Stage II endometrial carcinoma: Limiting post-operative radiotherapy to the vaginal vault in node-negative tumors

Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Stage II Endometrial Cancer: Selective De-intensification of Adjuvant Treatment

AIMS

Risk stratification, including nodal assessment, allows for selective de-intensification of adjuvant radiotherapy in stage II endometrial cancer. Patterns of treatment and clinical outcomes, including the use of reduced volume 'mini-pelvis' radiotherapy fields, were evaluated in a population-based study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients diagnosed with pathological stage II endometrial cancer between 2000 and 2014, and received adjuvant radiotherapy in a regional healthcare jurisdiction were reviewed. Registry data were supplemented by a comprehensive review of patient demographics, disease characteristics and treatment details. The Charlson Comorbidity Score was calculated. Survival and recurrence data were analysed.

RESULTS

In total, 264 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most patients had endometrioid histology (83%); 41% of patients had International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians grade 1 disease. Half (49%) had surgical nodal evaluation; 11% received chemotherapy. Most patients (59%) were treated with full pelvic radiotherapy fields ± brachytherapy. Seventeen per cent of patients received mini-pelvis radiotherapy ± brachytherapy, whereas 24% received brachytherapy alone. Five-year recurrence-free survival was 87% for the entire cohort, with no significant difference by adjuvant radiotherapy approach. Only one patient receiving mini-pelvis radiotherapy ± brachytherapy recurred in the pelvis but outside of the mini-pelvis field. Recorded late toxicity rates were highest for full pelvis radiotherapy + brachytherapy.

CONCLUSION

Risk stratification in a real-world setting allowed for selective de-intensification of adjuvant radiation with equivalent outcomes for stage II endometrial cancer. Mini-pelvis radiotherapy combined with brachytherapy is effective in highly selected patients, with the potential to decrease toxicity without compromising local control. Brachytherapy should be considered in low-risk stage II patients.

A population-based study of outcomes in adjuvant radiotherapy for stage II endometrial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Our study aimed to analyze recurrence and survival outcomes in stage II endometrial cancer patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy at CancerCare Manitoba, a Canadian provincial cancer program.

METHODS

This retrospective population-based cohort study identified all International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage II endometrioid type endometrial carcinoma diagnosed between January 1995 and December 2019. All patients underwent surgery followed by vaginal vault brachytherapy alone or external beam pelvic radiotherapy plus vaginal vault brachytherapy. We used Kaplan-Meier curves to describe overall survival and recurrence-free survival, and cumulative incidence to describe recurrence. Cox regression was used to predict overall survival and recurrence-free survival competing risk regression to predict recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 121 patients were included (78 vaginal brachytherapy alone and 43 external beam pelvic radiotherapy plus vaginal brachytherapy) with a median age of 62 (range 24-85). The median follow-up was 55.2 months (range 7.1-147.9) in the vaginal brachytherapy group and 41.9 months (range 7.4-127.0) in the pelvic radiotherapy group. Lymph node dissection was performed in 79 (65.3%) patients. There were 14 (17.9%) recurrences (8 vaginal vault, 3 pelvic, 3 distant) with vaginal brachytherapy and 7 (16.3%) recurrences (3 vaginal vault, 2 pelvic, 2 distant) with external beam pelvic radiotherapy. The 5 year overall survival was 73.1% with vaginal vault brachytherapy vs 73.7% with external beam pelvic radiotherapy plus vaginal brachytherapy (p=0.31), the 5 year recurrence-free survival was 65.0% vs 68.2% (p=0.61), and the 5 year recurrence risk was 20.3% vs 19.4% (p=0.94). On univariable and multivariable analysis, only age was a statistically significant predictor for overall survival and recurrence-free survival (p<0.05), but not lymphovascular space invasion (HR, 2.97; 95% CI, 0.99 to 8.93 for overall survival, p=0.15). The type of adjuvant radiotherapy did not predict for recurrence (p=0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and recurrence risk between vaginal vault brachytherapy vs external beam pelvic radiotherapy plus vaginal vault brachytherapy in patients with stage II endometrial cancer.

Preliminary clinical outcomes of patients treated with vaginal brachytherapy alone using multi-channel vaginal brachytherapy applicator in operated early-stage endometrial cancer

Background

Recommendations for adjuvant treatment for postoperative, early-stage endometrial cancer varies from observation through vaginal brachytherapy alone to pelvic radiation. While observation alone can lead to recurrence, external radiotherapy has increased morbidity. The aim of this study is to show our results with vaginal brachytherapy alone using a multichannel applicator for treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer.

Materials and methods

Consecutive patients undergoing vaginal brachytherapy alone following surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer were examined. A Miami multichannel vaginal brachytherapy applicator was used to deliver HDR brachytherapy in 62 patients from May 2013 to June 2018. CT scan-based images guided planning. A dose of 5.5-6.5 Gy × 4 fractions was prescribed 5 mm from the surface of the applicator.

Results

At a median follow up of 19 months (6-48 months), 93% of patients treated were alive with no recurrence. Two patients had only local recurrence, and 1 was salvaged with external radiotherapy and chemotherapy. There was only one nodal failure and 2 distant failures. There was no grade 2 or higher vaginal, gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity.

Conclusion

Vaginal brachytherapy alone using a multichannel applicator can be considered for early-stage endometrial cancers without compromising outcomes.

External beam radiotherapy versus vaginal brachytherapy in patients with stage II endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

The choice of adjuvant treatment for women with stage II endometrial cancer is challenging, given the known increase in morbidity with external beam radiation compared with vaginal brachytherapy, and the lack of consensus on its benefits. We summarized the evidence on survival and recurrence for stage II endometrial cancer, defined as cervical stromal invasion, after adjuvant postoperative external beam radiotherapy and vaginal brachytherapy.

Methods

We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Scopus databases from inception to January 2019 to identify studies that compared adjuvant postoperative external beam radiotherapy with or without vaginal brachytherapy and vaginal brachytherapy alone in stage II endometrial cancer. Our primary outcome was the locoregional recurrence rate, defined as recurrence in the pelvis or vagina. Secondary outcomes included the rate of recurrence at any site, distant recurrence rate, vaginal recurrence rate, pelvic recurrence rate, and 5 year overall survival. Study selection, assessment, and data abstraction were performed by an independent set of reviewers. Random effects models were used to synthesize quantitative data.

Results

We included 15 cohort studies reporting data on 1070 women. Most women with stage II endometrial cancer (848/1070, 79.3%) were treated with external beam radiotherapy with or without vaginal brachytherapy. Subgroup analysis was stratified by whether >90% of the women included underwent pelvic lymph node assessment (sampling or full dissection). Locoregional recurrence (pelvic and vaginal recurrence) was significantly reduced with external beam radiotherapy with or without vaginal brachytherapy compared with vaginal brachytherapy alone (14 studies (n=1057); odds ratio (OR) 0.33 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.68); I2=5%) regardless of pelvic lymph node assessment. Most women (81.8%) who recurred locoregionally had a least one uterine risk factor (grade 3 tumor, myometrial invasion >50%, or lymphovascular invasion). There was no difference in overall survival with external beam radiotherapy with or without vaginal brachytherapy compared with vaginal brachytherapy alone (five studies (n=463); OR 0.78 (95% CI 0.34 to 1.80); I2=48%).

Conclusions

External beam radiotherapy with or without vaginal brachytherapy decreased the locoregional recurrence threefold for stage II endometrial cancer, regardless of pelvic lymph node assessment. Most women who suffered recurrence locoregionally had a least one high risk factor. Vaginal brachytherapy alone may be sufficient therapy for node negative stage II endometrial cancer without uterine risk factors, while those with uterine risk factors should be considered for external beam radiotherapy with or without vaginal brachytherapy to improve locoregional control.

Evolving trends in the management of high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer in the United States

OBJECTIVE

Gynecologic oncology group protocol 249 (GOG 249) is the contemporary US study that aimed to define the standard of care adjuvant therapy for patients with high-intermediate risk (HIR) endometrial cancer; patients were randomized to pelvic radiation therapy (RT) or vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) with chemotherapy (VBT-C). The preliminary results of GOG 249 were recently presented, yet the management of patients represented in this trial remains controversial. We set out to review US patterns of care for patients meeting eligibility criteria for GOG 249.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify patients meeting GOG 249 eligibility criteria between 2010 and 2015. The Man-Kendall trend test was used to assess for significant trends over time.

RESULTS

We identified 23,015 patients that met study inclusion criteria. Between 2010 and 2015, there was a decline in the use of pelvic RT from 9.8% to 7.5%, although not meeting statistical significance (p = 0.136), and an increase in the use of VBT-C from 4.6% to 7.7% (p = 0.017). Most patients did not receive treatment per either arm of GOG 249, with observation being the most common approach throughout this era, although the percentage of patients observed decreased from 58.1% to 45.8% between 2010 and 2015 (p = 0.003). Further, 21.5% of patients received VBT alone in 2010, increasing to 30.3% by 2015 (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

National practice trends in HIR endometrial cancer reveal that a large number of patients are observed in lieu of receiving adjuvant therapy. Further, the utilization of pelvic RT has declined below utilization of VBT-C, despite a lack of data supporting either improved disease outcomes or toxicity with this experimental regimen on GOG 249.

Adjuvant Therapy Use and Survival in Stage II Endometrial Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Radiotherapy (RT) is an established adjuvant treatment for stage II endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EEC). The role of chemotherapy (CT) in stage II EEC is less proven. We used the National Cancer Data Base to identify factors associated with adjuvant CT in stage II EEC and to explore whether receipt of CT was associated with improved overall survival (OS).

METHODS/MATERIALS

Women diagnosed in 2010 to 2013 with International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology stage II EEC (grades 1-3) after hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were identified in the National Cancer Data Base. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify covariates associated with receipt of CT. Overall survival among patients receiving RT, CT, or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) after surgery was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates, the log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards regression, and propensity score matching.

RESULTS

We identified 6102 stage II EEC patients. There were 358 patients (6%) who received adjuvant CT alone and 525 (9%) who received CRT; the remainder received RT alone (n = 1906; 31%) or no adjuvant treatment (n = 3313; 54%). The presence of lymphovascular invasion (odds ratio, 3.58; P < 0.001) and grade 3 disease (odds ratio, 3.40; P < 0.001) was strongly associated with receipt of CT or CRT. The OS at 3 years for the entire cohort was 89%. On multivariable analysis, CT versus RT was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.12 [95% confidence interval, 1.46-3.06]; P < 0.001), whereas CRT versus RT was not associated with improved OS (HR, 1.07 [95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.62]; P = 0.781). After propensity score matching, there remained no difference in OS between RT and CRT (HR, 1.14; P = 0.614).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with stage II EEC have an excellent prognosis, and most undergo observation or receive adjuvant RT in the United States. Receipt of CT (alone or with RT) was not associated with an OS advantage compared with RT alone in this observational cohort. Randomized trials will help clarify the role of CT in stage II patients.

Radiation therapy improves disease-specific survival in women with Stage II endometrioid endometrial cancer-Brachytherapy may be sufficient

PURPOSE

To evaluate disease-specific survival (DSS) outcomes in Stage II endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC) patients based on pathology and treatment information including adjuvant radiotherapy and lymph node assessment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, 2877 patients with Stage II EC diagnosed between 2004 and 2012 treated with radiation were identified. DSS was determined for different modalities of radiation. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival and Cox regression modeling were used to explore the risk associated with various factors on DSS.

RESULTS

The 4-year DSS for the study population was 90%. Radiation was associated with improved 4-year DSS when compared to no radiotherapy (p = 0.03). Patients with Grade 2 and 3 tumors had improved 4-year DSS with radiation (94% vs. 90%, p = 0.02 and 81% vs. 73%, p = 0.15), respectively, but no differences in DSS when vaginal brachytherapy alone was compared with external beam alone or both. Patients with Grade 2 (p = 0.002) and Grade 3 (p < 0.001) tumors without a lymph node dissection (LND) had worse DSS compared to patients with any LND. Patients with Grade 3 tumors without an LND who received radiation showed improved DSS (p = 0.008). Multivariable analysis revealed that age >60 years (p < 0.001), Grade 3 (p < 0.001), no radiotherapy (p = 0.05), and no LNDs (p < 0.001) were significant prognostic factors for worse DSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant radiation, whether delivered by brachytherapy or external beam radiation, is associated with improved DSS in Stage II EC patients with high-grade tumors, therefore brachytherapy may be sufficient.

Patterns of care in women with high-intermediate risk endometrioid adenocarcinoma in the PORTEC-2 era: A SEER database analysis

PURPOSE

We examined the radiotherapy patterns of care over an 8-year period during which the PORTEC-2 trial and other series were published.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients diagnosed with Stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EA) between 2004 and 2011 were identified in the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Adjuvant radiation treatments were analyzed by year. Patterns of care from 2004 to 2008 were compared to those from 2009 to 2011 using the χ² test.

RESULTS

Analysis included 31,688 patients with Stage I EA. Among those diagnosed in 2004, 9.3% received adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and 5.0% received adjuvant brachytherapy. In 2011, 4.5% received EBRT and 9.3% received brachytherapy. In those diagnosed with high-intermediate risk (H-IR) EA in 2004, 58.8% received no adjuvant treatment, 28.3% received EBRT, and 12.9% received brachytherapy. In 2011, 57.8% of patients with H-IR disease received no adjuvant treatment, 14.3% received EBRT, and 27.9% received brachytherapy. There was a significant difference in the proportion of patients with H-IR EA treated with EBRT vs. brachytherapy alone before and after 2008 (p < 0.0001) with an increase in use of brachytherapy and a decrease in the use of EBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of brachytherapy alone after hysterectomy has increased over time in all women with Stage I EA and in those with H-IR disease. In almost all subsets, the proportion of women being treated with brachytherapy increased and the proportion treated with EBRT decreased. Less than 30% received adjuvant brachytherapy and over 50% of women were treated without adjuvant radiotherapy.

Recurrences and toxicity after adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy in Stage I-II endometrial cancer: A monoinstitutional experience

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidences of vaginal recurrence and toxicity after vaginal brachytherapy in Stage I-II endometrial cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 2003 and 2012, 150 high-intermediate-risk Stage I and 7 Stage II patients, median age 64 years, underwent surgery, with or without lymphadenectomy, and 3D brachytherapy: 7 Gy, at 5 mm depth from applicator surface, for 3-week fractions. The effects of age, grading, number of excised lymph nodes and pathologic stage on loco-regional relapse (LRR), metastases, and tumor-related death were investigated. Vaginal toxicity was evaluated during followup visits.

RESULTS

At 83 months of median followup, 144 patients were disease free, 2 in relapse, 7 deceased from disease, and 4 from other causes. One vaginal (0.6%), five nodal (3.2%), three pelvic over the vaginal cuff (1.9%), and one distant recurrences were seen (0.6%). The 5-year probability of LRR-free, distant metastasis-free and cause-specific survivals for all patients were 93.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88.1-96.7), 97.8% (95% CI: 93.2-99.3), and 96.5% (95% CI: 93.5-99.5) and for Stage I 95.7% (95% CI: 92.2-9.1), 99.3% (95% CI: 98.0-100), and 97.7% (95% CI: 95.2-100), respectively. At multivariate analysis, Stage II disease and more than 12 lymph nodes sampled were associated with LRR (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.88; 95% CI: 1.390-10.878; p = 0.010 and HR: 6.952; 95% CI: 1.591-30.385; p = 0.010) and Stage II with metastasis and tumor-related death (HR: 23.057; 95% CI: 2.296-231.485; p = 0.008 and HR: 4.324; 95% CI: 1.223-15.290; p = 0.023). Vaginal acute and chronic toxicity was 16% and 55.4%, respectively, all only Grades 1-2.

CONCLUSIONS

For high-to-intermediate-risk Stage I endometrial cancer, 3D vaginal brachytherapy achieved good local control and low toxicity. In Stage II, patients brachytherapy could be administered after complete surgical staging.

Evaluation of brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy for early stage, node-negative uterine carcinosarcoma

PURPOSE

There is limited evidence to guide treatment decision making for patients with early stage uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) regarding the use of pelvic external beam radiation therapy (RT) vs. vaginal brachytherapy (BT) after hysterectomy. We analyzed a population-based database to compare survival outcomes after adjuvant BT vs. pelvic external beam RT for patients with Stages I-II UCS.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry to identify a cohort of patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics I/II UCS diagnosed during 1998-2010, who received a total hysterectomy and for whom radiotherapy type was known. χ(2) tests were used to test associations between patient characteristics and radiotherapy type. Overall and cancer-specific survival, measured from date of diagnosis, were summarized within each covariate. Cox proportional hazards models were used to model the impact of RT type on survival while adjusting for other factors.

RESULTS

A total of 1581 subjects were identified, including 803 (50.8%) no radiotherapy; 636 (40.2%) external beam radiotherapy ± BT; and 142 (9.0%) BT alone. The use of BT alone increased from 4.5% in 1988-1999 to 12.5% in 2005-2010. Multivariate models of overall and cause-specific survival showed that radiotherapy type was not associated with survival after adjustment for other covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with Stages I-II UCS, adjuvant radiotherapy type did not influence survival after hysterectomy. This study addresses an existing evidence gap and identifies a trend toward increasing utilization of BT alone. Prospective trials are warranted to provide high-quality evidence to guide adjuvant therapy decisions for these patients.

Adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy as a part of management in early endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer is the most frequent cancer of female genital tract. Metro- and menorrhagia or postmenopausal bleeding results in its early presentation. It allows radical treatment. However, controversies remain on surgery coverage or adjuvant therapies in early endometrial women cancer. Optimal management should minimize intervention instead of aggressive approach, as showed by recent studies. There is a role for brachytherapy as an adjuvant irradiation. Crucial publications including PORTEC-1, GOG 99, MRC ASTEC, ASTEC/EN.5, PORTEC-2 or Italian lymphadenectomy trial are discussed. Moreover, there is attention paid on adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy analyses for the past fifteen years.

Endometrial cancer - reduce to the minimum. A new paradigm for adjuvant treatments?

BACKGROUND

Up to now, the role of adjuvant radiation therapy and the extent of lymph node dissection for early stage endometrial cancer are controversial. In order to clarify the current position of the given adjuvant treatment options, a systematic review was performed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Both, Pubmed and ISI Web of Knowledge database were searched using the following keywords and MESH headings: "Endometrial cancer", "Endometrial Neoplasms", "Endometrial Neoplasms/radiotherapy", "External beam radiation therapy", "Brachytherapy" and adequate combinations.

CONCLUSION

Recent data from randomized trials indicate that external beam radiation therapy - particularly in combination with extended lymph node dissection - or radical lymph node dissection increases toxicity without any improvement of overall survival rates. Thus, reduced surgical aggressiveness and limitation of radiotherapy to vaginal-vault-brachytherapy only is sufficient for most cases of early stage endometrial cancer.

Vaginal brachytherapy versus pelvic external beam radiotherapy for patients with endometrial cancer of high-intermediate risk (PORTEC-2): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised trial

BACKGROUND

After surgery for intermediate-risk endometrial carcinoma, the vagina is the most frequent site of recurrence. This study established whether vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) is as effective as pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in prevention of vaginal recurrence, with fewer adverse effects and improved quality of life.

METHODS

In this open-label, non-inferiority, randomised trial undertaken in 19 Dutch radiation oncology centres, 427 patients with stage I or IIA endometrial carcinoma with features of high-intermediate risk were randomly assigned by a computer-generated, biased coin minimisation procedure to pelvic EBRT (46 Gy in 23 fractions; n=214) or VBT (21 Gy high-dose rate in three fractions, or 30 Gy low-dose rate; n=213). All investigators were masked to the assignment of treatment group. The primary endpoint was vaginal recurrence. The predefined non-inferiority margin was an absolute difference of 6% in vaginal recurrence. Analysis was by intention to treat, with competing risk methods. The study is registered, number ISRCTN16228756.

FINDINGS

At median follow-up of 45 months (range 18-78), three vaginal recurrences had been diagnosed after VBT and four after EBRT. Estimated 5-year rates of vaginal recurrence were 1.8% (95% CI 0.6-5.9) for VBT and 1.6% (0.5-4.9) for EBRT (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, 95% CI 0.17-3.49; p=0.74). 5-year rates of locoregional relapse (vaginal or pelvic recurrence, or both) were 5.1% (2.8-9.6) for VBT and 2.1% (0.8-5.8) for EBRT (HR 2.08, 0.71-6.09; p=0.17). 1.5% (0.5-4.5) versus 0.5% (0.1-3.4) of patients presented with isolated pelvic recurrence (HR 3.10, 0.32-29.9; p=0.30), and rates of distant metastases were similar (8.3% [5.1-13.4] vs 5.7% [3.3-9.9]; HR 1.32, 0.63-2.74; p=0.46). We recorded no differences in overall (84.8% [95% CI 79.3-90.3] vs 79.6% [71.2-88.0]; HR 1.17, 0.69-1.98; p=0.57) or disease-free survival (82.7% [76.9-88.6] vs 78.1% [69.7-86.5]; HR 1.09, 0.66-1.78; p=0.74). Rates of acute grade 1-2 gastrointestinal toxicity were significantly lower in the VBT group than in the EBRT group at completion of radiotherapy (12.6% [27/215] vs 53.8% [112/208]).

INTERPRETATION

VBT is effective in ensuring vaginal control, with fewer gastrointestinal toxic effects than with EBRT. VBT should be the adjuvant treatment of choice for patients with endometrial carcinoma of high-intermediate risk.

FUNDING

Dutch Cancer Society.

Radiotherapy of endometrial carcinoma: Who needs to be irradiated?

Due to gynecological oncology general strategy and everyday aspiration for individual approach to malignant tumors, guidelines in treatment approach are not finally established, and they are controversial in some demands with age of the patients. If we look general treatment strategy approach to invasive endometrial cancer it is proved that operative treatment is priority and base line of treating endometrial carcinoma I and II clinical stage (FIGO) if there is general conditions for surgery, allowing complicated treatment in this age. Previous experience are showing that decision about application of therapy procedures in treatment of endometrial carcinoma every case have to has individual approach, regarding all known prognostic criteria: clinical stage, histological type, myometrial infiltration, lymph-vascular space involvement, size of the tumor and its localiza?tion, depth of myometrial infiltration, invading of serosa, cervix and adnexa, present of hormonal tissue receptors, information about lymph node: number, size and size of the biggest metastases, data about both extra nodular expansion of tumor and peritoneal cytology. The use of postoperative radiotherapy should be limited to group of patients with highly enough risk of locoregional recurrence (15% and more) as risk warranty of morbidity connected to radiological treatment. Therefore, the goal of postoperative radiotherapy appliance is to achieve maximum locoregional disease control and survival without relapse. New Radiotherapy (RT) techniques, Conformal Radiotherapy (CFRT) and Intensity Modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), reduce the risk of complications, especially for patients with multimodal treatment.

Ten-year data on 138 patients with endometrial carcinoma and postoperative vaginal brachytherapy alone: No need for external-beam radiotherapy in low and intermediate risk patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate long-term outcome, risk factors, and causes of death in stage I-IIIA endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients treated only with adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy (VB) and to clarify for which subgroups of patients it is safe to omit external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

METHODS

Out of 224 EC patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy between 1990 and 2002, 138 had VB alone in curative intent (FIGO [2002]: 85%I, 12%II, 3%IIIA; 18 low risk [IA G1-2, IB G1], 103 intermediate risk [IB G2-3, IC G1-2, IIA-B G1-2], 17 high risk [IC G3, IIIA]). After surgery+/-lymphadenectomy, HDR-brachytherapy prescription (in 95.7% of patients) was 3x10 Gy to the surface or 3x5 Gy at 5 mm tissue depths.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 107 months (range 3-185). Three intermediate and 7 high risk-patients relapsed. The 10-year vaginal control was 99.2%, locoregional control was 95.2% (low/intermediate/high risk: 100%/98.9%/68.8%), and disease-free survival (DFS) was 91.7% (100%/96.8%/55.2%). Risk factors for poor DFS were lymphovascular space invasion, > or = 50% myometrial invasion (univariate, p<0.05), pathological FIGO-stage, and grade 3 (uni-/multivariate, p<0.05). Leading causes of deaths (n=41) were cardiovascular disease (29%) and other malignancies (24%) ahead of EC (19.5%). The 10-year overall survival was 68.5% and the disease-specific survival was 92.4%. Thirty-five secondary tumors in 31 patients led to a higher actuarial death rate (10-year 9.9%, 15-year 17.7%) than EC (7.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Restricting adjuvant therapy to VB alone seems to be safe in low and intermediate risk EC and can be recommended. As death rarely relates to early-stage EC, value of adjuvant therapy is probably better reflected by DFS rather than by overall survival.