0.0001) than those who received other broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Conclusion

The administration of CBPs in epileptic patients under VPA therapy was associated with lower VAP serum concentration, a higher risk of seizures and SE, mortality, longer LOS, and significant utilization of healthcare resources. Healthcare professionals should pay attention to the concomitant use of VPA and CBPs when treating patients with epilepsy. Further studies are warranted to investigate the reason for the poor outcomes and whether avoiding the co-administration of VPA and CBP can improve the outcomes of epileptic patients.

Pre-hospital and emergency department treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in adults: an evidence synthesis

BACKGROUND

Convulsive status epilepticus is defined as ≥ 5 minutes of either continuous seizure activity or repetitive seizures without regaining consciousness. It is regarded as an emergency condition that requires prompt treatment to avoid hospitalisation and to reduce morbidity and mortality. Rapid pre-hospital first-line treatment of convulsive status epilepticus is currently benzodiazepines, administered either by trained caregivers in the community (e.g. buccal midazolam, rectal diazepam) or by trained health professionals via intramuscular or intravenous routes (e.g. midazolam, lorazepam). There is a lack of clarity about the optimal treatment for convulsive status epilepticus in the pre-hospital setting.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the current evidence on the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treatments for adults with convulsive status epilepticus in the pre-hospital setting.

DATA SOURCES

We searched major electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo®, CINAHL, CENTRAL, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, Health Technology Assessment Database, Research Papers in Economics, and the ISPOR Scientific Presentations Database, with no restrictions on publication date or language of publication. Final searches were carried out on 21 July 2020.

REVIEW METHODS

Systematic review of randomised controlled trials assessing adults with convulsive status epilepticus who received treatment before or on arrival at the emergency department. Eligible treatments were any antiepileptic drugs offered as first-line treatments, regardless of their route of administration. Primary outcomes were seizure cessation, seizure recurrence and adverse events. Two reviewers independently screened all citations identified by the search strategy, retrieved full-text articles, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included trials. Results were described narratively.

RESULTS

Four trials (1345 randomised participants, of whom 1234 were adults) assessed the intravenous or intramuscular use of benzodiazepines or other antiepileptic drugs for the pre-hospital treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in adults. Three trials at a low risk of bias showed that benzodiazepines were effective in stopping seizures. In particular, intramuscular midazolam was non-inferior to intravenous lorazepam. The addition of levetiracetam to clonazepam did not show clear advantages over clonazepam alone. One trial at a high risk of bias showed that phenobarbital plus optional phenytoin was more effective in terminating seizures than diazepam plus phenytoin. The median time to seizure cessation from drug administration varied from 1.6 minutes to 15 minutes. The proportion of people with recurrence of seizures ranged from 10.4% to 19.1% in two trials reporting this outcome. Across trials, the rates of respiratory depression among participants receiving active treatments were generally low (from 6.4% to 10.6%). The mortality rate ranged from 2% to 7.6% in active treatment groups and from 6.2% to 15.5% in control groups. Only one study based on retrospective observational data met the criteria for economic evaluation; therefore, it was not possible to draw any robust conclusions on cost-effectiveness.

LIMITATIONS

The limited number of identified trials and their differences in terms of treatment comparisons and outcomes hindered any meaningful pooling of data. None of the included trials was conducted in the UK and none assessed the use of buccal midazolam or rectal diazepam. The review of economic evaluations was hampered by lack of suitable data.

CONCLUSIONS

Both intravenous lorazepam and intravenous diazepam administered by paramedics are more effective than a placebo in the treatments of adults with convulsive status epilepticus, and intramuscular midazolam is non-inferior to intravenous lorazepam. Large well-designed clinical trials are needed to establish which benzodiazepines are more effective and preferable in the pre-hospital setting.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020201953.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 20. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Inpatient medical cost of status epilepticus in children: A national-wide, multicenter study from China

OBJECTIVES

To describe the inpatient medical cost during hospitalization in children with status epilepticus (SE) and identify factors associated with the cost by a nationwide, multicenter study in China.

MATERIALS & METHODS

We retrospectively identified pediatric inpatients with SE form Hospital Information System (HIS) of 44 hospitals in 27 provinces in China between 2013 and 2015. Inpatient medical cost and factors associated with the cost were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 4041 children diagnosed with SE with inpatient medical cost were enrolled in the present study. The median age at admission was 2.9 (range 0.1-18) years, and 2271 patients were male (56.2%). The median inpatient medical cost of children with SE was $1175.5 (665.1-2320.6). The median inpatient medical cost was $3865.6 (1837.4-8210.4) in children with SRSE and $1048.6 (619.8-1865.4) in those with N-SRSE (p < 0.0001). Children with length of hospital stay (LOS) > 7 showed a much higher inpatient medical cost than those with LOS ≤ 7 day ($2300.7 vs. $767.2, p < 0.0001). Regarding different etiologies, children with acute symptomatic etiology showed the highest median inpatient medical cost of $1681.1 (901.0-3699.6), in which children with central nervous system (CNS) infection reported $2606.0 (1380.0-5016.1) and prolonged febrile seizures (PFS) reported $909.8 (649.3-1322.0). Additionally, children with idiopathic/cryptogenic etiology reported a medical cost of $923.2 (548.9-1534.5). Multiple linear regression analysis of cost-driving factors revealed LOS > 7, examinations, treatment equipment and procedures, and treatment medicines were independently associated with a higher inpatient medical cost (R² = 60.91). In addition, PFS and idiopathic/cryptogenic epilepsy etiology were independently associated with a lower cost.

CONCLUSIONS

SE in children was a cost intensive disease in China with a median inpatient medical cost of $1175.5. LOS, etiology and examinations, treatment equipment and procedures, and treatment medicines were significantly associated with inpatient medical cost.

The burden of decisional uncertainty in the treatment of status epilepticus

OBJECTIVE

Treatments for convulsive status epilepticus (SE) have a wide range of effectiveness. The estimated effectiveness of non-intravenous benzodiazepines (non-IV BZDs) ranges from approximately 70% to 90% and the estimated effectiveness of non-benzodiazepine antiseizure medications (non-BZD ASMs) ranges from approximately 50% to 80%. This study aimed to quantify the clinical and economic burden of decisional uncertainty in the treatment of SE.

METHODS

We performed a decision analysis that evaluates how decisional uncertainty on treatment choices for SE impacts hospital admissions, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and costs in the United States. We evaluated treatment effectiveness based on the available literature.

RESULTS

Use of a non-IV BZD with high estimated effectiveness, like intranasal midazolam, rather than one with low estimated effectiveness, like rectal diazepam, would result in a median (p₂₅ -p₇₅ ) reduction in hospital admissions from 6 (3.9-8.8) to 1.1 (0.7-1.8) per 100 cases and associated cost reductions of $638 ($289-$1064) per pediatric patient and $1107 ($972-$1281) per adult patient. For BZD-resistant SE, use of a non-BZD ASM with high estimated effectiveness, like phenobarbital, rather than one with low estimated effectiveness, like phenytoin/fosphenytoin, would result in a reduction in ICU admissions from 9.1 (7.3-11.2) to 3.9 (2.6-5.5) per 100 cases and associated cost reduction of $1261 ($445-$2223) per pediatric patient and $319 ($-93-$806) per adult patient. Sensitivity analyses showed that relatively minor improvements in effectiveness may lead to substantial reductions in downstream hospital admissions, ICU admissions, and costs.

SIGNIFICANCE

Decreasing decisional uncertainty and using the most effective treatments for SE may substantially decrease hospital admissions, ICU admissions, and costs.

The timelines of MRI findings related to outcomes in adult patients with new-onset refractory status epilepticus

OBJECTIVE

To identify the timelines of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities and their relationships with the clinical outcomes of patients with new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE).

METHODS

This retrospective observational study enrolled patients with NORSE who were admitted from March 2008 to July 2018. MRI abnormalities were analyzed visually with the readers blinded to the clinical characteristics of the patients. Poor functional outcome was defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale score ≤ 3 at discharge. Subsequent pharmacoresistant epilepsy was defined as seizures not controlled by two or more anti-seizure medications 6 months after discharge.

RESULTS

Among 39 patients with NORSE, 32 (82.1%) exhibited an MRI abnormality. The most common abnormalities were persisting mesial temporal lobe signal abnormality (51.3%); initial diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement within 16 days from seizure onset (15/35, 42.9%); and hippocampal atrophy, which started to appear 26 days after seizure onset (15/26, 57.7%). Only three patients had claustrum abnormalities. Patients with insular involvement had longer treatment delay than those without (24.0 vs 5.5 hours, respectively, P = .02). Duration of status epilepticus (SE) tended to have a linear association with hippocampal atrophy (P = .055). Patients with diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement were more likely to have a poor functional outcome and to develop subsequent pharmacoresistant epilepsy than those without this finding (93.3% vs 15.0%, P < .001; 75.0% vs 22.2%, P = .004, respectively); the results were significant even after adjusting for age, sex, and duration of SE. Hippocampal atrophy and diffuse cortical atrophy were also significantly associated with poor functional outcomes (P = .001 and P = .002, respectively), and patients with these conditions were more likely to develop subsequent pharmacoresistant epilepsy than those without these conditions, after adjusting for age and sex (P = .035 and P = .048, respectively), but not after adjusting for duration of SE.

SIGNIFICANCE

Initial diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement and later hippocampal atrophy were associated with a poor functional outcome and subsequent pharmacoresistant epilepsy.

Medical management of status epilepticus: Emergency room to intensive care unit

In convulsive status epilepticus (SE), achieving seizure control within the first 1-2 hours after onset is a significant determinant of outcome. Treatment is also more likely to work and be cost effective the earlier it is given. Initial first aid measures should be accompanied by establishing intravenous access if possible and administering thiamine and glucose if required. Calling for help will support efficient management, and also the potential for video-recording the events. This can be done as a best interests investigation to inform later management, provided adequate steps to protect data are taken. There is high quality evidence supporting the use of benzodiazepines for initial treatment. Midazolam (buccal, intranasal or intramuscular) has the most evidence where there is no intravenous access, with the practical advantages of administration outweighing the slightly slower onset of action. Either lorazepam or diazepam are suitable IV agents. Speed of administration and adequate initial dosing are probably more important than choice of drug. Although only phenytoin (and its prodrug fosphenytoin) and phenobarbitone are licensed for established SE, a now considerable body of evidence and international consensus supports the utility of both levetiracetam and valproate as options in established status. Both also have the advantage of being well tolerated as maintenance treatment, and possibly a lower risk of serious adverse events. Two adequately powered randomized open studies in children have recently reported, supporting the use of levetiracetam as an alterantive to phenytoin. The results of a large double blind study also including valproate are also imminent, and together likely to change practice in benzodiazepine-resistant SE.

Seizure comorbidity boosts odds of 30-day readmission after an index hospitalization for sepsis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between comorbid seizures and hospital readmissions within 30 days following an index hospitalization for sepsis.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 445,489 adult discharges derived from the 2014 National Readmission Database, to evaluate the association of an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis of seizure during an index hospitalization for sepsis and 30-day readmission rates. We excluded patients who died during hospitalization and those who had missing information on the length of stay or were discharged in December 2014. Prespecified groups were compared by their 30-day readmission and seizure status. We applied a multivariable logistic regression analysis to assess the independent association between seizure and readmission.

RESULTS

Nearly one out of 15 patients discharged with a primary diagnosis of sepsis had comorbid seizures, of which 97% were status epilepticus. Patients with sepsis and comorbid seizures were 30% more likely to be readmitted within 30-days postdischarge, compared to those with sepsis and no comorbid seizures. Additional factors associated with a significantly higher risk for hospital readmission included male sex, age 45-84 years, increased length of stay and cost of primary admission, greater medical comorbidities, and discharge destination. Patients with seizures during their index hospitalization were significantly more likely to have also had a concurrent stroke or the central nervous system (CNS) infection compared with patients without seizures.

CONCLUSIONS

Seizures are not uncommon, and patients with sepsis and comorbid seizures are 30% more likely to be readmitted within 30-days postdischarge, compared to those with sepsis and no comorbid seizures.