Intraperitoneal radioactive phosphorus (32P) and vaginal brachytherapy as adjuvant treatment for uterine papillary serous carcinoma and clear cell carcinoma: a phase II Hoosier Oncology Group (HOG 97-01) study

Adjuvant therapy of uterine clear cell carcinoma: a review

PURPOSE

Uterine clear-cell carcinoma (UCCC) is a rare subset of type II endometrial carcinoma with a poor prognosis relative to the most common type of endometrioid carcinoma. Due to its rarity, there has been limited direct evidence of the efficacy of specific adjuvant therapy posthysterectomy in women with UCCC. We present a review of current literature regarding adjuvant therapy of uterine clear cell carcinoma.

METHODS

We searched for English-language publications through Pubmed using a combination of the following key words: endometrial carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, recurrence, prognosis, adjuvant therapy, radiation treatment and chemotherapy. Due to the rarity of UCCC, studies were not limited by design or number of patients.

RESULTS

There is a paucity of randomized prospective controlled studies focusing on UCCC adjuvant therapy. Findings have largely been derived from retrospective studies of type II endometrial carcinomas or all endometrial cancers as a group. Very few retrospective studies were found to focus on UCCC adjuvant therapy, although certain larger studies did have subset analyses of UCCC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

For early stage disease, locoregional radiotherapy, especially vaginal brachytherapy, has evidence of efficacy. The therapeutic gain of radiotherapy may be further improved with the addition of systemic chemotherapy. Evidence for combined radiation therapy with systemic chemotherapy in women with advanced stage UCCC has remained debatable. UCCC-specific studies are needed to determine the best adjuvant therapy for UCCC without the confounding effects of USC and other endometrial cancers.

Prognostic determinants in patients with stage I uterine papillary serous carcinoma: a 15-year multi-institutional review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective, multi-institutional study was to evaluate the importance of surgical staging for stage I uterine papillary serous carcinomas (UPSCs) to determine optimal management of this rare tumor.

METHODS

With institutional review board approval from both participating institutions, all patients with 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I mixed serous and UPSC diagnosed between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 2007, were identified at the 2 institutions. Clinical factors were correlated using Spearman correlation coefficients, Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Of the 204 UPSC patients treated during this period, 84 were classified as stage I, with substages as follows: stage IA, n = 71; stage IB, n = 13. Thirty-seven patients (44%) had a history of a second cancer (22 breast tumors, 9 synchronous müllerian cancers). Surgical staging with at least hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection was performed in 60 (71%) of 84 patients. The median survival for all patients was 10 years. Univariate analysis revealed surgical staging (P < 0.001), normal preoperative CA-125 (P < 0.001), and absence of additional cancers (P < 0.01) to be associated with improved survival. Age-adjusted multivariate analysis incorporating these factors revealed that advancing substage (hazard ratio, 4.59; P < 0.05), a second malignancy (hazard ratio, 2.75; P < 0.04), and surgical staging (hazard ratio, 0.18; P < 0.001) were independent factors associated with overall survival. In a subset analysis excluding patients with a second malignancy, substage (hazard ratio, 3.52; P < 0.05), and surgical staging (hazard ratio, 0.16; P < 0.001) were independent factors affecting overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Independent of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation, stage of disease, comprehensive surgical staging, and the presence of a second malignancy were predictors of overall survival.

Bioevaluation study of 32P-CP-PLLA particle brachytherapy in a rabbit VX2 lung tumor model

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the therapy effects of intratumoral administration of (32)P-CP-PLLA particles in a rabbit VX2 lung tumor model.

METHODS

16 rabbits with tumors were randomly divided into 4 groups. 4 rabbits served as untreated controls, and others received intratumoral administration of (32)P-CP-PLLA particles with CT guidance. The total radioactivities in treated groups were as follows: a low activity was 93 MBq (n=4) (group 1), a medium activity was 185 MBq (n=4) (group 2) and a high activity was 370 MBq (n=4) (group 3). Brachytherapy treated VX2 tumors underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT at 0 day, 3 day, 7 day and 14 day postinjection. In control group, (18)F-FDG PET/CT images were acquired at the same time points but without any treatment. Bremsstrahlung SPECT images were performed at 14 days after intratumoral brachytherapy in treated groups. After Bremsstrahlung SPECT and last (18)F-FDG PET/CT imagings, the rabbits were euthanized and the tumors were removed for histological examination.

RESULTS

Bremsstrahlung SPECT images study indicated that there was no leakage of (32)P out of the injection site at 14 days after treatment. Compared with the control, the tumor volumes in treated groups significantly decreased, and (32)P-CP-PLLA particle produced a reduction in maximum or mean SUV of VX2 tumor (p<0.05). The percentage changes in maximum and mean SUV gradually decreased in group 1 and group 2 from day 3 to day 14 (p<0.05). A transient increase in (18)F-FDG accumulation at group 3 occurred due to the inflammatory reaction elements. Activity dependence was seen in HE and PCNA staining after 14 days treatment among three treated groups (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggested that (32)P-CP-PLLA particle localized on the injecting sites. This novel brachytherapy device efficiently suppressed the growth of the VX2 tumors implanted in the rabbit.

Uterine papillary serous carcinoma: epidemiology, pathogenesis and management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) is a rare but aggressive subtype of endometrial cancer. Although it represents only 10% of all endometrial cancer cases, UPSC accounts for up to 40% of all endometrial cancer-related recurrences and subsequent deaths. The present article reviews the literature concerning the epidemiology, molecular pathogenesis and recent updates on management of UPSC.

RECENT FINDINGS

Women most often present with postmenopausal vaginal bleeding but may also be diagnosed by vaginal cytology. In women diagnosed with metastatic disease, ascites, omental implants or a pelvic mass may be present. Pelvic and extrapelvic recurrences occur frequently, with extrapelvic relapses being observed most commonly. Although few prospective trials exist, several retrospective series have demonstrated that optimal cytoreduction and adjuvant platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy appears to improve survival. In addition, another approach to UPSC management may lie in targeted therapy.

SUMMARY

Women diagnosed with UPSC should undergo comprehensive surgical staging and an attempt at optimal cytoreduction. Platinum/taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in the treatment of both early and advanced-stage patients. Careful long-term surveillance is indicated as many of these women will recur. Prospective studies are needed to define the optimal treatment regimens and to study the role of targeted therapies in UPSC.

Adjuvant Whole Pelvic Radiotherapy in 43 Patients with Uterine Serous Cancer: Outcome and Patterns of Failure

Aims and background

Uterine serous cancer is associated with a poor outcome and poses a therapeutic challenge. We retrospectively evaluated the experience of the Radiotherapy Department of the University of Florence.

Methods

Forty-three patients with stage I-III uterine serous cancer underwent surgery with (18 patients, group 1) or without complete surgical staging (25 patients, group 2) followed by adjuvant whole pelvic radiotherapy alone or combined with vaginal brachytherapy (in 35 and 8 cases, respectively). The median dose delivered with whole pelvic radiotherapy was 50Gy (range, 45–56) and for brachytherapy was 20 Gy (range, 20–30).

Results

Actuarial overall survival and disease-free survival rates at 5 years were 62.5% and 61%, respectively. Local failure was observed in 17 patients (39.5%) and distant metastasis in 10 (23.2%). Nine patients had both local failure and distant metastasis, which had developed concurrently in 7 cases. Isolated abdominal failure occurred in 4 cases (9.3%). Local relapse was noted in 22.2% of patients in group 1 compared to 52% in group 2. A trend towards a better 5-year overall survival (67.2% vs 58%), disease-free survival (63% vs 59%) and local control (70% vs 59%) was observed in group 1 than group 2, although the difference between the two groups failed to reach statistical significance.

Conclusions

Given the patterns of failure of patients with uterine serous cancer, adjuvant whole pelvic radiotherapy may be a reasonable approach, although novel integrated strategies are needed because the results achieved remain disappointing. Adjuvant whole pelvic radiotherapy might improve overall survival, disease-free survival and local control in complete surgically staged patients, but further investigations are required.

Non-Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Corpus: A Review of Selected Histological Subtypes

Background

Understanding the etiology, presentation, evaluation, and management of selected non-endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinomas of the uterine corpus is needed to define optimal treatment regimens.

Methods

The pathology and treatment of selected non-endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinomas of the uterus are reviewed and summarized.

Results

The most common non-endometrioid histology is papillary serous (10%), followed by clear cell (2% to 4%), mucinous (0.6% to 5%), and squamous cell (0.1% to 0.5%). Some non-endometrioid endometrial carcinomas behave more aggressively than the endometrioid cancers such that even women with clinical stage I disease often have extrauterine metastasis at the time of surgical evaluation. Therefore, when technically and medically feasible, comprehensive surgical staging is helpful for women with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer histology. Comprehensive surgical staging includes hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, and cytological evaluation of the abdominal cavity. While whole abdominal radiotherapy has a limited role in early-stage uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) and clear cell carcinoma (CC), there may be a role for postoperative chemotherapy and volume-directed radiotherapy in both early-stage UPSC and CC. In the setting of optimally debulked advanced-stage disease, a combination of radiation and chemotherapy may be indicated. In the setting of recurrent disease or in women with residual disease after surgery, a platinum-based regimen or enrollment in a clinical trial is recommended.

Conclusions

UPSC and CC are managed similarly since sufficient data to separate treatment recommendations are lacking. Because both histologies are associated with a high rate of recurrence, adjuvant therapy is recommended even in women with early-stage disease. The remaining cell types should be treated similar to endometrioid or other low-grade histologies.

Uterine papillary serous carcinoma: a review

The purpose of this article is to review the available literature for uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC). A literature search was conducted to identify publications on UPSC. The literature on UPSC is composed mainly of retrospective, single-institution reports. Despite these limitations, several recommendations can be made. When UPSC is confirmed on preoperative biopsy, complete surgical staging should be performed. Although whole abdominal radiotherapy has a limited role in early-stage UPSC, there may be a role for postoperative chemotherapy in early-stage UPSC. In the setting of optimally debulked advanced-stage disease, a combination of radiation and chemotherapy may be indicated. In the setting of recurrent or suboptimally debulked advanced disease, a platinum-based regimen is recommended. Although comprising a minority of the women with endometrial cancer, women with UPSC do account for a disproportionate percentage of the recurrences. There is a need for clinical trials to determine the optimal therapy for this cohort of patients.

The management of serous papillary uterine cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Uterine papillary serous cancer is an extremely aggressive cancer, the optimum management of which is still being determined. It is important to understand advances that have been made in 2005 regarding the molecular biology, diagnosis, and management of this deadly disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

The main themes in the literature regarding uterine papillary serous cancer are that a potential precursor lesion, serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma, has been recognized as an early form of the disease. A variety of molecular biologically important markers have now been identified, including p53, HER2/neu, IL-6, kallikrein 6, and claudin-4, some of which may be susceptible to molecularly targeted therapy. Systematic surgical staging is necessary before additional therapy is recommended. Stage I uterine papillary serous cancer requires aggressive treatment, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy for successful treatment. The most effective management of advanced stage disease remains to be resolved.

SUMMARY

Serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma should be treated as a form of uterine papillary serous cancer. Multimodality therapy is required for the successful management of early stage uterine papillary serous cancer. Advanced disease is often unresponsive to conventional therapy. Molecularly targeted therapies are now being introduced into the management of this disease.

Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Endometrial Carcinoma

Endometrial cancer is a common female malignancy, affecting approximately 40,000 women per year. Despite the publication of several prospective randomized trials, there continues to be controversy regarding the use of adjuvant radiation therapy in endometrial cancer management. It is clear that most women with early-stage, low-risk disease will do well without adjuvant therapy. Intermediate-risk patients are at risk for local-regional relapse, and radiotherapy has been shown to effectively reduce this risk without significantly impacting overall survival. The absence of a clear impact on survival has resulted in a lack of consensus regarding the use of radiotherapy in intermediate-risk patients. At the same time, the patterns of failure in intermediate-risk patients have resulted in differing recommendations regarding appropriate radiotherapy targets. High-risk patients are at risk for both local and distant failure, and chemotherapy has been shown to improve outcome in these patients. High-risk patients are also at risk for local failure, and targeted radiotherapy may be appropriate. In this article, we discuss the controversies surrounding the use of adjuvant radiotherapy in endometrial cancer using an evidence-based approach.