Longitudinal trajectory of quality of life and psychological outcomes following epilepsy surgery

Quality of life during usual epilepsy care for anxiety or depression symptoms: Secondary patient-reported outcomes in a randomized trial of remote assessment methods

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Anxiety and depression are highly prevalent and impactful in epilepsy. American Academy of Neurology quality measures emphasize anxiety and depression screening and quality of life (QOL) measurement, yet usual epilepsy care QOL and anxiety/depression outcomes are poorly characterized. The main objective was to assess 6-month QOL, anxiety and depression during routine care among adults with epilepsy and baseline anxiety or depression symptoms; these were prespecified secondary outcomes within a pragmatic randomized trial of remote assessment methods.

METHODS

Adults with anxiety or depression symptoms and no suicidal ideation were recruited from a tertiary epilepsy clinic via an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded process. Participants were randomized 1:1 to 6 month outcome collection via patient portal EHR questionnaires vs. telephone interview. This report focuses on an a priori secondary outcomes of the overall trial, focused on patient-reported health outcomes in the full sample. Quality of life, (primary health outcome), anxiety, and depression measures were collected at 3 and 6 months (Quality of Life in Epilepsy-10, QOLIE-10, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory-Epilepsy). Change values and 95 % confidence intervals were calculated. In post-hoc exploratory analyses, patient-reported anxiety/depression management plans at baseline clinic visit and healthcare utilization were compared with EHR-documentation, and agreement was calculated using the kappa statistic.

RESULTS

Overall, 30 participants (15 per group) were recruited and analyzed, of mean age 42.5 years, with 60 % women. Mean 6-month change in QOLIE-10 overall was 2.0(95 % CI -6.8, 10.9), and there were no significant differences in outcomes between the EHR and telephone groups. Mean anxiety and depression scores were stable across follow-up (all 95 % CI included zero). Outcomes were similar regardless of whether an anxiety or depression action plan was documented. During the baseline interview, most participants with clinic visit EHR documentation indicating action to address anxiety and/or depression reported not being offered a treatment(7 of 12 with action plan, 58 %), and there was poor agreement between patient report and EHR documentation (kappa=0.22). Healthcare utilization was high: 40 % had at least one hospitalization or emergency/urgent care visit reported and/or identified via EHR, but a third (4/12) failed to self-report an EHR-identified hospitalization/urgent visit.

DISCUSSION

Over 6 months of usual care among adults with epilepsy and anxiety or depression symptoms, there was no significant average improvement in quality of life or anxiety/depression, suggesting a need for interventions to enhance routine neurology care and achieve quality of life improvement for this group.

Decision-making under ambiguity after frontal lobe resection for epilepsy

PURPOSE

Decision-making is crucial to daily life and can impact our society as well as economic conditions. Although the frontal lobes have been identified as important for decision-making, this capacity has only been studied to a limited extent in frontal lobe epilepsy and not at all after frontal lobe resection (FLR) for epilepsy. This study aimed to explore decision-making under ambiguity after FLR for epilepsy.

METHODS

Fourteen patients having undergone FLR for epilepsy completed the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) which is a widely used tool to measure decision-making under ambiguity. Iowa Gambling Task scores included in the analysis were: total net score, separate scores from five blocks across the test, and a change score (last block of IGT minus first block). A group of healthy controls (n = 30) was used as a comparison. Associations between IGT and standardized neuropsychological methods for assessment of executive functions, self-rating questionnaires of mental health, fatigue, and behavior linked to frontal lobe dysfunction were also investigated.

RESULTS

The patient group performed inferior to controls at the final block of the IGT (p =.001).A group difference in IGT change scores was found (p =.005), reflectingthe absence of a positive change in performance over time for the FLR group compared to the control group. Correlations with tests of executive functions as well as self-rating scales were mainly statistically nonsignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that patients having undergone FLR for epilepsy have difficulties with decision-making under ambiguity. The performance illustrated a failure to learn throughout the task. Executive as well as emotional deficits may impact decision-making processes in this patient group and need to be considered in further studies. Prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed.

Experiences of emotional and psychosocial functioning after frontal lobe resection for epilepsy

PURPOSE

Frontal lobe resection (FLR) is the second most common epilepsy surgery procedure in adults. Few studies address neuropsychological consequences after FLR. The aim of this study was to explore patients' and relatives' experiences of cognitive, emotional and social cognitive functioning after frontal lobe epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were held with 14 patients having gone through FLR as adults during the years 2000-2016 and 12 of their relatives. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed with inductive qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Positive as well as negative consequences were described both by patients and relatives. Feelings of relief and an increased capacity to experience emotions of well-being were mainly experienced as related to seizure freedom. A newfound autonomy and a more grown-up identity as opposed to a self-image based on epilepsy was also highlighted. However, results also showed that even for seizure free patients, FLR could give rise to negative experiences, the most prominent of which were mental fatigue, lowered mood and social withdrawal. Coping strategies included planning ahead to avoid mental exhaustion. Over all, respondents considered that the epilepsy surgery had been a risk well worth taking and that positive consequences outweighed the negative ones.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows a range of positive as well as negative outcomes after FLR for epilepsy. The findings indicate that lowered mood and mental fatigue could affect the life situation in a negative way, regardless of seizure outcome. This is important to consider in the preoperative counselling of patients and their families, as well as in the postsurgical follow-up. It is also crucial that the epilepsy surgery team has the possibility to offer rehabilitation and support to families regarding these aspects after surgery.

Does etiology really matter for epilepsy surgery outcome?

Multiple factors influence the outcomes of epilepsy surgery. Prognostic indicators varying from clinical characteristics, imaging findings, ictal, and interictal electrophysiological activity have been linked to surgical outcomes. In this review, we focus on the relatively under‐studied role of the underlying epilepsy histopathology in driving post‐surgical outcomes, specifically focusing on the broad categories of seizure outcomes and cognitive outcomes. For each of these two outcomes of interest, we answer two questions: 1)‐ does etiology matter? and 2)‐ how could it matter? The goal is to review the existing literature on the relationship between etiology and surgical outcomes to provide the best possible judgment as to whether a causal relationship exists between histopathology and the ultimate surgical outcome as an initial step. Then, we delve into the possible mechanisms via which such relationships can be explained. We conclude with a call to action to the epilepsy surgery and histopathology research community to push the mechanistic understanding of the pathology‐outcome interaction and identify actionable knowledge and biomarkers that could inform patient care in a timely fashion.

In this review, we focus on the relatively under‐studied role of the underlying epilepsy histopathology in driving post‐surgical outcomes, specifically focusing on the broad categories of seizure outcomes and cognitive outcomes. For each of these two outcomes of interest, we answer two questions: (1) does etiology matter? and (2) how could it matter? We then delve into the mechanisms of these answers.

Speech Analysis Using Artificial Intelligence as a Peri-Operative Evaluation: A Case Report of a Patient with Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Secondary to Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Who Underwent Epilepsy Surgery

Background: Improved conversational fluency is sometimes identified postoperatively in patients with epilepsy, but improvements can be difficult to assess using tests such as the intelligence quotient (IQ) test. Evaluation of pre- and postoperative differences might be considered subjective at present because of the lack of objective criteria. Artificial intelligence (AI) could possibly be used to make the evaluations more objective. The aim of this case report is thus to analyze the speech of a young female patient with epilepsy before and after surgery. Method: The speech of a nine-year-old girl with epilepsy secondary to tuberous sclerosis complex is recorded during interviews one month before and two months after surgery. The recorded speech is then manually transcribed and annotated, and subsequently automatically analyzed using AI software. IQ testing is also conducted on both occasions. The patient remains seizure-free for at least 13 months postoperatively. Results: There are decreases in total interview time and subjective case markers per second, whereas there are increases in morphemes and objective case markers per second. Postoperatively, IQ scores improve, except for the Perceptual Reasoning Index. Conclusions: AI analysis is able to identify differences in speech before and after epilepsy surgery upon an epilepsy patient with tuberous sclerosis complex.