1
|
Liu Y, Geng F, Zhang H, Xue J, Chu R. The impact of lymphadenectomy on ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22:37. [PMID: 38287354 PMCID: PMC10823682 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03324-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) shares treatment strategies with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Due to OCCC's rarity, there's a lack of prospective studies on its surgery, resulting in heterogeneous and limited existing data. This study aims to clarify the prognostic significance of lymphadenectomy in OCCC patients. METHODS We systematically searched Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar until July 2023 for studies investigating lymphadenectomy's effects on OCCC patients. We calculated pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). This study is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021270460). RESULTS Among 444 screened articles, seven studies (2883 women) met inclusion criteria. Our analysis revealed that lymphadenectomy significantly improved disease-specific survival (DSS) (HR = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.60-0.95, P = 0.02) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 0.58, 95%CI = 0.34-0.99, P = 0.05). However, it did not significantly affect overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.60-1.06, P = 0.12) or progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.95, 95%CI = 0.64-1.42, P = 0.79). Notably, some earlier studies reported no survival benefit, warranting cautious interpretation. CONCLUSION Lymphadenectomy does not significantly enhance OS and PFS for OCCC but does improve DFS and DSS. Tailoring treatment to individual patient profiles is imperative for optimal outcomes. Precise preoperative or intraoperative lymph node metastasis detection is essential for identifying candidates benefiting from lymphadenectomy. Collaborative international efforts and an OCCC database are pivotal for refining future treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Feng Geng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Hongyang Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Jing Xue
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Ran Chu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heinze K, Cairns ES, Thornton S, Harris B, Milne K, Grube M, Meyer C, Karnezis AN, Fereday S, Garsed DW, Leung SC, Chiu DS, Moubarak M, Harter P, Heitz F, McAlpine JN, DeFazio A, Bowtell DD, Goode EL, Pike M, Ramus SJ, Pearce CL, Staebler A, Köbel M, Kommoss S, Talhouk A, Nelson BH, Anglesio MS. The Prognostic Effect of Immune Cell Infiltration Depends on Molecular Subtype in Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:3471-3483. [PMID: 37339172 PMCID: PMC10472107 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (ENOC) is the second most-common type of ovarian carcinoma, comprising 10%-20% of cases. Recently, the study of ENOC has benefitted from comparisons to endometrial carcinomas including defining ENOC with four prognostic molecular subtypes. Each subtype suggests differential mechanisms of progression, although tumor-initiating events remain elusive. There is evidence that the ovarian microenvironment may be critical to early lesion establishment and progression. However, while immune infiltrates have been well studied in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, studies in ENOC are limited. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We report on 210 ENOC, with clinical follow-up and molecular subtype annotation. Using multiplex IHC and immunofluorescence, we examine the prevalence of T-cell lineage, B-cell lineage, macrophages, and populations with programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed death-ligand 1 across subtypes of ENOC. RESULTS Immune cell infiltrates in tumor epithelium and stroma showed higher densities in ENOC subtypes with known high mutation burden (POLEmut and MMRd). While molecular subtypes were prognostically significant, immune infiltrates were not (overall survival P > 0.2). Analysis by molecular subtype revealed that immune cell density was prognostically significant in only the no specific molecular profile (NSMP) subtype, where immune infiltrates lacking B cells (TILB minus) had inferior outcome (disease-specific survival: HR, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-14.7; P < 0.05). Similar to endometrial carcinomas, molecular subtype stratification was generally superior to immune response in predicting outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Subtype stratification is critical for better understanding of ENOC, in particular the distribution and prognostic significance of immune cell infiltrates. The role of B cells in the immune response within NSMP tumors warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolin Heinze
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Evan S. Cairns
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Shelby Thornton
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Molecular and Cellular Immunology Core (MCIC), Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, Canada
| | - Bronwyn Harris
- Molecular and Cellular Immunology Core (MCIC), Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, Canada
| | - Katy Milne
- Molecular and Cellular Immunology Core (MCIC), Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, Canada
| | - Marcel Grube
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Charlotte Meyer
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anthony N. Karnezis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
| | - Sian Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dale W. Garsed
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Samuel C.Y. Leung
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Derek S. Chiu
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Malak Moubarak
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | - Philipp Harter
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
| | - Florian Heitz
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Essen, Germany
- Department for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jessica N. McAlpine
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anna DeFazio
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David D.L. Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ellen L. Goode
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Malcolm Pike
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Susan J. Ramus
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Group (Consortium)
| | - C. Leigh Pearce
- Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Group (Consortium)
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Annette Staebler
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Aline Talhouk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Brad H. Nelson
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Molecular and Cellular Immunology Core (MCIC), Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, Canada
- Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Group (Consortium)
| | - Michael S. Anglesio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- OVCARE - British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Köbel M, Kang E, Weir A, Rambau PF, Lee C, Nelson GS, Ghatage P, Meagher NS, Riggan MJ, Alsop J, Anglesio MS, Beckmann MW, Bisinotto C, Boisen M, Boros J, Brand AH, Brooks‐Wilson A, Carney ME, Coulson P, Courtney‐Brooks M, Cushing‐Haugen KL, Cybulski C, Deen S, El‐Bahrawy MA, Elishaev E, Erber R, Fereday S, Fischer A, Gayther SA, Barquin‐Garcia A, Gentry‐Maharaj A, Gilks CB, Gronwald H, Grube M, Harnett PR, Harris HR, Hartkopf AD, Hartmann A, Hein A, Hendley J, Hernandez BY, Huang Y, Jakubowska A, Jimenez‐Linan M, Jones ME, Kennedy CJ, Kluz T, Koziak JM, Lesnock J, Lester J, Lubiński J, Longacre TA, Lycke M, Mateoiu C, McCauley BM, McGuire V, Ney B, Olawaiye A, Orsulic S, Osorio A, Paz‐Ares L, Ramón y Cajal T, Rothstein JH, Ruebner M, Schoemaker MJ, Shah M, Sharma R, Sherman ME, Shvetsov YB, Singh N, Steed H, Storr SJ, Talhouk A, Traficante N, Wang C, Whittemore AS, Widschwendter M, Wilkens LR, Winham SJ, Benitez J, Berchuck A, Bowtell DD, Candido dos Reis FJ, Campbell I, Cook LS, DeFazio A, Doherty JA, Fasching PA, Fortner RT, García MJ, Goodman MT, Goode EL, Gronwald J, Huntsman DG, Karlan BY, Kelemen LE, Kommoss S, Le ND, Martin SG, Menon U, Modugno F, Pharoah PDP, Schildkraut JM, Sieh W, Staebler A, Sundfeldt K, Swerdlow AJ, Ramus SJ, Brenton JD. p53 and ovarian carcinoma survival: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study. J Pathol Clin Res 2023; 9:208-222. [PMID: 36948887 PMCID: PMC10073933 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
Our objective was to test whether p53 expression status is associated with survival for women diagnosed with the most common ovarian carcinoma histotypes (high-grade serous carcinoma [HGSC], endometrioid carcinoma [EC], and clear cell carcinoma [CCC]) using a large multi-institutional cohort from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium. p53 expression was assessed on 6,678 cases represented on tissue microarrays from 25 participating OTTA study sites using a previously validated immunohistochemical (IHC) assay as a surrogate for the presence and functional effect of TP53 mutations. Three abnormal expression patterns (overexpression, complete absence, and cytoplasmic) and the normal (wild type) pattern were recorded. Survival analyses were performed by histotype. The frequency of abnormal p53 expression was 93.4% (4,630/4,957) in HGSC compared to 11.9% (116/973) in EC and 11.5% (86/748) in CCC. In HGSC, there were no differences in overall survival across the abnormal p53 expression patterns. However, in EC and CCC, abnormal p53 expression was associated with an increased risk of death for women diagnosed with EC in multivariate analysis compared to normal p53 as the reference (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-3.47, p = 0.0011) and with CCC (HR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.11-2.22, p = 0.012). Abnormal p53 was also associated with shorter overall survival in The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I/II EC and CCC. Our study provides further evidence that functional groups of TP53 mutations assessed by abnormal surrogate p53 IHC patterns are not associated with survival in HGSC. In contrast, we validate that abnormal p53 IHC is a strong independent prognostic marker for EC and demonstrate for the first time an independent prognostic association of abnormal p53 IHC with overall survival in patients with CCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of Calgary, Foothills Medical CenterCalgaryABCanada
| | - Eun‐Young Kang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of Calgary, Foothills Medical CenterCalgaryABCanada
| | - Ashley Weir
- School of Clinical MedicineUNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research CentreUniversity of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical ResearchParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Peter F Rambau
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of Calgary, Foothills Medical CenterCalgaryABCanada
- Pathology DepartmentCatholic University of Health and Allied Sciences‐BugandoMwanzaTanzania
| | - Cheng‐Han Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonABCanada
| | - Gregg S Nelson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Department of Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Nicola S Meagher
- School of Clinical MedicineUNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- The Daffodil CentreThe University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSWSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Marjorie J Riggan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic OncologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - Jennifer Alsop
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of OncologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Michael S Anglesio
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE)University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General HospitalVancouverBCCanada
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Christiani Bisinotto
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical SchoolUniversity of São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
| | - Michelle Boisen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Jessica Boros
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Alison H Brand
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | | | - Michael E Carney
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, John A. Burns School of MedicineUniversity of HawaiiHonoluluHIUSA
| | - Penny Coulson
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Madeleine Courtney‐Brooks
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Kara L Cushing‐Haugen
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleWAUSA
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Suha Deen
- Department of HistopathologyNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical CentreNottinghamUK
| | - Mona A El‐Bahrawy
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and ReproductionImperial College London, Hammersmith HospitalLondonUK
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of PathologyUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMN, Friedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Sian Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - AOCS Group
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Anna Fischer
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Simon A Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCAUSA
| | | | - Aleksandra Gentry‐Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials UnitInstitute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Helena Gronwald
- Department of Propaedeutics, Physical Diagnostics and Dental PhysiotherapyPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Marcel Grube
- Department of Women's HealthTuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Paul R Harnett
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer CentreWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Holly R Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleWAUSA
- Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWAUSA
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Women's HealthTuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity Hospital of UlmUlmGermany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMN, Friedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Joy Hendley
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Brenda Y Hernandez
- Cancer Epidemiology ProgramUniversity of Hawaii Cancer CenterHonoluluHIUSA
| | - Yajue Huang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic DiagnosticsPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | | | - Michael E Jones
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Catherine J Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Tomasz Kluz
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsInstitute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow UniversityRzeszówPoland
| | | | - Jaime Lesnock
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Jenny Lester
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - Teri A Longacre
- Department of PathologyStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCAUSA
| | - Maria Lycke
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyInstitute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | | | - Bryan M McCauley
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Valerie McGuire
- Department of Epidemiology and Population HealthStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCAUSA
| | - Britta Ney
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Alexander Olawaiye
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
| | - Sandra Orsulic
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Ana Osorio
- Genetics Service, Fundación Jiménez DíazMadridSpain
- Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER)Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIMadridSpain
| | - Luis Paz‐Ares
- H12O‐CNIO Lung Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO)MadridSpain
- Oncology DepartmentHospital Universitario 12 de OctubreMadridSpain
| | | | - Joseph H Rothstein
- Department of Genetics and Genomic SciencesIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of Population Health Science and PolicyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Matthias Ruebner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Minouk J Schoemaker
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Mitul Shah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of OncologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Raghwa Sharma
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Mark E Sherman
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo ClinicJacksonvilleFLUSA
| | - Yurii B Shvetsov
- Cancer Epidemiology ProgramUniversity of Hawaii Cancer CenterHonoluluHIUSA
| | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Helen Steed
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonABCanada
- Section of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, North Zone, Alberta Health ServicesEdmontonABCanada
| | - Sarah J Storr
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research CentreBiodiscovery Institute, University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - Aline Talhouk
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- British Columbia's Gynecological Cancer Research Team (OVCARE)University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, and Vancouver General HospitalVancouverBCCanada
| | - Nadia Traficante
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Chen Wang
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Alice S Whittemore
- Department of Epidemiology and Population HealthStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCAUSA
- Department of Biomedical Data ScienceStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCAUSA
| | | | - Lynne R Wilkens
- Cancer Epidemiology ProgramUniversity of Hawaii Cancer CenterHonoluluHIUSA
| | - Stacey J Winham
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Computational Biology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Javier Benitez
- Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER)Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIMadridSpain
- Human Genetics Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO)MadridSpain
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic OncologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - David D Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Francisco J Candido dos Reis
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical SchoolUniversity of São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
| | - Ian Campbell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Linda S Cook
- Epidemiology, School of Public HealthUniversity of ColoradoAuroraCOUSA
- Community Health Sciences, University of CalgaryCalgaryABCanada
| | - Anna DeFazio
- The Daffodil CentreThe University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSWSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Centre for Cancer ResearchThe Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyWestmead HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health SciencesUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUTUSA
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen‐EMNFriedrich‐Alexander University Erlangen‐Nuremberg, University Hospital ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Renée T Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of NorwayOsloNorway
| | - María J García
- Computational Oncology Group, Structural Biology Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO)MadridSpain
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Cedars‐Sinai Cancer, Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer CenterPomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecinPoland
| | - David G Huntsman
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research CentreVancouverBCCanada
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of California at Los AngelesLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Division of Acute Disease Epidemiology, South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlColumbiaSCUSA
| | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women's HealthTuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Nhu D Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer AgencyVancouverBCCanada
| | - Stewart G Martin
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research CentreBiodiscovery Institute, University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials UnitInstitute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghPAUSA
- Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Public HealthPittsburghPAUSA
- Women's Cancer Research CenterMagee‐Womens Research Institute and Hillman Cancer CenterPittsburghPAUSA
| | - Paul DP Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of OncologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterWest HollywoodCAUSA
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public HealthEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Department of Genetics and Genomic SciencesIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of Population Health Science and PolicyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Annette Staebler
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tuebingen University HospitalTuebingenGermany
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical ScienceSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Anthony J Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Division of Breast Cancer ResearchThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Susan J Ramus
- School of Clinical MedicineUNSW Medicine and Health, University of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research CentreUniversity of NSW SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - James D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Imterat M, Bizzarri N, Fruscio R, Perrone AM, Traut A, du Bois A, Rosati A, Ferrari D, De Iaco P, Ataseven B, Ergasti R, Volontè S, Tesei M, Heitz F, Perri MT, Concin N, Fanfani F, Scambia G, Fagotti A, Harter P. Impact of substage and histologic type in stage I ovarian carcinoma survival: a multicenter retrospective observational study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:42-49. [PMID: 36104079 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This international study aimed to investigate the impact of substage, histological type and other prognostic factors on long-term survival for stage I ovarian carcinoma. METHODS Our study was a retrospective multicenter cohort study that included patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I (IA-IC3) ovarian carcinoma treated at four European referral centers in Germany and Italy. Using Kaplan-Meier survival curves we compared overall and disease-free survival between the different stage I groups. RESULTS A total of 1115 patients were included. Of these, 48.4% (n=540) were in stage IA, 6.6% (n=73) stage IB, and 45% (n=502) stage IC, of the latter substage IC1, 54% (n=271), substage IC2, 31.5% (n=158), and substage IC3, 14.5% (n=73). Five-year overall and disease-free survival rates for the entire cohort were 94% and 86%, respectively, with no difference between stage IA and IB. However, there was a significantly better overall and disease-free survival for stage IA as compared with stage IC (p=0.007 and p<0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed incomplete/fertility-sparing staging (HR 1.95; 95% CI 1.27 to 2.99, and HR 3.54; 95% CI 1.83 to 6.86, respectively), and stage IC (HR 2.47; 95% CI 1.63 to 3.75) as independent risk factors for inferior disease-free survival, while low-grade endometrioid (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.72) and low-grade mucinous (HR 0.17; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.44) histology had superior disease-free survival. Considering overall survival, stage IC (HR 2.41; 95% CI 1.45 to 4.01) and older age (HR 2.41; 95% CI 1.46 to 3.95) were independent risk factors. CONCLUSION Although stage I ovarian carcinoma exhibited excellent outcomes, the prognosis of patients with stage IA differs significantly compared with stage IC. Sub-optimal staging as an indicator for quality of care, and tumor biology defined by histology (low-grade endometrioid/mucinous) independently impact disease-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majdi Imterat
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Nicolò Bizzarri
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Robert Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Anna Myriam Perrone
- Division of Oncologic Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Alexander Traut
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Andrea Rosati
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Debora Ferrari
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Pierandrea De Iaco
- Division of Oncologic Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Raffaella Ergasti
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Volontè
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Marco Tesei
- Division of Oncologic Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.,Department for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maria Teresa Perri
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy
| | - Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Swift BE, Covens A, Mintsopoulos V, Parra-Herran C, Bernardini MQ, Nofech-Mozes S, Hogen L. Oncologic and pregnancy outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for stage I, low-grade endometrioid ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:ijgc-2022-003560. [PMID: 35768155 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate oncologic outcomes in patients with stage I endometrioid ovarian cancer treated with fertility-sparing compared with conventional surgery and to describe reproductive outcomes. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was carried out of patients aged 18-45 with stage I, grade 1 and 2 (low-grade) endometrioid ovarian cancer treated at two cancer centers between July 2001 and December 2019. Clinical and pathologic characteristics were compared using Fisher's exact test for categorical and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Recurrence-free and overall survival were calculated from Kaplan-Meier curves and compared for fertility-sparing and conventional surgery using the log rank test. Pregnancy outcomes are described. RESULTS There were 230 patients with endometrioid ovarian cancer. After exclusion of patients with stage greater than I and those older than 45 years, there were 31 patients with stage I cancer aged 18-45. Of these patients, 11 (35.5%) underwent fertility-sparing surgery and 20 (64.5%) underwent conventional surgery. The median follow-up was 6.0 years (range 1.8-17.3). The median age was 36 years (range 26-42) in the fertility-sparing group and 42 years (range 35-45) in the conventional surgery group (p=0.001), with no difference in other clinical and pathologic characteristics. The 5-year recurrence-free survival was 90.9% (95% CI 73.9% to 100%) for the fertility-sparing group and 84.0% (95% CI 67.3% to 100%) for the conventional surgery group (p=0.65). The 5-year overall survival was 100% for patients in the fertility-sparing group and 92.6% (95% CI 78.7% to 100%) for patients treated with conventional surgery (p=0.49). Four (12.9%) patients had disease recurrence: three (15%) after conventional surgery and one (9.1%) in the contralateral ovary after fertility-sparing surgery and embryo cryopreservation. After fertility-sparing surgery, seven (63.6%) patients attempted pregnancy, of which five (71.4%) conceived with four (57.1%) using in vitro fertilization. Of the five patients who conceived, there were three spontaneous abortions and five live births. CONCLUSION Fertility-sparing surgery appears safe and may be considered in young women with stage I, low-grade endometrioid ovarian cancer when fertility preservation is desired.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenna E Swift
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Allan Covens
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Carlos Parra-Herran
- Department of Anatomy and Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marcus Q Bernardini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sharon Nofech-Mozes
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Liat Hogen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wiedemeyer K, Wang L, Kang EY, Liu S, Ou Y, Kelemen LE, Feil L, Anglesio MS, Glaze S, Ghatage P, Nelson GS, Köbel M. Prognostic and Theranostic Biomarkers in Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2022; 41:168-179. [PMID: 33770057 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to test whether prognostic biomarkers can achieve a clinically relevant stratification of patients with stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) and to survey the expression of 10 selected actionable targets (theranostic biomarkers) in stage II to IV cases. From the population-based Alberta Ovarian Tumor Type study, 160 samples of OCCC were evaluated by immunohistochemistry and/or silver-enhanced in situ hybridization for the status of 5 prognostic (p53, p16, IGF2BP3, CCNE1, FOLR1) and 10 theranostic biomarkers (ALK, BRAF V600E, ERBB2, ER, MET, MMR, PR, ROS1, NTRK1-3, VEGFR2). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed. Cases with abnormal p53 or combined p16/IFG2BP3 abnormal expression identified a small subset of patients (6/54 cases) with stage I OCCC with an aggressive course (5-yr ovarian cancer-specific survival of 33.3%, compared with 91.5% in the other stage I cases). Among theranostic targets, ERBB2 amplification was present in 11/158 (7%) of OCCC, while MET was ubiquitously expressed in OCCC similar to a variety of normal control tissues. ER/PR showed a low prevalence of expression. No abnormal expression was detected for any of the other targets. We propose a combination of 3 biomarkers (p53, p16, IGF2BP3) to predict prognosis and the potential need for adjuvant therapy for patients with stage I OCCC. This finding requires replication in larger cohorts. In addition, OCCC could be tested for ERBB2 amplification for inclusion in gynecological basket trials targeting this alteration.
Collapse
|
7
|
Swift BE, Covens A, Mintsopoulos V, Parra-Herran C, Bernardini MQ, Nofech-Mozes S, Hogen L. The effect of complete surgical staging and adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in stage I, grade 1 and 2 endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 32:525-531. [PMID: 34969829 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of complete surgical staging and adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in stage I, low grade endometrioid ovarian cancer. METHODS This retrospective study was conducted at two cancer centers from July 2001 to December 2019. Inclusion criteria were all stage I, grade 1 and 2 endometrioid ovarian cancer patients. Patients with mixed histology, concurrent endometrial cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and patients who did not undergo follow-up at our centers were excluded. Clinical, pathologic, recurrence, and follow-up data were collected. Cox proportional hazard model evaluated predictive factors. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS There were 131 eligible stage I patients: 83 patients (63.4%) were stage IA, 5 (3.8%) were stage IB, and 43 (32.8%) were stage IC, with 80 patients (61.1%) having grade 1 and 51 (38.9%) patients having grade 2 disease. Complete lymphadenectomy was performed in 34 patients (26.0%), whereas 97 patients (74.0%) had either partial (n=22, 16.8%) or no (n=75, 57.2%) lymphadenectomy. Thirty patients (22.9%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 51.5 (95% CI 44.3 to 57.2) months. Five-year recurrence-free survival was 88.0% (95% CI 81.6% to 94.9%) and 5 year overall survival was 95.1% (95% CI 90.5% to 99.9%). In a multivariable analysis, only grade 2 histology had a significantly higher recurrence rate (HR 3.42, 95% CI 1.03 to 11.38; p=0.04). There was no difference in recurrence-free survival (p=0.57) and overall survival (p=0.30) in patients with complete lymphadenectomy. In stage IA/IB, grade 2 there was no benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.19), and in stage IA/IB, low grade without complete surgical staging there was no benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.16). Twelve patients (9.2%) had recurrence; 3 (25%) were salvageable at recurrence and are alive with no disease. CONCLUSIONS Patients with stage I, low grade endometrioid ovarian cancer have a favorable prognosis, and adjuvant chemotherapy and staging lymphadenectomy did not improve survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenna E Swift
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Allan Covens
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Gynecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Carlos Parra-Herran
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Anatomic Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marcus Q Bernardini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sharon Nofech-Mozes
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Liat Hogen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xu Y, Liu B, Zhang X, Chen L. Cytological features of ovarian or tubal high-grade serous carcinoma: A retrospective study of 12 cases with abnormal cervical liquid-based smear. Diagn Cytopathol 2021; 49:1207-1212. [PMID: 34506642 DOI: 10.1002/dc.24871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2021] [Revised: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is the most common epithelial carcinoma of the tubo-ovarian region, with a poor prognosis, which presents with an advanced stage at the time of diagnosis. This study summarizes the cytological features of cervical liquid-based cytological examination in order to diagnose ovarian or tubal HGSC at an early stage by cervical cytology smear. METHODS A total of 12 patients who were diagnosed with atypical glandular cell (AGC) and above lesions by cervical cytological examination and ovarian or tubal HGSC by histopathology were enrolled in this study. The cytological characteristics, including the arrangement and shape of the neoplastic cells, nuclear and cytoplasmic features, and the presence of tumor diathesis were reviewed. RESULTS Nine cases were determined to be AGC, and three cases were determined to be AGC favor neoplastic (AGC-FN) in the 12 cervical cytological diagnoses. The glandular cells showed significant atypia and proliferated actively with a three-dimensional structure. Increased nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratios, prominent nucleoli, and hyperchromasia were common. Vacuole-like changes were observed in the cytoplasm. Tumor diathesis was observed in only one case (1/12, 8.30%). CONCLUSION Ovarian or tubal HGSC can occasionally be detected using cervical liquid-based cytology. It has distinct cytological characteristics. Primary ovarian or tubal HGSC with positive cervical cytology was accompanied by tumor cells in ascites, which suggested that the patient had progressed to an advanced stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanning Xu
- Department of Pathology, Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics, Nankai University Affiliated Maternity Hospital, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Human Development and Reproductive Regulation, Tianjin, China
| | - Bingbing Liu
- Department of Pathology, Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics, Nankai University Affiliated Maternity Hospital, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Human Development and Reproductive Regulation, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiaojing Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics, Nankai University Affiliated Maternity Hospital, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Human Development and Reproductive Regulation, Tianjin, China
| | - Ling Chen
- Department of Pathology, Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics, Nankai University Affiliated Maternity Hospital, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Human Development and Reproductive Regulation, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bliton J, Parides M, Muscarella P, McAuliffe JC, Papalezova K, In H. Clinical Stage of Cancer Affects Perioperative Mortality for Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgeries. J Surg Res 2020; 260:1-9. [PMID: 33310353 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of the stage of cancer on perioperative mortality remains obscure. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether cancer stage influences 30-d mortality for gastric, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers. METHODS Data were collected from the National Cancer Database for patients undergoing resections for cancers of the stomach, pancreas, colon, or rectum between 2004 and 2015. The main analysis was conducted among patients with cancer stages 1-3. A sensitivity analysis also included cancer stage 4. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the patients' baseline characteristics. Generalized linear mixed models were used to evaluate the relationship between stage and 30-d mortality, controlling for other disease-, patient- and hospital-level factors. Pseudo R2 statistics (%Δ pseudo R2) were used to quantify the relative explanatory capacity of the variables to the model for 30-d mortality. All analyses were performed using SAS 9.4. RESULTS The cohort included 24,468, 28,078, 176,285, and 64,947 patients with stomach, pancreas, colon, and rectal cancers, respectively. After adjusting for other variables, 30-d mortality was different by stage for all cancer types examined. The factor most strongly associated with 30-d mortality was age (%Δ pseudo R2 range 14%-39%). The prognostic impact of cancer stage (Stages 1, 2, or 3) on 30-d mortality was comparable to that of the Charlson comorbidity index. CONCLUSIONS Cancer stage contributes to explaining differences observed in short-term mortality for gastrointestinal cancers. Short-term mortality models would benefit by including more granular cancer stage, beyond disseminated status alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Bliton
- Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Michael Parides
- Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Peter Muscarella
- Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - John C McAuliffe
- Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Katia Papalezova
- Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Haejin In
- Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rödel F, Zhou S, Győrffy B, Raab M, Sanhaji M, Mandal R, Martin D, Becker S, Strebhardt K. The Prognostic Relevance of the Proliferation Markers Ki-67 and Plk1 in Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer Patients With Serous, Low-Grade Carcinoma Based on mRNA and Protein Expression. Front Oncol 2020; 10:558932. [PMID: 33117692 PMCID: PMC7577119 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.558932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Since type and duration of an appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage ovarian cancer (OC) are still being debated, novel markers for a better stratification of these patients are of utmost importance for the design of an improved chemotherapeutical strategy. In contrast to numerous cancer studies on cellular proliferation based on the immunohistochemistry-driven evaluation of protein expression, we compared mRNA and protein expression of two independent markers of cellular proliferation, Ki-67 and Plk1, in a large cohort of 243 early-stage OC and their relationship with clinicopathological features and survival. Based on marker expression we demonstrate that early-stage OC patients (stages I/II, low-grade, serous) with high expression (Ki-67, Plk1) had a significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to patients with low expression (Ki-67, Plk1). Remarkably, based on mRNA expression this significant difference got lost in advanced stages (III/IV): At least for PFS, high levels of Ki-67 and Plk1 correlate with moderately better survival compared to patients with low expressing tumors. Our data suggest that in addition to Ki-67, Plk1 is a novel marker for the stratification of early-stage OC patients to maximize therapeutic efforts. Both, Ki-67 and Plk1, seem to be better suited in early-stages (I/II) as therapeutical targets compared to advanced-stages (III/IV) OC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franz Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site: Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Shengtao Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Balász Győrffy
- Department of Bioinformatics and 2nd Department of Pediatrics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.,TTK Cancer Biomarker Research Group, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Monika Raab
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Mourad Sanhaji
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Ranadip Mandal
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Daniel Martin
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Sven Becker
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Klaus Strebhardt
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site: Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Department of Gynecology, University Hospital, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Iida Y, Okamoto A, Hollis RL, Gourley C, Herrington CS. Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a clinical and molecular perspective. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 31:605-616. [PMID: 32948640 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary has distinct biology and clinical behavior. There are significant geographical and racial differences in the incidence of clear cell carcinoma compared with other epithelial ovarian tumors. Patients with clear cell carcinoma are younger, tend to present at an early stage, and their tumors are commonly associated with endometriosis, which is widely accepted as a direct precursor of clear cell carcinoma and has been identified pathologically in approximately 50% of clear cell carcinoma cases. The most frequent and important specific gene alterations in clear cell carcinoma are mutations of AT-rich interaction domain 1A (ARID1A) (~50% of cases) and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) (~50% cases). More broadly, subgroups of clear cell carcinoma have been identified based on C-APOBEC (apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like) and C-AGE (age-related) mutational signatures. Gene expression profiling shows upregulation of hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-beta (HNF1β) and oxidative stress-related genes, and has identified epithelial-like and mesenchymal-like tumor subgroups. Although the benefit of platinum-based chemotherapy is not clearly defined it remains the mainstay of first-line therapy. Patients with early-stage disease have a favorable clinical outcome but the prognosis of patients with advanced-stage or recurrent disease is poor. Alternative treatment strategies are required to improve patient outcome and the development of targeted therapies based on molecular characteristics is a promising approach. Improved specificity of the histological definition of this tumor type is helping these efforts but, due to the rarity of clear cell carcinoma, international collaboration will be essential to design appropriately powered, large-scale clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasushi Iida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Aikou Okamoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Robert L Hollis
- University of Edinburgh Cancer Research UK Centre, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Charlie Gourley
- University of Edinburgh Cancer Research UK Centre, Edinburgh, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ovarian Endometrioid Carcinoma Misdiagnosed as Mucinous Carcinoma: An Underrecognized Problem. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2020; 38:568-575. [PMID: 30480647 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Primary mucinous carcinoma of the ovary is uncommon, and while numerous studies have focused on improving our ability to distinguish these tumors from gastrointestinal metastases, recent data suggest that up to one fifth are still misdiagnosed with a previously underrecognized culprit: endometrioid carcinoma. Using an index case of an ovarian endometrioid carcinoma with mucinous differentiation masquerading as a mucinous carcinoma, we sought to identify the most efficient biomarker combination that could distinguish these 2 histotypes. Eight immunohistochemical markers were assessed on tissue microarrays from 183 endometrioid carcinomas, 77 mucinous carcinomas, and 72 mucinous borderline tumors. Recursive partitioning revealed a simple 2-marker panel consisting of PR and vimentin. The combination of PR absence and vimentin absence could predict mucinous tumors with a sensitivity of 95.1%, a specificity of 96.7%, and an overall accuracy of 96.0%. Additional marker combinations did not improve accuracy. The 5-yr ovarian cancer-specific survival for mucinous carcinoma was significantly worse than endometrioid carcinoma (70% vs. 86%, respectively, P=0.02). Our proposed 2-marker algorithm allows diagnostic distinction between mucinous and endometrioid ovarian carcinomas when morphology is not straightforward. Given key differences in the underlying biology and clinical behavior of these 2 histotypes, improved diagnostic precision is essential for guiding appropriate management and treatment.
Collapse
|
13
|
Engqvist H, Parris TZ, Kovács A, Rönnerman EW, Sundfeldt K, Karlsson P, Helou K. Validation of Novel Prognostic Biomarkers for Early-Stage Clear-Cell, Endometrioid and Mucinous Ovarian Carcinomas Using Immunohistochemistry. Front Oncol 2020; 10:162. [PMID: 32133296 PMCID: PMC7040170 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Early-stage (I and II) ovarian carcinoma patients generally have good prognosis. Yet, some patients die earlier than expected. Thus, it is important to stratify early-stage patients into risk groups to identify those in need of more aggressive treatment regimens. The prognostic value of 29 histotype-specific biomarkers identified using RNA sequencing was evaluated for early-stage clear-cell (CCC), endometrioid (EC) and mucinous (MC) ovarian carcinomas (n = 112) using immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. Biomarkers with prognostic significance were further evaluated in an external ovarian carcinoma data set using the web-based Kaplan-Meier plotter tool. Here, we provide evidence of aberrant protein expression patterns and prognostic significance of 17 novel histotype-specific prognostic biomarkers [10 for CCC (ARPC2, CCT5, GNB1, KCTD10, NUP155, RPL13A, RPL37, SETD3, SMYD2, TRIO), three for EC (CECR1, KIF26B, PIK3CA), and four for MC (CHEK1, FOXM1, KIF23, PARPBP)], suggesting biological heterogeneity within the histotypes. Combined predictive models comprising the protein expression status of the validated CCC, EC and MC biomarkers together with established clinical markers (age, stage, CA125, ploidy) improved the predictive power in comparison with models containing established clinical markers alone, further strengthening the importance of the biomarkers in ovarian carcinoma. Further, even improved predictive powers were demonstrated when combining these models with our previously identified prognostic biomarkers PITHD1 (CCC) and GPR158 (MC). Moreover, the proteins demonstrated improved risk prediction of CCC-, EC-, and MC-associated ovarian carcinoma survival. The novel histotype-specific prognostic biomarkers may not only improve prognostication and patient stratification of early-stage ovarian carcinomas, but may also guide future clinical therapy decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Engqvist
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Toshima Z. Parris
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anikó Kovács
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Elisabeth Werner Rönnerman
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Karin Sundfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Per Karlsson
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Khalil Helou
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Liu H, Zeng Z, Afsharpad M, Lin C, Wang S, Yang H, Liu S, Kelemen LE, Xu W, Ma W, Xiang Q, Mastriani E, Wang P, Wang J, Liu SL, Johnston RN, Köbel M. Overexpression of IGF2BP3 as a Potential Oncogene in Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2020; 9:1570. [PMID: 32083017 PMCID: PMC7002550 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma (OCCC) displays distinctive clinical and molecular characteristics and confers the worst prognosis among all ovarian carcinoma histotypes when diagnosed at advanced stage, because of the lack of effective therapy. IGF2BP3 is an RNA binding protein that modulates gene expression by post-transcriptional action. In this study, we investigated the roles of IGF2BP3 in the progression of OCCC. We used 328 OCCCs from the AOVT (the Alberta Ovarian Tumor Type study) and the COEUR (the Canadian Ovarian Experimental Unified Resource) cohorts to elucidate the associations between IGF2BP3 expression and clinicopathological parameters, with positive IGF2BP3 expression defined as diffuse block staining, being more frequently observed at stage III (P = 0.0056) and significantly associated with unfavorable overall survival (HR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.09-2.33) in multivariate analysis. IGF2BP3 mRNA gene expression was markedly increased in OCCC cell lines compared to normal tissues such as ovarian surface epithelium. We chose two IGF2BP3-overexpressing cell lines ES2 and OVMANA for in vitro and in vivo knockdown experiments. The proliferation and viability of both cell lines were significantly inhibited by two IGF2BP3 siRNAs and similar suppression was observed in cell migration and invasion by Wound Healing and Transwell assays. The percentage of apoptotic cancer cells was enhanced by both IGF2BP3 siRNAs. In vivo experiments showed significantly reduced sizes of tumors when treated with IGF2BP3 siRNA compared to controls. Furthermore, cancer metastasis-indicators MMP2 and MMP9 proteins were down-regulated. In conclusion, our study shows that IGF2BP3 expression is a promising biomarker for prognostication of women diagnosed with OCCC with multiple effects on key cell functions, supporting its role as an important cellular regulator with potential oncogenic activity, and as a potential target for future intervention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huidi Liu
- Genomics Research Center (State-Province Key Laboratories of Biomedicine-Pharmaceutics of China), College of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.,HMU-UCCSM Centre for Infection and Genomics, Harbin, China.,Translational Medicine Research and Cooperation Center of Northern China, Heilongjiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Harbin, China.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Zheng Zeng
- Genomics Research Center (State-Province Key Laboratories of Biomedicine-Pharmaceutics of China), College of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.,HMU-UCCSM Centre for Infection and Genomics, Harbin, China.,Translational Medicine Research and Cooperation Center of Northern China, Heilongjiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Harbin, China
| | - Mitra Afsharpad
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary Laboratory Service, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Caiji Lin
- Genomics Research Center (State-Province Key Laboratories of Biomedicine-Pharmaceutics of China), College of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.,HMU-UCCSM Centre for Infection and Genomics, Harbin, China.,Translational Medicine Research and Cooperation Center of Northern China, Heilongjiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Harbin, China
| | - Siwen Wang
- Genomics Research Center (State-Province Key Laboratories of Biomedicine-Pharmaceutics of China), College of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.,HMU-UCCSM Centre for Infection and Genomics, Harbin, China.,Translational Medicine Research and Cooperation Center of Northern China, Heilongjiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Harbin, China
| | - Hao Yang
- Department of Pathology, Harbin Chest Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Shuhong Liu
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary Laboratory Service, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Wenwen Xu
- Genomics Research Center (State-Province Key Laboratories of Biomedicine-Pharmaceutics of China), College of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.,HMU-UCCSM Centre for Infection and Genomics, Harbin, China.,Translational Medicine Research and Cooperation Center of Northern China, Heilongjiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Harbin, China
| | - Wenqing Ma
- Genomics Research Center (State-Province Key Laboratories of Biomedicine-Pharmaceutics of China), College of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.,HMU-UCCSM Centre for Infection and Genomics, Harbin, China.,Translational Medicine Research and Cooperation Center of Northern China, Heilongjiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Harbin, China
| | - Qian Xiang
- Genomics Research Center (State-Province Key Laboratories of Biomedicine-Pharmaceutics of China), College of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.,HMU-UCCSM Centre for Infection and Genomics, Harbin, China.,Translational Medicine Research and Cooperation Center of Northern China, Heilongjiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Harbin, China
| | - Emilio Mastriani
- Genomics Research Center (State-Province Key Laboratories of Biomedicine-Pharmaceutics of China), College of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.,HMU-UCCSM Centre for Infection and Genomics, Harbin, China.,Translational Medicine Research and Cooperation Center of Northern China, Heilongjiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Harbin, China
| | - Pengfei Wang
- Genomics Research Center (State-Province Key Laboratories of Biomedicine-Pharmaceutics of China), College of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.,HMU-UCCSM Centre for Infection and Genomics, Harbin, China.,Translational Medicine Research and Cooperation Center of Northern China, Heilongjiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Harbin, China
| | - Jiali Wang
- Genomics Research Center (State-Province Key Laboratories of Biomedicine-Pharmaceutics of China), College of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.,HMU-UCCSM Centre for Infection and Genomics, Harbin, China.,Translational Medicine Research and Cooperation Center of Northern China, Heilongjiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Harbin, China
| | - Shu-Lin Liu
- Genomics Research Center (State-Province Key Laboratories of Biomedicine-Pharmaceutics of China), College of Pharmacy, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.,HMU-UCCSM Centre for Infection and Genomics, Harbin, China.,Translational Medicine Research and Cooperation Center of Northern China, Heilongjiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Harbin, China.,Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Randal N Johnston
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Martin Köbel
- Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary Laboratory Service, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Takahashi K, Takenaka M, Kawabata A, Yanaihara N, Okamoto A. Rethinking of treatment strategies and clinical management in ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol 2020; 25:425-431. [PMID: 31989349 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-020-01625-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 01/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC), with unique clinical and molecular characteristics compared with other histological types of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), behaves like a distinct entity and has a poorer prognosis than other EOC types, especially in advanced stages. In addition, OCCC comprises approximately 27% of all EOC cases in Japan, compared with 12% in Western countries. Historically, patients with OCCC have been eligible for chemotherapeutic and surgical trials of EOC. It has been difficult to evaluate the specific impact of these trials on the prognosis of women with OCCC because of its rarity and unique molecular characteristics. Recent studies of OCCC revealed significant molecular variations related to carcinogenesis and molecular targets that could directly facilitate patient stratification and subsequent precision medicine. Thus, treatment strategies specific for OCCC based on its clinical and molecular characteristics are urgently needed. In this review, we highlight the management and treatment of OCCC from clinical aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuaki Takahashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan.
| | - Masataka Takenaka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Ayako Kawabata
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Nozomu Yanaihara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Aikou Okamoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chemotherapy is of Value in Second Line and Beyond, Relapsed High-grade, Serous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Analysis of Outcomes Obtained With Oral Etoposide. Am J Clin Oncol 2019; 41:379-384. [PMID: 26999277 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epithelial ovarian cancer is chemotherapy responsive, and multiple lines of chemotherapy are often given. However, there are few data with regard to its effectiveness in later lines. Our aim was to assess its benefit in the high-grade, serous subtype relative to the line of therapy, using etoposide as the example. METHODS Women treated with oral etoposide at the British Columbia Cancer Agency upon recurrence/progression in the years 2000 to 2010 were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used to correlate line of therapy with overall survival, progression-free survival, and interval between etoposide initiation and next progression or death (EPFS). RESULTS A total of 219 women, median age 61, received etoposide as second (17%), third (30%), fourth (26%), fifth (17%), and sixth to eighth (11%) lines of therapy. The median number of cycles was 2 to 4. Patients who received etoposide as fourth-line to eighth-line treatment had a significantly longer median overall survival and initial progression-free survival (from diagnosis to first relapse) when compared with those who received it as second-line to third-line treatment (47.8 vs. 25.8 mo, P<0.0001; and 16.1 vs. 12.1 mo, P<0.0001, respectively); that is, a selected population of survivors received it later in the course of their disease. On univariate analysis, there was no significant difference in median EPFS (range, 2 to 2.9 mo) on the basis of line of therapy. On multivariate analysis, the hazard ratios improved through the third, fourth, and fifth lines (hazard ratios: 0.82, 0.77, and 0.34, respectively), and was statistically significant in the fifth line. The a priori-defined endpoint of clinical benefit was the "percentage not progressing at 3 months," and this was achieved in 32% to 48%. CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective study, a similar degree of benefit from etoposide, as defined by the percentage remaining progression free at 3 months, was seen in all lines of therapy.
Collapse
|
17
|
Comprehensive Surgical Staging in Stage 1 Clear Cell and Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2019; 38:241-246. [DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
18
|
Prognostic Factors of Early Stage Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16040637. [PMID: 30795566 PMCID: PMC6406698 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16040637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2018] [Revised: 02/02/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
We aimed to determine prognostic factors of early stage (I/II) epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) including clinicopathologic and chemotherapeutic regimens. Four hundred and thirty-seven women who underwent primary staging surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed from two medical centers. The prognostic factors were determined from multivariate survival analyses using Cox regression models. The majority of women were diagnosed with stage Ic (244/437, 55.8%). The histopathologic types were clear cell (37.5%), endometrioid (27.2%), serous (14.0%), and mucinous (13.3%). Fifty-seven percent (249/437) of the women received taxane-based (platinum plus paclitaxel) regimens and 43.0% received non-taxane (platinum plus cyclophosphamide) regimens as frontline adjuvant chemotherapy. Clear cell tumors (adjusted Hazard ratio (aHR) 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21–0.73, p = 0.001) showed better 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) than serous tumors. Women diagnosed at FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage II (aHR 5.97, 95% CI = 2.47–14.39, p < 0.001), grade 3 tumor without clear cell (aHR 2.28, 95% CI = 1.02–5.07, p = 0.004) and who received 3–5 cycles of non-taxane regimens (aHR 3.29, 95% CI = 1.47–7.34, p = 0.004) had worse 5-year overall survival (OS). Clear cell histology treated with taxane-based regimens showed significantly higher 5-year DFS (91.2% vs. 82.0%, aHR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.21–0.93, p = 0.043) and 5-year OS (93.5% vs. 79.0%, aHR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.13–0.70, p = 0.005) than those treated with non-taxane-based regimens. We conclude that stage, tumor grade, and chemotherapeutic regimens/cycles are independent prognostic factors for early stage ovarian cancer.
Collapse
|
19
|
Wang L, Rambau PF, Kelemen LE, Anglesio MS, Leung S, Talhouk A, Köbel M. Nuclear β-catenin and CDX2 expression in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma identify patients with favourable outcome. Histopathology 2019; 74:452-462. [DOI: 10.1111/his.13772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Accepted: 10/12/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Linyuan Wang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; University of Calgary; Calgary AB Canada
| | - Peter F Rambau
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; University of Calgary; Calgary AB Canada
- Department of Pathology; Catholic University of Health and Allied Science; Mwanza Tanzania
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Hollings Cancer Center and Medical University of South Carolina; Charleston USA
| | - Michael S Anglesio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Robert HN Ho Research Centre; University of British Columbia; Vancouver BC Canada
| | - Samuel Leung
- Department of Pathology; University of British Colombia and British Colombia Cancer Agency; Vancouver BC Canada
| | - Aline Talhouk
- Department of Pathology; University of British Colombia and British Colombia Cancer Agency; Vancouver BC Canada
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; University of Calgary; Calgary AB Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
McCormack M. Radiation Therapy in Ovarian Cancer: An Overview and Future Directions. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:504-506. [PMID: 29981691 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2018] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Clear cell cancer of the ovary is a rare and aggressive subtype. There is a general paucity of data from randomised trials to inform the most appropriate approach to adjuvant therapy. Retrospective data has highlighted an improvement in disease free survival with the addition of whole abdominal radiotherapy. This approach merits further exploration in a randomised clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M McCormack
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Radiotherapy: An Analysis of Low-Stage Invasive Ovarian Mucinous Carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018; 27:1819-1825. [PMID: 28930809 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000001124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our aim was to evaluate the population-based outcomes of stages I and II invasive ovarian mucinous carcinomas (MCs) treated with adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy and abdominopelvic radiotherapy (XRT). METHODS International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I/II MC cases referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency between 1984 and 2014 were reviewed. Chemotherapy (minimum of 3 cycles) and XRT were the institutional policy for stages IA/B (grade 2/3) and IC/II (any grade). Physician patterns of practice determined XRT use in eligible patients, allowing for the comparison of outcomes based on receipt of XRT treatment on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS We identified 129 patients. Univariate analyses on substages IA, IC no rupture, IC with intraoperative rupture, and IC with preoperative rupture demonstrated 10-year DFS rates of 67%, 67%, 67%, and 27% (P = 0.004), respectively, and OS rates of 72%, 72%, 67%, and 38% (P = 0.01), respectively. For all patients, adjuvant XRT demonstrated improved 10-year DFS (78% vs 36%, P = 0.05) and OS (83% vs 36%, P = 0.02). Subgroup analysis did not detect a benefit of adjuvant therapy for stage IA grade 1/2. Multivariate analysis confirmed the benefit of XRT on DFS (hazard ratio, 0.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.98; P = 0.047) and a trend to improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.009-1.64; P = 0.11), whereas decision tree analysis demonstrated a reduced rate of relapse (33% vs 77%) and death (20% vs 46%) with the use of XRT, exclusive of patients with preoperative rupture. CONCLUSIONS This population-based retrospective study is the first to demonstrate that the use of adjuvant abdominopelvic XRT after chemotherapy can improve survival in patients diagnosed as having stage I/II MC. Patients with stage IA grade 1 and grade 2 MC can have adjuvant therapy omitted.
Collapse
|
22
|
Kwon BS, Jeong DH, Byun JM, Lee TH, Choi KU, Song YJ, Suh DS, Kim KH. Prognostic value of preoperative lymphocyte-monocyte ratio in patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma. J Cancer 2018; 9:1127-1134. [PMID: 29675093 PMCID: PMC5907660 DOI: 10.7150/jca.24057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2017] [Accepted: 01/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the present study was to determine the prognostic significances of markers of preoperative systemic inflammatory response (SIR) in patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC). Methods: A total of 109 patients diagnosed with OCCC that underwent primary cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy from 2009 to 2012 were enrolled in this retrospective study. SIR markers were calculated from complete blood cell counts determined before surgery. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine optimal cut-off values for neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Prognostic significances with respect to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined by Kaplan-Meier curve and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results: The optimized NLR, LMR and PLR cut-off values as determined by ROC curve analysis for PFS and OS were 2.3, 4.2, and 123.6, respectively. When the cohort was divided using these optimized cut-offs, NLR and LMR were found to be significantly associated with clinicopathologic factors, NLR with FIGO stage, the presence of malignant ascites, and platinum response, and LMR with FIGO stage, lymph node metastasis, malignant ascites, and platinum response. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a high NLR (> 2.3) was significantly associated with low 5-year PFS and OS rates and that a high LMR was significantly associated with high 5-year PFS and OS rates. Multivariate analysis identified FIGO stage, residual mass, and platinum response as independent prognostic factors of PFS, and FIGO stage, residual mass, platinum response, and LMR as independent prognostic factors of OS. Conclusions: Markers of systemic inflammatory response provide useful prognostic information and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio is the most reliable independent prognostic factor of overall survival in patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byung Su Kwon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, and Biomedical Research Institute and Pusan Cancer Center, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea
| | - Dae Hoon Jeong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Busan, South Korea
| | - Jung Mi Byun
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Busan, South Korea
| | - Tae Hwa Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea
| | - Kyung Un Choi
- Department of Pathology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, South Korea
| | - Yong Jung Song
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, and Biomedical Research Institute and Pusan Cancer Center, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea
| | - Dong Soo Suh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, and Biomedical Research Institute and Pusan Cancer Center, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea
| | - Ki Hyung Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, and Biomedical Research Institute and Pusan Cancer Center, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.,Biomedical Research Institute and Pusan Cancer Center, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Yamazaki H, Todo Y, Shimada C, Takeshita S, Minobe S, Okamoto K, Yamashiro K, Kato H. Therapeutic significance of full lymphadenectomy in early-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma. J Gynecol Oncol 2017; 29:e19. [PMID: 29400012 PMCID: PMC5823980 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2017] [Revised: 11/11/2017] [Accepted: 11/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study evaluated the therapeutic significance of full lymphadenectomy in early-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC). Methods We retrospectively reviewed records of 127 consecutive patients with pT1/pT2 and M0 OCCC who were treated between January 1995 and December 2015. We compared survival outcomes between those who did and did not undergo para-aortic lymph node dissection (PAND), and analyzed independent prognostic factors (Cox proportional hazards model with backward stepwise elimination). Results Of the 127 patients, 36 (28%) did not undergo lymphadenectomy; 12 (10%) patients underwent pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) only; and 79 (62%) patients underwent both PLND and PAND. Of the 91 patients with lymphadenectomy, 11 (12%) had lymph node metastasis (LNM). The PAND− and PAND+ groups did not significantly differ in age, distribution of pT status, radiologically enlarged lymph nodes, positive peritoneal cytology, capsule rupture, peritoneal involvement, and combined chemotherapy. Cox regression multivariate analysis confirmed that older age (hazard ratio [HR]=2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.0–4.3), LNM (HR=4.4; 95% CI=1.7–11.6), and positive peritoneal cytology (HR=4.2; 95% CI=2.1–8.4) were significantly and independently related to poor disease-specific survival (DSS), but implementation of both PLND and PAND (HR=0.4; 95% CI=0.2–0.8) were significantly and independently related to longer DSS. Conclusion Although few in number, there are some patients with early-stage OCCC who can benefit from full lymphadenectomy. Its therapeutic role should be continuously investigated in OCCC patients at potential risk of LNM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Yamazaki
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yukiharu Todo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan.
| | - Chisa Shimada
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Sho Takeshita
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Minobe
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kazuhira Okamoto
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Katsushige Yamashiro
- Division of Pathology, National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hidenori Kato
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Is adjuvant chemotherapy beneficial for surgical stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma? Gynecol Oncol 2017; 147:54-60. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.07.128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2017] [Revised: 07/09/2017] [Accepted: 07/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
25
|
Teer JK, Yoder S, Gjyshi A, Nicosia SV, Zhang C, Monteiro ANA. Mutational heterogeneity in non-serous ovarian cancers. Sci Rep 2017. [PMID: 28852190 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-10432-9]+[] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer is a leading cause of death in gynecological cancers. While several systematic studies have revealed the mutation landscape of serous epithelial ovarian cancer, other non-serous subtypes of the disease have not been explored as extensively. Here we conduct exome sequencing of nine non-serous epithelial ovarian tumors (six endometrioid and three mucinous) and their corresponding normal DNA as well as a tumor-only granulosa cell sample. We integrated the exome data with targeted gene sequencing for 1,321 genes selected for their involvement in cancer from additional 28 non-serous ovarian tumors and compared our results to TCGA ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma and uterine corpus endometrial carcinomas. Prevalence of TP53 mutations in non-serous was much lower than in serous epithelial OC, whereas the prevalence of PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PTEN, CTNNB1, ARID1A, and KRAS was higher. We confirmed the high prevalence of FOXL2 and KRAS mutations in granulosa cell tumors and in mucinous tumors, respectively. We also identified POLE proofreading domain mutations in three endometrioid ovarian tumors. These results highlight mutational differences between serous and non-serous ovarian cancers, and further distinguish different non-serous subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie K Teer
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Sean Yoder
- Molecular Genomics Core Facility, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Anxhela Gjyshi
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.,University of South Florida Cancer Biology PhD Program, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Santo V Nicosia
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, USF Morsani School of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Chaomei Zhang
- Molecular Genomics Core Facility, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Alvaro N A Monteiro
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer is a leading cause of death in gynecological cancers. While several systematic studies have revealed the mutation landscape of serous epithelial ovarian cancer, other non-serous subtypes of the disease have not been explored as extensively. Here we conduct exome sequencing of nine non-serous epithelial ovarian tumors (six endometrioid and three mucinous) and their corresponding normal DNA as well as a tumor-only granulosa cell sample. We integrated the exome data with targeted gene sequencing for 1,321 genes selected for their involvement in cancer from additional 28 non-serous ovarian tumors and compared our results to TCGA ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma and uterine corpus endometrial carcinomas. Prevalence of TP53 mutations in non-serous was much lower than in serous epithelial OC, whereas the prevalence of PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PTEN, CTNNB1, ARID1A, and KRAS was higher. We confirmed the high prevalence of FOXL2 and KRAS mutations in granulosa cell tumors and in mucinous tumors, respectively. We also identified POLE proofreading domain mutations in three endometrioid ovarian tumors. These results highlight mutational differences between serous and non-serous ovarian cancers, and further distinguish different non-serous subtypes.
Collapse
|
27
|
Teer JK, Yoder S, Gjyshi A, Nicosia SV, Zhang C, Monteiro ANA. Mutational heterogeneity in non-serous ovarian cancers. Sci Rep 2017; 7:9728. [PMID: 28852190 PMCID: PMC5574976 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-10432-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2016] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer is a leading cause of death in gynecological cancers. While several systematic studies have revealed the mutation landscape of serous epithelial ovarian cancer, other non-serous subtypes of the disease have not been explored as extensively. Here we conduct exome sequencing of nine non-serous epithelial ovarian tumors (six endometrioid and three mucinous) and their corresponding normal DNA as well as a tumor-only granulosa cell sample. We integrated the exome data with targeted gene sequencing for 1,321 genes selected for their involvement in cancer from additional 28 non-serous ovarian tumors and compared our results to TCGA ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma and uterine corpus endometrial carcinomas. Prevalence of TP53 mutations in non-serous was much lower than in serous epithelial OC, whereas the prevalence of PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PTEN, CTNNB1, ARID1A, and KRAS was higher. We confirmed the high prevalence of FOXL2 and KRAS mutations in granulosa cell tumors and in mucinous tumors, respectively. We also identified POLE proofreading domain mutations in three endometrioid ovarian tumors. These results highlight mutational differences between serous and non-serous ovarian cancers, and further distinguish different non-serous subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie K Teer
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Sean Yoder
- Molecular Genomics Core Facility, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Anxhela Gjyshi
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.,University of South Florida Cancer Biology PhD Program, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Santo V Nicosia
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, USF Morsani School of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Chaomei Zhang
- Molecular Genomics Core Facility, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Alvaro N A Monteiro
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Nabatchian F, Moradi A, Aghaei M, Ghanadian M, Jafari SM, Tabesh S. New 6(17)-epoxylathyrane diterpene: aellinane from Euphorbia aellenii induces apoptosis via mitochondrial pathway in ovarian cancer cell line. Toxicol Mech Methods 2017. [DOI: 10.1080/15376516.2017.1347735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Fariba Nabatchian
- Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Afshin Moradi
- Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahmoud Aghaei
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
- Isfahan Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Mustafa Ghanadian
- Isfahan Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Seyyed Mehdi Jafari
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Samineh Tabesh
- Isfahan Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rambau P, Kelemen LE, Steed H, Quan ML, Ghatage P, Köbel M. Association of Hormone Receptor Expression with Survival in Ovarian Endometrioid Carcinoma: Biological Validation and Clinical Implications. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18:ijms18030515. [PMID: 28264438 PMCID: PMC5372531 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18030515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2017] [Revised: 02/14/2017] [Accepted: 02/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper aims to validate whether hormone receptor expression is associated with longer survival among women diagnosed with ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (EC), and whether it identifies patients with stage IC/II tumors with excellent outcome that could be spared from toxic chemotherapy. Expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) was assessed on 182 EC samples represented on tissue microarrays using the Alberta Ovarian Tumor Type (AOVT) cohort. Statistical analyses were performed to test for associations with ovarian cancer specific survival. ER or PR expression was present in 87.3% and 86.7% of cases, respectively, with co-expression present in 83.0%. Expression of each of the hormonal receptors was significantly higher in low-grade tumors and tumors with squamous differentiation. Expression of ER (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.18, 95% confidence interval 0.08–0.42, p = 0.0002) and of PR (HR = 0.22, 95% confidence interval 0.10–0.53, p = 0.0011) were significantly associated with longer ovarian cancer specific survival adjusted for age, grade, treatment center, stage, and residual disease. However, the five-year ovarian cancer specific survival among women with ER positive stage IC/II EC was 89.0% (standard error 3.3%) and for PR positive tumors 89.9% (standard error 3.2%), robustly below the 95% threshold where adjuvant therapy could be avoided. We validated the association of hormone receptor expression with ovarian cancer specific survival independent of standard predictors in an independent sample set of EC. The high ER/PR co-expression frequency and the survival difference support further testing of the efficacy of hormonal therapy in hormone receptor-positive ovarian EC. The clinical utility to identify a group of women diagnosed with EC at stage IC/II that could be spared from adjuvant therapy is limited.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Biomarkers, Tumor
- Carcinoma, Endometrioid/diagnosis
- Carcinoma, Endometrioid/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Endometrioid/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Endometrioid/mortality
- Female
- Gene Expression
- Humans
- Kaplan-Meier Estimate
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Grading
- Neoplasm Staging
- Prognosis
- Receptors, Estrogen/genetics
- Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism
- Receptors, Progesterone/genetics
- Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism
- Retrospective Studies
- Risk Factors
- Treatment Outcome
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Rambau
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.
- Department of Pathology, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, P.O. Box 1464, Mwanza, Tanzania.
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
| | - Helen Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T5H 3V9, Canada.
| | - May Lynn Quan
- Division of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.
| | - Prafull Ghatage
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Three versus six cycles of adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in early stage clear cell ovarian carcinoma - A multi-institutional cohort. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 144:274-278. [PMID: 27979319 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2016] [Revised: 12/01/2016] [Accepted: 12/05/2016] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine if 6 versus 3cycles of adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy with or without taxane impacts survival in early stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC). METHODS We retrospectively identified all cases of stage I and II OCCC treated at 5 institutions from January 1994 through December 2011. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those who received 3 versus 6cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Our cohort consisted of 210 patients with stage IA-II disease, 116 of whom underwent full surgical staging. Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to evaluate progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between groups. RESULTS Among 210 eligible patients, the median age was 53years (range 30-88). The majority of patients were Caucasian (83.8%). All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy with 90% receiving carboplatin and paclitaxel. Thirty-eight (18.1%) patients received 3cycles, and 172 (81.9%) patients received 6cycles of adjuvant treatment. Recurrence rate was comparable between groups (18.4% vs. 27.3% for 3 vs. 6cycles, p=0.4). There was no impact of 3 versus 6cycles of chemotherapy on PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-3.12, p=0.4) or OS (HR 1.65; 95% CI 0.59-4.65, p=0.3) on univariate analysis. There was no benefit to more chemotherapy in stratified analysis by stage nor on multivariate analysis adjusting for the impact of stage. Subgroup analysis of surgically staged patients also showed no difference in survival between 3 versus 6cycles of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Three cycles of platinum with or without taxane adjuvant chemotherapy were comparable to 6cycles with respect to recurrence and survival in patients diagnosed with early stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma in this retrospective multi-institutional cohort. CONDENSATION Three cycles of platinum with or without taxane adjuvant chemotherapy are comparable to 6 cycles with respect to recurrence and survival in patients diagnosed with early stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma in this retrospective multi-institutional cohort.
Collapse
|
31
|
Hogen L, Thomas G, Bernardini M, Bassiouny D, Brar H, Gien LT, Rosen B, Le L, Vicus D. The effect of adjuvant radiation on survival in early stage clear cell ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 143:258-263. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2016] [Revised: 08/27/2016] [Accepted: 09/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
32
|
Sugiyama T, Okamoto A, Enomoto T, Hamano T, Aotani E, Terao Y, Suzuki N, Mikami M, Yaegashi N, Kato K, Yoshikawa H, Yokoyama Y, Tanabe H, Nishino K, Nomura H, Kim JW, Kim BG, Pignata S, Alexandre J, Green J, Isonishi S, Terauchi F, Fujiwara K, Aoki D. Randomized Phase III Trial of Irinotecan Plus Cisplatin Compared With Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin As First-Line Chemotherapy for Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: JGOG3017/GCIG Trial. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:2881-7. [PMID: 27400948 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.66.9010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) is a rare histologic subtype that demonstrates poor outcomes in epithelial ovarian cancer. The Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group conducted the first randomized phase III, CCC-specific clinical trial that compared irinotecan and cisplatin (CPT-P) with paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) in patients with CCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Six hundred sixty-seven patients with stage I to IV CCC of the ovary were randomly assigned to receive irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 plus cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 (CPT-P group) every 4 weeks for six cycles or paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) plus carboplatin area under the curve 6.0 mg/mL/min on day 1 every 3 weeks for six cycles (TC group). The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary end points were overall survival, overall response rate, and adverse events. RESULTS Six hundred nineteen patients were clinically and pathologically eligible for evaluation. With a median follow-up of 44.3 months, 2-year progression-free survival rates were 73.0% in the CPT-P group and 77.6% in TC group (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.58; P = .85). Two-year overall survival rates were 85.5% with CPT-P and 87.4% with TC (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.61; one-sided P = .76). Grade 3/4 anorexia, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and febrile neutropenia occurred more frequently with CPT-P, whereas grade 3/4 leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, peripheral sensory neuropathy, and joint pain occurred more frequently with TC. CONCLUSION No significant survival benefit was found for CPT-P. Both regimens were well tolerated, but the toxicity profiles differed significantly. Treatment with existing anticancer agents has limitations to improving the prognosis of CCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Sugiyama
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Aikou Okamoto
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
| | - Takayuki Enomoto
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Tetsutaro Hamano
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Eriko Aotani
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Yasuhisa Terao
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Nao Suzuki
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Mikio Mikami
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Nobuo Yaegashi
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Kiyoko Kato
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Hiroyuki Yoshikawa
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Yoshihito Yokoyama
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Hiroshi Tanabe
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Koji Nishino
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Hiroyuki Nomura
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Jae-Weon Kim
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Byoung-Gie Kim
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Sandro Pignata
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Jerome Alexandre
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - John Green
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Seiji Isonishi
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Fumitoshi Terauchi
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Keiichi Fujiwara
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Daisuke Aoki
- Toru Sugiyama, Iwate Medical University, Iwate; Aikou Okamoto, Hiroshi Tanabe, and Seiji Isonishi, The Jikei University School of Medicine; Tetsutaro Hamano, Kitasato University; Yasuhisa Terao, Juntendo University; Mikio Mikami, Tokai University; Hiroyuki Nomura and Daisuke Aoki, Keio University; Fumitoshi Terauchi, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo; Takayuki Enomoto and Koji Nishino, Niigata University, Niigata; Eriko Aotani, Kanagawa Academy of Science and Technology; Nao Suzuki, St Marianna University, Kanagawa; Nobuo Yaegashi, Tohoku University, Miyagi; Kiyoko Kato, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hirosaki University, Aomori; Keiichi Fujiwara, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan; Jae-Weon Kim, Seoul National University; Byoung-Gie Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, Naples, Italy; Jerome Alexandre, Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and John Green, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ma FH, Qiang JW, Zhang GF, Li HM, Cai SQ, Rao YM. Magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing ovarian clear cell carcinoma from high-grade serous carcinoma. J Ovarian Res 2016; 9:40. [PMID: 27377917 PMCID: PMC4932691 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-016-0251-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2016] [Accepted: 06/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) and high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), to distinguish CCC from HGSC. METHODS MRI features (laterality, shape, size, configuration, papillary projection, signal intensity, enhancement, peritoneal implant, lymphadenopathy, ascites) of 40 tumors in 37 patients with CCC, confirmed by surgery and pathology, were compared with those of 62 tumors in 40 patients with HGSC. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS There was a statistically significant difference in the mean maximum diameter, laterality, and FIGO stage (P = 0.002, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively) between CCC and HGSC. Compared to HGSCs, CCCs were more frequently oval (30/40, 75 % vs 12/62, 19 %; P < 0.001), more often cystic (21/40, 53 % vs 8/62, 13 %; P < 0.001) and unilocular (23/29, 79 % vs 7/31, 23 %; P < 0.001), had T1-hyperintense cystic components more often (18/29, 62 % vs 5/29, 17 %; P < 0.001), had larger papillary projections (5.13 ± 0.4 cm vs 2.91 ± 0.3 cm; P < 0.001), were peritoneally implanted less frequently (P = 0.001) and had fewer ascites (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS CCC typically showed an oval, unilocular cystic mass with large papillary projection and T1-hyperintense cystic components. MRI could be helpful for distinguishing CCC from HGSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng-Hua Ma
- Department of Radiology, Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 419 Fangxie Road, Shanghai, 200011, Huangpu District, China
| | - Jin-Wei Qiang
- Department of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 1508 Longhang Road, Shanghai, 201508, Jinshan District, China.
| | - Guo-Fu Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 419 Fangxie Road, Shanghai, 200011, Huangpu District, China.
| | - Hai-Ming Li
- Department of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 1508 Longhang Road, Shanghai, 201508, Jinshan District, China
| | - Song-Qi Cai
- Department of Radiology, Jinshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 1508 Longhang Road, Shanghai, 201508, Jinshan District, China
| | - Ya-Min Rao
- Department of Pathology, Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
|
35
|
Lim W, Jeong W, Song G. Delphinidin suppresses proliferation and migration of human ovarian clear cell carcinoma cells through blocking AKT and ERK1/2 MAPK signaling pathways. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2016; 422:172-181. [PMID: 26704080 DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2015.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2015] [Revised: 11/19/2015] [Accepted: 12/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Delphinidin possesses the highest chemopreventive activity among the six components of anthocyanidin that are pigments from fruits and vegetables giving them blue, purple or red colors. Although delphinidin has anti-carcinogenic and apoptotic effects in various cancers, little is known about its functional roles in ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) which shows poor prognosis with resistance to chemotherapy as compared with other subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC). Results of present study revealed that cell survival rates of ES2 cells from ovarian CCC treated with delphinidin decreased in a dose-dependent manner. Also, delphinidin inhibited migration and induced apoptosis of ES2 cells. To investigate the molecular mechanisms responsible for biological effects of delphinidin, we analyzed the phosphorylation status of carcinogenic protein kinases related to development of CCC in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Phosphorylation of downstream targets of PI3K (AKT and p70S6K) and MAPKs (ERK1/2 and JNK) signaling was suppressed by treatment of ES2 cells with delphinidin. In addition, pharmacological inhibitors of PI3K/AKT and ERK1/2 MAPK pathway improved the anti-proliferative action of delphinidin on ES2 cells. Moreover, we compared the cancer preventive effects of delphinidin with traditional cisplatin- and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy on cell viability of ES2 cells. Results showed that delphinidin is as effective in its therapeutic activity against ES2 cells as cisplatin and placlitaxel. Collectively, these results indicated that delphinidin plays a critical role as a new chemotherapeutic agent to prevent development and progression of ES2 cells in CCC via inactivation of PI3K/AKT and ERK1/2 MAPK signal transduction cascades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whasun Lim
- Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul 136-713, Republic of Korea
| | - Wooyoung Jeong
- Department of Animal Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan 330-714, Republic of Korea
| | - Gwonhwa Song
- Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul 136-713, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cont NT, Ferrero A, Peccatori FA, D'Alonzo M, Codacci-Pisanelli G, Colombo N, Biglia N. Medical treatment of early stage and rare histological variants of epithelial ovarian cancer. Ecancermedicalscience 2015; 9:584. [PMID: 26557882 PMCID: PMC4631577 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2015.584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer is often considered a single pathological entity, but increasing evidence suggests that it is rather a group of different neoplasms, each with unique pathological characteristics, molecular features, and clinical behaviours. This heterogeneity accounts for the different sensitivity to antineoplastic drugs and makes the treatment of ovarian tumours a challenge. For early-stage disease, as well as for heavily pre-treated patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, the benefit of chemotherapy remains uncertain. Clear-cell, mucinous, low-grade serous, and endometrioid carcinomas show different molecular characteristics, which require different therapeutic approaches. In the era of personalised cancer medicine, understanding the pathogenesis and the genetic background of each subtype of epithelial ovarian tumour may lead to a tailored therapy, maximising the benefits of specific treatments and possibly reducing the side effects. Furthermore, personal factors, such as the patient's performance status, should be taken into account in the management of ovarian cancer, with the aim of safeguarding the patients' quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicoletta Tomasi Cont
- Academic Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Mauriziano Hospital, University of Turin, Italy
| | - Annamaria Ferrero
- Academic Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Mauriziano Hospital, University of Turin, Italy
| | - Fedro Alessandro Peccatori
- Fertility and Pregnancy Unit, Medical Gynaecologic Oncology Division, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta D'Alonzo
- Academic Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Mauriziano Hospital, University of Turin, Italy
| | - Giovanni Codacci-Pisanelli
- Fertility and Pregnancy Unit, Medical Gynaecologic Oncology Division, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy ; Department of Medical and Surgical Science and Biotechnology, University of Rome 'La Sapienza', Italy
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Medical Gynaecologic Oncology Division, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Biglia
- Academic Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Mauriziano Hospital, University of Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Endometriosis may be a precursor lesion for some epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs), especially those of clear cell and endometrioid histologies. The causality of this relationship remains controversial and in need of further investigation because the high prevalence of endometriosis and high mortality of EOC carry significant public health implications if the association is real. Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC) often presents at an earlier stage and with lower-grade lesions than non-EAOC. After surgical resection, these patients also tend to have less residual disease than do patients with non-EAOC. Survival has been reported to be better for women with EAOC. The tumor suppression gene, ARID1A, is frequently disrupted in EAOC. The ARID1A mutation has been reported in preneoplastic lesions and may be an early marker in the transformation of endometriosis into cancer. The current evidence in respect to critical molecular pathways underscores the need to investigate possible role of targeted therapies in the treatment of EAOC.
Collapse
|
38
|
Skirnisdottir I, Seidal T, Åkerud H. Differences in Clinical and Biological Features Between Type I and Type II Tumors in FIGO Stages I-II Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015; 25:1239-47. [PMID: 26035126 PMCID: PMC4549863 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2015] [Revised: 03/18/2015] [Accepted: 04/01/2015] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare immunohistochemical profile for the apoptosis regulators p53, C-MYC, bax, PUMA, and PTEN and the cell cycle regulatory proteins p21 and p27, as well as clinical factors between types I and II tumors. METHODS In total, 131 patients in FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stages I-II were divided into 2 groups of patients after type I tumors (n = 79) and type II tumors (n = 52). Differences in the immunohistochemical profile for the cell cycle-related proteins, detected by tissue microarrays and immune-histochemistry, were compared. For statistical tests, the Pearson χ test and the logistic regression model were used. All tests were 2-sided, and the level of statistical significance was P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS In multivariate logistic regression analysis with recurrent disease as endpoint, FIGO stage (odds ratio [OR], 4.7), type I/II tumors (OR, 3.8), body mass index (BMI) (OR, 3.5), and p53 status (OR, 4.2) all were found to be independent predictive factors. In 2 different multivariate logistic regression analyses with type I/II tumors as endpoint, both p53p21 (OR, 2.9) and p27 status (OR, 3.0) were associated with type II tumors. Differently, C-MYC status (OR, 0.4) was associated with type I tumors. Furthermore, age (OR, 1.04), BMI (OR, 0.4), and recurrent disease (OR, 4.3) all were associated to type II tumors. In survival analysis, there was a trend (P = 0.054) toward better disease-free survival for patients with type I tumors. CONCLUSIONS Concomitant positivity for p53 and negativity for p21, positivity for p27, and negativity for C-MYC in an epithelial ovarian tumor might strengthen the diagnostic option of type II tumor ovarian carcinoma. Patients with type II tumors were older, had lower BMI, and had more often recurrent disease than patients with type I tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingiridur Skirnisdottir
- From the *Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala; and the †Department of Pathology, Halmstad Medical Center Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ye S, Yang J, You Y, Cao D, Huang H, Wu M, Chen J, Lang J, Shen K. Comparison of Clinical Characteristic and Prognosis between Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma and Serous Carcinoma: A 10-Year Cohort Study of Chinese Patients. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0133498. [PMID: 26186453 PMCID: PMC4506138 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2014] [Accepted: 06/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the clinicopathologic features and prognosis of Chinese patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) and serous carcinoma (SC). METHODS A retrospective cohort study was designed to investigate the clinicopathologic characteristic and prognosis of patients with CCC and SC who were diagnosed and treated in in a tertiary referral center (Peking Union Medical College Hospital) between 1999 and 2009. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression were employed in the survival analysis. RESULTS A total of 504 cases were included in the study, comprising 197 cases of CCC and 307 cases of SC. The mean age of the patients with SC was greater than of CCC patients (3.6±0.94, P<0.001). Patients with CCC were more likely to be early-stage and optimally debulked (P<0.001). Regarding cancer-antigen 125, 22% of the patients with CCC had normal values, and the level was significantly lower than in patients with SC (P<0.001). More CCC patients had platinum-resistant tumors compared with platinum-sensitive disease (45.7% in CCC vs. 61.0% in SC [P=0.008]). The 5-year survival rate was 51.2% in the CCC group vs. 49.8% in the SC group (P=0.428). Patients with advanced CCC had a statistically significant poorer overall survival (OS) compared with their SC counterparts (38.0 vs. 52.0 months; hazard ratio 1.584, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.167-2.150, P=0.003). However, the advantage of improved progression-free survival (PFS) existed across all stages. CONCLUSIONS Women with ovarian CCC presented at a younger age and early stage. Patients with ovarian CCC also had improved PFS, but they had similar OS compared to patients with SC. However, patients with advanced CCC had decreased survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang Ye
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiaxin Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yan You
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Dongyan Cao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Huifang Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jinghe Lang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Keng Shen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Incidental Nonuterine High-grade Serous Carcinomas Arise in the Fallopian Tube in Most Cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2015; 39:357-64. [DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000000353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
41
|
Seidman JD, Vang R, Ronnett BM, Yemelyanova A, Cosin JA. Distribution and case-fatality ratios by cell-type for ovarian carcinomas: A 22-year series of 562 patients with uniform current histological classification. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 136:336-40. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2014] [Revised: 12/03/2014] [Accepted: 12/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
42
|
Prahm KP, Karlsen MA, Høgdall E, Scheller NM, Lundvall L, Nedergaard L, Christensen IJ, Høgdall C. The prognostic value of dividing epithelial ovarian cancer into type I and type II tumors based on pathologic characteristics. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 136:205-11. [PMID: 25546113 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.12.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2014] [Revised: 12/13/2014] [Accepted: 12/16/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the prognostic significance of dividing epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) in type I and type II tumors based on pathologic variables. METHODS We used the Danish Gynecologic Cancer Database to identify all patients diagnosed with EOC from 2005 to 2012. Information on histologic type and grade were used to classify tumors as either type I or type II. Death, and several prognostic factors were used in the multivariate Cox regression, and Landmark analysis was used to estimate hazard ratios of all-cause mortality. RESULTS Among 2660 patients diagnosed with EOC, 735 were categorized as type I tumors, and 1925 as type II tumors. Patients with type II EOC were more frequently diagnosed in late FIGO stages (stages III-IV) than patients with type I EOC (78.1% vs. 32.1% respectively; P<0.001). Time dependent multivariate Cox analysis, adjusted for known prognostic variables, showed no significant difference in survival within the first two years after diagnosis, however, after 730days of follow-up a significantly increased overall survival for type I tumors was observed (hazard ratio 1.72, 95% confidence interval: 1.28-2.31, P<0.001). Similarly the Landmark analysis for survival confirmed the increased overall survival for type I tumors after two years of follow-up (hazard ratio: 1.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.35-2.54, P<0.001). CONCLUSION Classification of EOC in type I and type II tumors based on pathologic variables was associated with an increased risk of death for type II tumors after two years of follow-up, while no increased risk was seen during the first two years of follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kira Philipsen Prahm
- Dept. of Gynecology, Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Mona Aarenstrup Karlsen
- Molecular Unit, Dept. of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Estrid Høgdall
- Molecular Unit, Dept. of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Lene Lundvall
- Dept. of Gynecology, Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lotte Nedergaard
- Dept. of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ib Jarle Christensen
- Finsen Laboratory, Copenhagen Biocenter, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Claus Høgdall
- Dept. of Gynecology, Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Della Pepa C, Tonini G, Santini D, Losito S, Pisano C, Di Napoli M, Cecere SC, Gargiulo P, Pignata S. Low Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma: from the molecular characterization to the best therapeutic strategy. Cancer Treat Rev 2014; 41:136-43. [PMID: 25573350 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2014] [Revised: 12/06/2014] [Accepted: 12/08/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Low Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma, LGSOC, is certainly a rare disease, accounting for only a small proportion of all ovarian carcinomas, nevertheless in the last decade we have acquired many data about its molecular and clinical features and it has been largely accepted that it has distinct pathogenesis, genetic aberrations and clinical behavior compared to High Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma, HGSOC, which is the most common ovarian cancer histotype. A large number of series pointed out the high rate of KRAS and BRAF mutations in LGSOCs and Serous Borderline Tumors, SBLTs, in contrast with their rarity in HGSOC. Such finding, together with the recurrent observation of focus of LGSOC associated with areas of SBLT in the same lesion, led to abandon the traditional histology classification, defining three types of serous carcinomas, in favor of a new dualistic grading system which recognizes only LG and HG carcinomas corresponding to distinct tumorigenesis pathways, the former based on KRAS/BRAF mutations and alteration of the MAP/ERK signaling, the latter characterized by early genetic instability and wild type status of KRAS and BRAF. LGSOC shows favorable overall survival, compared to general ovarian cancer population, but worrying resistance to conventional treatments. MEK inhibitors are emerging as active agents and may well represent an effective therapeutic strategy in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Della Pepa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro Del Portillo, 200, 00128 Rome, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Tonini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro Del Portillo, 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro Del Portillo, 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Simona Losito
- Surgical Pathology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Fondazione G. Pascale", IRCCS, Via Mariano Semmola, 52, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Carmela Pisano
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Fondazione G. Pascale", IRCCS, Via Mariano Semmola, 52, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Marilena Di Napoli
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Fondazione G. Pascale", IRCCS, Via Mariano Semmola, 52, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Sabrina Chiara Cecere
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Fondazione G. Pascale", IRCCS, Via Mariano Semmola, 52, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Piera Gargiulo
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Napoli, Italy
| | - Sandro Pignata
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Fondazione G. Pascale", IRCCS, Via Mariano Semmola, 52, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Köbel M, Madore J, Ramus SJ, Clarke BA, Pharoah PDP, Deen S, Bowtell DD, Odunsi K, Menon U, Morrison C, Lele S, Bshara W, Sucheston L, Beckmann MW, Hein A, Thiel FC, Hartmann A, Wachter DL, Anglesio MS, Høgdall E, Jensen A, Høgdall C, Kalli KR, Fridley BL, Keeney GL, Fogarty ZC, Vierkant RA, Liu S, Cho S, Nelson G, Ghatage P, Gentry-Maharaj A, Gayther SA, Benjamin E, Widschwendter M, Intermaggio MP, Rosen B, Bernardini MQ, Mackay H, Oza A, Shaw P, Jimenez-Linan M, Driver KE, Alsop J, Mack M, Koziak JM, Steed H, Ewanowich C, DeFazio A, Chenevix-Trench G, Fereday S, Gao B, Johnatty SE, George J, Galletta L, Goode EL, Kjær SK, Huntsman DG, Fasching PA, Moysich KB, Brenton JD, Kelemen LE. Evidence for a time-dependent association between FOLR1 expression and survival from ovarian carcinoma: implications for clinical testing. An Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis consortium study. Br J Cancer 2014; 111:2297-307. [PMID: 25349970 PMCID: PMC4264456 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 09/03/2014] [Accepted: 10/02/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Folate receptor 1 (FOLR1) is expressed in the majority of ovarian carcinomas (OvCa), making it an attractive target for therapy. However, clinical trials testing anti-FOLR1 therapies in OvCa show mixed results and require better understanding of the prognostic relevance of FOLR1 expression. We conducted a large study evaluating FOLR1 expression with survival in different histological types of OvCa. METHODS Tissue microarrays composed of tumour samples from 2801 patients in the Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium were assessed for FOLR1 expression by centralised immunohistochemistry. We estimated associations for overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival using adjusted Cox regression models. High-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSC) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were evaluated independently for association between FOLR1 mRNA upregulation and survival. RESULTS FOLR1 expression ranged from 76% in HGSC to 11% in mucinous carcinomas in OTTA. For HGSC, the association between FOLR1 expression and OS changed significantly during the years following diagnosis in OTTA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=1422) and TCGA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=485). In OTTA, particularly for FIGO stage I/II tumours, patients with FOLR1-positive HGSC showed increased OS during the first 2 years only (hazard ratio=0.44, 95% confidence interval=0.20-0.96) and patients with FOLR1-positive clear cell carcinomas (CCC) showed decreased PFS independent of follow-up time (HR=1.89, 95% CI=1.10-3.25, N=259). In TCGA, FOLR1 mRNA upregulation in HGSC was also associated with increased OS during the first 2 years following diagnosis irrespective of tumour stage (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25-0.94). CONCLUSIONS FOLR1-positive HGSC tumours were associated with an increased OS in the first 2 years following diagnosis. Patients with FOLR1-negative, poor prognosis HGSC would be unlikely to benefit from anti-FOLR1 therapies. In contrast, a decreased PFS interval was observed for FOLR1-positive CCC. The clinical efficacy of FOLR1-targeted interventions should therefore be evaluated according to histology, stage and time following diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - J Madore
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Gloucester House–level 3, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - S J Ramus
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - B A Clarke
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 610 Univeristy Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - P D P Pharoah
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - S Deen
- Department of Histopathology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
| | - D D Bowtell
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, 30 Flemington Road, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, 30 Flemington Road, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - K Odunsi
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - U Menon
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Maple House 1st Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - C Morrison
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - S Lele
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - W Bshara
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - L Sucheston
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - M W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - F C Thiel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Krankenhausstrasse 8-10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - D L Wachter
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Krankenhausstrasse 8-10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - M S Anglesio
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada
| | - E Høgdall
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2370 Herlev, Denmark
| | - A Jensen
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - C Høgdall
- The Juliane Marie Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - K R Kalli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - B L Fridley
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - G L Keeney
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Stabile 13, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Z C Fogarty
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - R A Vierkant
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - S Liu
- Anatomic Pathology Research Laboratory, Calgary Laboratory Services, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - S Cho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - G Nelson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - P Ghatage
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - A Gentry-Maharaj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Maple House 1st Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - S A Gayther
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - E Benjamin
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London WC1E 6JJ, UK
| | - M Widschwendter
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6AU, UK
| | - M P Intermaggio
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - B Rosen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - M Q Bernardini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - H Mackay
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - A Oza
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - P Shaw
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - M Jimenez-Linan
- Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - K E Driver
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - J Alsop
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - M Mack
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - J M Koziak
- Department of Population Health Research, Alberta Health Services-Cancer Care, 2210 2nd Street SW, Calgary, AB, T2S 3C3, Canada
| | - H Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Ave, Edmonton, AB T5H 3V9, Canada
| | - C Ewanowich
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Ave, Edmonton, AB T5H 3V9, Canada
| | - A DeFazio
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Westmead Institute for Cancer Research, University of Sydney at Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - G Chenevix-Trench
- Genetics and Computational Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD,4006, Australia
| | - S Fereday
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - B Gao
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Westmead Institute for Cancer Research, University of Sydney at Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - S E Johnatty
- Genetics and Computational Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD,4006, Australia
| | - J George
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - L Galletta
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - AOCS Study Group
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - E L Goode
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - S K Kjær
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
- The Juliane Marie Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - D G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada
- Centre For Translational and Applied Genomics, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - P A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - K B Moysich
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - J D Brenton
- National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - L E Kelemen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina and Hollings Cancer Center, 135 Cannon Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Köbel M, Madore J, Ramus SJ, Clarke BA, Pharoah PDP, Deen S, Bowtell DD, Odunsi K, Menon U, Morrison C, Lele S, Bshara W, Sucheston L, Beckmann MW, Hein A, Thiel FC, Hartmann A, Wachter DL, Anglesio MS, Høgdall E, Jensen A, Høgdall C, Kalli KR, Fridley BL, Keeney GL, Fogarty ZC, Vierkant RA, Liu S, Cho S, Nelson G, Ghatage P, Gentry-Maharaj A, Gayther SA, Benjamin E, Widschwendter M, Intermaggio MP, Rosen B, Bernardini MQ, Mackay H, Oza A, Shaw P, Jimenez-Linan M, Driver KE, Alsop J, Mack M, Koziak JM, Steed H, Ewanowich C, DeFazio A, Chenevix-Trench G, Fereday S, Gao B, Johnatty SE, George J, Galletta L, Goode EL, Kjær SK, Huntsman DG, Fasching PA, Moysich KB, Brenton JD, Kelemen LE. Evidence for a time-dependent association between FOLR1 expression and survival from ovarian carcinoma: implications for clinical testing. An Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis consortium study. Br J Cancer 2014. [PMID: 25349970 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.567] [] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Folate receptor 1 (FOLR1) is expressed in the majority of ovarian carcinomas (OvCa), making it an attractive target for therapy. However, clinical trials testing anti-FOLR1 therapies in OvCa show mixed results and require better understanding of the prognostic relevance of FOLR1 expression. We conducted a large study evaluating FOLR1 expression with survival in different histological types of OvCa. METHODS Tissue microarrays composed of tumour samples from 2801 patients in the Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium were assessed for FOLR1 expression by centralised immunohistochemistry. We estimated associations for overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival using adjusted Cox regression models. High-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSC) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were evaluated independently for association between FOLR1 mRNA upregulation and survival. RESULTS FOLR1 expression ranged from 76% in HGSC to 11% in mucinous carcinomas in OTTA. For HGSC, the association between FOLR1 expression and OS changed significantly during the years following diagnosis in OTTA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=1422) and TCGA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=485). In OTTA, particularly for FIGO stage I/II tumours, patients with FOLR1-positive HGSC showed increased OS during the first 2 years only (hazard ratio=0.44, 95% confidence interval=0.20-0.96) and patients with FOLR1-positive clear cell carcinomas (CCC) showed decreased PFS independent of follow-up time (HR=1.89, 95% CI=1.10-3.25, N=259). In TCGA, FOLR1 mRNA upregulation in HGSC was also associated with increased OS during the first 2 years following diagnosis irrespective of tumour stage (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25-0.94). CONCLUSIONS FOLR1-positive HGSC tumours were associated with an increased OS in the first 2 years following diagnosis. Patients with FOLR1-negative, poor prognosis HGSC would be unlikely to benefit from anti-FOLR1 therapies. In contrast, a decreased PFS interval was observed for FOLR1-positive CCC. The clinical efficacy of FOLR1-targeted interventions should therefore be evaluated according to histology, stage and time following diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - J Madore
- 1] Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada [2] Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Gloucester House-level 3, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - S J Ramus
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - B A Clarke
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 610 Univeristy Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - P D P Pharoah
- 1] Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK [2] Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - S Deen
- Department of Histopathology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
| | - D D Bowtell
- 1] Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia [2] Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, 30 Flemington Road, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia [3] Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, 30 Flemington Road, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - K Odunsi
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - U Menon
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Maple House 1st Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - C Morrison
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - S Lele
- 1] Department of Gynecological Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA [2] Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - W Bshara
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - L Sucheston
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - M W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - F C Thiel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Krankenhausstrasse 8-10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - D L Wachter
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Krankenhausstrasse 8-10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - M S Anglesio
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada
| | - E Høgdall
- 1] Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark [2] Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2370 Herlev, Denmark
| | - A Jensen
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - C Høgdall
- The Juliane Marie Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - K R Kalli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - B L Fridley
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - G L Keeney
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Stabile 13, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Z C Fogarty
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - R A Vierkant
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - S Liu
- Anatomic Pathology Research Laboratory, Calgary Laboratory Services, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - S Cho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - G Nelson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - P Ghatage
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - A Gentry-Maharaj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Maple House 1st Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - S A Gayther
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - E Benjamin
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London WC1E 6JJ, UK
| | - M Widschwendter
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6AU, UK
| | - M P Intermaggio
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - B Rosen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - M Q Bernardini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - H Mackay
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - A Oza
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - P Shaw
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - M Jimenez-Linan
- 1] Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK [2] National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - K E Driver
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - J Alsop
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - M Mack
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - J M Koziak
- Department of Population Health Research, Alberta Health Services-Cancer Care, 2210 2nd Street SW, Calgary, AB, T2S 3C3, Canada
| | - H Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Ave, Edmonton, AB T5H 3V9, Canada
| | - C Ewanowich
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Ave, Edmonton, AB T5H 3V9, Canada
| | - A DeFazio
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Westmead Institute for Cancer Research, University of Sydney at Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - G Chenevix-Trench
- Genetics and Computational Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD,4006, Australia
| | - S Fereday
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - B Gao
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Westmead Institute for Cancer Research, University of Sydney at Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - S E Johnatty
- Genetics and Computational Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD,4006, Australia
| | - J George
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - L Galletta
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | | | - E L Goode
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - S K Kjær
- 1] Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark [2] The Juliane Marie Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - D G Huntsman
- 1] Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada [2] Centre For Translational and Applied Genomics, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - P A Fasching
- 1] Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany [2] Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - K B Moysich
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - J D Brenton
- 1] National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK [2] Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK [3] Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK [4] Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - L E Kelemen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina and Hollings Cancer Center, 135 Cannon Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Teng FF, Kalloger SE, Brotto L, McAlpine JN. Determinants of quality of life in ovarian cancer survivors: a pilot study. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2014; 36:708-715. [PMID: 25222166 DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30513-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Ovarian cancer treatments and outcomes vary substantially, yielding a diverse group of survivors. Few data exist on quality of life (QoL) concerns and the foremost needs of these patients. Our goal was to conduct a pilot study to determine the QoL needs of ovarian cancer survivors to establish priorities for future interventions. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and OV28) QoL questionnaires and one investigator-derived questionnaire were administered in an outpatient setting. Clinical parameters were abstracted and tested for associations with QoL measures. RESULTS A total of 102 women consented to participate and completed all components. Their mean age was 58 years (range 29 to 85), with 80% having epithelial ovarian carcinoma and 66% high-grade serous carcinoma. Women with stage I (28%), II (15%), III (47%), and IV (10%) lesions were represented in the primary treatment (25%), surveillance (46%), recurrent (23%), and palliative (7%) phases of the survivorship continuum. Fifty-one percent characterized their disease burden as "quite a bit" or "very much," and this did not vary by histology or diagnoses. Global QoL did not vary by clinico-pathologic parameters. Cardiovascular and respiratory comorbidities were associated with EORTC scores in physical functioning (P=0.027 for cardiovascular and P=0.041 for respiratory), global QoL (P=0.03 for cardiovascular and P=0.039 for respiratory), and sexual health (P=0.025 for cardiovascular). Task completion/memory/concentration, anxiety, and fatigue were the distress categories given highest priority by respondents. CONCLUSION In women with ovarian cancer, clinical factors such as age, stage, and histology did not have a significant impact on QoL. Psychosocial factors have a larger impact on global QoL than physical symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flora F Teng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC
| | - Steve E Kalloger
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC
| | - Lori Brotto
- Division of Gynaecologic Specialties, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC
| | - Jessica N McAlpine
- Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Early-Stage Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinoma: Population-Based Outcomes in British Columbia. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2014; 24:1401-5. [DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveSpecific outcomes for early-stage ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OEC) have not been well characterized. In addition, the benefit of any type of postsurgical therapy remains unclear. Our aims were to delineate (1) potential prognostic factors and (2) the impact of adjuvant treatment on survival in such patients.MethodsWomen with FIGO stages I and II OEC referred to one of the centers of the British Columbia Cancer Agency from 1984 to 2008 were included in a retrospectively abstracted computerized database. Irradiation (abdominal-pelvic) in addition to chemotherapy (3 cycles of platinum combination) was to be given for stage IA/B, grade 2/3; stage IC, any grade; and stage II, any grade, except from 1989 to 1994 when irradiation was dropped from the paradigm for all patients. Univariate analysis and a multivariate analysis, using a decision tree analysis, were carried out of disease-free survival (DFS).ResultsOne hundred seventy-two patients were identified. Twelve percent were grade 3; 55%, 85%, and 89% of stages IA/B, IC, and II received postoperative adjuvant treatment. Five-year DFS was 95%, 84%, and 74% for stages IA/B and IC based upon rupture alone, IC other (cytologic positivity and/or surface involvement), and II, respectively. No benefit in DFS was accrued in stage IA/B from adjuvant treatment. Decision tree analysis defined 2 poor prognostic groups: those 55 years or older with stage IC based upon positive washings or surface involvement and any patient with stage II disease; in these, an apparent DFS benefit from irradiation was seen (relative risk (RR), 1.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74–4.24).ConclusionOmission of adjuvant treatment can be considered in most early-stage OECs.
Collapse
|
48
|
Davis M, Rauh-Hain JA, Andrade C, Boruta DM, Schorge JO, Horowitz NS, May T, del Carmen MG. Comparison of clinical outcomes of patients with clear cell and endometrioid ovarian cancer associated with endometriosis to papillary serous carcinoma of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 132:760-6. [PMID: 24440832 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2013] [Revised: 01/09/2014] [Accepted: 01/10/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this investigation was to compare outcomes of patients with clear cell carcinoma (CCC) and endometrioid carcinoma (EC) of the ovary associated with endometriosis to patients with ovarian papillary serous carcinoma (PSC). METHODS Patients with CCC and EC of the ovary associated with endometriosis were identified and matched by age and stage to PSC controls. Student's t test and chi square test were used to analyze continuous and categorical data. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. RESULTS 67 cases associated with endometriosis were identified, of which 45 were arising in endometriosis. Cases were matched to 134 PSC controls. 27 patients with tumors associated with endometriosis presented at stage I (40.3%), 27 at stage II (40.3%), ten at stage III (14.9%) and three at stage IV (4.5%). There was no difference in rate of optimal cytoreduction or response to chemotherapy in cases vs. PSC controls. There was a significant increase in synchronous endometrial cancer in tumors associated with endometriosis compared to PSC (25.4% vs. 3.7%; P<0.001). 18 cases (26.9%) had recurrent disease vs. 55 (41%) controls (P=0.03). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with tumors associated with endometriosis compared to PSC controls were 75% vs. 55% (P=0.03) and 85% vs. 77% (P=0.2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Patients with tumors associated with endometriosis had a higher rate of synchronous endometrial cancer. Cases also demonstrated a lower rate of recurrence and improved 5 year DFS; however, this did not translate into a difference in OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Davis
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carolina Andrade
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David M Boruta
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John O Schorge
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Neil S Horowitz
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Taymaa May
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marcela G del Carmen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Skirnisdottir I, Bjersand K, Åkerud H, Seidal T. Napsin A as a marker of clear cell ovarian carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2013; 13:524. [PMID: 24191930 PMCID: PMC4228360 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2013] [Accepted: 10/30/2013] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clear cell carcinomas are aggressive tumors with a distinct biologic behaviour. In a genome-wide screening for genes involved in chemo-resistance, NAPA was over-expressed in cisplatin-resistant cells. The NAPA (protein) Napsin A was described to promote resistance to cisplatin by degradation of the tumor suppressor p53. METHODS Totally 131 patients were included in this study all in FIGO-stages I-II; 16 were clear cell tumors which were compared with 40 Type I tumors and 75 type II tumors according to the markers Napsin A, p21, p53 and p27 and some clinical features. For detection of the markers tissue microarrays and immunohistochemistry were used. RESULTS Positivity for Napsin A was detected in 12 (80%) out of the 15 clear cell tumors available for analysis compared with 3 (4%) out of the Type I and II tumors in one group (p<0.001). Differences in p21 status, p53 status, and p21+p53- status were striking when clear cell tumors were compared with Type I, Type II, and Type I and II tumors in one group, respectively. The p21+p53-status was associated to positive staining of Napsin A (p=0.0015) and clear cell morphology (p=0.0003). In two separate multivariate logistic regression analyses with Napsin A as endpoint both clear cell carcinoma with OR=153 (95% C.I. 21-1107); (p<001) and p21+p53- status with OR=5.36 (95% C.I. 1.6-17.5); (p=0.005) were independent predictive factors. ROC curves showed that AUC for Napsin A alone was 0.882, for p21+p53- it was 0.720 and for p21+p53-Napsin A+AUC was 0.795. Patients with clear cell tumors had lower (p=0.013) BMI than Type I patients and were younger (p=0.046) at diagnosis than Type II patients. Clear cell tumors had a higher frequency (p=0.039) of capsule rupture at surgery than Type I and II tumors. CONCLUSIONS Positivity of Napsin A in an epithelial ovarian tumor might strengthen the morphological diagnosis of clear cell ovarian carcinoma in the process of differential diagnosis between clear cell ovarian tumors and other histological subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kathrine Bjersand
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Helena Åkerud
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Tomas Seidal
- Department of Pathology, Halmstad Medical Center Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Matching maternal isodisomy in mucinous carcinomas and associated ovarian teratomas provides evidence of germ cell derivation for some mucinous ovarian tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 2013; 37:1229-35. [PMID: 23774174 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0b013e31828f9ecb] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The tissue derivation of mucinous ovarian carcinoma remains a mystery; however, rare tumors are associated with mature teratoma. Two decades ago, studies of chromosomal heteromorphisms and DNA polymorphisms proved that ovarian teratomas arise during female gametogenesis. We sought to exploit the relationship between mucinous carcinoma and associated teratoma to provide molecular evidence for tissue of origin. Seventeen cases of mucinous ovarian carcinoma were studied, 6 of which had associated mature teratoma. DNA was extracted from the mucinous carcinoma, teratoma, and normal dissected tissue from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections. Twelve polymorphic microsatellite markers were used to allelotype each sample. Alleles from the teratomas and carcinomas were scored as homozygous (1 allele present in the tumor when normal tissue was heterozygous), heterozygous (2 alleles present matching normal tissue), or noninformative (normal tissue was homozygous). Of the 6 carcinoma/teratoma pairs, 2 showed complete matching homozygosity for informative markers (isodisomy), whereas 2 showed matching heterozygosity. One case did not have the corresponding teratoma available for comparison but demonstrated complete homozygosity and was presumed to be isodisomic. The remaining case had a teratoma homozygous for 7 of 10 informative markers, whereas the matching carcinoma was homozygous for only 2 of these markers. Carcinomas without associated teratoma demonstrated variable zygosity. Microsatellite polymorphism analysis demonstrates that mucinous ovarian carcinomas usually clonally match associated teratomas when present and often show evidence of complete isodisomy, indicating that at least some mucinous carcinomas arise from female gametes and thus are of germ cell origin. The zygosity patterns in mucinous carcinomas without teratoma suggest that these tumors may arise through a different mechanism.
Collapse
|