Efficacy of intraperitoneal cisplatin as consolidation therapy in patients with pathologic complete remission following front-line therapy for epithelial ovarian cancer. Consolidative intraperitoneal cisplatin in ovarian cancer

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer is feasible with high completion rates, low complications, and acceptable patient outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Three large randomized clinical trials have shown a survival benefit for patients treated with intraperitoneal (IP) compared with intravenous chemotherapy for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). However, the use of IP chemotherapy in recurrent EOC is controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine outcomes, completion rates, and frequency of complications in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC treated with IP chemotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-institution analysis of women who received IP chemotherapy for recurrent EOC from January 2003 to April 2010 was conducted. Study patients were identified from the Tumor Registry and office records. Demographic factors, stage, histology, surgical findings, cytoreduction status, and subsequent therapies were abstracted. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

Fifty-six women who received IP chemotherapy for their first EOC recurrence were identified. The mean age of patients was 56.7 years (range, 40-79 y). Fifty-five patients (98.3%) had previously completed at least 6 cycles of intravenous chemotherapy. Of all patients, 87.5% were initially diagnosed with advanced stage disease (stage IIA-IV). All patients underwent secondary cytoreduction at the time of IP port placement. Moreover, 67.9% of patients were considered optimally cytoreduced (<1 cm residual disease) at the end of the secondary debulking surgery. Forty-two patients (75%) were able to successfully complete at least 6 cycles of IP chemotherapy. Reasons for noncompletion were disease progression, allergic reaction, renal failure, pain, severe nausea and vomiting, death, and patient refusal. Six patients (10.7%) developed port complications including pain around port site, port malfunction, and port erosion into small bowel. Median PFS since the initiation of IP chemotherapy was 10.5 months (95% confidence interval, 7.5-16.4 months) and median OS was 51 months (95% confidence interval, 40.8-61.1 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is a feasible option for patients with recurrent EOC, with high completion rates, low frequency of complications, and acceptable PFS and OS.

A review of the current evidence for maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

Ovarian cancer (OC) typically is diagnosed at advanced stages, in which the primary goal of therapy is to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In recent years, maintenance therapy has been tested for this purpose in advanced OC (AOC). Literature on maintenance therapy in AOC was systematically reviewed to assess current knowledge regarding the impact of this therapeutic approach.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed 2/2009 for articles published 1/2001-1/2009 pertaining to OC maintenance therapy guidelines, patterns, and outcomes. A second search used keywords specific to maintenance and included primary studies published in the last 10 years. Of 406 sources identified, 36 primary studies and 16 review articles were included in this systematic review. A third search used the keyword "consolidation" to find maintenance articles not identified through other searches; of 48 additional sources, 13 primary studies and 6 reviews were included. A fourth search of non-MEDLINE-indexed sources yielded 14 additional relevant publications from the same time period.

RESULTS

Among practice guidelines identified, only the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) 2008 guidelines provide recommendations regarding maintenance therapy, assigning it a category 2B recommendation. No studies were identified that reported current treatment patterns or economic outcomes in maintenance therapy; quality of life data were reported in one study. A variety of agents have been tested for maintenance, with paclitaxel the most commonly evaluated. The Southwest Oncology Group-Gynecologic Oncology Group 178 trial has found that 12 cycles of paclitaxel extend PFS (by 7 months) compared to 3 months paclitaxel, but could not adequately evaluate OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance therapy may improve clinical outcomes in AOC, but additional research is needed to demonstrate an OS advantage. Future studies should investigate the long-term clinical benefit of maintenance treatment and its impact on resource utilization and health-related quality of life.

Intra-operative intra-peritoneal chemotherapy with cisplatin in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of ovarian cancer

Background

Intra-peritoneal (i.p.) chemotherapy is an encouraging treatment option for ovarian cancer with peritoneum involvement in addition with intravenous (i.v.) chemotherapy. Intra-operative i.p. chemotherapy is an interesting method of administration by enhancing the diffusion of chemotherapy. This study had assessed the feasibility of intra-operative i.p. chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinoma of ovarian cancer.

Methods

From January 2003 to February 2006, 47 patients with stage III ovarian cancer were treated with standard paclitaxel carboplatin intravenous chemotherapy and debulking surgery with intra-operative i.p. chemotherapy. After optimal cytoreductive surgery, defined by no unresectable residual disease > 1 cm, i.p. chemotherapy was performed during surgery. The peritoneal cavity was filled by 3 litres of isotonic saline pre-heated at 37 degrees and 90 mg of cisplatin. The sequence was repeated twice during 2 hours based on previous published studies which optimized the cisplatin dosage and exposure duration. Optimal diffusion was obtained by stirring by hands during the 2 hours.

Results

Median age was 59.6 years. No severe haematological or non-haematological toxicity induced by intra operative i.p. chemotherapy was reported. No patient died due to the complications of surgery or the i.p. chemotherapy. No neurotoxicity occurred, and one patients had renal impairment.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the feasibility of intra-operative i.p. chemotherapy with cisplatin after optimal resection of peritoneal tumor nodules. Further randomized trials are planned to investigate the clinical benefit of this therapeutic modality.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a critical review of the literature

The use of intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy has been advocated in different settings of patients with ovarian cancer. Cisplatin is the drug of choice because of its high response rate and minimal local toxicity. This treatment can be given to women with small residual disease after second look, with surgically assessed complete response rates of approximately 30%, and with a prolonged survival in small subset of patients. However, the use of IP chemotherapy as consolidation treatment of pathologically complete responders after first-line systemic chemotherapy has not been definitively evaluated in a phase III trial. There is much debate in the literature both for and against the use of IP chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of optimally debulked ovarian cancer patients. The recent Cochrane meta-analyses of eight randomized trials enrolling 1819 patients has shown that first-line IP chemotherapy improves progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with minimal residual disease after initial surgery. However, the potential for catheter-related complications, abdominal pain with infusion, and toxicities needs to be taken into consideration for decision making in each individual woman. Rectosigmoidal surgery can be associated with gross contamination of the operative field, and in this case, the catheter placement should not be performed during primary surgery but should be delayed to 3 weeks later. Patients should be provided with information on the survival and toxicity for both IP and systemic treatments, as well as practical information about the administration of each regimen, so that they may be involved in the decision-making process.

Extraperitoneal Leakage as a Possible Explanation for Failure of One-Time Intraperitoneal Treatment in Ovarian Cancer

We conducted a single-arm study to determine the biodistribution of intraperitoneally (i.p.) administered 90yttrium-labeled murine monoclonal antibody HMFG1 (90Y-muHMFG1) in patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer. Seventeen (17) patients in complete clinical remission for epithelial ovarian cancer were included. After completion of chemotherapy, a mixture of 111indium-labeled muHMFG1 (imaging) and 90Y-muHMFG1 (therapy) was i.p. administered by a surgically placed, indwelling i.p. catheter. Planar and single-photon emission computed tomography images were recorded to determine the distribution of the study medication during the first 6 days postinjection. Of the first 3 patients, 2 patients had extraperitoneal leakage of up to 50% of the injected dose within 24 hours after injection of the study medication. Extraperitoneal leakage was mainly seen in the retroperitoneal spaces covering the upper and lower quadrant of the abdomen. After adjustments in the procedure, leakage was observed in 2 of the remaining 14 patients. Extraperitoneal leakage of i.p. administered therapy does occur. Such leakage would reduce the locally delivered dose of a drug and could potentially have a negative impact on therapeutic efficacy. Given the potential attraction of developing i.p. treatments for intra-abdominal cancer, the observations in this study need to be taken into consideration.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A Canadian perspective

The objectives of this study were to: a) assess the position of Canadian gynecological oncologists (GOC) toward intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy as primary treatment for ovarian cancer, b) initiate a process of communication among GOC, and c) assess the perception of barriers to implementing IP chemotherapy across Canada. An electronic practice survey was mailed to all GOC in January 2006. The response rate was 62%. GOC accept IP chemotherapy as the standard of care in the primary treatment of optimally debulked epithelial ovarian cancer. The majority of respondents were working on implementation strategies at their local institutions. The cost of administration and use of additional resources were identified as sources of moderate and high concerns, respectively. Moderate concerns were expressed with regard to the management of systemic and local toxicity, catheter complications, patients' acceptance, and quality of life. Catheter insertion issues were of low concern to most respondents. Previous experience with IP administration did not significantly impact the perceived level of concern. GOC support the use of IP chemotherapy for appropriate patients with ovarian cancer. This survey identifies important implementation challenges of IP therapy for Canada, and processes must be developed before successful delivery of IP chemotherapy can be realized. This survey serves to initiate a process of communication among GOC. A collaborative effort will be needed to facilitate this change in practice. Further study of the implementation process is warranted as more experience is gained with this modality of treatment.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer is based on sound pharmacological principles and is technically feasible. There is mounting evidence, bolstered by a recent randomized trial, that in certain patients, this route of delivery may be superior to traditional intravenous chemotherapy. This review explores the background and pharmacokinetic principles of intraperitoneal chemotherapy, the recent evidence supporting an intraperitoneal approach, and some of the logistical and technical challenges involved.

RECENT FINDINGS

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been evaluated in several settings. Most phase I and II data came from second-line treatment of ovarian cancer, and there have been a few series, including one recent phase III trial, exploring intraperitoneal consolidation. The greatest impact among recent studies will be from a large, intergroup phase III trial evaluating intraperitoneal therapy in the front-line setting. This study will probably change the dialogue of standard treatment for optimally cytoreduced, advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

SUMMARY

Based on recent findings, intraperitoneal chemotherapy should be considered for the front-line treatment of women with minimal residual advanced ovarian cancer. Efforts should continue to facilitate the integration of intraperitoneal treatment into mainstream practice, and future trials should be designed to address lingering controversy surrounding this route of treatment.

Consolidation therapy in ovarian cancer: where do we stand?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of consolidation chemotherapy in ovarian cancer is to maximize the benefit of primary therapy and improve progression-free and overall survival. Consolidation has been tested with multiple treatment modalities including cytotoxic chemotherapy, radiation and biological therapies. A review of recently published clinical trials is presented.

RECENT FINDINGS

Consolidation therapy is not a new concept. More than 30 clinical trials utilizing consolidation therapy have been published in the last two decades. The natural history of many patients who participate in consolidation trials is often favorable, making the effect of consolidation treatments difficult to interpret. Small phase II studies have suggested improved outcomes compared with historical controls, but randomized trials have yet to show a distinct survival advantage with consolidation therapy.

SUMMARY

The role of consolidation therapy in ovarian cancer is evolving. Although it is recognized that ovarian cancer patients commonly suffer recurrences after initial response, it is not clear that current therapies alter this course. Future clinical designs should include appropriate control groups. Novel therapies should be studied in randomized controlled trials with sufficient power to detect relevant clinical differences, the most important being overall survival. Toxicity and ease of administration must be considered against the benefits of therapy.

Phase III Trial of Intraperitoneal Therapy With Yttrium-90–Labeled HMFG1 Murine Monoclonal Antibody in Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer After a Surgically Defined Complete Remission

Purpose

This was a multinational, open-label, randomized phase III trial comparing yttrium-90–labeled murine HMFG1 (90Y-muHMFG1) plus standard treatment versus standard treatment alone in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who had attained a complete clinical remission after cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy.

Patients and Methods

In total, 844 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage Ic to IV patients were initially screened, of whom 447 patients with a negative second-look laparoscopy (SLL) were randomly assigned to receive either a single dose of 90Y-muHMFG1 plus standard treatment (224 patients) or standard treatment alone (223 patients). Patients in the active treatment arm received a single intraperitoneal dose of 25 mg of 90Y-muHMFG1 (target dose 666 MBq/m2). The primary end point was length of survival; secondary end points included time to relapse and safety. The study had an 80% power to detect a 15% change in survival.

Results

After a median follow-up of 3.5 years (range, 1 to 6 years), 70 patients had died in the active treatment arm compared with 61 patients in the control arm. Cox proportional hazards analysis of survival demonstrated no difference between treatment arms. In the study drug arm, 104 patients experienced relapse compared with 98 patients in the standard treatment arm. No difference in time to relapse was observed between the two study arms. Active therapy was associated with occasional grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia and grade 1 or 2 GI symptoms, abdominal discomfort, arthralgia, and myalgia.

Conclusion

A single IP administration of 90Y-muHMFG1 to patients with EOC who had a negative SLL after primary therapy did not extend survival or time to relapse.

Serum and intraperitoneal pharmacokinetics of cisplatin within intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy: influence of protein binding

Intraperitoneal (i.p.) chemotherapy is a promising therapeutic method to improve the effectiveness of cisplatin in patients with ovarian cancer and peritoneum involvement. Intraperitoneal treatment can be intraoperatively performed just after a complete surgical resection of peritoneal tumor nodules. However, little is known regarding the pharmacokinetics of platinum during intraoperative i.p. chemotherapy (IIC). Serum and i.p. measurements of total and ultrafilterable platinum were performed to determined pharmacokinetic parameters in 11 consecutive patients who received a 2-h IIC with 50 mg/m cisplatin. Protein concentrations were determined in serum and peritoneal liquid at the same times. The cisplatin concentration required to kill OVCAR-3 human ovarian cancer cells and evaluation of cisplatin binding to proteins were determined in vitro. Platinum i.p. concentration decreased rapidly and quickly came under the cytotoxicity threshold (10 mg for 2 h). About 85% of i.p. and serum cisplatin was ultrafilterable during IIC. Platinum concentrations were closely related to protein concentrations. Due to the very low level of serum protein (almost 25 g/l), serum cisplatin binding during chemotherapy was very low (almost 25%), but increased with protein concentration recovery. These pharmacokinetic data show that a sufficient concentration to kill human ovarian cancer is not reached with a single i.p. bath containing 50 mg/m cisplatin for 2 h. A new protocol with a renewed bath and a higher cisplatin concentration is under investigation.

Consolidation and maintenance treatments for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in complete response after first-line chemotherapy: A review of the literature

Most patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer experience objective responses to paclitaxel/platinum-based chemotherapy, but responses are generally short-lived and the clinical outcome is still unsatisfactory. Therefore, the strategy to consolidate and to prolong the duration of response is very attractive. Different consolidation or maintenance treatments have been attempted, such as whole abdomen radiotherapy, intraperitoneal chromic phosphate, radioimmunotherapy, intraperitoneal chemotherapy, high-dose chemotherapy with haematopoietic support, prolonged administration of the first-line regimen, second-line single-agent chemotherapy, and biological agents. Clinical studies have given conflicting, inconclusive, and generally disappointing results. A recent US randomised trial appeared to show that the prolonged administration of single-agent paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) significantly improved the progression-free survival of complete responders to paclitaxel/platinum-based chemotherapy. Alternative less toxic, and probably more effective schedules of administration of chemotherapy (i.e. weekly paclitaxel) might assure a better balance between quality of life and anti-tumor activity in patients previously exposed to chemotherapy.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: who and when?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer has been studied for several years and developed in many countries. However, despite positive results from well-conducted clinical trials, its clinical application is still controversial. A review of recent advances is presented.

RECENT FINDINGS

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been studied in two situations: in the first line, combined with intravenous chemotherapy, or as a consolidation treatment, after surgery and systemic chemotherapy. In the first line, two randomized studies showed an increased survival in patients with intraperitoneal chemotherapy. In patients with pathological complete remission, the theoretical principle remains valid, treating minimal disease, but definitive results from randomized studies are lacking.

SUMMARY

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is a regional treatment for ovarian cancer. Its development is limited by the reluctance of the medical oncologist community to include this technique in the whole strategy of treatment, despite positive results. However, intraperitoneal chemotherapy should be considered in patients optimally debulked and with minimal residual disease.