Perampanel may represent an effective treatment for the prevention of migraine comorbid with epilepsy

A cross-sectional, multicenter survey of the prevalence and influencing factors for migraine in epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

Epilepsy and migraine are common chronic neurological disease. Epidemiologic studies and shared pathophysiology and treatment suggest that these two diseases overlap. However, migraine is often underestimated among patients with epilepsy. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of migraine and identify the related influencing factors among adult patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

Adult patients with epilepsy were recruited at the outpatient epilepsy clinic of 13 tertiary hospitals in China from February to September 2022. ID Migraine questionnaire was applied to evaluate for migraine. Both univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to explore the influencing factors of migraine.

RESULTS

A total of 1326 patients with epilepsy were enrolled in this study. The prevalence of migraine among patients with epilepsy was 19.2% (254/1326). In the multivariable analysis, being female (OR = 1.451, 95% CI: 1.068-1.975; p = 0.018), focal and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (OR = 1.583, 95% CI: 1.090-2.281; p = 0.015), and current seizure attack in the last 3 months (OR = 1.967, 95% CI: 1.282-3.063; p = 0.002) were the influencing factors for migraine. However, <10% of patients with epilepsy received analgesics for migraine.

SIGNIFICANCE

Approximately 20% of patients with epilepsy screened positive for migraine. Being female, focal and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, and current seizure attack in the last 3 months were the influencing factors for migraine. Neurologists should pay more attention to the screening and management of the migraine among patients with epilepsy in China.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Epilepsy and migraine are common chronic neurological disease with shared pathophysiological mechanisms and therapeutic options. However, migraine is often underestimated among patients with epilepsy. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of migraine and current status of treatment. In this study, approximately 20% of patients with epilepsy screened positive for migraine. Female, focal and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, and current seizure attack in the last 3 months were identified as independent influencing factors for migraine. Despite the high prevalence, the treatment for migraine was not optimistic, neurologists should pay more attention to the screening and management of migraine.

Migraine - a borderland disease to epilepsy: near it but not of it

BACKGROUND

Migraine and epilepsy are two paroxysmal chronic neurological disorders affecting a high number of individuals and being responsible for a high individual and socioeconomic burden. The link between these disorders has been of interest for decades and innovations concerning diagnosing and treatment enable new insights into their relationship.

FINDINGS

Although appearing to be distinct at first glance, both diseases exhibit a noteworthy comorbidity, shared pathophysiological pathways, and significant overlaps in characteristics like clinical manifestation or prophylactic treatment. This review aims to explore the intricate relationship between these two conditions, shedding light on shared pathophysiological foundations, genetic interdependencies, common and distinct clinical features, clinically overlapping syndromes, and therapeutic similarities. There are several shared pathophysiological mechanisms, like CSD, the likely underlying cause of migraine aura, or neurotransmitters, mainly Glutamate and GABA, which represent important roles in triggering migraine attacks and seizures. The genetic interrelations between the two disorders can be observed by taking a closer look at the group of familial hemiplegic migraines, which are caused by mutations in genes like CACNA1A, ATP1A2, or SCN1A. The intricate relationship is further underlined by the high number of shared clinical features, which can be observed over the entire course of migraine attacks and epileptic seizures. While the variety of the clinical manifestation of an epileptic seizure is naturally higher than that of a migraine attack, a distinction can indeed be difficult in some cases, e.g. in occipital lobe epilepsy. Moreover, triggering factors like sleep deprivation or alcohol consumption play an important role in both diseases. In the period after the seizure or migraine attack, symptoms like speech difficulties, tiredness, and yawning occur. While the actual attack of the disease usually lasts for a limited time, research indicates that individuals suffering from migraine and/or epilepsy are highly affected in their daily life, especially regarding cognitive and social aspects, a burden that is even worsened using antiseizure medication. This medication allows us to reveal further connections, as certain antiepileptics are proven to have beneficial effects on the frequency and severity of migraine and have been used as a preventive drug for both diseases over many years.

CONCLUSION

Migraine and epilepsy show a high number of similarities in their mechanisms and clinical presentation. A deeper understanding of the intricate relationship will positively advance patient-oriented research and clinical work.

Sleep-wake cycle and daytime sleepiness in patients with epilepsy after initiating perampanel as adjunctive therapy

BACKGROUND

Antiseizure medications (ASMs) may affect nocturnal sleep and daytime vigilance. Perampanel (PER), a third-generation ASM, showed to improve nocturnal sleep in patients with epilepsy (PWE). Although ASMs can have beneficial effects on nocturnal sleep and daytime sleepiness, no study investigated the effect of PER on both sleep-wake cycle and daytime sleepiness. Therefore, this study aimed to objectively evaluate the sleep-wake cycle and daytime sleepiness in PWE treated with PER as adjunctive therapy.

METHODS

This prospective study included adult PWE who received PER as add-on treatment. Sleep-wake cycle was assessed through actigraphic monitoring and daytime sleepiness by the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) performed at the end of the actigraphic recording. All patients performed both tests at baseline and at 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Ten patients (mean age: 44.50 ± 22.71 years, 50.0% female) were included. The mean monthly seizure frequency was 3.20 ± 5.94. Six of ten patients started PER as a first add-on treatment. The final PER dose was 5.11 ± 2.02 mg/day, and nine of ten patients achieved seizure freedom at follow-up. There was a significant decrease in mean monthly seizure frequency from baseline to follow-up (p = 0.004). No significant changes were found in the sleep-wake cycle parameters. An increase in sleep latency mean was observed at MSLT at 6-month follow-up (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that adjunctive PER is effective on seizures without pathologically change of the sleep-wake cycle in PWE and can even improve daytime sleepiness. This effect can be mediated by the achievement of seizure control. Therefore, PER may be promising in PWE with sleep disturbances and daytime sleepiness.

Bioinformatics and network pharmacology analysis of drug targets and mechanisms related to the comorbidity of epilepsy and migraine

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to explore the mechanisms underlying the comorbidity of epilepsy and migraine, identify potential common targets for drug intervention, and provide insight into new avenues for disease prevention and treatment using an integrated bioinformatic and network pharmacology approach.

METHODS

Disease targets in epilepsy and migraine were screened using the DisGeNET database to identify intersecting gene targets. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEEG) enrichment analyses were then performed using the WebGestalt database. Furthermore, the STRING database was used to construct a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network, and Cytoscape software was used to analyze the protein molecular signals at the intersection of epilepsy and migraine. The Drugbank database was used to identify common targets for antiepileptic drugs in epilepsy and migraine to further analyze the disease-gene-target-drug interaction network. Finally, molecular docking simulations were performed to verify the hypothesis that migraine and epilepsy share common diseases and drug targets.

RESULTS

A total of 178 common targets for epilepsy and migraine were identified using the DisGeNET database, and the 24 genes most related to the diseases were screened using the Score_gda gene scoring system. GO enrichment analysis indicated that common targets were mainly enriched in biological processes and molecular functions, including membrane potential regulation, inorganic ion transmembrane transport, axonal signaling, and ion channel activity. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis indicated that the mechanism of action might be related to neuroactive ligand receptors, AGE-RAGE, cAMP, and VEGF signaling pathways. The PPI network construction and analysis results showed that the PPI grid had 23 central nodes and 24 connected edges, with an average node degree of 2.09 and an average clustering coefficient of 0.384. The 10 genes with potentially important roles in epilepsy and migraine were CACNA1A, KCNQ2, KCNA1, SCN1A, PRRT2, SCN8A, KCNQ3, SCN2A, GRIN2A, and GABRG2. Drugbank database results indicated that antiepileptic drugs, including lamotrigine, topiramate, valproic acid, carbamazepine, gabapentin, and perampanel, also had common targets with migraine. The three most important targets exhibited strong binding affinity with drugs in the molecular docking simulations.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic and comprehensive analyses of disease-gene-target-drug interaction networks identified several biological processes and molecular functions common to migraine and epilepsy, most of which were related to neuroactive ligand-receptor interactions. These data provide a new theoretical basis and reference for the clinical treatment of comorbid epilepsy and migraine and may aid in the development of novel pharmacological strategies.

Antiseizure Medications for the Prophylaxis of Migraine during the Anti- CGRP Drugs Era

Migraine and epilepsy are fundamentally distinct disorders that can frequently coexist in the same patient. These two conditions significantly differ in diagnosis and therapy but share some widely- used preventive treatments. Antiseizure medications (ASMs) are the mainstay of therapy for epilepsy, and about thirty different ASMs are available to date. ASMs are widely prescribed for other neurological and non-neurological conditions, including migraine. However, only topiramate and valproic acid/valproate currently have an indication for migraine prophylaxis supported by high-quality evidence. Although without specifically approved indications and with a low level of evidence or recommendation, several other ASMs are used for migraine prophylaxis. Understanding ASM antimigraine mechanisms, including their ability to affect the pro-migraine calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) signaling pathway and other pathways, may be instrumental in identifying the specific targets of their antimigraine efficacy and may increase awareness of the neurobiological differences between epilepsy and migraine. Several new ASMs are under clinical testing or have been approved for epilepsy in recent years, providing novel potential drugs for migraine prevention to enrich the treatment armamentarium and drugs that inhibit the CGRP pathway.

Clinical and Instrumental Follow-Up of Childhood Absence Epilepsy (CAE): Exploration of Prognostic Factors

Background: Idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGEs) represent 15−20% of all cases of epilepsy in children. This study explores predictors of long-term outcome in a sample of children with childhood absence epilepsy (CAE). Methods: The medical records of patients with CAE treated at a university paediatric hospital between 1995 and 2022 were systematically reviewed. Demographics and relevant clinical data, including electroencephalogram, brain imaging, and treatment outcome were extracted. Outcomes of interest included success in seizure control and seizure freedom after anti-seizure medication (ASM) discontinuation. An analysis of covariance using the diagnostic group as a confounder was performed on putative predictors. Results: We included 106 children (age 16.5 ± 6.63 years) with CAE with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Seizure control was achieved in 98.1% (in 56.6% with one ASM). Headache and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) were more frequent in children requiring more than one ASM (p < 0.001 and p < 0.002, respectively). Of 65 who discontinued ASM, 54 (83%) remained seizure-free, while 11 (17%) relapsed (mean relapse time 9 months, range 0−18 months). Relapse was associated with GTCS (p < 0.001) and number of ASM (p < 0.002). Conclusions: A history of headache or of GTCS, along with the cumulative number of ASMs utilized, predicted seizure recurrence upon ASM discontinuation. Withdrawing ASM in patients with these characteristics requires special attention.