Epilepsy knowledge, attitudes, and practices among primary healthcare providers in an Indian district

The reality of epilepsy in primary care in Rio de Janeiro: the importance of educational projects for better patient care

BACKGROUND

 The Basic Health Unit (Unidade Básica de Saúde - UBS, in Portuguese) is the first point of contact in the public healthcare system for people with epilepsy. Primary care professionals need to appropriately diagnose, treat, and refer, if necessary, to tertiary services.

OBJECTIVE

 To evaluate the knowledge of UBS professionals on the management of patients with epilepsy in Rio de Janeiro.

METHODS

 Online questionnaires were performed on the topic of epilepsy before and after exposure to classes taught by epileptologists.

RESULTS

 A total of 66 doctors participated, 54.5% of whom were residents or trained in family medicine. The majority had from 1 to 3 years of practice. Insecurity prevailed in the management of pregnant women and the elderly. Around 59.1% of the participants referred patients with seizures without examinations. A total of 78% of the participants did not correctly classify seizure types, and 2/3 did not define drug-resistant epilepsy. Induction and broad-spectrum drugs were common. The therapeutic decision depended on availability in the basic health unit (UBS) (81.8%), dosage (60.6%), side effects (34.8%), and age (36.4%). Comorbidities and sex influenced 1/4 of the sample. For 23% of the participants, the type of crisis did not affect the choice. Regarding typical non-pharmacological options, 75% of the participants were aware of cannabidiol, 40.9% of surgery, 22.7% of ketogenic diet, and 22.8% of deep brain stimulation/vagus nerve stimulation (DBS/VNS). A total of 90.2% indicated the need for training.

CONCLUSION

 There are deficits in the knowledge of UBS professionals in the management of epilepsy. Specialized training is imperative to optimize the care offered within SUS.

Implementing WHO's Intersectoral Global Action Plan for epilepsy and other neurological disorders in Southeast Asia: a proposal

The World Health Assembly approved the Intersectoral Global Action Plan for epilepsy and neurological disorders. Member states, including those in Southeast Asia, must now prepare to achieve IGAP's strategic targets by embracing novel approaches and strengthening existing policies and practices. We propose and present evidence to support four such processes. The opening course should engage all stakeholders to develop people-centric instead of outcome-centric approaches. Rather than caring for convulsive epilepsy alone, as currently done, primary care providers should also be skilled in diagnosing and treating focal and non-motor seizures. This could reduce the diagnostic gap as over half of epilepsies present with focal seizures. Currently, primary care providers lack knowledge and skills to manage focal seizures. Technology-enabled aids can help overcome this limitation. Lastly, there is need to add newer "easy to use" epilepsy medicines to Essential Medicines lists in light of emerging evidence for better tolerability, safety and user-friendliness.

A cluster-randomized trial comparing home-based primary health care and usual clinic care for epilepsy in a resource-limited country

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain whether home-based care with community and primary healthcare workers' support improves adherence to antiseizure medications, seizure control, and quality of life over routine clinic-based care in community samples of people with epilepsy in a resource-poor country.

METHODS

Participants included consenting individuals with active epilepsy identified in a population survey in impoverished communities. The intervention included antiseizure medication provision, adherence reinforcement and epilepsy self- and stigma management guidance provided by a primary health care-equivalent worker. We compared the intervention group to a routine clinic-based care group in a cluster-randomized trial lasting 24 months. The primary outcome was antiseizure medication adherence, appraised from monthly pill counts. Seizure outcomes were assessed by monthly seizure aggregates and time to first seizure and impact by the Personal Impact of Epilepsy scale.

RESULTS

Enrolment began on September 25, 2017 and was complete by July 24, 2018. Twenty-four clusters, each comprising ten people with epilepsy, were randomized to either home- or clinic-care. Home-care recipients were more likely to have used up their monthly-dispensed epilepsy medicine stock (regression coefficient: 0.585; 95% confidence intervals, 0.289-0.881; P = 0.001) and had fewer seizures (regression coefficient: -2.060; 95%CI, -3.335 to -0.785; P = 0.002). More people from clinic-care (n = 44; 37%) than home-care (n = 23; 19%) exited the trial (P = 0.003). The time to first seizure, adverse effects and the personal impact of epilepsy were similar in the two arms.

SIGNIFICANCE

Home care for epilepsy compared to clinic care in resource-limited communities improves medication adherence and seizure outcomes and reduces the secondary epilepsy treatment gap.

Treatment gaps in epilepsy

Over 50 million people around the world have epilepsy, and yet, epilepsy recognition and access to care are ongoing issues. Nearly 80% of people with epilepsy live in low-and middle-income countries and face the greatest barriers to quality care. However, there are substantial disparities in care within different communities in high-income countries as well. Across the world, under-recognition of seizures continues to be an issue, leading to diagnostic and treatment delays. This stems from issues surrounding stigma, public education, basic access to care, as well as healthcare worker education. In different regions, people may face language barriers, economic barriers, and technological barriers to timely diagnosis and treatment. Even once diagnosed, people with epilepsy often face gaps in optimal seizure control with the use of antiseizure medications. Additionally, nearly one-third of people with epilepsy may be candidates for epilepsy surgery, and many either do not have access to surgical centers or are not referred for surgical evaluation. Even those who do often experience delays in care. The purpose of this review is to highlight barriers to care for people with epilepsy, including issues surrounding seizure recognition, diagnosis of epilepsy, and the initiation and optimization of treatment.

Conocimiento de los residentes de especialidades médico-quirúrgicas en Colombia acerca del estado epiléptico

 Introducción: el estado epiléptico es una emergencia con serias implicaciones a nivel social y económico, cuando no se maneja de manera adecuada puede llevar a la muerte. Debe abordarse por el primer especialista que tenga contacto con el paciente. En Colombia no hay estudios acerca de la adherencia a guías de práctica clínica. Objetivo: evaluar cuál es el conocimiento acerca del estado epiléptico en residentes de especialidades médico quirúrgicas en Colombia. Métodos: estudio de corte transversal descriptivo. Se aplicó una encuesta por medio de formulario google, diseñada con base en las guías de práctica clínica rutinaria para el manejo de esta patología. Resultados: respondieron la encuesta 76 residentes de neurología, medicina interna, medicina de urgencias y cuidado crítico, la edad más frecuente fue 26 a 31 años, con una relación hombre mujer de 46/54%. Discusión: las preguntas concernientes a las definiciones operativas y a los tiempos de acción fueron las que tuvieron una mejor consistencia al responderse, hay una importante falencia en la selección y uso de medicamentos anticrisis en el contexto del estado epiléptico, por lo que es importante fortalecer la educación médica en éstos aspectos académicos.