Neuropsychological performance and effort in patients diagnosed with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures - Descriptive study of a Czech sample

Neurocognitive performance in functional neurological disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cognitive complaints are common in functional neurological disorder (FND), but it is unclear whether objective neurocognitive deficits are present. This systematic review summarized validated/standardized cognitive test performance in FND samples across cognitive domains.

METHODS

Embase, PsycInfo and MEDLINE were searched from inception to 15 May 2023, combining terms for FND and cognitive domains (e.g., attention, memory, executive functioning). Studies included a range of FND phenotypes (seizures, motor, cognitive disorder, mixed), compared to healthy or clinical controls. Risk of bias was assessed with the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and a qualitative synthesis/narrative review of cognitive performance in FND was conducted. Test performance scores were extracted, and random effects meta-analyses were run where appropriate. This review was registered on PROSPERO, CRD42023423139.

RESULTS

Fifty-six studies including 2260 individuals with FND were eligible. Although evidence for some impairments emerged across domains of executive functioning, attention, memory and psychomotor/processing speed, this was inconsistent across studies and FND phenotypes. Common confounds included group differences in demographics, medication and intellectual functioning. Only 24% of studies objectively assessed performance validity. Meta-analyses revealed higher scores on tests of naming (g = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50, 0.84) and long-term memory (g = 0.43, 95% CI 0.13, 0.74) in functional seizures versus epilepsy, but no significant differences in working (g = -0.08, 95% CI -0.44, 0.29) or immediate (g = 0.25, 95% CI -0.02, 0.53) memory and cognitive flexibility (g = -0.01, 95% CI -0.29, 0.28).

CONCLUSIONS

There is mixed evidence for objective cognitive deficits in FND. Future research should control for confounds, include tests of performance validity, and assess relationships between objective and subjective neurocognitive functioning.

Neuropsychological characteristics of drug resistant epilepsy patients with and without comorbid functional seizures

INTRODUCTION

Neuropsychological testing is a mandatory component in the evaluation of drug resistant epilepsy. The results of testing may assist with both the localization of an epilepsy as well as assessment of surgical risk. Previous studies have demonstrated differences in the neuropsychological performance of patients with epilepsy and functional seizures. We hypothesized that comorbid functional seizures could potentially influence neuropsychological test performance. Therefore, we evaluated whether there is a difference in the neuropsychological test results between drug resistant epilepsy patients with and without comorbid functional seizures.

METHOD

Neuropsychological test results were compared between 25 patients with drug resistant focal epilepsy and 25 patients that also had documented functional seizures. Univariate analyses and multiple logistic regression models were used to both assess performance differences between the groups and to assess whether test results could be used to accurately identify which patients had comorbid functional seizures.

RESULTS

Epilepsy patients with comorbid functional seizures performed significantly worse on the FAS Verbal Fluency Test compared to ES patients (p = 0.047). Digit Span Backwards (p = 0.10), Digit Span Forwards (p = 0.14) and Working Memory Index (p = 0.10) tended to be lower in the epilepsy and functional seizures group but was not statistically significant. A multiple logistic regression model using the results of four neuropsychological tests was able to identify patients with comorbid functional seizures with 83.33% accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

There are appeared to be some differences in the neuropsychological performance among drug resistant epilepsy patients based on whether they have comorbid functional seizures. These findings may have relevant implications for the interpretation of neuropsychological test results.

Performance validity tests in nonlitigant patients with functional motor disorder

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Performance validity tests (PVTs) are used in neuropsychological assessments to detect patterns of performance suggesting that the broader evaluation may be an invalid reflection of an individual's abilities. Data on functional motor disorder (FMD) are currently poor and conflicting. We aimed to examine the rate of failure on three different PVTs of nonlitigant, non-compensation-seeking FMD patients, and we compared their performance to that of healthy controls and controls asked to simulate malingering (healthy simulators).

METHODS

We enrolled 29 nonlitigant, non-compensation-seeking patients with a clinical diagnosis of FMD, 29 healthy controls, and 29 healthy simulators. Three PVTs, the Coin in the Hand Test (CIH), the Rey 15-Item Test (REY), and the Finger Tapping Test (FTT), were employed.

RESULTS

Functional motor disorder patients showed low rates of failure on the CIH and REY (7% and 10%, respectively) and slightly higher rates on the FTT (15%, n = 26), which implies a motor task. Their performance was statistically comparable to that of healthy controls but statistically different from that of healthy simulators (p < 0.001). Ninety-three percent of FMD patients, 7% of healthy simulators, and 100% of healthy controls passed at least two of the three tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Performance validity test performance of nonlitigant, non-compensation-seeking patients with FMD ranged from 7% to 15%. Patients' performance was comparable to that of controls and significantly differed from that of simulators. This simple battery of three PVTs could be of practical utility and routinely used in clinical practice.