Visceral fat amount as predictive factor for early laparotomic conversion in obese patients with endometrial cancer

Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy and Body Mass Index: Is It Really a Limiting Factor for the Procedure?

Objective: To explore if obesity measured by body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m² represents a limiting factor for para-aortic lymphadenectomy done with a transperitoneal laparoscopic approach. Materials and Methods: Retrospective observational study with 146 consecutive patients, diagnosed with a gynecological cancer submitted to para-aortic surgical staging between January 2010 and December 2018. The mean age was 52 years and the mean BMI was 27 kg/m². 72.6% (106 patients) had BMI <30 kg/m² and 27.4% (40 patients) had BMI ≥30 kg/m². Half of the patients did not have prior abdominal surgeries. Results: The statistical analysis showed that there were no significant differences between two groups depending on their BMI in the lymph node count: BMI <30 kg/m² 14 nodes versus BMI ≥30 kg/m² 10 nodes (P = .122); rate of intraoperative complications: BMI <30: 6.3% versus BMI ≥30: 0% (P = .180), postoperative complications: BMI <30: 6.6% versus BMI ≥30: 5% (P = .723); feasibility rate: BMI <30: 97.1% versus BMI ≥30: 95.6% (P = .063) or the mean hospital stay BMI <30: 2.47 ± 2.05 days (standard deviation [SD]), BMI ≥30: 2.64 ± 0.93 days (SD) (P = .171). The only significant difference observed was due to the operating time: BMI <30: 103.1 ± 60.8 (SD) versus BMI ≥30: 146.9 ± 82.5 (SD) (P = .019), being longer in obese patients. Conclusions: Obesity, estimated by BMI, does not seem to represent a limiting factor for this surgical procedure in our series. We feel it is a feasible and justified approach in obese patients when other surgical procedures have to be carried out in the same surgical act. Probably, other factors and anthropometric measurements are more accurate to select patients in which this approach is feasible.

Magnetic resonance or computerized tomography imaging to predict difficulty of robotic surgery for endometrial cancer

To determine if the difficulty of a robotic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer can be predicted by MRI, CT or other methods. All robotic cases from 1 August 2006 through 30 July 2009 were identified. Data collected prospectively included co-morbidities, body mass index, surgical times, estimated blood loss (EBL), uterine weight, and pre- and postoperative complications. Those patients who received an MRI or CT scan prior to robotic hysterectomy had additional data gathered from imaging, including uterine volume, pelvic measurements and abdominal wall thickness. Cases were labeled difficult for the following reasons: outliers greater than 2 SD from the mean EBL, hysterectomy time and total console time. Additional factors identifying difficult cases included the need to undock to remove the specimen or conversion to laparotomy. Data were analyzed for their possible role in causing difficulty in a robotic hysterectomy. Comparative statistics utilized included chi-square and t-test, ANOVA and logistic regression analysis.From 2 August 2006 through 30 July 2009, 119 patients underwent robotic surgery for endometrial cancer and are included in this study. Of these patients, 25/119 (20.0%) were identified as difficult cases. Difficulty was found in those patients with greater than 2 SD from the mean for hysterectomy time, >90.9 min (n = 3, 2.5%), total console time of >178.1 min (n = 6, 5.0%), EBL >232 cc (n = 7, 5.9%) and undocking to remove the uterine specimen in 8 (6.7%) cases; 1/119 (0.8%) was converted to laparotomy. Lymphadenectomy (P = 0.005) was associated with case difficulty. In a logistic regression analysis CT/MRI measurements of uterine volume greater than 793 cm³ and CT/MRI pelvimetry, as well as abdominal wall thickness were independent predictors of a difficult case (P = 0.0116). MRI and CT scans can detect the probability that a robotic surgery will be difficult by determining uterine volume and pelvimetry; however, these were not the strongest predictors in our study. A narrow pelvic outlet as measured on CT/MRI and uterine volume of greater than 793 cc should raise a flag of caution when planning robotic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

Presurgical assessment of intraabdominal visceral fat in obese patients with early-stage endometrial cancer treated with laparoscopic approach: Relationships with early laparotomic conversions

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship between intraabdominal visceral fat (IVF) and early conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy in obese patients.

DESIGN

Prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

SETTING

Department of obstetrics and gynecology, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro.

PATIENTS

One hundred fifty-one obese patients with endometrial cancer and laparoscopic surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Laparoscopic treatment for early-stage endometrial cancer.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

In all patients, demographic, anthropometric (including body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist circumference), and IVF assessments (using ultrasonography [IVF-USG, cm] and computed tomography [IVF-CT, cm(2)]), were evaluated. In 122 patients (122/151, 80.8%), the laparoscopies were successfully completed (group A), whereas 29 patients (29/151, 19.2%) had a laparotomic conversion. Specifically, in 19 (19/29, 65.5%) and in 10 patients (10/29, 34.5%) the conversion was early (group B1) and late (group B2), respectively. A significant (p <.05) difference in surgical stage IC and in postoperative complications rate was detected between group A and groups B1 and B2, without difference between these 2 last groups. IVF-USG and IVF-CT were significantly (p <.01) higher in group B1 in comparison with groups A and B2, without difference between these 2 last groups. A strong and significant (p <.001) association between IVF-USG and IVF-CT was detected in all groups by Spearman bivariate correlation (r = 0.78, 0.918, and 0.978 for group A, B1, and B2, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed the IVF-CT as the main predictor for early laparotomic conversion (OR 2.184; 95% CI 1.227-3.886).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraabdominal visceral fat is a predictor for early laparotomic conversion in obese patients with endometrial cancer. Further studies are necessary to assess the efficacy of the IVF evaluation for reducing the laparotomic conversion risk in obese women undergoing laparoscopic surgery for gynecologic malignancy.