The role of adenosine A1 receptor agonist in adenosine augmentation therapy for patients with refractory epilepsy in Sturge-Weber syndrome: An in vitro electrophysiological study

Ectopic expression of neuronal adenosine kinase, a biomarker in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy without hippocampal sclerosis

AIMS

Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy without hippocampal sclerosis (no-HS MTLE) refers to those MTLE patients who have neither magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions nor definite pathological evidence of hippocampal sclerosis. They usually have resistance to antiepileptic drugs, difficulties in precise seizure location and poor surgical outcomes. Adenosine is a neuroprotective neuromodulator that acts as a seizure terminator in the brain. The role of adenosine in no-HS MTLE is still unclear. Further research to explore the aetiology and pathogenesis of no-HS MTLE may help to find new therapeutic targets.

METHODS

In surgically resected hippocampal specimens, we examined the maladaptive changes of the adenosine system of patients with no-HS MTLE. In order to better understand the dysregulation of the adenosine pathway in no-HS MTLE, we developed a rat model based on the induction of focal cortical lesions through a prenatal freeze injury.

RESULTS

We first examined the adenosine system in no-HS MTLE patients who lack hippocampal neuronal loss and found ectopic expression of the astrocytic adenosine metabolising enzyme adenosine kinase (ADK) in hippocampal pyramidal neurons, as well as downregulation of neuronal A1 receptors (A1 Rs) in the hippocampus. In the no-HS MTLE model rats, the transition of ADK from neuronal expression to an adult pattern of glial expression in the hippocampus was significantly delayed.

CONCLUSIONS

Ectopic expression of neuronal ADK might be a pathological hallmark of no-HS MTLE. Maladaptive changes in adenosine metabolism might be a novel target for therapeutic intervention in no-HS MTLE.

Recent Advances in the Development of Pyrimidine-based CNS Agents

BACKGROUND

In the past few decades, considerable progress has been made in CNS drug discovery, and various new CNS agents have been developed. Pyrimidine is an important scaffold in the area of medicinal chemistry. Recently, pyrimidine-containing compounds have been successfully designed as potent CNS agents. Substantial research has been carried out on pyrimidine-bearing compounds to treat different disorders of CNS in various animal models.

METHODS

Utilizing various databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, and Web of Science, the literature review was conducted. The specifics of significant articles were discussed with an emphasis on the potency of pyrimidines derivatives possessing CNS activity.

RESULTS

Recent papers indicating pyrimidine derivatives with CNS activity were incorporated into the manuscript. (46) to (50) papers included different pyrimidine derivatives as 5-HT agonist/antagonists, (62) to (67) as adenosine agonist/antagonist, (70) to (75) as anticonvulsant agents, (80) to (83) as cannabinoid receptor agonists, (102) to (103) as nicotinic and (110) as muscarinic receptor agonists. The remaining papers (113) to (114) represented pyrimidine-based molecular imaging agents.

CONCLUSION

Pyrimidine and its derivatives have been studied in detail to evaluate their efficacy in overcoming multiple central nervous system disorders. The article covers the current updates on pyrimidine-based compounds as potent CNS and molecular imaging agents and will definitely provide a better platform for the development of potent pyrimidine-based CNS drugs in the near future.

Novel and emerging therapeutics for genetic epilepsies

INTRODUCTION

Disease-specific treatments are available only for a minority of patients with genetic epilepsies, while the rest are treated with anticonvulsants, which are ineffective in almost one-third of patients.

AREAS COVERED

Recently approved and the most effective emerging therapeutics under development for the treatment of genetic epilepsies are overviewed after systematic search and analysis of relevant literature.

EXPERT OPINION

New and emerging drugs for genetic epilepsies exploit one of the two approaches: inhibiting hyperactive brain foci through blocking excitatory or augmenting inhibitory neurotransmission, or correcting the underlying genetic defect. The first is limited by insufficient selectivity of available compounds, and the second by imperfection of currently used vectors of genetic material, unselective and transient transgene expression. Besides, the treatment may come too late, after structural abnormalities and epilepsy deterioration takes place. However, with recent improvements, we can expect to see soon gradual decline in the number of patients with therapy-resistant genetic epilepsies.