Paclitaxel and carboplatin in the adjuvant treatment of patients with high-risk stage III and IV endometrial cancer: A retrospective study

A phase 2 feasibility study of nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin in epithelial carcinoma of the uterus

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the feasibility of completing 6 cycles of nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) and carboplatin (C) in a single arm prospective clinical trial for advanced/recurrent EC and safety and efficacy of day (D) 1, 8 nab-P in combination with D1 C q3weeks.

METHODS

Patients with early-stage, high-risk, advanced primary/recurrent EC without prior platinum/taxane exposure were enrolled in an open-label, single-institution trial (NCT02744898). Patients received 6 cycles of D1 nab-P 100 mg/m2 IV with C AUC 6 IV and D8 nab-P 100 mg/m2 IV q21D. The trial tested the null hypothesis that subjects completing 6 cycles was ≤0.50 versus the alternative that the proportion is ≥0.75 in a single stage design with alpha = 0.05 and power = 80% with 23 subjects. Patients who completed 6 cycles (primary outcome), objective response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) were estimated with exact 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

From 08/2016-03/2018, 23 patients were enrolled. Nineteen patients (82.6%, 95% CI: 61.2%, 95.0%) completed 6 cycles, thus we could reject our null. Twelve patients (52.2%) experienced ≥1 grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events including: anemia, 6 (26.1%); neutropenia, 5 (21.7%); diarrhea, 3 (13.0%). Fourteen patients (60.1%) reported grade 1 neuropathy. Of 9 patients with measurable target lesions, the ORR was 33.3% (95% CI: 7.5%, 70.1%) and CBR was 55.6% (95% CI: 21.2%, 86.3%). Median PFS in the advanced/recurrent patients was 23.2 (95% CI: 12.1, NR) months.

CONCLUSIONS

The nab-P/C D1, 8 regimen met pre-specified feasibility criteria with acceptable toxicity and efficacy. Use of nab-P decreases need for steroid pre-medications, and this carboplatin doublet may prove advantageous for trials assessing combinations with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced EC.

Adjuvant Therapy in Node-Positive Endometrial Cancer: A Focus on Chemotherapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In advanced-stage and high-risk endometrial cancer, adjuvant treatment is the standard of care and typically includes chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. Debate continues over the optimal use of these two treatment modalities together or separately. This review covers the historical literature leading to the current recommendation for adjuvant chemotherapy, in addition to looking forward to the relatively new field of targeted molecular treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

The review covers recent phase III trials comparing chemotherapy to radiotherapy in high-risk endometrial cancer. Additionally, the era of genomic medicine has a new foothold in endometrial cancer, and the review covers new discoveries on molecular classification and prognostic implications. Fortunately, the majority of endometrial cancer has a good prognosis. For advanced-stage and high-risk histologies, the prognosis can be guarded, with adjuvant treatment improving outcomes. Gynecologic oncologists continue to debate the optimal treatment modality/modalities, a debate which will likely become more robust as the field of molecular treatment in endometrial cancer evolves.

Proteomic Analysis of Pre-Invasive Serous Lesions of the Endometrium and Fallopian Tube Reveals Their Metastatic Potential

Serous endometrial cancer (SEC) and high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) are aggressive gynecological malignancies with high rates of metastasis and poor prognosis. Endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (EIC), the precursor for SEC, and serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), believed to be the precursor lesion for HGSOC, can also be associated with intraabdominal spread. To provide insight into the etiology of these precancerous lesions and to explore the potential molecular mechanisms underlying their metastatic behavior, we performed a proteomic mass spectrometry analysis in a patient with synchronous EIC and STIC. Through histological and molecular identification of precancerous lesions followed by laser capture microdissection, we were able to identify over 450 proteins within the precancerous lesions and adjacent healthy tissue. The proteomic analysis of STIC and EIC showed remarkable overlap in the proteomic patterns, reflecting early neoplastic changes in proliferation, loss of polarity and attachment. Our proteomic analysis showed that both EIC and STIC, despite being regarded as premalignant lesions, have metastatic potential, which correlates with the common presentation of invasive serous gynecological malignancies at advanced stage.

Unique Molecular Features in High-Risk Histology Endometrial Cancers

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States and the sixth most common cancer in women worldwide. Fortunately, most women who develop endometrial cancer have low-grade early-stage endometrioid carcinomas, and simple hysterectomy is curative. Unfortunately, 15% of women with endometrial cancer will develop high-risk histologic tumors including uterine carcinosarcoma or high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, or serous carcinomas. These high-risk histologic tumors account for more than 50% of deaths from this disease. In this review, we will highlight the biologic differences between low- and high-risk carcinomas with a focus on the cell of origin, early precursor lesions including atrophic and proliferative endometrium, and the potential role of stem cells. We will discuss treatment, including standard of care therapy, hormonal therapy, and precision medicine-based or targeted molecular therapies. We will also discuss the impact and need for model systems. The molecular underpinnings behind this high death to incidence ratio are important to understand and improve outcomes.

A phase I/II study of GLIF combination chemotherapy for taxane/platinum-refractory/resistant endometrial cancer (GOGO-EM2)

PURPOSE

Development of new treatment strategies for endometrial cancer that has become refractory or resistant to taxane/platinum is a critical need. The present study was a phase I/II study of gemcitabine, levofolinate, irinotecan, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (GLIF) combination chemotherapy to determine optimal dosages, safety, and efficacy.

METHODS

Taxane/platinum-resistant or -refractory endometrial disease was defined as tumor progression within 6 months after a taxane/platinum-based regimen. Maximum tolerated dose was investigated by a 3 + 3-designed phase I study. The phase II study was conducted using the recommended doses determined in the phase I study.

RESULTS

The dosages recommended for the phase II trial were determined, in the phase I trial, to be: gemcitabine 800 mg/m², levofolinate 100 mg/m², irinotecan 80 mg/m², and 5-FU 1000 mg/m². Thirty patients were enrolled, including the three patients who received GLIF therapy at the same dose as the recommended phase II dose in the phase I study. Two patients were excluded at this point due to study protocol violations, and the remaining 28 patients were included for analysis. Phase II revealed that the response and disease control rates were 7.1% (2/28) and 39.3% (11/28), respectively, and that the median PFS and OS were 3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3-7] and 12 months (95% CI 9-17), respectively. Febrile or grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 14% (4/28) of the cases. Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was not observed.

CONCLUSION

We found that GLIF combination chemotherapy is potentially a useful treatment option for endometrial cancers refractory or resistant to taxane/platinum-based chemotherapy.

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in high-risk endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The benefits of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for high-risk endometrial cancer (HREC) in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I-III remain controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of postoperative CRT over radiotherapy (RT) alone, exclusively for patients with HREC for the following key endpoints: overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), the local recurrence rate, the distant metastasis rate, cancer-specific survival (CSS), grade III/IV acute and late toxicities, and the small bowel obstruction rate.

METHODS

Five databases, namely, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov, were systematically explored and supplemented by manual searching to identify relevant studies published before Dec 9, 2017. Only prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted for HREC comparing CRT and RT alone after surgery were included. All statistical analyses were performed using RevMan Version 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Six eligible trials involving 2105 patients were identified for the final meta-analysis (CRT: n = 1064; RT: n = 1041). No statistically significant differences were evident between the CRT and RT groups regarding OS (n = 2105, RR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.98-1.06, P = 0.40). Additionally, no differences were apparent in terms of the local recurrence rate (n = 690, RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.19-1.18, P = 0.11) or distant metastasis rate (n = 1445, RR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.72-1.23, P = 0.67). However, CRT significantly prolonged overall five-year PFS (80.2% vs. 74.5%, +5.7%; RR = 1.08, P = 0.005) and five-year CSS (86.1% vs. 79.0%, +7.1%; RR = 1.09, P = 0.03). A higher incidence of grade III/IV toxicities (P < 0.00001) was evident with CRT, while grade III/IV late toxicities and the small bowel obstruction rate were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with endometrial cancers with stage I-III risk factors, adjuvant CRT can significantly improve PFS and CSS compared with RT. With the exception of increased acute toxicities, CRT is well accepted and tolerated in HREC patients.

Uterine Papillary Serous Carcinoma: A Single-Institution Review of 62 Cases

Objective

Uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) is a rare variant of endometrial carcinoma responsible for up to 40% of endometrial cancer deaths. Controversy remains regarding optimal adjuvant therapy for UPSC, with lack of randomized trials to date. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate clinicopathological factors and determine event-free survival and overall survival (OS) in patients with UPSC managed within a single institution.

Materials and Methods

Medical and pathological records between 1987 and 2004 were reviewed at the Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze effects of clinical and histopathological variables on patient survival and survival times following adjuvant therapy. Event-free survival and OS were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve.

Results

Sixty-two patients were included; 96.8% were managed surgically and 56.5% were completely surgically staged. Myoinvasion was present in 72.6% (n = 45) of the patients.

In patients with stage I disease, recurrence rate was 41.4% with a 5-year OS of 46%. In stage II, recurrence rate was 20% with a 5-year OS of 67%. In stage III, recurrence rate was 58.8% with a 5-year OS of 34%. In stage IV, recurrence rate was 71.4% with a 5-year OS of 29%.

There was no significant difference in survival based on the presence of positive peritoneal cytology, positive lymphovascular space invasion or positive lymph nodes at diagnosis, and no significant difference in survival based on the type of adjuvant therapy administered. Depth of myometrial invasion was a significant determinant of poor prognosis (P = 0.027).

Conclusions

Uterine papillary serous carcinoma is an aggressive variant of endometrial cancer associated with a high proportion of advanced-stage disease at diagnosis, high recurrence rates, and low OS. In our patients, prognosis was determined by myometrial invasion and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage at diagnosis. Randomized trials in this area are required to clarify optimal adjuvant therapy for patients with UPSC.

Adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation followed by chemotherapy for high-risk endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

The adjuvant treatment of high-risk endometrial cancer (HREC) remains controversial. This prospective phase-II clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by chemotherapy in patients with HREC.

METHODS

Altogether 122 patients were enrolled between January 2007 and January 2013, in which 112 were analyzable. The inclusion criteria included endometrioid endometrial cancer of histological grade 3 and with greater than 50% myometrial invasion, cervical stromal invasion, pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node metastases; non-endometrioid endometrial cancer; no residual disease and distant metastases. Pelvic radiation was administered with cisplatin on days 1 and 28. Para-aortic radiation was administered with confirmed para-aortic lymph node metastases, and vaginal afterloading brachytherapy with cervical stromal invasion after total hysterectomy. Four courses of paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) or cisplatin, cyclophosphamide and epirubicin (CEP) were administered at three-week interval after radiation.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients (85.7%) completed the planned treatment. Treatment discontinuation was the result of toxicity (5/112, 4.5%), disease progression (8/112, 7.1%), and patients refusal (3/112, 2.7%). There was no life-threatening toxicity. Twenty-five (22.3%) patients recurred, in which 4 cases recurred in the field of radiation, and 13 (11.6%) patients died of endometrial cancer during follow-up. The estimated five-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 73% and 84%, respectively. Adverse effects were less common in patients who received PC than CEP (p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen demonstrated acceptable toxicity and good survival outcomes despite a preponderance (62.5%) of late stage disease. PC showed less adverse effects than CEP. A well designed randomized trial is under development.

CLINICAL TRIAL ID

https://clinicaltrials.gov/: 070148-7.

Relapse patterns and outcomes following recurrence of endometrial cancer in northern Thai women

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyze the patterns of relapse and survival outcomes in Northern Thai women with recurrent endometrial cancer (EC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records were abstracted from EC patients who underwent primary surgery from 1999 to 2012. Data on clinicopathologic variables, sites of first recurrence, time to relapse of disease, and overall survival (OS) was analyzed. Associations between the clinicopathological variables and the rates of disease recurrence were determined.

RESULTS

Among 1,204 reviewed records, 42 eligible patients were identified with recurrent disease. The median age was 55 years and the median follow-up time was 26.0 months. The median times to recurrence (TTR) after completion of the initial treatment in the group of local relapse (LR) and distant/combined sites of recurrence (DCSR) was 6.6 (95% CI=4.6 to 8.6 months) and 16.9 months (95% CI=5.6 to 28.2 months), respectively (p=0.36). The 2-year survival and 3-year survival probability in the group of LR was 54.2% (95% CI=27.2 to 81.3%) and 34.7% (95% CI=9.2 to 60.2%), compared to 50.4% (95% CI=41.1 to 59.7%) and 42.1% (95%CI= 24.1 to 60.1%) for those with DCSR. Distant recurrence was the most frequent pattern of relapse. Overall survival was not significantly different in patients with local relapse when compared to those with DCSR (p=0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with recurrence of EC after primary treatment had a worse prognosis and clinical aggressiveness. LR and DCSR occurred most during the first three years. The common sites of relapses were vaginal cuff, pelvis, and lungs. No significant clinicopathological predictor for survival outcomes was identified.

Weekly ixabepilone with or without biweekly bevacizumab in the treatment of recurrent or persistent uterine and ovarian/primary peritoneal/fallopian tube cancers: A retrospective review

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical outcome and tolerability of weekly ixabepilone (16-20mg/m(2) days 1, 8, 15 of a 28-day cycle)±biweekly bevacizumab (10mg/kg days 1 and 15) in patients with recurrent/persistent uterine or ovarian/primary peritoneal/fallopian tube cancers.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective review was performed inclusive of all patients who received ≥2cycles from 01/2010 to 06/2014. Progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicities were graded according to CTCAEv4.0. Best response was categorized using RECIST or by CA-125 criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients (24 uterine and 36 ovarian cancers) were identified. Patients had received a median of 3.5 (range:1-10) prior lines of chemotherapy. Patients completed a mean of 4.7±2.9cycles of ixabepilone; 66.7% (16/24) and 91.7% (33/36) of patients with uterine and ovarian cancers received concurrent bevacizumab. For uterine cancers, objective response rate (ORR) was 41.7% (12.5% complete, 29.2% partial); median duration of response or stabilization was 7months (range:2-30). Median PFS and OS were 5.2 and 9.6months, respectively. PFS and OS were improved in the setting of concurrent bevacizumab (6.5 versus 3.0months, p=0.01, HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.05-0.77; 9.6 versus 4.2months, p=0.02, HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.04-0.74). Similar ORR was observed among ovarian cancers; median PFS/OS were not yet reached. Most toxicities were grade 1/2.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly ixabepilone with or without biweekly bevacizumab has promising activity and acceptable toxicity in patients with platinum-/taxane-resistant endometrial and ovarian cancers. This combination warrants further prospective study in these populations.

Taxanes: their impact on gynecologic malignancy

The use of taxanes in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies has expanded tremendously over the past 30 years. Both paclitaxel and docetaxel have unique microtubule stabilizing, antiangiogenic and radiation sensitizing properties that endow them with remarkable activity as chemotherapeutic agents. As research into the appropriate dose, timing, treatment interval, and response rates have been studied, they have emerged as one of the most active agents available in the treatment of gynecologic cancer. The body of research on taxanes continues to expand especially with regard to the use of taxanes in alternative formulations and in combination with newer treatments or routes of treatment. This review focuses on the development of taxanes as an effective therapy in the treatment of gynecologic cancers and data currently available in the literature regarding their efficacy. Future directions of taxane-based chemotherapy with regards to ovarian, uterine, and cervical cancers are also addressed. There is little doubt that taxane-based chemotherapy will remain an integral part of the treatment of gynecologic cancer for the foreseeable future.

HER2/neu in Endometrial Cancer: A Promising Therapeutic Target With Diagnostic Challenges

CONTEXT

In the era of targeted cancer therapy, there is growing interest in developing novel therapeutic strategies against endometrial carcinoma, especially its most biologically aggressive variant, serous adenocarcinoma. Several publications have demonstrated that a significant proportion of uterine serous carcinomas show HER2 overexpression and/or amplification, suggesting that HER2 may be a promising therapeutic target. Case reports have already shown clinical response to trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 antibody against HER2, and patients are currently being enrolled in a multi-institutional prospective randomized trial to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of trastuzumab.

OBJECTIVE

To review current data on HER2 testing and targeted therapy against HER2/neu in endometrial carcinoma.

DATA SOURCES

Review of the literature and personal experience of the authors.

CONCLUSIONS

Parallel to the clinical studies, there is a need to develop standardized criteria for HER2 testing in endometrial carcinoma that reflect the unique biological and pathogenetic features of these tumors and correlate with clinical response to therapy. This article presents a comprehensive review of the current state of HER2-based therapy and HER2 testing in endometrial carcinoma.

Adjuvant sequential chemoradiation therapy in high-risk endometrial cancer: results of a prospective, multicenter phase-II study of the NOGGO (North-Eastern German Society of Gynaecological Oncology)

PURPOSE

The management of high-risk endometrial cancer (HREC) remains controversial. We conducted a prospective multicenter phase-II clinical trial to evaluate an adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) with sequential radiotherapy (RT) in patients with HREC.

METHODS

Patients with HREC from 8 institutions in Germany were enrolled. After surgery, patients received four cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m² (P) and carboplatin AUC5 (C) (d1, q21d) and subsequent external pelvic radiation therapy (1.8 Gy/d, d1-5) at a total dose of 45 Gy with vaginal brachytherapy (3 × 5 Gy). Quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Primary endpoints were tolerability, toxicity and QoL. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were enrolled from 2004 through 2008. Median follow-up was 24 months (range 3-24 months). All patients received 4 cycles of P and C and completed RT. Overall, grade 3/4 haematological toxicity was 25.6 %. Three cycles were delayed because of leukopenia. Grade 3/4 non-haematologic toxicities were rare (≤3 %). No overall change in QoL occurred during treatment. Two-year median PFS and OS rates were both 75.8 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant combination CT with P + C and sequential RT is well tolerated and a feasible regimen in patients with HREC. Subsequent phase-III trials are warranted.

Contemporary clinical management of endometrial cancer

Although the contemporary management of endometrial cancer is straightforward in many ways, novel data has emerged over the past decade that has altered the clinical standards of care while generating new controversies that will require further investigation. Fortunately most cases are diagnosed at early stages, but high-risk histologies and poorly differentiated tumors have high metastatic potential with a significantly worse prognosis. Initial management typically requires surgery, but the role and extent of lymphadenectomy are debated especially with well-differentiated tumors. With the changes in surgical staging, prognosis correlates more closely with stage, and the importance of cytology has been questioned and is under evaluation. The roles of radiation in intermediate-risk patients and chemotherapy in high-risk patients are emerging. The therapeutic index of brachytherapy needs to be considered, and the best sequencing of combined modalities needs to balance efficacy and toxicities. Additionally novel targeted therapies show promise, and further studies are needed to determine the appropriate use of these new agents. Management of endometrial cancer will continue to evolve as clinical trials continue to answer unsolved clinical questions.

Tubulin-β-III overexpression by uterine serous carcinomas is a marker for poor overall survival after platinum/taxane chemotherapy and sensitivity to epothilones

BACKGROUND

Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is a subtype of endometrial cancer associated with chemoresistance and poor outcome. Overexpression of tubulin-β-III and p-glycoprotein has been linked to paclitaxel resistance in many cancers but has been undercharacterized among USCs. Epothilones have demonstrated activity in certain paclitaxel-resistant malignancies. In this study, relationships are clarified, in USCs relative to ovarian serous carcinomas (OSCs), between tubulin-β-III and p-glycoprotein expression, clinical outcome, and in vitro chemoresponsiveness to epothilone B, ixabepilone, and paclitaxel.

METHODS

Tubulin-β-III and p-glycoprotein were quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction in 48 fresh-frozen tissue samples and 13 cell lines. Copy number was correlated with immunohistochemistry and overall survival. Median inhibitory concentration (IC50 ) was determined using viability and metabolic assays. Impact of tubulin-β-III knockdown on IC50 was assessed with small interfering RNAs.

RESULTS

USC overexpressed tubulin-β-III but not p-glycoprotein relative to OSC in both fresh-frozen tissues (552.9 ± 106.7 versus 202.0 ± 43.99, P = .01) and cell lines (1701.0 ± 376.4 versus 645.1 ± 157.9, P = .02). Tubulin-β-III immunohistochemistry reflected quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction copy number and overexpression stratified patients by overall survival (copy number ≤ 400: 615 days; copy number > 400: 165 days, P = .049); p-glycoprotein did not predict clinical outcome. USCs remained exquisitely sensitive to patupilone in vitro despite tubulin-β-III overexpression (IC50,USC 0.245 ± 0.11 nM versus IC50,OSC 1.01 ± 0.13 nM, P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

Tubulin-β-III overexpression in USCs discriminates poor prognosis, serves as a marker for sensitivity to epothilones, and may contribute to paclitaxel resistance. Immunohistochemistry reliably identifies tumors with overexpression of tubulin-β-III, and a subset of individuals likely to respond to patupilone and ixabepilone. Epothilones warrant clinical investigation for treatment of USCs.

Uterine papillary serous cancer: a review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) represents a distinct subtype of endometrial cancer. UPSC is less common than endometrioid carcinoma (ECC) but accounts for a disproportionate number of uterine cancer related deaths. This article critically reviews the literature pertinent to the pathology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, and outcome of patients with UPSC.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched for all research articles published in English between January 1, 1967-January 1, 2012 which reported on patients diagnosed with UPSC. Given the rarity of this tumor, studies were not limited by design or number of reported patients.

RESULTS

UPSC represents a histologically aggressive subtype of endometrial cancer. It commonly presents with extra uterine disease involvement which can be identified by comprehensive surgical staging. Optimal cytoreduction and systemic platinum/taxane-based adjuvant therapy appear to confer a survival advantage.

CONCLUSIONS

UPSC is a biologically distinct entity, different from ECC. Future studies should explore the role of targeted therapies in the management of UPSC.

Adjuvant Pelvic Radiotherapy vs. Sequential Chemoradiotherapy for High-Risk Stage I-II Endometrial Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To explore if the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin to radiotherapy confers an advantage for overall survival (OAS), and progression free survival (PFS); to assess the incidence of relapses over standard pelvic radiotherapy; and to evaluate the related toxicity in high-risk stage I-II endometrial carcinoma.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed to identify high-risk stage I-II endometrial carcinoma cases treated in the Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine department between 2002 and 2008 with adjuvant radiotherapy alone (arm I) (57 patients) or with sequential carboplatin (AUC5-6) and paclitaxel (135-175 mg/m(2)) with radiotherapy (arm II) (51 patients). Radiotherapy was performed through the four-field box technique at doses of 45-50 Gy (1.8 Gy/day × 5 days/week).

RESULTS

The toxicity was manageable and predominantly hematologic with a grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 9.8% and 6% of the patients in arm I and arm II, respectively, without febrile neutropenia. All patients experienced hair loss. Chemoradiotherapy arm was associated with a lower incidence rate of relapse (9.8% vs. 22.7%). After a median follow-up period of 48 months, the 5-year OAS and PFS rates for chemoradiotherapy-treated patients were significantly more favorable than those who did not receive chemotherapy (P=0.02 and 0.03, respectively). In arm I, the OAS and PFS rates were 73.7% and 66.7% compared with those in arm II, whose rates were 90.2% and 84.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemoradiation with paclitaxel and carboplatin improved the survival rates and decreased the recurrence rates in patients with high-risk stage I-II endometrial carcinoma. Chemotherapy was associated with an acceptable rate of toxicity. However, a prospective study with a larger number of patients is needed to define a standard adjuvant treatment for high-risk stage I-II endometrial carcinoma.

Contemporary management of endometrial cancer

The treatment of endometrial cancer has changed substantially in the past decade with the introduction of a new staging system and surgical approaches accompanied by novel adjuvant therapies. Primary surgical treatment is the mainstay of therapy but the effectiveness and extent of lymphadenectomy has been challenged, and its acceptance as a routine procedure varies by country. The role of radiation has evolved and chemotherapy has been incorporated, either alone or combined with radiation, to treat the many patients in whom cancer recurs because of a tumour outside the originally radiated pelvic and lower abdominal area. Use of traditional adjuvant chemotherapeutics has been challenged in clinical trials of new agents with improved side-effect profiles. Novel agents and targeted therapies are being investigated. Research into genetic susceptibility to endometrial cancer and the potential genetic aberrations that might translate into therapeutic interventions continues to increase. Substantial global variability in the treatment of endometrial cancer has led to examination of long-accepted norms, which has resulted in rapidly changing standards. International cooperation in clinical trials will hasten progress in treatment of this ubiquitous cancer.

[Endometrial cancer: place for adjuvant chemotherapy]

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological cancer in western countries. Radiotherapy remains the mainstay of postoperative management, but accumulating data show that adjuvant chemotherapy may display promising results after surgery. Characteristic features of the patients and disease, type of treatment including modality of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy are different from studies reported. The results from these trials are inconsistent but certain groups of patients with high-risk features could have advantage to adjuvant chemotherapy. The indication of adjuvant chemotherapy must be discussed in this situation taking into account the patient's profile with potential comorbidities and risk of toxicities.

Clear cell cancer of the uterine corpus: the association of clinicopathologic parameters and treatment on disease progression

This paper presents a single-institution experience regarding the clinicopathologic features and treatment strategies used in uterine clear cell cancer (UCC), a rare, aggressive histologic subtype of uterine cancer with poor prognosis and discusses parameters associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients (n = 80) diagnosed with UCC and treated between 1994 and 2009 at a single academic institution. Data on demographics, FIGO stage, treatment regimens, and recurrences were collected. Patients with early-stage UCC had an excellent survival regardless of adjuvant therapy. Advanced-stage patients had a worse survival. Vaginal apex brachytherapy was associated with an increased OS (P = 0.02) but not PFS (P = 0.10). The use of platinum-based chemotherapy in combination with vaginal apex brachytherapy did not significantly improve survival. Innovative therapies still need to be identified for this uncommon uterine cancer.

Controversies in the adjuvant therapy of endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer is the most common malignancy of the female genital tract. Surgical treatment includes hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and an appropriate staging procedure. Relapse of endometrial cancer may occur in patients with high risk factors, such as old age, grade 3 cancer, deep myometrial invasion, and papillary serous and clear cell types. In recent years, several randomized trials reported the results of adjuvant therapy for patients with high risk factors. Nonetheless, some controversies still exist. This paper presents and discusses the results of important randomized trials of adjuvant therapy for endometrial cancer with risk factors.

Recurrent endometrial carcinoma: prognosis for patients with recurrence within 6 to 12 months is worse relative to those relapsing at 12 months or later

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated association of prognosis of endometrial carcinoma patients and treatment-free intervals (TFIs).

STUDY DESIGN

We compared the effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy performed for patients with TFIs of 6-12 months and 12 or more months following a first-line chemotherapy based on taxane (paclitaxel) and carboplatin, with or without the anthracycline (TC).

RESULTS

Progression-free and overall survivals were significantly shorter in patients with TFIs of 6-12 months than those with TFIs of 12 or more months. Among the patients who received similar second-line chemotherapy, response rates of 15 patients with TFIs of 12 or more months and 7 patients with TFIs of 6-12 months were 67% and 43%, respectively. Progression-free survival was significantly worse in those with TFIs of 6-12 months (median, 7 months) than those with TFIs of 12 or more months (median, 12 months).

CONCLUSION

Our small retrospective analysis suggests that recurrent endometrial carcinomas with TFIs of 6-12 months can be regarded as being partially sensitive to TC-based chemotherapy.

Should all patients with serous and clear cell endometrial carcinoma receive adjuvant chemotherapy?

Uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) and uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCCC) represent two rare subtypes that have an increased risk of recurrence and worse overall survival compared with the more common endometrioid endometrial cancers. Meaningful data in the form of prospective randomized trials is lacking for both advanced and early-stage UPSC and UCCC. Data extrapolated from prospective trials in advanced endometrioid endometrial cancer and retrospective trials on early-stage UPSC suggest that adjuvant platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy may provide a survival benefit for these patients. Future trials specifically examining UPSC and UCCC are needed to elucidate the optimal treatment regimen for these patients. Given the current data, the option of chemotherapy should be considered in treatment-planning discussions for all patients with UPSC and UCCC.

A phase II trial of carboplatin and docetaxel followed by radiotherapy given in a "Sandwich" method for stage III, IV, and recurrent endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine feasibility and efficacy of administering docetaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy followed by pelvic radiotherapy and then consolidation chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Patients with surgically staged III-IV (excluding IIIA from positive cytology alone) endometrial cancer or biopsy confirmed recurrent disease were eligible. Treatment consisted of 3 cycles of docetaxel (75 mg/m²) and carboplatin (AUC 6) on a q21 day schedule followed by involved field irradiation (45 Gy)± brachytherapy and three additional cycles of docetaxel and carboplatin. Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods estimated overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Forty-two patients enrolled, 7 did not complete therapy. 95% (39/41) had primary disease. Median age=58 years (range: 21-81 years). 78% (32/41)=endometrioid histology. Stages=10 IIIA, 21 IIIC, 1 IVA, 7 IVB, (recurrent=1 IC, 1 IIA). There were 23 non-hematologic and 14 grade 3 and 16 grade 4 hematologic toxicities. Seven patients died following treatment with a median follow-up of 28 months (range: 7-70 months). KM estimates and 95% confidence intervals for OS at 1 year were 95% (82-99%), at 3 years 90% (75-96%), and at 5 years 71% (45-86%). Of the 39 with primary disease, 11 progressed or died within 5 years of study enrollment. KM estimates and 95% confidence intervals for PFS at 1 year were 87% (72-94%), at 3 years 71% (51-83%), and at 5 years 64% (42-80%).

CONCLUSIONS

"Sandwiching" radiation between chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer merits further development based on the reported PFS and OS.

A feasibility study of carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel combination chemotherapy in endometrial cancer: a Kansai Clinical Oncology Group study (KCOG0015 trial)

OBJECTIVES

The optimal chemotherapy regimen for women with endometrial cancer has not been established. We assessed the feasibility, toxicity and clinical efficacy of combination triweekly carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel in women with endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Eligible patients had histologically confirmed primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (Group A), or had localized high-risk features (Group B). All were treated with paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8 and 15) and carboplatin AUC 5 (day 1) each 21-day cycle. A minimum of 3 cycles was planned; if 75% or more of patients were able to receive at least 3 cycles with acceptable toxicity, the regimen was declared "feasible."

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled and administered 163 cycles of therapy; 38 (95%) were chemo-naive. No patients received radiation previously. Group A (measurable disease) contained 15 patients (5 with recurrent disease, 7 receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, and 3 treated adjuvantly following suboptimal cytoreduction). Group B (non-measurable disease) contained 25 patients (primary stage I:10, II:5, III:8, IV:1 and relapse 1). Hematological toxicities(G3/G4) were neutropenia (31%/33%) and thrombocytopenia (6%/0%). Reversible G3 hypersensitivity (5%) and G2 cardiotoxicity (3%) was uncommon. Thirty-one patients (78%) completed ≥3 cycles (median 4, range: 1-9). Thirteen of 15 (87%) measurable patients responded (3CR, 10PR). Eighty-seven percent of measurable patients were not progressive at 6 months. In Group A, QOL scores were significantly improved after 3 cycles of chemotherapy (p=0.037), and at the completion of chemotherapy (p=0.045). QOL scores in Group B did not change during therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This combination chemotherapy is feasible and effective for endometrial cancer patients.

Controversies in the management of endometrial carcinoma

Endometrial carcinoma is the most common type of female genital tract malignancy. Although endometrial carcinoma is a low grade curable malignancy, the condition of the disease can range from excellent prognosis with high curability to aggressive disease with poor outcome. During the last 10 years many researches have provided some new valuable data of optimal treatments for endometrial carcinoma. Progression in diagnostic imaging, radiation delivery systems, and systemic therapies potentially can improve outcomes while minimizing morbidity. Firstly, total hysterectomy and bilateral salphingo-oophorectomy is the primary operative procedure. Pelvic lymhadenectomy is performed in most centers on therapeutic and prognostic grounds and to individualize adjuvant treatment. Women with endometrial carcinoma can be readily segregated intraoperatively into “low-risk” and “high-risk” groups to better identify those women who will most likely benefit from thorough lymphadenectomy. Secondly, adjuvant therapies have been proposed for women with endometrial carcinoma postoperatively. Postoperative irradiation is used to reduce pelvic and vaginal recurrences in high risk cases. Chemotherapy is emerging as an important treatment modality in advanced endometrial carcinoma. Meanwhile the availability of new hormonal and biological agents presents new opportunities for therapy.

Second-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma previously treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin, with or without epirubicin

PURPOSE

A combined chemotherapy of taxane and platinum, with or without anthracycline, has been used as a standard first-line regimen. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy for treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma previously treated with a combined chemotherapy of taxane and platinum, with or without anthracycline.

METHODS

During the 2000-2008 study period, 723 patients were diagnosed with endometrial cancer at the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Osaka University and the Osaka Rosai Hospitals, Osaka, Japan. The subset of these cases that eventually required treatment by second-line chemotherapy was retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Response rate to second-line chemotherapy was 25%. Treatment-free interval (TFI) of ≥ or <6 months was demonstrated to be significantly associated with the response to second-line chemotherapy (P = 0.0026), progression-free survival (P = 0.0003) and overall survival (P = 0.025). The second-line chemotherapy similar to the first-line regimen was ineffective in all the 7 cases (100%) whose TFI was shorter than 6 months. Multivariate analysis showed that TFI was the most significantly important factor predicting the effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy (the adjusted hazard ratio of TFI on PFS and OS: 3.482, 95% CI, 1.641-7.388, P = 0.0012, and 2.341, 95% CI, 1.034-5.301, P = 0.042, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our present study provides, for the first time, evidence that the majority of refractory or recurrent diseases, if they occur within 6 months of a first-line chemotherapy using taxane and platinum with or without anthracycline, are non-responsive to the current regimens of second-line chemotherapy.

Endometrial cancer: what is new in adjuvant and molecularly targeted therapy?

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological cancer in western countries. Radiotherapy remains the mainstay of postoperative management, but accumulating data show that adjuvant chemotherapy may display promising results after staging surgery. The prognosis of patients with metastatic disease remains disappointing with only one-year survival. Progestins represent an effective option, especially for those patients with low-grade estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive disease. Chemotherapy using the combination of paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and cisplatin is beneficial for patients with advanced or metastatic disease after staging surgery and potentially for patients with early-stage disease and high-risk factors. Toxicity is a point in question; however, the combination of paclitaxel with carboplatin may diminish these concerns. In women with multiple medical comorbidities, single-agent chemotherapy may be better tolerated with acceptable results. Our increased knowledge of the molecular aspects of endometrial cancer biology has paved the way for clinical research to develop novel targeted antineoplastic agents (everolimus, temsirolimus, gefitinib, erlotinib, cetuximab, trastuzumab, bevacizumab, sorafenib) as more effective and less toxic options. Continued investigation into the molecular pathways of endometrial cancer development and progression will increase our knowledge of this disease leading to the discovery of novel, superior agents.

Current challenges in clinical management of endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer remains a management challenge. Improved understanding of the mechanisms of carcinogenesis may enable better understanding of biologic behavior and guide therapy. Improvements in diagnostic imaging, radiation delivery systems, and systemic therapies potentially can improve outcomes while minimizing morbidity. Novel strategies for screening and prevention also hold promise for reducing incidence and mortality of this disease.

Adjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy interposed with involved field radiation for advanced endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate recurrence and survival associated with adjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy interposed with involved field radiation for advanced endometrial cancer.

METHOD

This is a prospective cohort study of women with Stage III and IV endometrial cancer treated at a single institution between April 2002 and July 2006. Adjuvant therapy consisted of 4 cycles of intravenous paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (350 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks, followed by external beam radiotherapy (RT) to the pelvis (45 Gy), then another 2 cycles of chemotherapy. Para-aortic RT and/or HDR vault brachytherapy were added at the discretion of the treating physician. Toxicity of this protocol was previously reported. Primary endpoints for this study were disease-free and overall survival rates.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients with a median age of 64 years (46-83 years) were evaluated. The majority had Stage IIIC disease (63%), and the most common histology was serous carcinoma (49%). Six cycles of combination chemotherapy were completed in 81%, and all patients completed pelvic RT. Median follow-up was 30 months (9-71 months). Twenty-one patients (49%) recurred at a median of 17 months (7-62 months). There were only 3 local recurrences, including 2 in the pelvis and 1 in the vagina/vulva. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 50 months and median overall survival (OS) has not been reached. Three year DFS and OS rates were 53% and 68%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy interposed with involved field radiation is associated with a low rate of local recurrence and favorable survival for advanced endometrial cancer.

Outcomes in surgical stage I uterine papillary serous carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The optimal management of patients with stage I uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) is unclear. We sought to determine whether outcomes of women with surgical stage I UPSC differ with and without adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective multi-institution analysis of women with stage I UPSC surgically staged from 1976 to 2006.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

comprehensive staging procedure including hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, selective pelvic/aortic lymphadenectomy, peritoneal cytology. Recurrence and survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of 83 women with stage I UPSC, 36 (43%) received adjuvant therapies (23% radiotherapy, 3% chemotherapy, 15% chemotherapy and radiotherapy, 2% progestins). Three-year overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 80% and 68%, respectively. Three-year OS and PFS by adjuvant treatment were observation (N=47) 86% and 78%, radiotherapy (N=17) 63% and 44%, chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy (N=17) 92% and 76%, respectively. Of the 18 recurrences, 9 (50%) included an extrapelvic component. Local recurrence was 2/30 (7%) following adjuvant radiotherapy and 7/53 (13%) without radiotherapy (p=0.48). Recurrence was higher in stage IB/IC (15/51, 29%) compared to stage IA (3/32, 9%). There has been one recurrence (5%) among the 22 women observed with stage IA disease.

CONCLUSION

In this largest reported series of women with surgical stage I UPSC, the high recurrence (29%) among patients with stage IB/IC disease highlights the need for clinical trials to test new therapeutic approaches. Surgically staged patients with IA disease had good prognosis. These data suggest that radiotherapy alone is not effective, that systemic therapy is needed, and that observation could be considered in patients with stage IA disease.