NK1 receptor antagonistic effect of 17-trifluoromethyl phenyl trinor prostaglandin F2α on the growth of human breast cancer cell line

Harnessing the synergistic potential of NK1R antagonists and selective COX-2 inhibitors for simultaneous targeting of TNBC cells and cancer stem cells

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks the expression of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), rendering it unresponsive to endocrine therapy and HER2 targeted treatments. Though certain chemotherapeutics targeting the cell cycle have shown efficacy to a certain extent, the presence of chemotherapy-resistant cancer stem cells (CSCs) presents a significant challenge in tackling TNBC. Multiple lines of evidence suggest the upregulation of neuropeptide Substance P (SP), its NK-1 receptor (NK1R) and the Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) enzyme in TNBC patients. Upregulation of the SP/NK1R system and COX-2 influences major signalling pathways involved in cell proliferation, growth, survival, angiogenesis, inflammation, metastasis and stem cell activity. The simultaneous activation and crosstalk between the pathways activated by SP/NK1R and COX-2 consequently increase the levels of key regulators of self-renewal pathways in CSCs, promoting stemness. The combination therapy with NK1R antagonists and COX-2 inhibitors can simultaneously target TNBC cells and CSCs, thereby enhancing treatment efficacy and reducing the risk of recurrence and relapse. This review discusses the rationale for combining NK1R antagonists and COX-2 inhibitors for the better management of TNBC and a novel strategy to deliver drug cargo precisely to the tumour site to address the challenges associated with off-target binding.

A Transcriptomic and Reverse-Engineering Strategy Reveals Molecular Signatures of Arachidonic Acid Metabolism in 12 Cancers

Cancer and arachidonic acid (AA) have important linkages. For example, AA metabolites regulate several critical biological functions associated with carcinogenesis: angiogenesis, apoptosis, and cancer invasion. However, little is known about the comparative changes in metabolite expression of the arachidonic acid pathway (AAP) in carcinogenesis. In this study, we examined transcriptome data from 12 cancers, such as breast invasive carcinoma, colon adenocarcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, and prostate adenocarcinoma. We also report here a reverse-engineering strategy wherein we estimated metabolic signatures associated with AAP by (1) making deductive inferences through transcriptome-level data extraction, (2) remodeling AA metabolism, and (3) performing a comparative analysis of cancer types to determine the similarities and differences between different cancer types with respect to AA metabolic alterations. We identified 77 AAP gene signatures differentially expressed in cancers and 37 AAP metabolites associated with them. Importantly, the metabolite 15(S)-HETE was identified in almost all cancers, while arachidonate, 5-HETE, PGF2α, 14,15-EET, 8,9-EET, 5,6-EET, and 20-HETE were discovered as other most regulated metabolites. This study shows that the 12 cancers studied herein, although in different branches of the AAP, have altered expression of AAP gene signatures. Going forward, AA related-cancer research generally, and the molecular signatures and their estimated metabolites reported herein specifically, hold broad promise for precision/personalized medicine in oncology as potential therapeutic and diagnostic targets.

Docking is not enough: 17-trifluoromethylphenyl trinor PGF2α is only a very weak ligand of neurokinin-1 receptor

17-trifluoromethylphenyl trinor prostaglandin F_2α (17-CF₃PTPGF_2α) was reported recently to exhibit in vitro and in vivo anticancer activity. Based solely on the results of in silico molecular docking, it was claimed that this compound is NK1 receptor (NK1R) antagonist and that its activity is through this receptor. In this contribution we show that 17-CF₃PTPGF_2α is only a very weak NK1R ligand (IC₅₀ > 200 μM). In connection with that we discuss the issue of this compound's molecular target. Finally, we briefly narrate on the proper use of molecular docking in biomedical research.