Challenging behavior in children and adolescents with Dravet syndrome: Exploring the lived experiences of parents

Survey of rehabilitation approaches and plans for individuals with dravet syndrome (RAPIDS) in Italy: Current practices and strategies to progress

Dravet syndrome, a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, manifests with varying degrees of cognitive and communication impairment, postural and movement disorders (such as ataxia, coordination issues, and crouch gait) and behavioural challenges (including attention deficit/hyperactivity, oppositional/defiant behaviour, and autistic traits). Rehabilitation is a valuable tool for most patients, typically prescribed to address the most pressing issues. However, current practices often fall short in proactively preventing and treating known challenges associated with the syndrome, as indicated by the latest literature, at different life stages. Furthermore, there is a notable lack of evidence regarding treatment types and efficacy specific to people with Dravet Syndrome. Conducted in collaboration with one of the Italian Patient associations, this national survey provides a comprehensive view of the rehabilitation landscape in Dravet Syndrome, as perceived by caregivers. It outlines the types of treatments for 51 patients, based on age and relevant clinical features. The findings reveal a heterogenous rehabilitation approach, only partly tailored to the presence of specific comorbidities, and underline numerous unmet needs. Compared to the past there is indirect evidence that more patients are offered early rehabilitation. Nonetheless, while nowadays speech therapy and neuropsychomotor therapy are nearly universal for children up to the age of 10, some begin physiotherapy and psychotherapy thereafter, with a majority discontinuing treatments. Therefore, families of adolescent and adult patients often face a lack of comprehensive support, predominantly offered when epilepsy is more challenging to control affecting rehabilitation adherence and effectiveness. Finally, a negligible minority is offered treatments such as neurovisual training, augmentative and alternative communication, and occupational therapy. Many of these considerations could apply to other developmental and epileptic encephalopathy with lifelong disability. This survey calls for more data collection on this important topic for more efficient allocation of rehabilitation resources.

Interaction between healthcare providers and parents of children or adolescents with epilepsy: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis

AIMS

This study aimed to explore the interactions between healthcare providers and parents of children or adolescents with epilepsy. A qualitative systematic review based on the theory-generating meta-synthesis research approach proposed by Finfgeld-Connett (2018) was applied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched for empirical qualitative studies in five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science), from January 1, 2003 to February 9, 2023. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used to guide the selection process, and two researchers independently assessed the methodological quality of the articles using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Studies Checklist.

RESULTS

Of the 4,768 studies initially imported for screening, 27 studies were reviewed and synthesized. Only one qualitative study directly focused on the interactions between parents and healthcare providers, but various studies mentioning such interaction as themes or sub-themes of other phenomena allowed us to draw out common attributes. Defining attribute, "journey through the three stages of interaction," were derived as follows: Stage 1: trust vs. mistrust; Stage 2: autonomy vs. doubt; Stage 3: adaptation. The antecedents included encounters with healthcare providers and parent empowerment. A patient-centered approach was found to be the consequence.

CONCLUSION

It is important for parents of children or adolescents with epilepsy to empower themselves and increase their interactions. Considering the stage of interaction, healthcare providers and researchers should explore strategies to promote effective communication. Further research is required to develop strategies aimed at supporting parents and healthcare providers to achieve the tasks at each stage and maintain Stage 3, "adaptation."

Caregiver perceptions of the impact of Dravet syndrome on the family, current supports and hopes and fears for the future: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Dravet syndrome (DS) is a Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathy (DEE) with onset typically in infancy. Seizures are pharmaco-resistant, and neurodevelopment is compromised in almost all children. There is limited data on the impact of the condition on the family, support needs and hopes and fears in Sweden.

METHODS

Interviews were undertaken with the caregivers of 36 of 48 (75%) living children with DS in Sweden focusing on the perceived impact on the family, current supports and hopes and fears for the future. Data from the interviews were analyzed by two raters using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed seven main themes focusing on the perceived negative impact the disease has on caregivers and family functioning. These negative impacts concerned: caregiver sleep (e.g., frequent night waking), siblings (e.g., gets less attention/time), social life (e.g., limited vacations), family finances (e.g., limited career progression), parental health (both mental and physical) and need for constant supervision (e.g., child's need for constant supervision for fear of seizures). Another theme concerned the impact on family relationships. Whilst some caregivers perceived the impact to be negative (e.g., limited time for each other) others felt that having a child with DS lead to stronger relationships and more 'teamwork'. With respect to supports, the caregivers identified a number of areas where they felt the family could access appropriate supports. Themes regarding supports included: support from the wider family and friends, support from DS support groups (online or in-person), support from the child's hospital or disability service and respite care (e.g., child was looked after on weekends or had paid carers in the home). Regarding hopes and fears for the future, responses focused mainly on fears, including concerns about premature death of the child, transition to adult healthcare services and care arrangements for child when parents are dead. Hopes for the future included better treatment for epilepsy and associated neurodevelopmental problems and finding a cure for DS.

CONCLUSIONS

Caregivers of children with DS report that the disease can have a very comprehensive negative impact on caregiver and family functioning. Identifying and providing the supports to ameliorate these negative impacts is vital to optimize caregiver and family wellbeing and quality of life.

Understanding neurodevelopmental trajectories and behavioral profiles in SCN1A-related epilepsy syndromes

BACKGROUND

A pathogenic variant in SCN1A can result in a spectrum of phenotypes, including Dravet syndrome (DS) and genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS + ) syndrome. Dravet syndrome (DS) is associated with refractory seizures, developmental delay, intellectual disability (ID), motor impairment, and challenging behavior(1,2). GEFS + is a less severe phenotype in which cognition is often normal and seizures are less severe. Challenging behavior largely affects quality of life of patients and their families. This study describes the profile and course of the behavioral phenotype in patients with SCN1A-related epilepsy syndromes, explores correlations between behavioral difficulties and potential risk factors.

METHODS

Data were collected from questionnaires, medical records, and semi-structured interviews. Behavior difficulties were measured using the Adult/Child Behavior Checklist (C/ABCL) and Adult self-report (ASR). Other questionnaires included the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), the Functional Mobility Scale (FMS) and the Sleep Behavior Questionnaire by Simonds & Parraga (SQ-SP). To determine differences in behavioral difficulties longitudinally, paired T-tests were used. Pearson correlation and Spearman rank test were used in correlation analyses and multivariable regression analyses were employed to identify potential risk factors.

RESULTS

A cohort of 147 participants, including 107 participants with DS and 40 with genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS + ), was evaluated. Forty-six DS participants (43.0 %) and three GEFS + participants (7.5 %) showed behavioral problems in the clinical range on the A/CBCL total problems scale. The behavioral profile in DS exists out of withdrawn behavior, aggressive behavior, and attention problems. In DS patients, sleep disturbances (β = 1.15, p < 0.001) and a lower age (β = -0.21, p = 0.001) were significantly associated with behavioral difficulties. Between 2015 and 2022, behavioral difficulties significantly decreased with age (t = -2.24, CI = -6.10 - -0.15, p = 0.04) in DS participants aging from adolescence into adulthood. A decrease in intellectual functioning (β = 3.37, p = 0.02) and using less antiseizure medications in 2022 than in 2015, (β = -1.96, p = 0.04), were identified as possible risk factors for developing (more) behavioral difficulties.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that, in addition to epilepsy, behavioral difficulties are a core feature of the DS phenotype. Behavioral problems require personalized management and treatment strategies. Further research is needed to identify effective interventions.

Health care concerns in parents of children with different genetic developmental and epileptic encephalopathies: A qualitative study

AIM

To describe the experiences and unmet medical care needs of a group of parents of children with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) caused by the SCN1A, KCNQ2, CDKL5, PCDH19, and GNAO1 variants.

METHOD

A qualitative descriptive study was conducted. Participants were recruited using purposeful sampling. The inclusion criteria consisted of parents of children with DEEs caused by the SCN1A, KCNQ2, CDKL5, PCDH19, or GNAO1 variants, aged between 4 and 10 years old. In total, 21 parents were included. Data were acquired via researcher field notes and in-depth interviews. A thematic analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Three main themes were identified: (1) managing symptoms: epileptic seizures are experienced with great uncertainty and are accompanied by cognitive, behavioural, and motor symptoms; (2) accepting treatment: the ideal medication regimen is a challenge and the decision to withdraw or start a new therapy falls on the parents; and (3) therapeutic relationship and medical care: behaviours related to the health professional can hinder the therapeutic relationship with the parents. Parents are apprehensive about going to the emergency department.

INTERPRETATION

Professionals in emergency departments should acquire better knowledge of DEEs, welcome parents, and improve treatment for the children. The results of this study can serve as a starting point for a roadmap of relevant caregiver-reported outcomes in DEEs, to be implemented with new clinical trials and aetiology-targeted therapies.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Epileptic seizures are the symptom that is most experienced and feared by parents. The medication regime has no defined protocol and the decision to withdraw a medication is frequently left to parents.

Preocupaciones sobre la atención sanitaria en progenitores de niños con diferentes encefalopatías epilépticas genéticas del desarrollo: Un estudio cualitativo

Objetivo

Describir las experiencias y las necesidades de atención médica de un grupo de progenitores de niños con encefalopatías epilépticas y del desarrollo (EED) causadas por las variantes SCN1A, KCNQ2, CDKL5, PCDH19 y GNAO1.

Método

Se realizó un estudio cualitativo descriptivo. Los participantes fueron reclutados mediante un muestreo intencional. Los criterios de inclusión consistieron en progenitores de niños con EED causadas por las variantes SCN1A, KCNQ2, CDKL5, PCDH19 o GNAO1, con edades comprendidas entre los 4 y los 10 años. En total, se incluyeron 21 progenitores. Los datos se obtuvieron mediante entrevistas en profundidad y notas de campo del investigador. Se realizó un análisis temático.

Resultados

Se identificaron tres temas principales: (1) Manejando los síntomas, las crisis epilépticas se viven con gran incertidumbre, y se acompañan de síntomas cognitivos, conductuales y motores que limitan la vida del niño; b) Aceptando el tratamiento, la pauta de la medicación idónea es un reto, la decisión de retirar o comenzar una nueva terapia recae en los progenitores; y c) Relación terapéutica y atención médica, existen comportamientos y acciones del profesional que facilitan o dificultan la relación terapéutica con los progenitores. Acudir al servicio de urgencias es vivido con recelo por los progenitores.

Interpretación

Los profesionales de los servicios de urgencias deben conocer mejor las EED, acoger a los progenitores y mejorar el tratamiento de los niños. Los resultados de este estudio pueden servir como punto de partida para una hoja de ruta de los resultados relevantes reportados por los cuidadores de las EED, a implementar nuevos ensayos clínicos y terapias dirigidas a la etiología.

Qué añade este documento

Evaluating the challenges and needs of parents caring for children with Williams syndrome: A preliminary study from Poland

BACKGROUND

Although physical, cognitive and behavioural manifestations of Williams syndrome (WS) affect every dimension of caregivers lives, no studies on the parental experiences of caring for a WS child have to date been carried out in Poland.

METHODS

In order to identify the challenges and needs of Polish carers of WS children a survey was conducted with 32 family caregivers who were supported by the Polish Williams Syndrome Association.

RESULTS

While caregivers were mostly challenged by their WS child's behaviours, health problems and mood swings, many parents experienced fatigue, intimacy problems with the partner and deterioration of mental health. They were also burdened by the lack of time for themselves and work restrictions resulting from caregiving responsibilities. Even though parents positively assessed quality of medical care for WS children, still many expressed their dissatisfaction both with the way the healthcare system for WS children works in Poland and complained about the doctors' lack of knowledge about WS, access to specialist care and lack of support from government and social institutions. Although many parents stressed positive impact of rising WS child, more than half experienced role captivity or role overload and felt not being understood by others. They also experienced variety of distressing emotions, including impatience, emotional lability, helplessness, anxiety and depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Although many WS parents stressed the affirmative aspect of raising WS child this research shows that the burden of caring for such a child goes far beyond clinical aspects and seriously affects every aspect of parents' lives, including their mental health, daily lives, family, their professional and social lives. Because apart from the daily challenges related to caring for a WS child, parents' dealings with the healthcare system and support services represent major problems there is a the need for a bio-psychosocial approach to WS that should include not only WS children, but also their caregivers. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS?: 1. It analyses the challenges and needs of parents caring for children with Williams syndrome; 2. It provides evidence that the impact of caring for WS children goes far beyond clinical aspects and seriously affects every aspect of parents' lives, including their mental health, daily lives, family, their professional and social lives; 3. It also shows that, apart from the daily challenges related to caring for a WS child, parents' dealings with the healthcare system and support services represent major problems. 4. Thereby, it highlights the importance of incorporating a bio-psychosocial approach to WS that should include not only WS children, but also their caregivers.

Living with and managing seizures among parents of children diagnosed with Phelan-McDermid syndrome: a qualitative study using in-depth interviews

To describe the experience of parents of children diagnosed with Phelan-McDermid syndrome (PMS) in relation to epileptic seizures and/or convulsions, their daily management and impact on family life. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted. The study included parents of children diagnosed with PMS by a medical specialist. Purposive sampling was used, and data were collected via in-depth interviews. A thematic analysis was performed on the data. This study was conducted according to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Thirty-two parents were recruited. Four themes were identified: (a) the first epileptic seizure, where the first seizure appears abruptly and unexpectedly; (b) living with seizures, seizures generate high concern about the evolution of the disease and the future of children with PMS; (c) treatment of epileptic seizures, obtaining an adequate treatment is a long process that involves decision making by parents; (d) the impact of epilepsy on the family, where there is a change in the functioning and relationships among family members.  Conclusions: It is necessary to develop programs where parents can discuss treatment decisions with professionals and provide coping strategies for the management of epilepsy and seizures. What is Known: • Children with Phelan-McDermid syndrome may develop epilepsy. Parents receive insufficient information for the management and control of seizures. • Parents describe concerns about the evolution of epilepsy in their children's adulthood, along with the impact of seizures and/or convulsions on their children. What is New: • Epilepsy and seizures force the entire family to adapt their lifestyle and give up activities that can trigger seizures. • Parents pointed out the need to create programs to inform about the benefits and disadvantages of pharmacological treatments in order to improve decision making.

Emotional experiences of family caregivers of children with Dravet syndrome

BACKGROUND

Since the psychosocial implications of Dravet syndrome (DS) are much more serious and far-reaching than in other types of epilepsy, caring for a DS child seriously affects the entire family. This study describes the emotional experiences of family caregivers of DS children and evaluates the way caregiving affects their perceived quality of life.

METHODS

An anonymous, self-administered online questionnaire was sent to family caregivers of DS children through the online patient advocacy organization the Association for People with Severe Refractory Epilepsy DRAVET.PL. It focussed on the psychosocial impact of caregiving for DS children, the perceived burden of caregiving, caregivers' emotional experiences and feelings related to caregiving, and the impact of DS on the perceived quality of life.

RESULTS

Caregivers stressed that caring for a DS child is associated with a significant psychosocial and emotional burden that affects the entire family. Although most caregivers reported that it was the child's health problems and behavioral and psychological disorders that were the most challenging aspects of caregiving, they were also burdened by the lack of emotional support. As caregivers were profoundly engaged in caregiving, they experienced a variety of distressing emotions, including feelings of helplessness, anxiety and fear, anticipated grief, depression, and impulsivity. Many caregivers also reported that their children's disease disrupted their relationships with their spouses, family, and healthy children. As caregivers reported experiencing role overload, physical fatigue, and mental exhaustion, they stressed the extent to which caregiving for DS children impaired their quality of life, their social and professional life, and was a source of financial burden.

CONCLUSIONS

As this study identified specific burden domains affecting DS caregivers' well-being family carers often need special attention, support, and help. To alleviate the humanistic burden of DS carers a bio-psychosocial approach focusing on physical, mental, and psychosocial interventions should include both DS children and their caregivers.