A role for p21 (WAF1) in the cAMP-dependent differentiation of F9 teratocarcinoma cells into parietal endoderm

LXR agonist T0901317 upregulates thrombomodulin expression in glomerular endothelial cells by inhibition of nuclear factor‑κB

Dysfunction of glomerular endothelial cells (GECs) induces a variety of symptoms, including proteinuria, inflammation, vascular diseases, fibrosis and thrombosis. Thrombomodulin (TM) acts as a vasoprotective molecule on the surface of the vascular endothelial cells to maintain the homeostasis of the endothelial microenvironment by suppressing cellular proliferation, adhesion and inflammatory responses. Liver X receptor (LXR), a nuclear receptor (NR) and a bile acid‑activated transcription factor, regulates metabolism and cholesterol transport, vascular tension and inflammation. Previous studies indicated that TM expression is upregulated by various NRs; however, it is unclear whether pharmacological modulation of LXR may affect TM expression and GEC function. The current study revealed that LXR activation by its agonist, T0901317, upregulates the expression and activity of TM. This effect was mediated specifically through LXR‑α, and not through LXR‑β. Additionally, T0901317 treatment inhibited nuclear factor‑κB (NF‑κB) signaling and the secretion of high glucose‑induced proinflammatory mediators, including tumor necrosis factor‑α and interleukin‑1β in GECs. Co‑immunoprecipitation experiments determined that treatment with T0901317 enhances the interaction between LXR‑α and the transcriptional coactivator, p300, in GEC extracts. The present findings suggest that NF‑κB may be a negative regulator of TM expression, and its removal may contribute to TM gene expression, particularly when in competition with the T0901317‑enhanced formation of the LXR/p300 complex. Therefore, LXR may be a novel molecular target for manipulating TM in GECs, which may advance the treatment of endothelial cell‑associated diseases.

Cell cycle inhibitor p21/ WAF1/ CIP1 as a cofactor of MITF expression in melanoma cells

p21/ WAF1/ Cip1 (p21), a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, may act as an antioncogene, but may also behave as a tumor promoting factor by inhibiting apoptosis. p21 is also a transcriptional regulator, exerting this activity independently of cyclin-dependent kinases. Increased p21 protein levels were found in a subset of melanomas. However, the mechanism(s) contributing to the tolerance of high p21 levels in melanoma cells remains unexplained. Here, we show that the p21 protein positively regulates the promoter of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF), a transcription factor which plays a central role in the expression of melanocyte-specific genes, lineage determination, and survival of melanoma cells. p21 activated the MITF promoter-reporter, occupied the promoter in vivo and cooperated with cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) in promoter activation. In addition, p21 knockdown by shRNA resulted in a decrease of MITF protein and promoter activity, and p21 protein levels correlated with MITF mRNA in most cell lines tested. As the p21 gene is a known transcriptional target of MITF, the reciprocal stimulation of transcription may constitute a positive-feedback loop reinforcing MITF expression in melanoma cells. Our results might help explain the tolerance of increased p21 levels found in some melanomas.

Nuclear receptor hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha1 competes with oncoprotein c-Myc for control of the p21/WAF1 promoter

The dichotomy between cellular differentiation and proliferation is a fundamental aspect of both normal development and tumor progression; however, the molecular basis of this opposition is not well understood. To address this issue, we investigated the mechanism by which the nuclear receptor hepatocyte nuclear factor 4alpha1 (HNF4alpha1) regulates the expression of the human cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor gene p21/WAF1 (CDKN1A). We found that HNF4alpha1, a transcription factor that plays a central role in differentiation in the liver, pancreas, and intestine, activates the expression of p21 primarily by interacting with promoter-bound Sp1 at both the proximal promoter region and at newly identified sites in a distal region (-2.4 kb). Although HNF4alpha1 also binds two additional regions containing putative HNF4alpha binding sites, HNF4alpha1 mutants deficient in DNA binding activate the p21 promoter to the same extent as wild-type HNF4alpha1, indicating that direct DNA binding by HNF4alpha1 is not necessary for p21 activation. We also observed an in vitro and in vivo interaction between HNF4alpha1 and c-Myc as well as a competition between these two transcription factors for interaction with promoter-bound Sp1 and regulation of p21. Finally, we show that c-Myc competes with HNF4alpha1 for control of apolipoprotein C3 (APOC3), a gene associated with the differentiated hepatic phenotype. These results suggest a general model by which a differentiation factor (HNF4alpha1) and a proliferation factor (c-Myc) may compete for control of genes involved in cell proliferation and differentiation.