Complications associated with the use of enzyme-inducing and non-enzyme-inducing anti-seizure medications in the Japanese population: A retrospective cohort study

Antiseizure Medications and Cardiovascular Events in Older People With Epilepsy

Importance

How epilepsy may promote cardiovascular disease remains poorly understood.

Objective

To estimate the odds of new-onset cardiovascular events (CVEs) over 6 years in older people with vs without epilepsy, exploring how enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (EIASMs) and traditional cardiovascular risk factors mediate these odds.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a prospective cohort study using the comprehensive cohort of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA), with 6 years of follow-up (2015-2021, analysis performed in December 2023). The CLSA is an ongoing, national study of 51 338 adults aged 45 to 85 years at baseline who are recruited in Canada. The comprehensive cohort includes 30 097 individuals living near 1 of 11 data collection centers. Participation in the CLSA was voluntary; participation rate was 45%. Among those in the comprehensive cohort, individuals reporting no previous history of CVEs (ie, stroke, transient ischemic attack [TIA], or myocardial infarction [MI]) at baseline were excluded. No other exclusion criteria were applied. A total of 86% of participants completed follow-up.

Exposure

Lifetime history of epilepsy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was new-onset CVEs over 6 years. Secondary outcomes were new-onset strokes, TIAs, and MIs. Logistic models were fitted for these outcomes as a function of epilepsy, age, sex, household income, and education level. Mediation analyses were conducted for strong EIASM use, weak EIASM use, Framingham score, Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) score, and waist to hip ratio.

Results

Among the 30 097 individuals in the comprehensive cohort, a total of 27 230 individuals (mean [SD] age, 62.3 [10.1] years; 14 268 female [52.4%]) were included, 431 with a lifetime history of epilepsy. New-onset CVEs were more likely in epilepsy, with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.20 (95% CI, 1.48-3.27). The proportion of the effect of epilepsy on new-onset CVEs was mediated as follows by each of the following variables: strong EIASM use, 24.6% (95% CI, 6.5%-54.6%), weak EIASM use, 4.0% (95% CI, 0.8%-11.0%), Framingham score, 1.4% (95% CI, -1.6% to 4.5%), PASE score, 3.3% (95% CI, 1.4%-6.8%), and waist to hip ratio, 1.6% (95% CI, 0.4%-3.7%).

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this cohort study reveal that epilepsy was associated with new-onset CVEs. Nearly one-third of this association can be explained by EIASMs. These findings should be considered when choosing an antiseizure medication for a person at risk for cardiovascular disease.

Adherence to and persistence with lacosamide, perampanel, lamotrigine, and levetiracetam in adult patients with focal epilepsy in Japan: A descriptive cohort study using a claims database

Objective

We evaluated adherence to and 1-year persistence of two third-generation anti-seizure medications (ASMs), lacosamide and perampanel, in adult patients with focal epilepsy, compared with lamotrigine and levetiracetam.

Methods

A cohort study was conducted using a Japanese health insurance claims database (JMDC Inc.). We identified patients with adult-onset focal epilepsy who initiated any of the four ASMs between August 31, 2016, and October 31, 2019. Patients were further classified into ASM-naïve patients initiating any of the four ASMs as first-line treatment, and ASM-experienced patients initiating any of the four ASMs as second- or later-line treatment. Outcomes included adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC], defined as the total number of days covered by ASMs divided by the total number of days in the follow-up period) and 1-year persistence for the four ASMs.

Results

We identified 141 lacosamide, 75 perampanel, 80 lamotrigine, and 530 levetiracetam initiators. Among these, the proportion of ASM-naïve patients was highest in the levetiracetam group (60.8%), followed by the lamotrigine (25.0%), lacosamide (20.6%), and perampanel groups (1.3%). Mean PDC (standard deviation) was similar across the four groups, at 0.95 (0.08) for lacosamide, 0.93 (0.12) for perampanel, 0.92 (0.10) for lamotrigine and 0.94 (0.11) for levetiracetam. The proportion of patients persisting with treatment for 1 year was highest in the lacosamide group (73.0%), followed by the levetiracetam (58.3%), lamotrigine (57.5%), and perampanel groups (54.7%). In ASM-naïve patients, adherence and 1-year persistence were almost identical in the lacosamide, lamotrigine, and levetiracetam groups. Results for ASM-experienced patients did not significantly differ from those of all patients.

Significance

With regard to adherence and 1-year persistence, lacosamide may be equal to or better than lamotrigine and levetiracetam, especially in patients with experienced ASM, while perampanel may be comparable to lamotrigine and levetiracetam in patients with experienced ASM.

Implementing WHO's Intersectoral Global Action Plan for epilepsy and other neurological disorders in Southeast Asia: a proposal

The World Health Assembly approved the Intersectoral Global Action Plan for epilepsy and neurological disorders. Member states, including those in Southeast Asia, must now prepare to achieve IGAP's strategic targets by embracing novel approaches and strengthening existing policies and practices. We propose and present evidence to support four such processes. The opening course should engage all stakeholders to develop people-centric instead of outcome-centric approaches. Rather than caring for convulsive epilepsy alone, as currently done, primary care providers should also be skilled in diagnosing and treating focal and non-motor seizures. This could reduce the diagnostic gap as over half of epilepsies present with focal seizures. Currently, primary care providers lack knowledge and skills to manage focal seizures. Technology-enabled aids can help overcome this limitation. Lastly, there is need to add newer "easy to use" epilepsy medicines to Essential Medicines lists in light of emerging evidence for better tolerability, safety and user-friendliness.