Evaluation of deletions in 7q11.2 and 8p12–p21 as prognostic indicators of tumour development following molar pregnancy

NEFL is overexpressed and it modulates invasion and migration in neuroendocrine-like PC3-ML2 prostate cancer cells

Prostate cancer clinical outcomes are varied, from non-aggressive asymptomatic to lethal aggressive neuroendocrine forms which represent a critical challenge in the management of the disease. The neurofilament light ( NEFL ) is proposed to be a tumor suppressor gene. Studies have shown that expression of the gene is decreased in various cancers. We have used quantitative RT-PCR, immunoblotting, methylation specific PCR, siRNA knockdown followed by migration/invasion assays to determine associations between NEFL expression and disease phenotype in a panel of prostate cells. We demonstrate that NEFL is overexpressed and it modulates invasion and migration in PC3-ML2 prostate cancers cells which have an aggressive neuroendocrine-like phenotype.

Genetics of gestational trophoblastic disease

The abnormal pregnancies complete and partial hydatidiform mole are genetically unusual, being associated with two copies of the paternal genome. Typical complete hydatidiform moles (CHMs) are diploid and androgenetic, while partial hydatidiform moles (PHMs) are diandric triploids. While diagnosis can usually be made on the basis of morphology, ancillary techniques that exploit their unusual genetic origin can be used to facilitate diagnosis. Genotyping and p57 immunostaining are now routinely used in the differential diagnosis of complete and partial hydatidiform moles, for investigating unusual mosaic or chimeric products of conception with a molar component and identifying the rare diploid, biparental HMs associated with an inherited predisposition to molar pregnancies. Genotyping also plays an important role in the differential diagnosis of gestational and non-gestational trophoblastic tumours and identification of the causative pregnancy where tumours are gestational. Recent developments include the use of cell-free DNA for non-invasive diagnosis of these conditions.

Linear regression of postevacuation serum human chorionic gonadotropin concentrations predicts postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

OBJECTIVE

Currently, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) follow-up after evacuation of hydatidiform moles is essential to identify patients requiring chemotherapeutic treatment for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). We propose a model based on linear regression of postevacuation serum hCG concentrations for the prediction of GTN.

METHODS

One hundred thirteen patients with at least 3 serum samples from days 7 to 28 after evacuation were selected from the Dutch Central Registry for Hydatidiform Moles (1994-2009). The slopes of the linear regression lines of the first 3 log-transformed serum hCG and free β-hCG values were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to calculate areas under curve (AUCs).

RESULTS

The slope of the hCG regression line showed an AUC of 0.906 (95% confidence interval, 0.845-0.967). Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia could be predicted in 52% of patients with GTN at 97.5% specificity (cutoff, -0.020). Twenty-one percent of patients with GTN could be predicted before diagnosis according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2000 criteria. The slope of free β-hCG showed an AUC of 0.844 (95% confidence interval, 0.752-0.935), 69% sensitivity at 97.5% specificity, and 38% of patients with GTN could be predicted before diagnosis according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The slope of the linear regression line of hCG proved to be a good test to discriminate between patients who will achieve spontaneous disease remission and patients developing GTN. The slope of free β-hCG seems to be a better predictor for GTN than the slope of hCG. Although this model needs further validation for different assays, it seems a promising way to predict the more aggressive cases of GTN.

[Cytogenomic studies of hydatiform moles and gestational choriocarcinoma]

The complete hydatidiform mole (CHM), a gestational trophoblastic disease, is usually caused by the development of an androgenic egg whose genome is exclusively paternal. Due to parental imprinting, only trophoblasts develop in the absence of a fetus. CHM are diploid and no abnormal karyotype is observed. It is 46,XX in most cases and less frequently 46,XY. The major complication of this disease is gestational choriocarcinoma, a metastasizing tumor and a true allografted malignancy. This complication is infrequent in developed countries, but is more common in the developing countries and is then worsened by delayed care. The malignancies are often accompanied by acquired, possibly etiological genomic abnormalities. We investigated the presence of recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities in CHM and post-molar choriocarcinoma using metaphasic CGH (mCGH) and high-resolution 244K aCGH techniques. The 10 CHM studied by mCGH showed no chromosomal gains or losses. For post-molar choriocarcinoma, 11 tumors, whose diagnosis was verified by histopathology, were investigated by aCGH. Their androgenic nature and the absence of tumor DNA contamination by maternal DNA were verified by the analysis of microsatellite markers. Three choriocarcinoma cell lines (BeWo, JAR and JEG) were also analyzed by aCGH. The results allowed us to observe some chromosomal rearrangements in primary tumors, and more in the cell lines. Chromosomal abnormalities were confirmed by FISH and functional effect by immunohistochemical analysis of gene expression. Forty minimum critical regions (MCR) were defined on chromosomes. Candidate genes implicated in choriocarcinoma oncogenesis were selected. The presence in the MCR of many miRNA clusters whose expression is modulated by parental imprinting has been observed, for example in 14q32 or in 19q13.4. This suggests that, in gestational choriocarcinoma, the consequences of gene abnormalities directly linked to acquired chromosomal abnormalities are superimposed upon those of imprinted genes altered at fertilization.

NEFL mRNA expression level is a prognostic factor for early-stage breast cancer patients

Neurofilament, light polypeptide (NEFL) was demonstrated to be ectopically expressed in breast cancer tissues and decreased in lymph node metastases compared to the paired primary breast cancers in our previous study. Moreover, in several studies, NEFL was regarded as a tumor suppressor gene, and its loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was related to carcinogenesis and metastasis in several types of cancer. To explore the role of NEFL in the progression of breast cancer and to evaluate its clinical significance, we detected the NEFL mRNA level in normal breast tissues, primary breast cancer samples and lymph node metastases, and then analyzed the association between the NEFL expression level and several clinicopathological parameters and disease-free survival (DFS). NEFL mRNA was found to be expressed in 92.3% of breast malignancies and down-regulated in lymph node metastases compared to the paired primary tumors. NEFL mRNA level was lower in primary breast cancers with positive lymph nodes than in cancers with negative lymph nodes. Moreover, a low expression level of NEFL mRNA indicated a poor five-year DFS for early-stage breast cancer patients. Thus, NEFL mRNA is ectopically expressed in breast malignancies and could be a potential prognostic factor for early-stage breast cancer patients.

Genome-wide high-resolution aCGH analysis of gestational choriocarcinomas

Eleven samples of DNA from choriocarcinomas were studied by high resolution CGH-array 244 K. They were studied after histopathological confirmation of the diagnosis, of the androgenic etiology and after a microsatellite marker analysis confirming the absence of contamination of tumor DNA from maternal DNA. Three cell lines, BeWo, JAR, JEG were also studied by this high resolution pangenomic technique. According to aCGH analysis, the de novo choriocarcinomas exhibited simple chromosomal rearrangements or normal profiles. The cell lines showed various and complex chromosomal aberrations. 23 Minimal Critical Regions were defined that allowed us to list the genes that were potentially implicated. Among them, unusually high numbers of microRNA clusters and imprinted genes were observed.

Genetics of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: an update for the clinician

Gestational trophoblastic disease is a spectrum of disorders ranging from premalignant hydatidiform moles through to malignant invasive moles, choriocarcinoma and rare placental site trophoblastic tumor. The latter are often collectively referred to as gestational trophoblastic tumors or neoplasia (GTN). Although most women can expect to be cured of their disease, many interesting questions arise in the management of gestational trophoblastic disease. Current issues pertain to diagnosis of GTN, predicting progression from hydatidiform moles to GTN and the emergence of drug resistance in GTN. Our understanding of the genetics of GTN has helped us answer some of these questions but many remain unresolved. This article seeks to address recent advances in the genetics of GTN in relation to diagnosis, etiology, prognosis and treatment.

Persistence and malignant sequelae of gestational trophoblastic disease: Clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment and outcome

BACKGROUND

The major concern in gestational trophoblastic disease is management of persistent disease and malignant sequelae. However, prediction of response to treatment is difficult and methods used controversial.

AIM AND METHODS

To evaluate the usefulness of clinical presentation, methods of diagnosis and categorisation of risk in determining clinical outcomes, by analysis of a database of 705 registered patients collected over 30 years.

RESULTS

From the database, there were 97 patients who developed persistent disease and malignant sequelae on the basis of defined criteria - 80.4% had molar pregnancy and 19.6% non-molar pregnancy. Vaginal bleeding was not a common presentation; 59.8% had no clinical symptoms. According to protocol, monitoring by serial human chorion gonadotrophin (HCG) levels followed by imaging screen was used in all patients; histology was also available in 41.2% from hysterectomy and curettage specimens. There were 16 of 76 patients with persisting disease who had metastases (21.1%), and 2 of 20 patients with choriocarcinoma who had an antecedent molar pregnancy (10.0%). Based on five risk factors, 25 patients were categorised as 'high risk' and assigned to receive multi-drug chemotherapy. There were two deaths (2.1% for all malignant sequelae); both were from molar pregnancies. One patient failed to respond and the other suffered a complication of intensive chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Serial HCG levels remain the best monitor to determine therapeutic response. Categorisation of 'high risk' by five factors is useful in treatment. Albeit a small series, clinical outcome is favourable with a five-year survival of 89.7%.

Pathogenesis of choriocarcinoma: clinical, genetic and stem cell perspectives

Choriocarcinoma is a unique malignant neoplasm composed of mononuclear cytotrophoblasts and multinucleated syncytiotrophoblasts that produce human chorionic gonadotrophin. Choriocarcinoma can occur after a pregnancy, as a component of germ cell tumors, or in association with a poorly differentiated somatic carcinoma, each with distinct clinical features. Cytogenetic and molecular studies, predominantly on gestational choriocarcinoma, revealed the impact of oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes and imprinting genes on its pathogenesis. The role of stem cells in various types of choriocarcinoma has been studied recently. This review will discuss how such knowledge can enhance our understanding of the pathogenesis of choriocarcinoma, enable exploration of novel anti-choriocarcinoma targeted therapy and possibly improve our insight on embryological and placental development.

The impact of molecular genetic diagnosis on the management of women with hCG-producing malignancies

OBJECTIVES

The diagnosis of a gestational trophoblastic tumour (GTT) should be considered in all women presenting with a malignancy and an elevated human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) level. Whilst some non-gestational malignancies can also produce hCG, most non-gestational tumours can be distinguished from GTT on the basis of histopathological examination. However, some non-gestational tumours can exhibit trophoblastic differentiation and so make establishing the definitive diagnosis difficult. In these cases, molecular genetic investigation can establish the differential diagnosis between gestational and non-gestational tumours and facilitate optimal management. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the clinical value of distinguishing these two diagnoses by genetic analysis in patient care at a major GTT treatment centre.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 2005, fluorescent microsatellite genotyping was used to examine the genetic origin of 35 cases of metastatic hCG-producing tumours with trophoblastic differentiation, three cases of atypical uterine tumours, three cases of uterine choriocarcinoma with a very long interval and one atypical ovarian tumour.

RESULTS

Of the 42 cases examined, 24 were proved to be of gestational origin, 14 were non-gestational and in 4 cases genetic analysis was inconclusive. We illustrate the clinical value of this diagnostic technique by presenting five individual cases in which molecular genetic results helped determine the appropriate clinical management.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of the genetic origin of atypical hCG-producing tumours in women allows the optimisation of individual patient care and should be considered in the management of these unusual cases.

Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia management: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia represents the malignant end of the gestational trophoblastic disease spectrum. This review updates readers on developments in the management of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia over the past few years.

RECENT FINDINGS

Progress has been made in elucidating the genetic changes that give rise to gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. The importance of accurate human chorionic gonadotrophin monitoring and the types of human chorionic gonadotrophin produced in cancer are also topical. Fortunately, most patients are cured with chemotherapy, and the choice of treatment schedule according to low-risk and high-risk prognostic groups is relatively unchanged. Indeed, most patients with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia are treated with single agent chemotherapy, and those who have high-risk disease with combination chemotherapy using etoposide, methotrexate and actinomycin D, alternating with cyclophosphamide and oncovine. For resistant disease, new paclitaxel-containing regimens appear better tolerated than etoposide and cisplatin alternating weekly with etoposide, methotrexate and actinomycin D.

SUMMARY

Prognosis in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia is now excellent following treatment. Virtually all patients with low-risk disease are cured, and survival is now 86% in high-risk patients. Optimization of treatment strategies for those who develop drug resistance remains a key challenge.

Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia—pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets

Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia comprises a unique group of human neoplastic diseases that derive from fetal trophoblastic tissues and represent semiallografts in patients. This group is composed of choriocarcinoma, placental-site trophoblastic tumour, and epithelioid trophoblastic tumour, and many forms are derived from the precursor lesions, hydatidiform moles. Although most patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia are cured by chemotherapy and tumour resection, some patients suffer from metastatic diseases that are refractory to conventional chemotherapy. Therefore, new therapeutic regimens are needed to reduce the toxic effects associated with current chemotherapy and to salvage the occasional non-operable patients with recurrent and chemoresistant disease. Until the fundamental biology of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia becomes more clearly understood, development of a new treatment will remain empirical. This review will briefly summarise the recent advances in understanding the molecular aetiology of this group of diseases and highlight the molecules that can be potentially used for therapeutic targets to treat metastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.