Quality of life after switching to generic levetiracetam - A prospective comparative study

Impact of the socioeconomic crisis in Lebanon on people with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

The economic crisis in Lebanon, which began in 2019, has affected the healthcare system and patients' incomes. The aim of this study was to analyze the obstacles faced by people with epilepsy (PWE) during this crisis and to assess its impact on their quality of life.

METHODS

The method used was a cross-sectional study conducted among PWE aged 18-65 years, who were asked to complete a comprehensive questionnaire covering sociodemographic aspects, clinical aspects, the impact of the economic crisis, and the QOLIE-31 (version 1.0), validated in English and Arabic, which assesses the quality of life of PWE.

RESULTS

71 patients were included in the study with an average age of 35.2 years [23.5; 62.5] (53.5% were males). Their average QOLIE-31 score was 50.3 (+/- 17.9). A significant proportion (71%) of patients reported difficulties during the crisis, with 25% reporting having had seizure-related injuries in the years 2022-2023 and 36.6% reporting an increase in seizure frequency compared to that prior to 2020. Moreover, many patients had to change (33.8%) or discontinue (18.3%) antiseizure medications, due to drug shortages, rising costs, and high gas prices. To mitigate these challenges, patients sought solutions such as obtaining medications from abroad (34%) or through donations (8%) or purchasing from the black market (8%). Low quality of life was associated with unemployment, low education level, the presence of focal seizures with impaired awareness or generalized seizures, polytherapy, seizure-related injuries, and medication changes during the economic crisis.

SIGNIFICANCE

These results highlight the considerable challenges faced by PWE in Lebanon during the economic crisis, emphasizing the negative effect of the crisis on their quality of life and seizure control.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

This study analyzed the obstacles faced by 71 people with epilepsy during Lebanon's economic crisis and showed that many patients had to change (33.8%) or discontinue (18.3%) antiseizure medications, due to drug shortages, rising costs, and high gas prices. To mitigate these challenges, patients sought solutions such as obtaining medications from abroad (34%) or through donations (8%) or purchasing from the black market (8%). This affected their quality of life. In fact, low quality of life was associated with unemployment, low education level, focal seizures with impaired awareness or generalized seizures, polytherapy, seizure-related injuries, and medication changes.

Discontinuation of infliximab treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease who retransitioned to originator and those who remained on biosimilar

Background

Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have transitioned from an infliximab originator to a biosimilar. However, some patients retransition to the originator (i.e. stop biosimilar and reinitiate the originator). Whether this sign of potential unsatisfactory treatment response is specifically related to the infliximab biosimilar or the patient and/or the disease including patients' beliefs on the biosimilar is unclear.

Objectives

We aimed to compare the risk of and reasons for infliximab discontinuation between retransitioned patients and those remaining on biosimilar.

Design

Non-interventional, multicentre cohort study.

Methods

IBD patients who transitioned from infliximab originator to biosimilar between January 2015 and September 2019 in two Dutch hospitals were eligible for this study. Retransitioned patients (retransitioning cohort) were matched with patients remaining on biosimilar (biosimilar remainder cohort). Reasons for discontinuation were categorised as the unwanted response (i.e. loss of effect or adverse events) or remission. Risk of unwanted discontinuation was compared using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

Patients in the retransitioning cohort (n = 44) were younger (median age 39.9 versus 44.0 years), more often female (65.9% versus 48.9%) and had shorter dosing intervals (median 48.5 versus 56.0 days) than in the biosimilar remainder cohort (n = 127). Infliximab discontinuation due to unwanted response was 22.7% in the retransitioning and 13.4% in the biosimilar remainder cohort, and due to remission was 2.3% and 9.4%, respectively. Retransitioned patients are at increased risk of discontinuing due to unwanted response compared with biosimilar remainder patients (adjusted HR 3.7, 95% CI: 1.0-13.9). Patients who retransitioned due to an increase in objective disease markers had higher discontinuation rates than patients who retransitioned due to symptoms only (66.7% versus 23.7%).

Conclusion

Retransitioned patients are at increased risk of infliximab discontinuation due to unwanted response. Retransitioning appeared related to the patient and/or disease and not the product. Clinicians might switch patients opting for retransitioning to other treatment regimens.

Brand-to-generic Levetiracetam Switch in Patients with Epilepsy: Seizure Control and its Predictors in a Real-world Setting

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is a common neurological disease. Treatment with original antiepileptic drugs may result in high cost. Levetiracetam (LEV) is a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug. Several studies showed that generic LEV is safe, effective, and saves cost. There are limited data on predictors of seizure control in persons with epilepsy treated with LEV, particularly switch therapy to generic LEV. METHODS: This study was a comparison study conducted at two tertiary care hospitals. One hospital used an original LEV, while another one switched to generic LEV. The outcomes of the study included seizure control after switching to generic LEV treatment, treatment cost, dosage of LEV, adverse events of LEV, switching therapy to original LEV, emergency room visit, and abnormal laboratory tests. These outcomes were compared between the generic and original LEV. Seizure control defined by free of seizure after switch therapy. Predictors of seizure control were analyzed by multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 96 eligible patients and treated with generic LEV in 61 patients (63.54%). Regarding treatment outcomes, the generic LEV group had significantly higher proportions of seizure control (91.80% vs. 45.71%) than the original LEV group. The original LEV group had significantly higher cost than the generic LEV group (65,250 vs. 9500 Baht; p < 0.001). The final model had two factors remaining: Generic LEV and frequency of seizure before switch therapy. Generic LEV was independently associated with seizure control with adjusted OR of 6.35 (95% CI of 1.73, 23.34). CONCLUSION: Switch therapy to generic LEV is an alternative therapy with comparable efficacy, lower cost, and safe. Generic LEV and frequency of seizure attack before switch therapy to generic LEV may be related to seizure control.

Lack of association between generic brittleness and neuropsychiatric measures in patients with epilepsy

PURPOSE

In a prior bioequivalence study, generic brittle (GB) patients with epilepsy who were considered at risk of worsened seizures or drug side effects from switching antiepileptic drug (AED) formulations demonstrated no significant difference in their drug levels when switched between a brand and generic AED. An alternative basis for being GB may relate to having a personality or mindset that predisposes to poor outcomes from a formulation switch. The objective of this study was to explore whether GB patients with epilepsy could be differentiated from not GB patients based on standardized measures of personality, mood, outlook, and beliefs.

METHODS

This was an exploratory, observational, case-control, non-therapeutic study in patients with epilepsy. Patient interviews were conducted, and histories were collected, yielding each patient (n = 148) to be determined as GB or not GB. Eight neuropsychiatry tests were administered to n = 127 of these patients. Tests included Neuroticism Extraversion Openness Personality Inventory 3 (NEO-PI 3), Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-89 (QOLIE-89), Adverse Childhood Experiences Score (ACE), Physical Symptoms Questionnaire or Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15), Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and the Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire Epilepsy (BMQ-Epilepsy). A total of 23 Chi squared analyses, along with logistical regression, were performed to assess which tests and sub-elements associated with GB status.

RESULTS

None of the neuropsychiatry tests or their sub-elements differentiated GB patients from not GB patients. Results implicate that standardized measures of personality, mood, outlook, and beliefs about their healthcare do not differ between GB and not GB patients with epilepsy, possibly because generic brittleness is caused by factors that neuropsychiatry tests do not measure.

CONCLUSIONS

We hypothesized that being GB may relate to having a personality or mindset that predisposes patients to attributing poor outcomes to a formulation switch. However, findings here in patients with epilepsy did not uncover neuropsychiatric factors that predict which patients were GB and which were not GB.

The Efficacy and Safety Profile of Generic Intravenous Levetiracetam in a Real-World Setting

Background

There are 3 main epileptic conditions in hospital settings that may require intravenous antiepileptic treatment: status epilepticus, acute repetitive convulsive seizures, and postoperative seizures. Generic intravenous levetiracetam (IV LEV) (Focale; Great Eastern Drug Co, Bangkok, Thailand), has been reported to have comparable efficacy to original IV LEV for treating status epilepticus and acute repetitive convulsive seizures in a randomized controlled trial. At present, there are limited data on the efficacy and tolerability of generic intravenous LEV in real-world situations.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of generic IV LEV in a real-world setting.

Methods

A retrospective study and analyses were conducted. All adult patients who used IV LEV at University Hospital, Khon Kaen University, Thailand from June 1, 2019, until February 15, 2020, were included. Data were analyzed and reported in terms of the efficacy and tolerability of generic IV LEV.

Results

Ninety-three patients received IV LEV by 3 indications: status epilepticus, acute repetitive convulsive seizures, and postoperative seizures. The proportions of these 3 indications were 41.94% (39 patients), 9.67% (9 patients), and 48.39% (45 patients), respectively. The average seizure control rate at 24 hours was 89.25%. The seizure control rate was significantly higher in the acute repetitive convulsive seizures and postoperative seizure groups than in the status epilepticus group when generic IV LEV was given as the first-line treatment (75.00%; 88.37% vs 50.00%; P 0.035). The average length of hospital stay was 18.24 (25.40) days. There was no significant discharge status among the 3 groups (P = 0.348). Moreover, the average mortality rate was 5.38%. Side effects were reported in 14 patients (15.05%). The 2 most common side effects were vomiting and bronchospasm (3 patients; 3.22%). There were 10 patients with uncontrolled seizures at 24 hours (10.75%). The only factor associated with uncontrolled seizures at 24 hours was a history of epilepsy. The uncontrolled seizure group had a higher proportion of epilepsy patients than the seizure-controlled group (70.00% vs 33.73%; P = 0.037). Poor discharge status (not improved/death) was 18.28% (17 patients). There was no significant factor between those with an improved or poor discharge status.

Conclusions

Generic IV LEV was effective and relatively well tolerated in the 3 clinical settings (ie, status epilepticus, acute repetitive convulsive seizures, and postoperative seizures). Further clinical data are still required to confirm the results of this study.

(Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2022; 83:XXX–XXX)

Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Recommendations of Levetiracetam in Adult and Elderly Patients With Epilepsy

The objective was to develop and externally validate a population pharmacokinetic model of levetiracetam in adult and elderly patients with epilepsy, and to perform dosing simulations to propose individualized dosing regimens more likely to achieve therapeutic concentrations. This prospective study included 367 plasma samples from 107 patients receiving oral levetiracetam. Samples were analyzed by HPLC-UV. Pharmacokinetic data, as well as patient demographic, clinical characteristics, other drug therapy, and the use of innovator or generic products of levetiracetam, were collected. Population modeling was performed with NONMEM and included internal and external validations of the final model. Simulations were used to propose optimized dosing regimens. The pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam was described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and linear elimination. Body surface area had a significant effect on the apparent volume of distribution, as did creatinine clearance (CrCL) over the drug clearance (p < 0.01). The final model performed adequately during external validation testing. The final model showed a better predictive performance. Dosing simulations support 1000 mg 12-hourly dosing of levetiracetam for patients with CrCL ~60-75 mL/min with higher dose needed for higher values (1500 mg 12-hourly for CrCL ~93-111 mL/min). Dosing regimens should be personalized to the patient's CrCL to maximize the likelihood of therapeutic concentrations.