Alternative intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimens for optimally debulked ovarian cancer

[Malignant epithelial ovarian cancer: Role of intra peritoneal chemotherapy and hyperthermic intra peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): Article drafted from the French Guidelines in oncology entitled "Initial management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer" developed by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY under the aegis of CNGOF and endorsed by INCa]

Intraperitoneal drug delivery in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer have been widely studied. After a complete primary surgery or with residual disease<1cm, intraperitoneal chemotherapy significantly improves disease-free and overall survival (NP1), but with more local and systemic toxicities. Whenever this therapeutic option is under consideration, the ratio efficacy/toxicity must be carefully discussed. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has to be considered after complete or optimal primary surgery in ovarian, tubal or primitive peritoneal carcinomatosis FIGO IIIC. This treatment must be performed by trained teams and after an assessment of the ratio efficacy/toxicity. In one randomized study, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) using cisplatinum at interval surgery demonstrated an improvement in recurrence free and overall survival compared to surgery alone, in patients initially not resectable and with residual tumor less than 1cm (complete or optimal surgery) (NP1). HIPEC has to be considered after a complete or optimal interval surgery (residu<10mm) in patients with ovarian, tubal or primitive carcinomatosis FIGO IIIC, initially not resectable (Grade B).

Utilization and Toxicity of Alternative Delivery Methods of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Compared with conventional intravenous platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy for ovarian cancer, both intraperitoneal chemotherapy and more frequent dose-dense intravenous chemotherapy have been associated with improved survival in some studies. We examined the utilization and toxicity of these three methods of chemotherapy delivery in women with ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We performed a population-based study and analyzed data on women with ovarian cancer who underwent primary surgery followed by platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy from 2009 to 2013 who were recorded in the MarketScan database. Adjuvant chemotherapy was classified as: intraperitoneal chemotherapy, dose-dense chemotherapy (weekly administration of chemotherapy), or standard chemotherapy (every 3 weeks). Hospitalizations and emergency department visits for chemotherapy-associated complications and costs were recorded and compared using χ tests.

RESULTS

A total of 5,892 patients, including 4,135 (70.2%) who received standard chemotherapy, 859 (14.6%) who received intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and 898 (15.2%) treated with dose-dense chemotherapy, were identified. From 2009 to 2013, use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy remained constant (16.3-16.3%), whereas use of dose-dense therapy increased (8.7-18.1%) (P<.001). Hospitalizations for chemotherapy-associated complications occurred in 21.3% of women receiving standard chemotherapy, 34.7% of patients treated with intraperitoneal therapy, and in 25.2% of those receiving dose-dense treatment (P<.001); emergency department visits occurred in 18.3%, 26.3%, and 20.3%, respectively (P<.001). The largest differences in hospitalizations and emergency department visits were seen for gastrointestinal toxicities and electrolyte disorders. The per-patient costs of hospitalization were higher for intraperitoneal chemotherapy than other treatment modalities.

CONCLUSION

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy was used in less than 15% of women with ovarian cancer, whereas use of dose-dense chemotherapy is increasing. Although we did not examine survival, intraperitoneal chemotherapy is significantly more toxic than the other methods of treatment.

Intra-peritoneal cisplatin combined with intravenous paclitaxel in optimally debulked stage 3 ovarian cancer patients: an Izmir Oncology Group study

BACKGROUND

The advantage of intra-peritoneal (IP) chemotherapy (CT) in the initial management of ovarian cancer after cytoreductive surgery is well known. The feasibility and toxicity of a treatment regimen with an IP+intravenous CT (IPIVCT) for optimally debulked stage III ovarian cancer were here evaluated retrospectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 30 patients were treated in our institution between October 2006 and February 2011. Patients received IV paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3 hours followed by IP cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1; they also received IP paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 on day 8. They were also scheduled to receive 6 courses of CT every 21 days.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 55 years (35-77), and the majority had papillary serous ovarian cancer (63.3%). The patients completed a total of 146 cycles of IPIVCT. Twenty-eight were able to receive at least three cycles of IPIVCT and 18 (60%) completed the scheduled 6 cycles. Two patients discontinued the IPIVCT because of toxicity of chemotherapy agents and 6 had to stop treatment due to intolerable abdominal pain during IP drug administration, obstruction and impaired access. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (6 patients; 20%), anemia (2 patients; 6.7%) and nausea-vomiting (2 patients; 6.7%). Doses were delayed in 12 cycles (8%) for neutropenia (n=6), thrombocytopenia (n=3) and elevated creatinine (n=3). Drug doses were not reduced. The median duration of progression-free survival (PFS) was 47.7 months (95%CI, 38.98-56.44) and overall survival (OS) was 51.7 months (95%CI, 44.13-59.29). Two and five-year overall survival rates were 75.6 % and 64.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

IPIVCT is feasible and well-tolerated in this setting. Its clinically proven advantages should be taken into consideration and more efforts should be made to administer IPIVCT to suitable patients.

New poly(ester-amide) copolymers modified with polyether (PEAE) for anticancer drug encapsulation

New poly(ester-amide) copolymers modified with polyethers were developed for carboplatin encapsulation. These new copolymers contain hydrophobic blocks made of tyrosine derivative and dimer fatty acid, and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) as hydrophilic blocks. Short-term hydrolytic degradation revealed high water absorption, slight increase of pH of simulated body fluid and change of sample shape, which indicated the erosive mechanism of polymers degradation. Poly(ester-amide)-PEG copolymers were used for microspheres preparation and carboplatin encapsulation. A double emulsification process was used to produce microspheres with an average diameter of 20-30 μm. It was found that the amount of drug released was controlled by the molecular mass of PEG used for microspheres preparation. Mathematical models were used to elucidate the release mechanism of the carboplatin from the microspheres. The results demonstrate that poly(ester-amide)-PEG copolymers may be used for targeted carboplatin encapsulation and release.

Can advanced-stage ovarian cancer be cured?

Approximately 20% of women with advanced-stage ovarian cancer survive beyond 12 years after treatment and are effectively cured. Initial therapy for ovarian cancer comprises surgery and chemotherapy, and is given with the goal of eradicating as many cancer cells as possible. Indeed, the three phases of therapy are as follows: debulking surgery to remove as much of the cancer as possible, preferably to a state of no visible residual disease; chemotherapy to eradicate any microscopic disease that remains present after surgery; and second-line or maintenance therapy, which is given to delay disease progression among patients with tumour recurrence. If no cancer cells remain after initial therapy is completed, a cure is expected. By contrast, if residual cancer cells are present after initial treatment, then disease recurrence is likely. Thus, the probability of cure is contingent on the combination of surgery and chemotherapy effectively eliminating all cancer cells. In this Perspectives article, I present the case that the probability of achieving a cancer-free state is maximized through a combination of maximal debulking surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. I discuss the evidence indicating that by taking this approach, cures could be achieved in up to 50% of women with advanced-stage ovarian cancer.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the initial management of primary epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer tends to be chemosensitive and confine itself to the surface of the peritoneal cavity for much of its natural history. These features have made it an obvious target for intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy. Chemotherapy for ovarian cancer is usually given as an intravenous (IV) infusion repeatedly over five to eight cycles. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is given by infusion of the chemotherapeutic agent directly into the peritoneal cavity. There are biological reasons why this might increase the anticancer effect and reduce some systemic adverse effects in comparison to IV therapy.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if adding a component of the chemotherapy regime into the peritoneal cavity affects overall survival, progression-free survival, quality of life (QOL) and toxicity in the primary treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Gynaecological Cancer Review Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) Issue 2, 2011, MEDLINE (1951 to May 2011) and EMBASE (1974 to May 2011). We updated these searches in February 2007, August 2010, May 2011 and September 2015. In addition, we handsearched and cascade searched the major gynaecological oncology journals up to May 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The analysis was restricted to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing women with a new diagnosis of primary epithelial ovarian cancer, of any FIGO stage, following primary cytoreductive surgery. Standard IV chemotherapy was compared with chemotherapy that included a component of IP administration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data on overall survival, disease-free survival, adverse events and QOL and performed meta-analyses of hazard ratios (HR) for time-to-event variables and relative risks (RR) for dichotomous outcomes using RevMan software.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine randomised trials studied 2119 women receiving primary treatment for ovarian cancer. We considered six trials to be of high quality. Women were less likely to die if they received an IP component to chemotherapy (eight studies, 2026 women; HR = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72 to 0.90). Intraperitoneal component chemotherapy prolonged the disease-free interval (five studies, 1311 women; HR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.70 to 0.86). There was greater serious toxicity with regard to gastrointestinal effects, pain, fever and infection but less ototoxicity with the IP than the IV route.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy increases overall survival and progression-free survival from advanced ovarian cancer. The results of this meta-analysis provide the most reliable estimates of the relative survival benefits of IP over IV therapy and should be used as part of the decision making process. However, the potential for catheter related complications and toxicity needs to be considered when deciding on the most appropriate treatment for each individual woman. The optimal dose, timing and mechanism of administration cannot be addressed from this meta-analysis. This needs to be addressed in the next phase of clinical trials.

Feasibility and safety of a modified outpatient regimen with intravenous/intraperitoneal chemotherapy for optimally debulked stage III ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Intraperitoneal (i.p.) chemotherapy improves survival in optimally debulked ovarian cancer patients. However, the need for inpatient administration and the perceived higher toxicity rates compared with standard intravenous chemotherapy have limited its widespread application. Several modified outpatient schemes, such as the Spanish Ovarian Cancer Research Group (GEICO) regimen, have been tested and have reported overall better tolerance with an improvement in completion treatment rates. The aim of our study was to assess the toxicity of the GEICO regimen in patients treated at our institution.

METHODS

We reviewed clinical records of stage III ovarian cancer patients with optimally debulked primary cytoreduction surgery that were treated from June 2009 to April 2013 with the GEICO regimen. Patients received intravenous paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) for 3 hours on day 1, i.p. cisplatin (100 mg/m2) on day 2, and i.p. paclitaxel (60 mg/m2) on day 8 every 21 days for a maximum of 6 cycles.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were identified. In 67% of the patients, i.p. port placement was performed at the primary surgery. The most common grade 3-to-4 toxicities seen were abdominal pain (14.3%) and neurotoxicity (9.5%). Eighteen patients (85.7%) completed the 6 cycles. Three patients stopped chemotherapy because of treatment-related toxicity. There were no serious port-related complications. With a median follow-up of 46 months, median progression-free survival was 23 months (95% confidence interval [11.8-34.6]). Nine patients (42.9%) have relapsed; most relapses were multifocal and extraperitoneal.

CONCLUSION

The administration of the GEICO outpatient modified regimen was feasible with a good safety profile. It seems to show less toxicity than previously reported IP chemotherapy regimens. In our institution, port-related complications were infrequent and easily managed. However, further studies are warranted to establish the optimal i.p. regimen in a prospective manner and to validate it in a larger phase 3 trial.

Dual-layer surface coating of PLGA-based nanoparticles provides slow-release drug delivery to achieve metronomic therapy in a paclitaxel-resistant murine ovarian cancer model

Development of drug resistance is a central challenge to the treatment of ovarian cancer. Metronomic chemotherapy decreases the extent of drug-free periods, thereby hindering development of drug resistance. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy allows for treatment of tumors confined within the peritoneum, but achieving sustained tumor-localized chemotherapy remains difficult. We hypothesized that modulating the surface properties of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)-based nanoparticles could enhance their drug retention ability and extend their release profile, thereby enabling metronomic, localized chemotherapy in vivo. Paclitaxel was encapsulated in particles coated with a layer of polydopamine and a subsequent layer of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG). These particles achieved a 3.8-fold higher loading content compared to that of nanoparticles formulated from linear PLGA-PEG copolymers. In vitro release kinetic studies and in vivo drug distribution profiles demonstrate sustained release of paclitaxel. Although free drug conferred no survival advantage, low-dose intraperitoneal administration of paclitaxel-laden surface-coated nanoparticles to drug-resistant ovarian tumor-bearing mice resulted in significant survival benefits in the absence of any apparent systemic toxicity.

Safety and outcome of patients treated with a modified outpatient intraperitoneal regimen for epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite the survival benefit of intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy observed in GOG172, significant toxicity and poor treatment completion rates have prevented the widespread acceptance of this regimen. Here, we report our experience with a modified outpatient GOG172 regimen.

METHODS

Eligible patients had stage III, optimally debulked epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer that underwent IP port placement for administration of a modified GOG172 regimen consisting of: (i) intravenous paclitaxel 135 mg/m² on day 1 over 3 h; (ii) intraperitoneal cisplatin 75 mg/m² on day 2, and (iii) intraperitoneal paclitaxel 60 mg/m² on day 8. Day 8 IP paclitaxel was omitted until tolerance of the first cycle of IP cisplatin had been established.

RESULTS

Four or more cycles of IP chemotherapy were completed by 72.5% (29) of 40 eligible patients; 20% of patients exhibited catheter-related complications requiring port removal and discontinuation of IP chemotherapy. Grade 3-4 hematologic, metabolic and gastrointestinal toxicities occurred in 36, 8 and 21% of the patients, respectively. With a median follow-up of 47.7 months, progression-free and overall survival was comparable to GOG172.

CONCLUSIONS

This modified outpatient GOG172 regimen is associated with less toxicity and improved completion rates compared to the original GOG172 regimen.

Feasibility of a modified outpatient regimen of intravenous/intraperitoneal chemotherapy in optimally debulked stage III ovarian cancer patients: a GEICO study

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to assess the feasibility, toxicity, and reasons for early discontinuation of a modified outpatient intraperitoneal/intravenous (IP/IV) chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of patients with optimally debulked stage III ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Between February 2006 and November 2008, 51 consecutive patients from Institutions of the Spanish Ovarian Cancer Group (GEICO) were treated with a modified outpatient IP chemotherapy regimen. Patients received IV paclitaxel 175 mg/m over 3 hours on day 1, followed by IP cisplatin 100 mg/m (or 75 mg/m according to the principal investigator's criteria) on day 2. On day 8, patients received IP paclitaxel 60 mg/m. To homogenize the IP administration and supportive measures, a GEICO guideline for IP chemotherapy was established. Patients were treated with the intention to receive 6 courses of chemotherapy every 21 days.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 49 years (range, 36-75 years), and most of them had papillary serous ovarian cancer (78%), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC (76%). Thirty-nine patients completed 4 or more IP cycles, and 28 (61%) completed all 6 IP cycles. Twenty-two patients discontinued the IP/IV treatment, mainly because of chemotherapy toxicity (10 patients) and catheter-related complications (5 patients). The most prevalent grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (14 patients; 30%) and gastrointestinal events (12 patients; 26%).

CONCLUSIONS

The GEICO outpatient modified regimen resulted in a lesser toxicity and a greater rate of treatment completion than previously reported. The accurate selection of patients and the administration following well-defined guidelines can increase the feasibility of IP chemotherapy administration.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the initial management of primary epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer tends to be chemosensitive and confine itself to the surface of the peritoneal cavity for much of its natural history. These features have made it an obvious target for intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy. Chemotherapy for ovarian cancer is usually given as an intravenous (IV) infusion repeatedly over five to eight cycles. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is given by infusion of the chemotherapeutic agent directly into the peritoneal cavity. There are biological reasons why this might increase the anticancer effect and reduce some systemic adverse effects in comparison to IV therapy.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if adding a component of the chemotherapy regime into the peritoneal cavity affects overall survival, progression-free survival, quality of life (QOL) and toxicity in the primary treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Gynaecological Cancer Review Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) Issue 2, 2011, MEDLINE (1951 to May 2011) and EMBASE (1974 to May 2011). We updated these searches in February 2007, August 2010 and May 2011. In addition, we handsearched and cascade searched the major gynaecological oncology journals.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The analysis was restricted to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing women with a new diagnosis of primary epithelial ovarian cancer, of any FIGO stage, following primary cytoreductive surgery. Standard IV chemotherapy was compared with chemotherapy that included a component of IP administration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data on overall survival, disease-free survival, adverse events and QOL and performed meta-analyses of hazard ratios (HR) for time-to-event variables and relative risks (RR) for dichotomous outcomes using RevMan software.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine randomised trials studied 2119 women receiving primary treatment for ovarian cancer. We considered six trials to be of high quality. Women were less likely to die if they received an IP component to chemotherapy (eight studies, 2026 women; HR = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72 to 0.90). Intraperitoneal component chemotherapy prolonged the disease-free interval (five studies, 1311 women; HR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.70 to 0.86). There was greater serious toxicity with regard to gastrointestinal effects, pain, fever and infection but less ototoxicity with the IP than the IV route.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy increases overall survival and progression-free survival from advanced ovarian cancer. The results of this meta-analysis provide the most reliable estimates of the relative survival benefits of IP over IV therapy and should be used as part of the decision making process. However, the potential for catheter related complications and toxicity needs to be considered when deciding on the most appropriate treatment for each individual woman. The optimal dose, timing and mechanism of administration cannot be addressed from this meta-analysis. This needs to be addressed in the next phase of clinical trials.