CCN1 sensitizes esophageal cancer cells to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis

CCN1 suppresses cell proliferation of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through amyloid precursor protein without DR6 participation

Esophageal cancer is commonly seen as either squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) or adenocarcinoma (EAC), two very different cancers. CCN1 is a matricellular protein that induces apoptosis in EAC cells through upregulation of DR5, a death receptor, while its role in ESCC is unclear. DR6 is another death receptor, which has been reported to induce apoptosis, necroptosis, or pyroptosis in various cell systems with or without the engagement of its putative ligand amyloid precursor protein (APP). In this study, we found that CCN1 and DR6 were both highly expressed in ESCC but downregulated in EAC. Overexpression of CCN1 in ESCC cells inhibited cell proliferation through upregulation of APP and its association with p53 without DR6 involvement. Overexpression of APP stopped cell growth, but overexpression of DR6 did not affect cell growth or cell death whatsoever.

The Role of CCN1 in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: What We Have Learned From the Lab

Background: Esophageal cancer is one of the most common and deadliest cancers in the world, particularly esophageal adenocarcinoma. There has never been a special drug to treat it.Purpose: This article summarizes the work that we have done in our laboratory about the role of CCN1 in esophageal cancer and gives a new perspective of CCN1 biology.Research Design: This is a review article. Study Sample: The work was done using validated cell lines and fixed human tissue slides.Data Collection and Analysis: This is a review article, therefore, no data collection or analysis was involved.Results: CCN1 is a matricellular protein supporting adhesion, migration, and survival in normal cells, but in the esophageal cancer cells, it induces TRAIL-mediated apoptosis. CCN1 promotes TRAIL and its death receptor expression but downregulates the decoy receptors and survivin in a p53-dependant manner. It was thought that CCN1 relies on TNF to induce apoptosis, but our study found that these two molecules antagonize each other. CCN1 promotes TNFR1 cleavage and uses the soluble product to block TNF signaling, while TNF upregulates PGLYRP1 to overcome this obstacle because PGLYRP1 is a secreted protein that competes with TNF for TNFR1 binding. As a result, when CCN1 and TNF are present together in the vicinity of esophageal tumors, they cancel each other out.Conclusions: Based on our laboratory study, CCN1 has much potential to be a candidate for the treatment of esophageal cancer.

From Apoptosis to Necroptosis: The Death Wishes to Cancer

DNA mutation is a common event in the human body, but in most situations, it is fixed right away by the DNA damage response program. In case the damage is too severe to repair, the programmed cell death system will be activated to get rid of the cell. However, if the damage affects some critical components of this system, the genetic scars are kept and multiply through mitosis, possibly leading to cancer someday. There are many forms of programmed cell death, but apoptosis and necroptosis represent the default and backup strategy, respectively, in the maintenance of optimal cell population as well as in cancer prevention. For the same reason, the ideal approach for cancer treatment is to induce apoptosis in the cancer cells because it proceeds 20 times faster than tumor cell proliferation and leaves no mess behind. Induction of necroptosis can be the second choice in case apoptosis becomes hard to achieve, however, necroptosis finishes the job at a cost-inflammation.

The CCN axis in cancer development and progression

Since the authors first reviewed this subject in 2016 significant progress has been documented in the CCN field with advances made in the understanding of how members of the CCN family of proteins, CCN1-6, contribute to the pathogenesis and progression, positive and negative, of a larger variety of cancers. As termed matricellular proteins, and more recently the connective communication network, it has become clearer that members of the CCN family interact complexly with other proteins in the extracellular microenvironment, membrane signaling proteins, and can also operate intracellularly at the transcriptional level. In this review we expand on this earlier information providing new detailed information and insights that appropriate a much greater involvement and importance of their role in multiple aspects of cancer. Despite all the new information many more questions have been raised and intriguing results generated that warrant greater investigation. In order to permit the reader to smoothly integrate the new information we discuss all relevant CCN members in the context of cancer subtypes. We have harmonized the nomenclature with CCN numbering for easier comparisons. Finally, we summarize what new has been learned and provide a perspective on how our knowledge about CCN1-6 is being used to drive new initiatives on cancer therapeutics.

TNF antagonizes CCN1 in apoptosis in esophageal adenocarcinoma

TNF signaling mostly supports cell growth by activating NFκB and only induces cell death when NFκB activation fails. CCN1 is a matricellular protein that has been reported capable to convert TNF from a pro-survival factor into a stimulus for cell death without interfering with NFκB signaling. In this study, we examined the relationship between CCN1 and TNF in the context of esophageal adenocarcinoma and found that CCN1 did not help TNF to induce cell death when they were together, instead, it inhibited TNF expression, as well as TNF-induced JNK activation and apoptosis. CCN1 induced apoptosis in the cancer cells by itself through upregulation of TRAIL and its death receptors. The presence of TNF significantly lowered CCN1 expression and its capability in apoptosis induction. Furthermore, we found that CCN1 boosted ADAM17-mediated cleavage of TNF receptors through ITGA11 and the soluble decoy receptors generated by this action neutralized TNF activity. Taken together, CCN1 and TNF antagonize each other in esophageal cancer cells.

CCN Family Proteins in Cancer: Insight Into Their Structures and Coordination Role in Tumor Microenvironment

The crosstalk between tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME), triggers a variety of critical signaling pathways and promotes the malignant progression of cancer. The success rate of cancer therapy through targeting single molecule of this crosstalk may be extremely low, whereas co-targeting multiple components could be complicated design and likely to have more side effects. The six members of cellular communication network (CCN) family proteins are scaffolding proteins that may govern the TME, and several studies have shown targeted therapy of CCN family proteins may be effective for the treatment of cancer. CCN protein family shares similar structures, and they mutually reinforce and neutralize each other to serve various roles that are tightly regulated in a spatiotemporal manner by the TME. Here, we review the current knowledge on the structures and roles of CCN proteins in different types of cancer. We also analyze CCN mRNA expression, and reasons for its diverse relationship to prognosis in different cancers. In this review, we conclude that the discrepant functions of CCN proteins in different types of cancer are attributed to diverse TME and CCN truncated isoforms, and speculate that targeting CCN proteins to rebalance the TME could be a potent anti-cancer strategy.

Esophageal cancer cells convert the death signal from TRAIL into a stimulus for survival during acid/bile exposure

BACKGROUND

TRAIL is best known for killing cancer cells selectively, however, some cancers resist TRAIL treatment for various reasons. Esophageal adenocarcinoma is such an example. Previously, we reported that the tumor cells interrupted TRAIL-mediated apoptosis by overexpressing the decoy receptors and survivin.

AIMS

To investigate TRAIL resistance in esophageal adenocarcinoma during GERD.

METHODS

We simulated GERD episodes in vitro by exposing cancer cells to the acid/bile conditions acutely as well as chronically. TRAIL and its receptors were examined for expression, interaction, and induction of cell death.

RESULTS

We found that acid/bile exposure drove the tumor cells to express TRAIL and TRAILR2 robustly, but did not lead to apoptosis, because the tumor cells overexpressed TRADD to replace FADD as the adaptor molecule to trigger NFκB activation instead of caspases, and thereby convert a death signal from TRAIL into a stimulus for survival. The tumor cells also overexpressed c-FLIP to keep caspases away from TRAILR2 in case FADD finds a way back to the death receptor.

CONCLUSION

Multiple reasons contribute to TRAIL resistance in esophageal adenocarcinoma, including overexpression of the decoy receptors to block the death receptors, using TRADD to replace FADD, and using c-FLIP to replace caspase-8.

Molecular Dynamics in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Who's in Control?

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is one of the fastest-growing cancers in the world. It occurs primarily due to the chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), during which the esophageal epithelium is frequently exposed to the acidic fluid coming up from the stomach. This triggers gene mutations in the esophageal cells, which may lead to EAC development. While p53 is activated to get rid of the mutated cells, NFκB orchestrates the remaining cells to heal the wound. However, if the mutations happen to TP53 (a common occasion), the mutant product turns to support tumorigenesis. In this case, NFκB goes along with the mutant p53 to facilitate cancer progression. TRAIL is one of the cytokines produced in response to GERD episodes and it can kill cancer cells selectively, but its clinical use has not been as successful as expected, because some highly sophisticated defense mechanisms against TRAIL have developed during the malignancy. To clear the obstacles for TRAIL action, using a second agent to disarm the cancer cells is required. CCN1 appears to be such a molecule. While supporting normal esophageal cell growth, CCN1 suppresses malignant transformation by inhibiting NFκB and kills the EAC cell through TRAIL-mediated apoptosis.

Acid/bile exposure triggers TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in esophageal cancer cells by suppressing the decoy receptors and c-FLIPR

Esophageal adenocarcinoma essentially develops from esophageal inflammation caused by chronic GERD. During GERD episodes, the lower esophageal epithelium is repeatedly exposed to stomach acid, which often contains duodenal bile salts that prompt malignant transformation. TRAIL is one of the cytokines produced in response to such insults and targets the transformed cells exclusively. In this study, we simulated GERD episodes in vitro by exposing the cancer cells to acid or acid/bile combination and found that the cancer cells lived through acid attacks by expression of the decoy receptors and c-FLIP_R but died of TRAIL-mediated apoptosis when bile salts were present. Further investigation revealed that acid/bile exposure downregulated the decoy receptors and thereby facilitated TRAIL signaling; meantime, it inhibited protein kinase C activity and thus expedited c-FLIP_R degradation, allowing apoptosis to take place.

CCN1 induces apoptosis in esophageal adenocarcinoma through p53-dependent downregulation of survivin

Many cancer drugs have been developed to control tumor growth by inducing cancer cell apoptosis. However, several intracellular barriers could fail this attempt. One of these barrier is high expression of survivin. Survivin can interfere caspase activation and thereby abort apoptosis. In this study, we found that CCN1 suppressed the survivin expression in tumor cells of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and thus allowed apoptosis to finish. Furthermore, we demonstrated that this downregulation was dependent on p53 phosphorylation at Ser20, and CCN1 induced EAC cell apoptosis through the activation of p53.