A community-targeted implementation of self-management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events (SMART): A research and community partnership to reduce epilepsy burden

A multicenter randomized controlled feasibility trial of a digital self-management intervention for adults with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Self-management interventions may enhance health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in epilepsy. However, several barriers often impair their implementation in the real world. Digital interventions may help to overcome some of these barriers. Considering this, the Helpilepsy Plus Prototype was developed as a prototype smartphone-delivered self-care treatment program for adults with epilepsy.

METHODS

The 12-week Helpilepsy Plus Prototype was evaluated through a randomized controlled feasibility trial with a waiting-list control (WLC) group. Outcome measurement at baseline and at 12 weeks assessed adherence to the prototype intervention and changes in epilepsy-related outcomes. The primary endpoint was patient autonomy measured with EASE, and secondary endpoints included HRQoL measured with QOLIE-31, health literacy measured with HLQ, anxiety, and depression symptoms measured with HADS. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a heterogeneous sample of participants to assess user-friendliness and usefulness. The prototype program was delivered through the Neuroventis Platform (Neuroventis, BV, Overijse, Belgium), a certified medical device (under EU/MDD Class I, and EU/MDR grace period).

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients were included (46 in the intervention group, 46 in WLC). Most participants (63%, 58/92 women, median age 30 years) had pharmacoresistant epilepsy (61%, 56/92). Only 22% of participants (10/46) in the intervention group completed at least half of all intervention sessions. No significant differences between the intervention group and WLC were observed. Although there was a larger proportion of patients in the intervention group with meaningful improvements in HRQoL compared to WLC (19/46 versus 11/46), the difference was not significant (p = 0.119). Qualitative feedback showed that participants would appreciate more personalization, such as adaptation of the content to their current epilepsy knowledge level, a more interactive interface, shorter text sections, and interaction through reminders and notifications.

SIGNIFICANCE

Digital interventions should allow sufficient scope for personalization and interaction to increase patient engagement and enable benefits from self-care apps. Feedback loops allow the participatory development of tailored interventions.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of an app-based self-help intervention. Study participants were either randomly assigned to a group that had access to the app or a group that received access to the app after the end of the study. Although a larger proportion of participants in the intervention group showed a relevant improvement in quality of life, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Less than one-fifth of participants in the intervention group attended at least half of all intervention sessions; patient feedback showed that patients required more personalization and interactive options.

Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the disease-related fear scale in patients with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to test the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Disease-Related Fear Scale (D-RFS) in order to understand the experience of fear in patients with epilepsy (PWE).

METHODS

The researchers obtained translation permission and followed international guidelines to develop a Chinese version of the D-RFS. A total of 609 PWE were recruited from a general tertiary hospital in Hangzhou, China, between January 2023 and June 2023. We evaluated the psychometric properties of the D-RFS, including content validity, reliability, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity.

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analyses (EFA) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were conducted on two separate samples with a sample size of 307 and 302. The results of EFA indicated that the scale could be divided into three dimensions, which were supported by the structure in CFA. We named the three dimensions as follows: "fear of seizure consequences", "fear of poor epilepsy management", and "fear of social restrictions", respectively. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the entire scale was 0.960, with a coefficient of 0.907, 0.953, and 0.917 on three dimensions.

CONCLUSION

The Chinese version of the D-RFS was found to be an effective and reliable tool to measure the experience of fear in adult PWE in China. The study could lay the foundation for future investigations to explore associated factors of epilepsy-related fear and establish intervention strategies to alleviate patients' fear in clinical practice.

Understanding Contexts and Challenges of Information Management for Epilepsy Care

Epilepsy is a common chronic neurological disease. People with epilepsy (PWE) and their caregivers face several challenges related to their epilepsy management, including quality of care, care coordination, side effects, and stigma management. The sociotechnical issues of the information management contexts and challenges for epilepsy care may be mitigated through effective information management. We conducted 4 focus groups with 5 PWE and 7 caregivers to explore how they manage epilepsy-related information and the challenges they encountered. Primary issues include challenges of finding the right information, complexities of tracking and monitoring data, and limited information sharing. We provide a framework that encompasses three attributes - individual epilepsy symptoms and health conditions, information complexity, and circumstantial constraints. We suggest future design implications to mitigate these challenges and improve epilepsy information management and care coordination.

MEW network self-management program characteristics and lessons learned through the RE-AIM framework

RATIONALE

The promotion of evidence-based self-management support for people living with chronic conditions such as epilepsy is a public health priority. Epilepsy self-management encompasses three general areas: (1) treatment management, (2) seizure management, and (3) lifestyle management. Interventions focusing on self-management have increased quality of life and adherence to treatment. This study assesses and synthesizes the Managing Epilepsy Well Network (MEWN) program implementation experiences using the RE-AIM framework. This research informs the quality and rigor of MEWN program dissemination and implementation efforts to assess whether these programs are being implemented and their scalability.

METHODS

The study data were derived from a MEWN Self-management Program Survey conducted with currently active MEWN researchers through an online survey and review of program publications and archival documents. Survey data were obtained from either the principal investigator or study team for the UPLIFT, HOBSCOTCH, SMART, MINDSET, TIME, and PACES programs. The survey questionnaire included 6 sections consisting of 68 questions and focused on the RE-AIM dimensions and respondent characteristics. The RE-AIM dimensions included: (1) Reach, (2) Effectiveness, (3) Adoption (number of and type of adopting sites), (4) Implementation (retention rate, barriers to implementation), and (5) Maintenance.

RESULTS

Across the MEWN programs, participation (44-120 individuals) and delivery methods (community, clinic, or asynchronous; group or individual) ranged with most programs predominantly reaching White or African American participants. Common program outcome measures included clinical outcomes (e.g., depression, quality of life, seizure frequency) and indicators of self-management behaviors (e.g., problem-solving; self-efficacy). Initial efficacy trials suggested programs were effective in changing some of their targeted outcomes (effectiveness). Most programs were implemented in clinical settings and several programs are being replicated or adapted to different geographical (e.g., urban, rural, suburban) or demographic (e.g., race, age) settings (adoption). Program delivery methods involved a mixture of program staff, peer educators, and researchers. Implementation enabling factors included partnerships with local epilepsy organizations and the inclusion of peer educators. Retention rates for all programs averaged 83.6%. Internal barriers included recruitment and lack of sufficient resources for participants. External barriers included clinical staff buy-in, staffing, and insufficient funding for support staff. Despite uncertain funding, all programs offered next steps to sustain their initiatives such as packaging their programs, initiating adoption with regional organizations, and supporting organizational readiness (maintenance). Dissemination efforts included partnering with other organizations, provision of training and technical assistance, and partnering with national organizations on grant opportunities to scale up existing programs.

CONCLUSION

These data showcase the impact of the MEWN self-management interventions on health and quality of life. These programs are employing training, readiness assessment, technical assistance, and development of partnerships to increase program scalability. Finally, program adaptations are being conducted to expand the interventions to other populations to address health inequalities. The lessons learned are critical for other interventions attempting to increase the translation of their programs to other settings.