One-year follow-up of a remotely delivered epilepsy self-management program in high-risk people with epilepsy

Clinical correlates of perceived stigma among people living with epilepsy enrolled in a self-management clinical trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stigma is a pervasive barrier for people living with epilepsy (PLWE) and can have substantial negative effects. This study evaluated clinical correlates of perceived stigma in a research sample of PLWE considered to be at high risk due to frequent seizures or other negative health events.

METHODS

Analyses were derived from baseline data from an ongoing Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-funded randomized controlled trial (RCT) testing an epilepsy self-management approach. Standardized measures assessed socio-demographics, perceived epilepsy stigma, epilepsy-related self-efficacy, epilepsy self-management competency, health literacy, depressive symptom severity, functional status, social support and epilepsy-related quality of life.

RESULTS

There were 160 individuals, mean age of 39.4, (Standard deviation/SD=12.2) enrolled in the RCT, 107 (66.9 %) women, with a mean age of epilepsy onset of 23.9 (SD 14.0) years. The mean seizure frequency in the prior 30 days was 6.4 (SD 21.2). Individual factors correlated with worse perceived stigma were not being married or cohabiting with someone (p = 0.016), lower social support (p < 0.0001), lower self-efficacy (p < 0.0001), and lower functional status for both physical health (p = 0.018) and mental health (p < 0.0001). Perceived stigma was associated with worse depressive symptom severity (p < 0.0001). Multivariable linear regression found significant independent associations between stigma and lower self-efficacy (β -0.05; p = 0.0096), lower social support (β -0.27; p = 2.4x10-5, and greater depression severity (β 0.6; p = 5.8x10-5).

CONCLUSIONS

Perceived epilepsy stigma was positively correlated with depression severity and negatively correlated with social support and self-efficacy. Providers caring for PLWE may help reduce epilepsy stigma by screening for and treating depression, encouraging supportive social relationships, and providing epilepsy self-management support. Awareness of epilepsy stigma and associated factors may help reduce some of the hidden burden borne by PLWE.

A case study in science-to-service application of epilepsy self-management

AIMS

Epilepsy self-management (ESM), the overall approach of reducing seizures and optimizing whole-health, is a targeted approach to improve population health for people with epilepsy (PWE). "Self-management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events" (SMART) is an 8-session group-format, remotely delivered ESM. This report describes the evolution of SMART development, testing and scale-up, taking advantage of ESM team expertise, community relationships and infrastructure established by social service agencies that deliver support to PWE.

METHODS

This is a case-study dissemination and implementation (D&I) science-to-service model using the RE-AIM framework approach (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) focused on 5 dimensions of individual- and setting-level outcomes important to program adoption, impact and sustainability. Performance evaluations include participation representativeness, ESM attendance and acceptability as well as change in relevant health outcomes.

RESULTS

SMART D & I is implemented via a collaboration of 3 unique regional, epilepsy-focused nonprofit social service organizations and a university team that developed SMART. The ongoing collaboration is expanding SMART delivery to PWE across 13 U.S. states. Thus far, we have trained 17 Nurse and Peer Educators (NEs and PEs). PEs (N = 10) have a mean age 51.1 (SD 10.4) years and a mean age of epilepsy diagnosis of 29.4 (SD 19.3). Of 128 participants offered SMART, and who provided age data (N = 86) mean age was 37.7 years (SD 14.4). Of participants who provided data on gender and race (N = 89), 65 were women (73.9 %), 18 African-American (20.2 %). Mean age of epilepsy diagnosis was 19.4 years (SD 16.6) and 59 (52.2 %) of PWE reported having seizures in the last 30 days pre-SMART sessions. Among those with attendance data (N = 103), mean number of SMART groups attended was 5.7 (SD 2.3). Mean values for past 30-day seizure frequency, 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Inventory (GAD-7) and 10-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy Scale (QOLIE-10) for PWE that provided both pre and post SMART data were 7.6 (SD 15.8) vs 2.8 (SD 3.4) p = 0.3, 7.63 (SD 6.6) vs 6.3 (SD 5.7) p = 0.95, 6.6 (SD 5.7) vs 6.67(SD 5.3) p = 0.47 and 2.8 (SD 0.8) vs 2.7 (SD 1.0) p = 0.07 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing ESM using a RE-AIM/Iterative RE-AIM framework links intervention developers and community partners. While PWE have substantial barriers to health, including frequent seizures, they are able engage in the SMART program. Although a major limitation to patient-level evaluation is challenges in collecting post-SMART follow-up data, preliminary findings suggest a trend for improved quality of life.

Informing Digital Programs for Lupus Self-Management Education: A Systematic Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

We describe the characteristics, content, and effectiveness of digital self-management (SM) education programs for lupus and other chronic conditions to identify gaps and inform the improvement of future programs in lupus.

METHODS

Three bibliographic databases were searched for articles published between May 2012 and April 2022. The search was cast to capture the breadth of digital SM education programs in the following conditions: lupus, epilepsy, fibromyalgia, multiple sclerosis, sickle cell anemia, Sjögren syndrome, psoriatic arthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis. Title and abstract screening, as well as full-text review, was conducted by two independent reviewers. Data extraction was first completed by one author charting all studies and then, a second time, by four members of the research team charting collaboratively.

RESULTS

Of the 1,969 articles identified through the search, 14 met inclusion criteria. Two additional articles were included following bibliography review. The 16 articles represented 12 unique digital SM education programs. Programs covered five conditions: epilepsy (n = 3), fibromyalgia (n = 2), multiple sclerosis (n = 4), lupus (n = 1), and rheumatoid arthritis (n = 2). Most programs were asynchronous and internet-based (n = 9) with a prescribed sequence of content (n = 8). Peer, technical, or specialist support was offered in seven programs. Most programs demonstrated statistically significant improvement of symptoms in the intervention group (n = 8).

CONCLUSION

This scoping review summarizes the current landscape for digital SM education programs in lupus and similar conditions. In lupus, further investigation will fill in the gaps around digital SM education needs, user experience, and evaluation of outcomes.

Neuropsychiatric Treatments for Epilepsy: Nonpharmacological Approaches

Neuropsychiatric conditions are frequently found in patients with epilepsy (PWE). These entities can be as disabling as epilepsy resulting in a significant negative impact on the quality of life of this population if not addressed and treated appropriately. In this article, we provide an overview of non-pharmacological treatments currently available to these patients-and review their effect on mood and anxiety disorders as well as epilepsy. These treatment strategies will allow the practitioner to optimize clinical care during the initial evaluation, which begins with the recognition of the neuropsychiatric condition followed by the appropriate individualized psychotherapeutic approach and/or neuromodulation therapy. To plan a comprehensive treatment for PWE, practitioners must be familiar with these therapeutic tools. Additional clinical research is needed to further create a multidisciplinary team in the assessment and management of neuropsychiatric disorders in PWE.

A community-targeted implementation of self-management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events (SMART): A research and community partnership to reduce epilepsy burden

AIMS

Self-management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events (SMART) is a behavioral intervention that has been demonstrated to reduce epilepsy-related complications and improve physical and mental health functioning among people with epilepsy (PWE) [1]. The Community-SMART (C-SMART) initiative was a 4-month prospective implementation of feasibility and pre/post outcomes of SMART in a community setting and in collaboration with key epilepsy service stakeholders.

METHODS

Self-management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events is a group-format, entirely virtual intervention delivered in eight 60-90 sessions over the course of 8-10 weeks. The C-SMART initiative used research staff to guide intervention performance evaluation and staff of a regional epilepsy advocacy agency to assist with community engagement. Process evaluations included outreach and engagement efforts needed to reach PWE, the barriers and facilitators to roll-out, and participant retention and satisfaction. Outcomes included depressive symptoms and epilepsy self-management competency.

RESULTS

Thirty individuals were enrolled in 3 "cohorts" of approximately 10 PWE per cohort. Mean age of participants was 48.50 (standard deviation 16.15) years, 60% were female and 53.3% were African-American. Individuals had epilepsy, on average, for over 2 decades, were on approximately 2 prescribed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and had an average of just over 6 seizures in the last 30 days. Over 63% had a comorbid mental health condition. There were 23 individuals (76.7%) who were retained at the 4-month follow-up. Baseline to 4-month outcomes for depression and epilepsy self-management were significantly improved. Most (90%) of participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the program.

CONCLUSIONS

The SMART epilepsy self-management program can be successfully implemented in partnership with epilepsy-focused community partners, is acceptable to participants and associated with improved outcomes. Future work might consider how to make virtual epilepsy self-management available to the full spectrum of PWE.

Decreasing Emergency Department Visits for Children With Epilepsy

Background and Objectives

Epilepsy and seizures represent a frequent cause of emergency department (ED) visits for patients. By implementing quality improvement (QI) methodology, we planned to decrease ED visits for children and adolescents with epilepsy.

Methods

In 2016, a multidisciplinary team was created to implement QI methodology to address ED visits for patients with epilepsy. Based on previous successes, further ED visit reduction was deemed possible. Our aim statement was to decrease the number of ED visits, per 1000 established patients with epilepsy, from 13.03 to 11.6, by December 2019 and sustain for 1 year.

Results

We successfully decreased ED visits for seizure-related care in patients with epilepsy from 13.03% to 10.2% per 1,000 patients, which resulted in a centerline shift.

Discussion

Using QI methodology, we improved the outcome measure of decreasing ED visits for children with epilepsy. Implementations of these interventions can be considered at other institutions that may lead to similar results.

Sleep duration and quality among U.S. adults with epilepsy: National Health Interview Survey 2013, 2015, and 2017

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is associated with a high prevalence of sleep disturbance. However, population-based studies on the burden of sleep disturbance in people with epilepsy are limited. This study assessed sleep duration and sleep quality by epilepsy status in the general U.S. adult population aged ≥ 18 years.

METHODS

We pooled data of cross-sectional National Health Interview Surveys in 2013, 2015, and 2017 to compare the prevalence of sleep duration and quality among those without epilepsy (N = 93,126) with those with any epilepsy (a history of physician-diagnosed epilepsy) (N = 1774), those with active epilepsy (those with a history of physician-diagnosed epilepsy who were currently taking medication to control it, had one or more seizures in the past year, or both) (N = 1101), and those with inactive epilepsy (those with a history of physician-diagnosed epilepsy who were neither taking medication for epilepsy nor had had a seizure in the past year) (N = 673). We also compared these measures between those with active and those with inactive epilepsy. The prevalences were adjusted for sociodemographics, behaviors, and health covariates, with multivariable logistic regression. We used Z-tests to compare prevalences of sleep duration and quality at the statistical significance level of 0.05.

RESULTS

Adults with any epilepsy reported significantly higher adjusted prevalences of short sleep duration (<7 h) (36.0% vs. 31.8%) and long sleep duration (>9 h per day) (6.7% vs. 3.7%) but a lower prevalence of healthy sleep duration (7-9 h per day) (57.4% vs.64.6%) than those without epilepsy. In the past week, adults with any epilepsy reported significantly higher adjusted prevalences than adults without epilepsy of having trouble falling asleep (25.0% vs. 20.3%), staying asleep (34.4% vs. 26.3%), nonrestorative sleep (adults did not wake up feeling well rested) (≥3days) (50.3% vs. 44.3%), and taking medication to help themselves fall asleep or stay asleep (≥1 times) (20.9% vs. 13.5%). However, adults with active epilepsy did not differ from adults with inactive epilepsy with respect to these sleep duration and quality measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Adults with epilepsy reported more short or long sleep duration and worse sleep quality than those without epilepsy. Neither seizure occurrence nor antiepileptic drug use accounted for these differences in sleep duration and quality. Careful screening for sleep complaints as well as identifying and intervening on the modifiable risk factors associated with sleep disturbances among people with epilepsy could improve epilepsy outcomes and quality of life.

Feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of an adopted novel self-management intervention among people with epilepsy in Uganda

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is a common neurological condition characterized by poor quality of life and associated stigma. Studies in long-term health conditions suggest that self-management interventions improve the quality of life (QoL) and reduce the perceived stigma among people with epilepsy (PWE). Yet, the utilization of these interventions remains low in sub-Saharan Africa.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an adopted novel self-management intervention, Self-management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events (SMART) among PWE in Uganda.

DESIGN

A two-year, uncontrolled, prospective pilot study in Ugandans with epilepsy was conducted.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults aged ≥ 18 years with epilepsy attending a neurology outpatient clinic were enrolled.

INTERVENTION

Using a nurse led and peer educator interactions; nine self-management approach sessions (1 individual session and 8 group sessions) were conducted.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was QoL, perceived stigma and depression in PWE at 24-month follow-up using the Quality Of Life In Epilepsy 31 (QOLIE-31) scale and perceived stigma using the Kilifi stigma score and Neurological disorders depression index for epilepsy (NDDI-E).

RESULTS

There were 17 individuals and their caregivers who were enrolled into this study with a mean age of 23.47 (SD = 5.3) years. The study intervention was feasible and acceptable within our settings. Overall, quality of life, stigma level, depression, and seizure frequency in the past 30 days were significantly improved from the baseline scores before the intervention with p-values of <0.0001, <0.0001, 0.004, and <0.0001, respectively.

SIGNIFICANCE

The SMART intervention engages individuals to actively participate in self-management, and can help reduce depressive symptom severity in PWE. Given the high morbidity and mortality associated with epilepsy, additional research is needed to better identify how SMART might be implemented in routine care settings.

Engaging stakeholders in the refinement of an evidence-based remotely delivered epilepsy self-management program for rural populations

A growing body of research supports self-management approaches that can improve outcomes in people living with epilepsy (PLWE). An evidence-based remotely delivered self-management program (SMART) that was successfully delivered in an urban/suburban setting has the potential to be particularly helpful to PLWE who live in rural communities, where heavy stigma burden and limited access to healthcare is common. In this Phase 1 exploratory study, focus groups of key rural stakeholders (PLWE, family members, care providers) were used to: (1) gather information on factors that may impede or facilitate participation in SMART and (2) elicit overall perceptions of the program, as well as suggestions and feedback for refining it for implementation in Phase 2 of the randomized controlled study (RCT). Qualitative data analysis revealed that focus group participants identified geographic and social isolation, and the more limited access to epilepsy care, as the major barriers to epilepsy self-management for rural populations. However, they felt strongly that SMART could fill an epilepsy care gap in rural communities, and provided suggestions for recruitment and retention strategies of subjects, as well as improvement/modifications to the program curriculum for the Phase 2 RCT.

Psychological treatments for people with epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Given the significant impact epilepsy may have on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of individuals with epilepsy and their families, there is increasing clinical interest in evidence-based psychological treatments, aimed at enhancing psychological and seizure-related outcomes for this group. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in Issue 10, 2017.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of psychological treatments for people with epilepsy on HRQOL outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update, we searched the following databases on 12 August 2019, without language restrictions: Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web), which includes randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials from the Specialized Registers of Cochrane Review Groups including Epilepsy, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to 09 August 2019), and PsycINFO (EBSCOhost, 1887 onwards), and from PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We screened the references from included studies and relevant reviews, and contacted researchers in the field for unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs for this review. HRQOL was the main outcome. For the operational definition of 'psychological treatments', we included a broad range of skills-based psychological treatments and education-only interventions designed to improve HRQOL, seizure frequency and severity, as well as psychiatric and behavioral health comorbidities for adults and children with epilepsy. These psychological treatments were compared to treatment as usual (TAU), an active control group (such as social support group), or antidepressant pharmacotherapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 36 completed RCTs, with a total of 3526 participants. Of these studies, 27 investigated skills-based psychological interventions. The remaining nine studies were education-only interventions. Six studies investigated interventions for children and adolescents, three studies investigated interventions for adolescents and adults, and the remaining studies investigated interventions for adults. Based on satisfactory clinical and methodological homogeneity, we pooled data from 11 studies (643 participants) that used the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31 (QOLIE-31) or other QOLIE inventories (such as QOLIE-89 or QOLIE-31-P) convertible to QOLIE-31. We found significant mean changes for the QOLIE-31 total score and six subscales (emotional well-being, energy and fatigue, overall QoL, seizure worry, medication effects, and cognitive functioning). The mean changes in the QOLIE-31 total score (mean improvement of 5.23 points, 95% CI 3.02 to 7.44; P < 0.001), and the overall QoL score (mean improvement of 5.95 points, 95% CI 3.05 to 8.85; P < 0.001) exceeded the threshold of minimally important change (MIC: total score: 4.73 points; QoL score: 5.22 points), indicating a clinically meaningful postintervention improvement in HRQOL. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence provided by the meta-analysis due to serious risks of bias in some of the included studies. Consequently, these results provided moderate-certainty evidence that psychological treatments for adults with epilepsy may enhance overall HRQOL.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Implications for practice: Skills-based psychological interventions improve HRQOL in adults and adolescents with epilepsy. Adjunctive use of skills-based psychological treatments for adults and adolescents with epilepsy may provide additional benefits in HRQOL when these are incorporated into patient-centered management. We judge the evidence to be of moderate certainty.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

Investigators should strictly adhere to the CONSORT guidelines to improve the quality of reporting on their interventions. A thorough description of intervention protocols is necessary to ensure reproducibility. When examining the effectiveness of psychological treatments for people with epilepsy, the use of standardized HRQOL inventories, such as the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventories (QOLIE-31, QOLIE-31-P, and QOLIE-89) would increase comparability. Unfortunately, there is a critical gap in pediatric RCTs and RCTs including people with epilepsy and intellectual disabilities. Finally, in order to increase the overall quality of RCT study designs, adequate randomization with allocation concealment and blinded outcome assessment should be pursued. As attrition is often high in research that requires active participation, an intention-to-treat analysis should be carried out. Treatment fidelity and treatment competence should also be assessed. These important dimensions, which are related to 'Risk of bias' assessment, should always be reported.

Bridging the divide between epilepsy and mental health to drive solutions

Since its establishment in 2000, Epilepsy & Behavior has published more than 1000 papers on mental health issues among people with epilepsy, including about 200 reviews. These studies on prevalence, treatment, and guidance for future research are important contributions to the field, and they offer great promise. Yet these papers and the multitude published in other journals over the years have failed to result in systematic, scaled changes in how the epilepsy field in the United States addresses mental health issues. The mental health assessment and management gap is especially notable given decades-old, as well as more recent, recommendations from national initiatives on epilepsy, consensus statements, and other expert appeals to reduce psychiatric burden. Selected or comprehensive elements of emerging models and latest approaches from behavioral health (e.g., peer support) and public health (e.g., community-clinical linkages) highlight current opportunities to engage multiple community partners and sectors to bridge the epilepsy and behavioral health fields to implement solutions for improved mental healthcare for people with epilepsy. In honor of the 20th anniversary of Epilepsy & Behavior and its contribution to the literature and the field, we seek to build public health roadmaps to bridge the epilepsy and behavioral health divide-with new epilepsy partners who can expand community-based partnerships that may help facilitate systematic changes to close mental health treatment gaps. Special Issue: Epilepsy & Behavior's 20th Anniversary.