Optimizing clinical cytology touch preparations for next generation sequencing

Fusion of old and new: Employing touch imprint slides for next generation sequencing in solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Cytomorphological evaluation of tissue touch imprints during rapid on-site evaluation or intraoperative pathology consultation has crucial value. However, literature on their utility for molecular testing is limited. In this study, we emphasize a further benefit of touch imprint slides and scrutinize our institutional experience on their use in molecular testing, specifically next generation sequencing (NGS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

NGS-based reports (2019-2023) of Koç University Hospital were retrospectively analyzed and circumstances in which sequencing was conducted on touch imprint slides were retrieved (n = 18). Type/location of the biopsy, diagnosis, results, and quality metrics were recorded.

RESULTS

Touch imprints were addressed when they harbored more neoplastic cells compared with permanent biopsies, when suboptimal fixation mitigated deoxyribonucleic acid/ribonucleic acid (DNA/RNA) yield in resections or when the sample was obtained from bone and required decalcification. Diagnoses were diverse, namely non-small-cell lung cancer, gastric adenocarcinoma, glial tumor, Ewing sarcoma, and carcinoma of unknown primary. The percentage of tumor cells on slides stretched between 15% and 70%. Molecular findings ranged from KRAS mutations to TRIM1::NTRK2 and EWSR::FLI1 fusions. For five cases, sequencing did not yield any alteration, one study was not completed because it did not yield high-quality RNA.

CONCLUSION

Touch imprint slides provide a reliable alternative, especially when neoplastic cells are scarce in permanent biopsies or decalcification deters nucleic acid quality. Based on our experience, we suggest making touch imprints on a routine basis, especially for every bone biopsy. Once digitally scanned duplicates are made, original slides can be safely used for DNA-/RNA-based molecular studies.

Performance of non-formalin fixed paraffin embedded samples in hybrid capture and amplicon next-generation sequencing panels

BACKGROUND

Genomic profiling using next-generation sequencing (NGS) is fundamental for driving prognostic and therapy in cancer. Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue is the widely used material, whereas non-FFPE may represent an alternative. However, studies comparing the NGS performance of non-FFPE materials to FFPE are still lacking in the literature. The objective of this study was to characterize in non-FFPE preparations the nucleic acid yield and NGS performance on both a capture-based and an amplicon-based NGS platform. NGS quality metrics obtained from non-FFPE preparations were compared to FFPE.

METHODS

We analyzed the cellularity and nucleic acid yield in 111 tumors from non-FFPE preparations. In addition, comprehensive hybrid capture panel sequencing metrics obtained from DNA and RNA libraries were compared between independent non-FFPE and FFPE samples. A paired comparison between non-FFPE and FFPE samples was performed to analyze concordance in mutant allele detection using an amplicon panel.

RESULTS

The mean target coverage from DNA libraries was 2× higher in non-FFPE samples than in FFPE. The detection of exogenous DNA was 2.5× higher in non-FFPE than in FFPE. Conversely, a lower performance was observed in non-FFPE RNA libraries in comparison to FFPE DNA libraries with no impact in minimum standard cutoffs. The variant allele detection in non-FFPE was found to be comparable to that of FFPE tumor samples in matched samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-FFPE was demonstrated to be a suitable material for DNA and RNA library preparations using a comprehensive NGS panel. This is the first study reporting library quality metrics according to the TSO500 analysis pipeline.

Deep targeted sequencing of cytological tumor cells using whole genome amplification

BACKGROUND

Genomic profiling in lung cancer is essential for precision medicine. Cytological specimens provide an alternative to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples for comprehensive genomic analysis. However, this approach remains challenging when a limited number of tumor cells are available. We applied whole genome amplification (WGA) to cytology specimens to overcome this limitation.

METHODS

Using a lung cancer panel targeting 58 genes, we performed next-generation sequencing of whole genome-amplified DNA extracted from cytological specimens containing 10-20 tumor cells (cyto-WGA) and DNA from corresponding FFPE tumor tissue. We compared sequencing data from cyto-WGA and FFPE samples to examine the detection accuracy of copy number variations and oncogenic and drug-matched variants.

RESULTS

The DNA quality and quantity from cyto-WGA were higher than those from FFPE samples (p < .0005 and p < .05, respectively). Sequencing metrics of cyto-WGA and FFPE tissues showed no difference in the number of mapped reads and mean coverage depth, but there were significant differences in the on-target rate (p < .05) and uniformity (p < .0005). Copy number variations in cyto-WGA samples (n = 211) were higher than in FFPE samples (n = 9) (p < .0001). Fourty nine oncogenic variants were detected in cyto-WGA and 39 in FFPE. Of these variants, 34 (63%) were present in both samples. In addition, all 16 drug-matched variants were detected in FFPE and cyto-WGA samples with 100% concordance.

CONCLUSION

Cyto-WGA can be a feasible and alternative method to detect oncogenic and drug-matched variants.

Testing EGFR with Idylla on Cytological Specimens of Lung Cancer: A Review

The current standard of care for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer is based on detecting actionable mutations that can benefit from targeted therapy. Comprehensive genetic tests can have long turn-around times, and because EGFR mutations are the most prevalent actionable mutation, a quick detection would enable a prompt initiation of targeted therapy. Furthermore, the scarcity of diagnostic material means that sometimes only cytologic material is available. The Idylla™ EGFR assay is a real-time PCR–based method able to detect 51 EGFR mutations in 2.5 h. Idylla is validated for use only on FFPE sections, but some researchers described their experiences with cytological material. We reviewed the relevant literature, finding four articles describing 471 cases and many types of cytological input material: smears, cell-block sections, suspensions, and extracted DNA. The sensitivity, specificity, and limit of detection appear comparable to those obtained with histological input material, with one exception: the usage of scraped stained smears as input may reduce the accuracy of the test. In conclusion, usage of cytological material as input to the Idylla EGFR test is possible. A workflow where common mutations are tested first and fast, leaving rarer mutations for subsequent comprehensive profiling, seems the most effective approach.