Differentiation of psychogenic nonepileptic attacks from status epilepticus among patients intubated for convulsive activity

An update on psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The understanding of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) has advanced steadily over recent decades. This update summarizes new insights from the last three years.

RECENT FINDINGS

The process of diagnosing PNES has shifted from the exclusion of epilepsy to one based on the recognition of typical clinical features. While the diagnosis cannot rely on any single feature in isolation, a range of semiological features characterising PNES are now recognised and a number of studies hint at the potential for machine learning and AI to improve the diagnostic process. Advances in data processing and analysis may also help to make sense of the heterogeneity of PNES populations demonstrated by recent studies focussing on aetiology and patient subgroups. It is now clear that PNES are associated with high rates of mental and physical comorbidities and premature death, highlighting that they are only one manifestation of a complex disorder extending beyond the nervous system and the seizures themselves.

SUMMARY

PNES are now understood as a manifestation of dysfunction in interacting brain networks. This understanding provides an explanation for the psychopathological and semiological heterogeneity of PNES patient populations. New insights into medical comorbidities and increased rates of premature death call for more research into associated pathological processes outside the nervous system.

[Status epilepticus-Detection and treatment in the intensive care unit]

Status epilepticus is characterized by persistent or repetitive seizures which, without successful treatment, can lead to neuronal damage, neurological deficits and death of the patient.While status epilepticus with motor symptoms can usually be clinically diagnosed, nonconvulsive status epilepticus is often clinically overlooked due to its ambiguous semiology, so that electroencephalography (EEG) recording is necessary. The treatment of status epilepticus is performed in four treatment steps, whereby a difficult to treat status epilepticus is present from the third step at the latest and intensive medical care of the patient is necessary. Timely initiation of treatment and sufficient dosage of anticonvulsive medication are decisive for the success of treatment. There is little evidence for the "late" stages of treatment. Intensive medical measures pose the risk of complications that worsen the prognosis. Especially in nonconvulsive status epilepticus, the use of anesthetics must be weighed against possible complications of mechanical ventilation.

The A to F of functional status in the acute setting: A scoping review

Functional status (FSt) describes the phenomenon of prolonged non-epileptic attacks that may be misidentified as Status Epilepticus (SE). The early differentiation between epileptic and functional status is crucial in order to avoid unnecessarily invasive and costly medical escalation in the latter group, including the hazards of overmedication, intubation and intensive care admission. The authors conducted a literature review of available studies describing cases of functional status to extract the common aspects of FSt seizure semiology, investigations used to differentiate from SE, and guidance for managing FSt. A search was carried out using Medline, Embase and PsychInfo databases and 3909 papers were extracted for review. 30 papers were found relevant for inclusion, describing 260 cases of FSt. FSt was found to occur more commonly in younger, female patients with a family history of epilepsy, co-morbid psychiatric diagnosis and following a recent traumatic event. Common clinical features of FSt during and after, the events were identified. While video-EEG remains the gold standard investigation for differentiating FSt from SE, many of the included studies considered the utility of other investigation modalities including serum markers and neuroimaging. One key shortcoming identified within the literature reviewed was a lack of well-defined guidance on the acute management of FSt. We offer an A-F step management plan for the immediate and longer term assessment and treatment of FSt.

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures treated as epileptic seizures in the emergency department

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to estimate the rate of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) among patients presenting to an emergency department with presumed seizures. We also wanted to identify factors that can assist health care professionals in determining whether these events are likely to be epileptic or nonepileptic.

METHODS

We performed two retrospective audits on patients who were treated for seizures in the department of emergency medicine at the Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. Exploratory analyses and logistic regressions were conducted to investigate the characteristics of the presentations and the relationships between our variables of interest.

RESULTS

In the group of all presentations with presumed seizures over a 3-month period (n = 157), a total of 151 presentations (96.2%) presentations were given a primary diagnosis of epileptic seizures. Of these 151 presentations, only 84 (55.6%) presented with epileptic seizures and 40 (26.5%) actually presented with PNES. In the group of patients who presented with prolonged and/or multiple events (n = 213) over a 1-year period, 196 (92.0%) were treated as epileptic seizures. Of these 196 presentations, only 85 (43.4%) presented with epileptic seizures and 97 (49.5%) actually presented with PNES. Several factors were identified to help risk stratify between epileptic seizures and PNES: Duration of events and of the postictal phase, number of events, presence of a structural brain pathology, mental health history, lactate levels and presence of tongue bite, incontinence, and/or vomiting.

SIGNIFICANCE

A large proportion of people who present to emergency departments with events resembling epileptic seizures actually have PNES rather than epilepsy-particularly those patients who present with prolonged and/or multiple events. The rate of misdiagnosis was high. Efforts need to be made to recognize patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures earlier and diagnose them correctly to avoid unnecessary iatrogenic harm and to provide adequate treatment.

Long-Term V-EEG in Epilepsy: Chronological Distribution of Recorded Events Focused on the Differential Diagnosis of Epileptic Seizures and Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures

Differential diagnosis in epilepsy is sometimes challenging. Video-electroencephalography (V-EEG) is an essential tool in the diagnosis and management of epilepsy. The prolonged duration of V-EEG recording increases the diagnostic yield of a conventional V-EEG. The right length of monitoring for different indications is still to be established. We present a retrospective descriptive study with a sample of 50 patients with long-term V-EEG monitoring, with a mean age of 36.1 years, monitored from 2013 to 2019 at the Burgos University Hospital. The mean monitoring time was 3.6 days. Events were obtained in 76% of the patients, corresponding to epileptic seizures (ES) in 57.9% of them, with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) in 39.5%, and with episodes of both pathologies in 2.6% of the patients. We found that the first event was highly representative, and it correlated with the rest of the events that would be recorded. Moreover, 92% of the first PNES had been captured at the end of the second day, and 89% of the first ES by the end of the third day. V-EEG for differential diagnosis between ES and PNES can be performed in hospitals without specialized epilepsy surgery units. For this indication, the duration of long-term V-EEG can be adjusted individually depending on the nature of the first event.