Seizure detection devices: A survey of needs and preferences of patients and caregivers

Users´ perspectives and preferences on using wearables in epilepsy: A critical review

Seizure detection devices (SDDs) offer promising technological advancements in epilepsy management, providing real-time seizure monitoring and alerts for patients and caregivers. This critical review explores user perspectives and experiences with SDDs to better understand factors influencing their adoption and sustained use. An electronic literature search identified 34 relevant studies addressing common themes such as usability, motivation, comfort, accuracy, barriers, and the financial burden of these devices. Usability emerged as the most frequently discussed factor, with patients and caregivers also emphasizing the importance of ease of use, long battery life, and waterproof design. Although validated devices showed high user satisfaction, technical challenges, false negatives, and false positives need much improvement. Motivation to use SDDs was driven by enhanced safety, symptom tracking, and health care professional recommendations. Comfort and wearability were also critical aspects, with users favoring lightweight, breathable, and discreet designs for long-term wear. Users reported the devices as "comfortable" and preferring wrist or arm-worn devices for the long term. Accuracy-particularly minimizing false positives and false negatives-was a priority for users. Barriers to adoption included device cost, limited insurance reimbursement, discomfort, and concerns about data privacy. Despite these challenges, many users were willing to use SDDs. Recommendations from health care professionals significantly increased user motivation. This review highlights the need for SDD designs that address user concerns regarding usability, comfort, looks, and accuracy, while also reducing financial and technical barriers. Enhancing clinical involvement and tailoring devices to specific patient needs may be crucial to promoting wider SDD adoption. Further research is needed to evaluate the impact of SDDs on quality of life and to explore ways to mitigate challenges in long-term use.

User involvement in the design and development of medical devices in epilepsy: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to describe the involvement of persons with epilepsy (PWE), healthcare professionals (HP) and caregivers (CG) in the design and development of medical devices is epilepsy.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligibility criteria included peer-reviewed research focusing on medical devices for epilepsy management, involving users (PWE, CG, and HP) during the MDD process. Searches were performed on PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, and a total of 55 relevant articles were identified and reviewed.

RESULTS

From 1999 to 2023, there was a gradual increase in the number of publications related to user involvement in epilepsy medical device development (MDD), highlighting the growing interest in this field. The medical devices involved in these studies encompassed a range of seizure detection tools, healthcare information systems, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and electroencephalogram (EEG) technologies reflecting the emphasis on seizure detection, prediction, and prevention. PWE and CG were the primary users involved, underscoring the importance of their perspectives. Surveys, usability testing, interviews, and focus groups were the methods used for capturing user perspectives. User involvement occurs in four out of the five stages of MDD, with production being the exception.

SIGNIFICANCE

User involvement in the MDD process for epilepsy management is an emerging area of interest holding a significant promise for improving device quality and patient outcomes. This review highlights the need for broader and more effective user involvement, as it currently lags in the development of commercially available medical devices for epilepsy management. Future research should explore the benefits and barriers of user involvement to enhance medical device technologies for epilepsy.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

This review covers studies that have involved users in the development process of medical devices for epilepsy. The studies reported here have focused on getting input from people with epilepsy, their caregivers, and healthcare providers. These devices include tools for detecting seizures, stimulating nerves, and tracking brain activity. Most user feedback was gathered through surveys, usability tests, interviews, and focus groups. Users were involved in nearly every stage of device development except production. The review highlights that involving users can improve device quality and patient outcomes, but more effective involvement is needed in commercial device development. Future research should focus on the benefits and challenges of user involvement.

Epileptic seizure forecasting with wearable-based nocturnal sleep features

OBJECTIVE

Non-invasive biomarkers have recently shown promise for seizure forecasting in people with epilepsy. In this work, we developed a seizure-day forecasting algorithm based on nocturnal sleep features acquired using a smart shirt.

METHODS

Seventy-eight individuals with epilepsy admitted to the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal epilepsy monitoring unit wore the Hexoskin biometric smart shirt during their stay. The shirt continuously measures electrocardiography, respiratory, and accelerometry activity. Ten sleep features, including sleep efficiency, sleep latency, sleep duration, time spent in non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREM) and rapid eye movement sleep (REM), wakefulness after sleep onset, average heart and breathing rates, high-frequency heart rate variability, and the number of position changes, were automatically computed using the Hexoskin sleep algorithm. Each night's features were then normalized using a reference night for each patient. A support vector machine classifier was trained for pseudo-prospective seizure-day forecasting, with forecasting horizons of 16- and 24-h to include both diurnal and nocturnal seizures (24-h) or diurnal seizures only (16-h). The algorithm's performance was assessed using a nested leave-one-patient-out cross-validation approach.

RESULTS

Improvement over chance (IoC) performances were achieved for 48.7% and 40% of patients with the 16- and 24-h forecasting horizons, respectively. For patients with IoC performances, the proposed algorithm reached mean IoC, sensitivity and time in warning of 34.3%, 86.0%, and 51.7%, respectively for the 16-h horizon, and 34.2%, 64.4% and 30.2%, respectively, for the 24-h horizon.

SIGNIFICANCE

Smart shirt-based nocturnal sleep analysis holds promise as a non-invasive approach for seizure-day forecasting in a subset of people with epilepsy. Further investigations, particularly in a residential setting with long-term recordings, could pave the way for the development of innovative and practical seizure forecasting devices.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Seizure forecasting with wearable devices may improve the quality of life of people living with epilepsy who experience unpredictable, recurrent seizures. In this study, we have developed a seizure forecasting algorithm using sleep characteristics obtained from a smart shirt worn at night by a large number of hospitalized patients with epilepsy (78). A daily seizure forecast was generated following each night using machine learning methods. Our results show that around half of people with epilepsy may benefit from such an approach.

Detection of focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures using a connected shirt

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to develop and evaluate a machine learning-based algorithm for the detection of focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS) using a novel multimodal connected shirt.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited patients with epilepsy admitted to our epilepsy monitoring unit and asked them to wear the connected shirt while under simultaneous video-electroencephalographic monitoring. Electrocardiographic (ECG) and accelerometric (ACC) signals recorded with the connected shirt were used for the development of the seizure detection algorithm. First, we used a sliding window to extract linear and nonlinear features from both ECG and ACC signals. Then, we trained an extreme gradient boosting algorithm (XGBoost) to detect FBTCS according to seizure onset and offset annotated by three board-certified epileptologists. Finally, we applied a postprocessing step to regularize the classification output. A patientwise nested cross-validation was implemented to evaluate the performances in terms of sensitivity, false alarm rate (FAR), time in false warning (TiW), detection latency, and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC).

RESULTS

We recorded 66 FBTCS from 42 patients who wore the connected shirt for a total of 8067 continuous hours. The XGBoost algorithm reached a sensitivity of 84.8% (56/66 seizures), with a median FAR of .55/24 h and a median TiW of 10 s/alarm. ROC-AUC was .90 (95% confidence interval = .88-.91). Median detection latency from the time of progression to the bilateral tonic-clonic phase was 25.5 s.

SIGNIFICANCE

The novel connected shirt allowed accurate detection of FBTCS with a low false alarm rate in a hospital setting. Prospective studies in a residential setting with a real-time and online seizure detection algorithm are required to validate the performance and usability of this device.

A systematic review of the literature reporting on remote monitoring epileptic seizure detection devices

BACKGROUND

Early detection and alert notification of an impending seizure for people with epilepsy have the potential to reduce Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP). Current remote monitoring seizure detection devices for people with epilepsy are designed to support real-time monitoring of their vital health parameters linked to seizure alert notification. An understanding of the rapidly growing literature on remote seizure detection devices is essential to address the needs of people with epilepsy and their carers.

AIM

This review aims to examine the technical characteristics, device performance, user preference, and effectiveness of remote monitoring seizure detection devices.

METHODOLOGY

A systematic review referenced to PRISMA guidelines was used.

RESULTS

A total of 1095 papers were identified from the initial search with 30 papers included in the review. Sixteen non-invasive remote monitoring seizure detection devices are currently available. Such seizure detection devices were found to have inbuilt intelligent sensor functionality to monitor electroencephalography, muscle movement, and accelerometer-based motion movement for detecting seizures remotely. Current challenges of these devices for people with epilepsy include skin irritation due to the type of patch electrode used and false alarm notifications, particularly during physical activity. The tight-fitted accelerometer-type devices are reported as uncomfortable from a wearability perspective for long-term monitoring. Also, continuous recording of physiological signals and triggering alert notifications significantly reduce the battery life of the devices. The literature highlights that 3.2 out of 5 people with epilepsy are not using seizure detection devices because of the cost and appearance of the device.

CONCLUSION

Seizure detection devices can potentially reduce morbidity and mortality for people with epilepsy. Therefore, further collaboration of clinicians, technical experts, and researchers is needed for the future development of these devices. Finally, it is important to always take into consideration the expectations and requirements of people with epilepsy and their carers to facilitate the next generation of remote monitoring seizure detection devices.

A sustainable artificial-intelligence-augmented digital care pathway for epilepsy: Automating seizure tracking based on electroencephalogram data using artificial intelligence

Objective

Scalp electroencephalograms (EEGs) are critical for neurological evaluations, particularly in epilepsy, yet they demand specialized expertise that is often lacking in many regions. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers potential solutions to this gap. While existing AI models address certain aspects of EEG analysis, a fully automated system for routine EEG interpretation is required for effective epilepsy management and healthcare professionals' decision-making. This study aims to develop an AI-augmented model for automating EEG seizure tracking, thereby supporting a sustainable digital care pathway for epilepsy (DCPE). The goal is to improve patient monitoring, facilitate collaborative decision-making, ensure timely medication adherence, and promote patient compliance.

Method

The study proposes an AI-augmented framework using machine learning, focusing on quantitative analysis of EEG data to automate DCPE. A focus group discussion was conducted with healthcare professionals to find the problem of the current digital care pathway and assess the feasibility, usability, and sustainability of the AI-augmented system in the digital care pathway.

Results

The study found that a combination of random forest with principal component analysis and support vector machines with KBest feature selection achieved high accuracy rates of 96.52% and 95.28%, respectively. Additionally, the convolutional neural networks model outperformed other deep learning algorithms with an accuracy of 97.65%. The focus group discussion revealed that automating the diagnostic process in digital care pathway could reduce the time needed to diagnose epilepsy. However, the sustainability of the AI-integrated framework depends on factors such as technological infrastructure, skilled personnel, training programs, patient digital literacy, financial resources, and regulatory compliance.

Conclusion

The proposed AI-augmented system could enhance epilepsy management by optimizing seizure tracking accuracy, improving monitoring and timely interventions, facilitating collaborative decision-making, and promoting patient-centered care, thereby making the digital care pathway more sustainable.

EEG based automated seizure detection - A survey of medical professionals

Diagnosing and managing seizures presents substantial challenges for clinicians caring for patients with epilepsy. Although machine learning (ML) has been proposed for automated seizure detection using EEG data, there is little evidence of these technologies being broadly adopted in clinical practice. Moreover, there is a noticeable lack of surveys investigating this topic from the perspective of medical practitioners, which limits the understanding of the obstacles for the development of effective automated seizure detection. Besides the issue of generalisability and replicability seen in a small amount of studies, obstacles to the adoption of automated seizure detection remain largely unknown. To understand the obstacles preventing the application of seizure detection tools in clinical practice, we conducted a survey targeting medical professionals involved in the management of epilepsy. Our study aimed to gather insights on various factors such as the clinical utility, professional sentiment, benchmark requirements, and perceived barriers associated with the use of automated seizure detection tools. Our key findings are: I) The minimum acceptable sensitivity reported by most of our respondents (80%) seems achievable based on studies reported from most currently available ML-based EEG seizure detection algorithms, but replication studies often fail to meet this minimum. II) Respondents are receptive to the adoption of ML seizure detection tools and willing to spend time in training. III) The top three barriers for usage of such tools in clinical practice are related to availability, lack of training, and the blackbox nature of ML algorithms. Based on our findings, we developed a guide that can serve as a basis for developing ML-based seizure detection tools that meet the requirements of medical professionals, and foster the integration of these tools into clinical practice.

A novel approach to automatic seizure detection using computer vision and independent component analysis

OBJECTIVE

Epilepsy is a neurological disease that affects ~50 million people worldwide, 30% of which have refractory epilepsy and recurring seizures, which may contribute to higher anxiety levels and poorer quality of life. Seizure detection may contribute to addressing some of the challenges associated with this condition, by providing information to health professionals regarding seizure frequency, type, and/or location in the brain, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy and medication adjustment, and alerting caregivers or emergency services of dangerous seizure episodes. The main focus of this work was the development of an accurate video-based seizure-detection method that ensured unobtrusiveness and privacy preservation, and provided novel approaches to reduce confounds and increase reliability.

METHODS

The proposed approach is a video-based seizure-detection method based on optical flow, principal component analysis, independent component analysis, and machine learning classification. This method was tested on a set of 21 tonic-clonic seizure videos (5-30 min each, total of 4 h and 36 min of recordings) from 12 patients using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation.

RESULTS

High accuracy levels were observed, namely a sensitivity and specificity of 99.06% ± 1.65% at the equal error rate and an average latency of 37.45 ± 1.31 s. When compared to annotations by health care professionals, the beginning and ending of seizures was detected with an average offset of 9.69 ± 0.97 s.

SIGNIFICANCE

The video-based seizure-detection method described herein is highly accurate. Moreover, it is intrinsically privacy preserving, due to the use of optical flow motion quantification. In addition, given our novel independence-based approach, this method is robust to different lighting conditions, partial occlusions of the patient, and other movements in the video frame, thereby setting the base for accurate and unobtrusive seizure detection.

Assessment of an under-mattress sensor as a seizure detection tool in an adult epilepsy monitoring unit

OBJECTIVE

Because of SUDEP (Sudden and unexpected death in epilepsy) and other direct consequences of generalized tonic-clonic seizures, the use of efficient seizure detection tool may be helpful for patients, relatives and caregivers. We aimed to evaluate an under-mattress detection tool (EMFIT®) in real-life hospital conditions, in particular its sensitivity and false alarm rate (FAR), as well as its impact on patient care.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective study on a cohort of patients with epilepsy admitted between September 2017 and June 2021 to Amiens University Hospital for a video-EEG of at least 24 h, during which at least one epileptic seizure was recorded. All video-EEGs records were analyzed visually in order to assess the sensitivity of the under-mattress tool (triggering of the alarm) and to classify the seizure type (convulsive/non convulsive). We also considered whether nurses intervened during the seizure, and the time of their intervention if applicable. An additional prospective survey was conducted over 272 days to analyze the FAR of the tool.

RESULTS

A total of 220 seizures were included in the study, from 55 patients, including 23 convulsive seizures from 15 patients and 197 non-convulsive seizures. Sensitivity for convulsive seizure detection was 69.6%. As expected, none of the non-convulsive seizures was detected. The false alarm rate was 0.007/day. Median trigger time was 74 s, decreasing to 5 s for generalized tonic-clonic seizure. The frequency of nurses' intervention during convulsive seizures was significantly greater in case of the alarm triggering (100% vs 57%, p<0.02).

SIGNIFICANCE

These results suggest that EMFIT® sensor is able to detect convulsive seizures with good sensitivity and low FAR, and allows caregivers to intervene more often in the event of a nocturnal seizure. This would be an interesting complementary tool to better secure the patients with epilepsy during hospitalization or at home.

Adaptive Remote Sensing Paradigm for Real-Time Alerting of Convulsive Epileptic Seizures

Epilepsy is a debilitating neurological condition characterized by intermittent paroxysmal states called fits or seizures. Especially, the major motor seizures of a convulsive nature, such as tonic-clonic seizures, can cause aggravating consequences. Timely alerting for these convulsive epileptic states can therefore prevent numerous complications, during, or following the fit. Based on our previous research, a non-contact method using automated video camera observation and optical flow analysis underwent field trials in clinical settings. Here, we propose a novel adaptive learning paradigm for optimization of the seizure detection algorithm in each individual application. The main objective of the study was to minimize the false detection rate while avoiding undetected seizures. The system continuously updated detection parameters retrospectively using the data from the generated alerts. The system can be used under supervision or, alternatively, through autonomous validation of the alerts. In the latter case, the system achieved self-adaptive, unsupervised learning functionality. The method showed improvement of the detector performance due to the learning algorithm. This functionality provided a personalized seizure alerting device that adapted to the specific patient and environment. The system can operate in a fully automated mode, still allowing human observer to monitor and override the decision process while the algorithm provides suggestions as an expert system.

Epileptic Prodromes: Insights from Surveying 196 Patients and 150 Caregivers

OBJECTIVE

Uncontrolled epilepsy creates a constant source of worry for patients and puts them at a high risk of injury. Identifying recurrent "premonitory" symptoms of seizures and using them to recalibrate seizure prediction algorithms may improve prediction performances. This study aimed to investigate patients' ability to predict oncoming seizures based on preictal symptoms.

METHODS

Through an online survey, demographics and clinical characteristics (e.g., seizure frequency, epilepsy duration, and postictal symptom duration) were collected from people with epilepsy and caregivers across Canada. Respondents were asked to answer questions regarding their ability to predict seizures through warning symptoms. A total of 196 patients and 150 caregivers were included and were separated into three groups: those who reported warning symptoms within the 5 minutes preceding a seizure, prodromes (symptoms earlier than 5 minutes before seizure), and no warning symptoms.

RESULTS

Overall, 12.2% of patients and 12.0% of caregivers reported predictive prodromes ranging from 5 minutes to more than 24 hours before the seizures (median of 2 hours). The most common were dizziness/vertigo (28%), mood changes (26%), and cognitive changes (21%). Statistical testing showed that respondents who reported prodromes also reported significantly longer postictal recovery periods compared to those who did not report predictive prodromes (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest that patients who present predictive seizure prodromes may be characterized by longer patient-reported postictal recovery periods. Studying the correlation between seizure severity and predictability and investigating the electrical activity underlying prodromes may improve our understanding of preictal mechanisms and ability to predict seizures.

Preferences and User Experiences of Wearable Devices in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Mixed-Methods Synthesis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To examine the preferences and user experiences of people with epilepsy and caregivers regarding automated wearable seizure detection devices.

METHODS

We performed a mixed-methods systematic review. We searched electronic databases for original peer-reviewed publications between January 1, 2000, and May 26, 2021. Key search terms included "epilepsy", "seizure", "wearable", and "non-invasive". We performed a descriptive and a qualitative thematic analysis of the studies included according to the technology acceptance model. Full texts of the discussion sections were further analyzed to identify word frequency and word mapping.

RESULTS

Twenty-two observational studies were identified. Collectively, they comprised responses from 3299 participants including patients with epilepsy, caregivers and healthcare workers. Sixteen studies examined user preferences, five examined user experiences, and one examined both experiences and preferences. Important preferences for wearables included improving care, cost, accuracy, and design. Patients desired real-time detection with a latency of ≤15 minutes from seizure occurrence, along with high sensitivity (≥90%) and low false-alarm rates. Device related costs were a major factor for device acceptance, where device costs of <$300 USD and a monthly subscription fee of <$20 USD were preferred. Despite being a major driver of wearable-based technologies, sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) was rarely discussed. Among studies evaluating user experiences, there was a greater acceptance towards wristwatches. Thematic coding analysis showed that attitudes towards device use, and perceived usefulness were reported consistently. Word mapping identified 'specificity', 'cost', and 'battery' as key single terms, and 'battery life', 'insurance coverage', 'prediction/detection quality', and the effect of devices on 'daily life' as key bigrams.

DISCUSSION

User acceptance of wearable technology for seizure detection was strongly influenced by accuracy, design, comfort, and cost. Our findings emphasise the need for standardised and validated tools to comprehensively examine preferences and user experiences of wearable devices in this population, using the themes identified in this study. Greater efforts to incorporate perspectives and user experiences in developing wearables for seizure detection, particularly in community-based settings are needed.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42020193565.

Seizure Detection in Continuous Inpatient EEG: A Comparison of Human vs Automated Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this work was to test the accuracy of Persyst commercially available automated seizure detection in critical care EEG by comparing automated seizure detections to human review in a manually reviewed cohort and on a large scale.

METHODS

Automated seizure detections (Persyst versions 12 and 13) were compared to human review in a pilot cohort of 229 seizures from 85 EEG records and then in an expanded cohort of 7,924 EEG records. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for individual seizures (pilot cohort) and for entire records (pilot and expanded cohorts). We assessed EEG features associated with the accuracy of automated seizure detections.

RESULTS

In the pilot cohort, accuracy of automated detection for individual seizures was modest (sensitivity 0.50, PPV 0.60). At the record level (did the recording contain seizures or not?), sensitivity was higher (pilot cohort 0.78, expanded cohort 0.91), PPV was low (pilot cohort 0.40, expanded cohort 0.08), and NPV was high (pilot cohort 0.88, expanded cohort 0.97). Different software versions (version 12 vs 13) performed similarly. Sensitivity was higher for records containing focal-onset seizures compared to generalized-onset seizures (0.93 vs 0.85, p = 0.012).

DISCUSSION

In critical care continuous EEG recordings, automated detection of individual seizures had rates of both false negatives and false positives that bring into question its utility as a seizure alarm in clinical practice. At the level of entire EEG records, the absence of automated detections accurately predicted EEG records without true seizures. The true value of Persyst automated seizure detection appears to lie in triaging of low-risk EEGs.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that an automated seizure detection program cannot accurately identify EEG records that contain seizures.

Seizure documentation in people living with epilepsy

Seizure documentation is an essential component of epilepsy management. Not all persons with epilepsy choose to document their seizures, but many view the practice as essential to managing their disease. While seizure documentation is a valuable aspect of patient care, clinicians and patients must remain aware that seizure underreport and overreport commonly occur due to lack of seizure awareness. Additionally, in rare cases, persons with epilepsy may intentionally conceal their seizures from clinicians. The continued development of electronic seizure diaries and epilepsy self-management software provides patients with new and expanding options for seizure documentation and disease management. In order for these tools to be utilized most effectively, patient input must be central to their development. Given the limitations of seizure documentation, the development of accurate, non-invasive seizure detection devices is crucial for accurate seizure monitoring.

Association between semiologic, autonomic, and electrographic seizure characteristics in children with generalized tonic-clonic seizures

INTRODUCTION

Generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) are associated with elevated electrodermal activity (EDA) and postictal generalized electroencephalographic suppression (PGES), markers that may indicate sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) risk. This study investigated the association of GTCS semiology, EDA, and PGES in children with epilepsy.

METHODS

Patients admitted to the Boston Children's Hospital long-term video-EEG monitoring unit wore a sensor that records EDA. We selected patients with at least one GTCS and reviewed video-EEGs for semiology, tonic and clonic phase duration, total clinical seizure duration, electrographic onset, offset, and PGES. We grouped patients into three semiology classes: GTCS 1: bilateral symmetric tonic arm extension, GTCS 2: no specific tonic arm extension or flexion, GTCS 3: unilateral or asymmetrical arm extension, tonic arm flexion or posturing that does not fit into GTCS 1 or 2. We analyzed the correlation between semiology, EDA, and PGES, and measured the area under the curve (AUC) of the ictal EDA (seizure onset to one hour after), subtracting baseline EDA (one-hour seizure-free before seizure onset). Using generalized estimating equation (GEE) and linear regression, we analyzed all seizures and single episodes per patient.

RESULTS

We included 30 patients (median age 13.8 ± 3.6 years, 46.7% females) and 53 seizures. With GEE, GTCS 1 was associated with longer PGES duration compared to GTCS 2 (Estimate (β) = -26.32 s, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -36.46 to -16.18, p < 0.001), and the presence of PGES was associated with greater EDA change (β = 429604 μS, 95% CI: 3550.96 to 855657.04, p = 0.048). With single-episode analysis, GTCS 1 had greater EDA change than GTCS 2 ((β = -601339 μS, 95% CI: -1167016.56 to -35661.44, p = 0.047). EDA increased with PGES presence (β = 637500 μS, 95% CI: 183571.84 to 1091428.16, p = 0.01) and duration (β = 16794 μS, 95% CI: 5729.8 to 27858.2, p = 0.006). Patients with GTCS 1 had longer PGES duration compared to GTCS 2 (β = -30.53 s, 95% CI: -44.6 to -16.46, p < 0.001) and GTCS 3 (β = -22.07 s, 95% CI: -38.95 to -5.19, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

In children with epilepsy, PGES correlates with greater ictal EDA. GTCS 1 correlated with longer PGES duration and may indirectly correlate with greater ictal EDA. Our study suggests potential applications in monitoring and preventing SUDEP in these patients.