1
|
Hwang JH, Kim BW. The incidence of postoperative symptomatic lymphocele after pelvic lymphadenectomy between abdominal and laparoscopic approach: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7114-7125. [PMID: 35467142 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09227-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the risks of symptomatic lymphocele after pelvic lymphadenectomy between the laparoscopic and abdominal approach in uterine cervical and endometrial cancer. METHODS We searched Ovid Medline, Ovid EMBASE, and the Cochrane library through April 2020. We selected the comparative studies contained information on symptomatic lymphoceles in postoperative complications. All articles searched were independently reviewed and selected by two researchers. A meta-analysis was performed using the Stata MP version 16.0 software package. RESULTS A total of 33 eligible clinical trials were ultimately enrolled in this meta-analysis. When all studies were pooled, the odds ratios (OR) of the laparoscopic approach for the risk of symptomatic lymphoceles compared to the abdominal approach was 0.58 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42-0.81, p = 0.022, I-squared = 0.0%]. The risk of postoperative symptomatic lymphoceles in the laparoscopic group tended to decrease over time in the cumulative meta-analysis. In the subgroup analysis, there was no evidence for an association between cancer type, quality of the study methodology, hysterectomy type, and postoperative symptomatic lymphoceles. However, in a recently published article, being overweight (body mass index ≥ 25) and studies conducted in oriental area were associated with a lower incidence of postoperative symptomatic lymphoceles. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy was associated with a significantly lower risk of postoperative symptomatic lymphoceles than abdominal lymphadenectomy (PROSPERO registration number: CRD 42,020,187,165).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Ha Hwang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Seo-Gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Simgokro 100 Gil 25, Incheon, 22711, South Korea.
| | - Bo Wook Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Seo-Gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Simgokro 100 Gil 25, Incheon, 22711, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vardar MA, Guzel AB, Taskin S, Gungor M, Ozgul N, Salman C, Kucukgoz-Gulec U, Khatib G, Taskiran C, Dünder I, Ortac F, Yuce K, Terek C, Simsek T, Ozsaran A, Onan A, Coban G, Topuz S, Demirkiran F, Takmaz O, Kose MF, Gocmen A, Seydaoglu G, Gumurdulu D, Ayhan A. Could the Long-Term Oncological Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery in Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer also Be Valid for the High-Intermediate- and High-Risk Patients? A Multi-Center Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group Study Conducted with 2745 Endometrial Cancer Cases. (TRSGO-End-001). Curr Oncol 2021; 28:4328-4340. [PMID: 34898563 PMCID: PMC8628704 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28060368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Revised: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
This study was conducted to compare the long-term oncological outcomes of laparotomy and laparoscopic surgeries in endometrial cancer under the light of the 2016 ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification system, with particular focus on the high–intermediate- and high-risk categories. Using multicentric databases between January 2005 and January 2016, disease-free and overall survivals of 2745 endometrial cancer cases were compared according to the surgery route (laparotomy vs. laparoscopy). The high–intermediate- and high-risk patients were defined with respect to the 2016 ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification system, and they were analyzed with respect to differences in survival rates. Of the 2745 patients, 1743 (63.5%) were operated by laparotomy, and the remaining were operated with laparoscopy. The total numbers of high–intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer cases were 734 (45%) patients in the laparotomy group and 307 (30.7%) patients in the laparoscopy group. Disease-free and overall survivals were not statistically different when compared between laparoscopy and laparotomy groups in terms of low-, intermediate-, high–intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer. In conclusion, regardless of the endometrial cancer risk category, long-term oncological outcomes of the laparoscopic approach were found to be comparable to those treated with laparotomy. Our results are encouraging to consider laparoscopic surgery for high–intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Ali Vardar
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Çukurova University, Adana 01380, Turkey; (M.A.V.); (A.B.G.); (U.K.-G.)
| | - Ahmet Baris Guzel
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Çukurova University, Adana 01380, Turkey; (M.A.V.); (A.B.G.); (U.K.-G.)
| | - Salih Taskin
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Ankara University, Ankara 06100, Turkey; (S.T.); (M.G.); (I.D.); (F.O.)
| | - Mete Gungor
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Ankara University, Ankara 06100, Turkey; (S.T.); (M.G.); (I.D.); (F.O.)
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Acıbadem University, İstanbul 34684, Turkey;
| | - Nejat Ozgul
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06230, Turkey; (N.O.); (C.S.); (K.Y.)
| | - Coskun Salman
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06230, Turkey; (N.O.); (C.S.); (K.Y.)
| | - Umran Kucukgoz-Gulec
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Çukurova University, Adana 01380, Turkey; (M.A.V.); (A.B.G.); (U.K.-G.)
| | - Ghanim Khatib
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Çukurova University, Adana 01380, Turkey; (M.A.V.); (A.B.G.); (U.K.-G.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +90-322-3386060-3195-3196; Fax: +90-322-3386527
| | - Cagatay Taskiran
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Gazi University, Ankara 06560, Turkey; (C.T.); (A.O.)
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Koç University, İstanbul 34450, Turkey
| | - Ilkkan Dünder
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Ankara University, Ankara 06100, Turkey; (S.T.); (M.G.); (I.D.); (F.O.)
| | - Firat Ortac
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Ankara University, Ankara 06100, Turkey; (S.T.); (M.G.); (I.D.); (F.O.)
| | - Kunter Yuce
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06230, Turkey; (N.O.); (C.S.); (K.Y.)
| | - Cosan Terek
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Ege University, İzmir 35040, Turkey; (C.T.); (A.O.)
| | - Tayup Simsek
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07070, Turkey;
| | - Aydın Ozsaran
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Ege University, İzmir 35040, Turkey; (C.T.); (A.O.)
| | - Anil Onan
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Gazi University, Ankara 06560, Turkey; (C.T.); (A.O.)
| | - Gonca Coban
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Adana Training and Research Hospital, Başkent University, Adana 01250, Turkey;
| | - Samet Topuz
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Çapa Medical Faculty, İstanbul University, İstanbul 34093, Turkey;
| | - Fuat Demirkiran
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, İstanbul University, Cerrahpaşa, İstanbul 34098, Turkey;
| | - Ozguc Takmaz
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Acıbadem University, İstanbul 34684, Turkey;
| | - M. Faruk Kose
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Medipol University, İstanbul 34200, Turkey;
| | - Ahmet Gocmen
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul 34760, Turkey;
| | - Gulsah Seydaoglu
- Department of Biostatistics, Medical Faculty, Çukurova University, Adana 01380, Turkey;
| | - Derya Gumurdulu
- Department of Gynecologic Pathology, Medical Faculty, Çukurova University, Adana 01380, Turkey;
| | - Ali Ayhan
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Başkent University, Ankara 06490, Turkey;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Deura I, Shimada M, Azuma Y, Komatsu H, Nagira K, Sawada M, Harada T. Comparison of laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for surgical staging of patients with presumed low-risk endometrial cancer: The current state of Japan. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 58:99-104. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
|
4
|
Eisenkop SM. Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Pelvic/Aortic Lymph Node Dissection for Endometrial Cancer Using Passive Instrument Positioners: A Retrospective Case-Control Series. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017; 25:800-809. [PMID: 29246636 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2017] [Revised: 12/05/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To investigate the influence of the use of passive instrument positioners (PIPs) on laparoscopic operative outcomes for endometrial cancer relative to other independent variables. DESIGN Retrospective case-controlled study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING Laparoscopies performed by the author in multiple community hospitals. PATIENTS A total of 297 consecutive patients between December 2009 and October 2016 with clinically isolated endometrial cancer or retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy on imaging studies. INTERVENTIONS Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and pelvic/aortic lymph node dissection using passive instrument positioners to secure the laparoscope (PIP group) and using instruments providing exposure and historical control by hand control of all instruments (HC group). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The overall group mean age was 63.2 years (range, 32.4-90.9 years), and patient characteristics were equivalent in the 2 groups. In the PIP group, 1 procedure was converted to a laparotomy (0.5%), and in the HC group, 6 procedures were converted (5.4%; p = .008). The mean operative time was 140.1 minutes for the PIP group and 153.8 minutes for the HC group (p < .001). The mean length of hospital stay was 44.8 hours for the PIP group and 58.6 hours for the HC group (p < .001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that study group (PIP vs HC; p = .014) and the presence vs absence of metastatic disease (p = .001) influenced conversion; study group (PIP vs HC; p < .001), body mass index (p < .001), past surgical history (p = .010), and assistant training (p = .011) influenced operative time; and study group (PIP vs HC; p < .001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (p < .001), and operative time (p = .051) influenced hospital stay. CONCLUSION For clinically localized endometrial cancer managed laparoscopically, the use of PIPs reduces conversions, operative time, and hospital stay.
Collapse
|
5
|
Predictive Factor of Conversion to Laparotomy in Minimally Invasive Surgical Staging for Endometrial Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016; 26:290-300. [PMID: 26569058 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to identify risk factors associated with laparotomy conversion during total laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. METHODS This is a retrospective study examining endometrial cancer cases that underwent hysterectomy-based surgical staging initiated via conventional laparoscopic approach. Factors related to patient, tumor, and surgeon were examined to establish risk of laparotomy conversion using a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS There were 251 cases identified including 30 cases (12.0%) of laparotomy conversion. The most common indication for laparotomy conversion was a large uterus (27.0%), followed by extensive adhesions (24.3%) and surgical complications (18.9%). Outcomes of cases resulting in laparotomy conversion include longer surgical time (333 vs 224 minutes, P < 0.001), larger blood loss (350 vs 100 mL, P < 0.001), longer hospital stay (4 vs 2 days, P < 0.001), and increased risk of hospital readmission (10% vs 1.4%, P = 0.024). In multivariate analysis, morbid obesity (odds ratio [OR], 4.51; P = 0.011), suboptimal pelvic examination or enlarged uterus during preoperative evaluation (OR, 3.55; P = 0.034), para-aortic lymphadenectomy (OR, 10.5; P = 0.001), uterine size 250 g or greater (OR, 3.49; P = 0.026), and extrauterine disease (OR, 4.68; P = 0.012) remained the independent predictors for laparotomy conversion. The following numbers of risk factors were significantly correlated with laparotomy-conversion rate: none, 1.1%; single risk factor, 5.3% (OR, 5.00; P = 0.15); double risk factors, 21.7% (OR, 24.9; P = 0.002); and triple or more risk factors, 50% (OR, 90.0; P < 0.001). Ultrasonographic 3-dimensional volumes of 496 cm in preoperative uterine size correlate with actual uterine weight of 250 g (Y = 61.5 + 0.38X, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Laparotomy conversion significantly impacts outcomes of patients with endometrial cancer. In this setting, our predictive model for laparotomy conversion will be useful to guide the surgical management of endometrial cancer.
Collapse
|
6
|
Chu LH, Chang WC, Sheu BC. Comparison of the laparoscopic versus conventional open method for surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 55:188-92. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2015] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
|
7
|
Turner TB, Habib AS, Broadwater G, Valea FA, Fleming ND, Ehrisman JA, Di Santo N, Havrilesky LJ. Postoperative Pain Scores and Narcotic Use in Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Staging. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015; 22:1004-10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2015] [Revised: 05/04/2015] [Accepted: 05/04/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
8
|
Geppert B, Persson J. Robotic infrarenal paraaortic and pelvic nodal staging for endometrial cancer: feasibility and lymphatic complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015. [DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Geppert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Skane University Hospital; Lund University; Lund Sweden
| | - Jan Persson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Skane University Hospital; Lund University; Lund Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hackethal A, Brennan D, Rao A, Land R, Obermair A, Nicklin J, Garrett A, Nascimento M, Crandon A, Perrin L, Chetty N. Consideration for safe and effective gynaecological laparoscopy in the obese patient. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 292:135-41. [DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3600-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2014] [Accepted: 12/11/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
10
|
Nam JH, Park JY. The Modern Surgical Strategy for Endometrial Cancer: Laparoscopic Surgery. CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS 2013. [DOI: 10.1007/s13669-012-0031-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
11
|
Laparoscopic compared with open radical hysterectomy in obese women with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119:1201-9. [PMID: 22617585 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e318256ccc5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in obese women with early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS The medical records of 166 patients with stage IA2-IIA2 cervical cancer and a body mass index of at least 30 who underwent laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (n=54) or open radical hysterectomy (n=112) at the Asan Medical Center between 1998 and 2011 were reviewed. RESULTS None of the patients in the laparoscopic radical hysterectomy group required conversion to laparotomy. The resection margin was negative in 98.1% of the laparoscopic radical hysterectomy group and 98.2% of the open radical hysterectomy group (P=.976). No difference between the two groups was observed in terms of operating time, perioperative hemoglobin level change, transfusion requirement, or the number of retrieved lymph nodes. Compared with open radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy was associated with a significant reduction in the following: interval to return of bowel movements (2 days compared with 2.7 days, P<.001); duration of postoperative hospital stay (9.3 days compared with 21 days, P<.001), postoperative complications (5.6% compared with 17.9%, P=.032), and estimated blood loss (494 mL compared with 620 mL, P=.009). After a median follow-up period of 44 months, the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 88% for the laparoscopic radical hysterectomy group and 85% for the open radical hysterectomy group (P=.682). The 5-year overall survival rate was 97% for the laparoscopic radical hysterectomy group and 90% for the open radical hysterectomy group (P=.220). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy was a preferred alternative to open radical hysterectomy in the present cohort of obese women with early-stage cervical cancer because it is associated with a more favorable surgical outcome without compromising survival outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II.
Collapse
|
12
|
Ghezzi F, Uccella S, Cromi A, Bogani G, Robba C, Serati M, Bolis P. Lymphoceles, lymphorrhea, and lymphedema after laparoscopic and open endometrial cancer staging. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19:259-267. [PMID: 21695563 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1854-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2011] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the incidence of lymphoceles, lymphorrhea, and lymphedema after systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients who underwent laparoscopic or open abdominal staging for endometrial cancer. METHODS A total of 138 consecutive women who underwent systematic laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging were compared to 123 historical control subjects staged via an open approach. Postoperative screening for lymphadenectomy-related complications by ultrasound was consistently performed. RESULTS The incidence of perioperative complications was lower in cases than in control subjects. Overall, lymphoceles were diagnosed in 19 (15.4%) and 2 (1.4%) patients who had open and laparoscopic staging, respectively (odds ratio 12.42; 95% confidence interval 2.82-54.55; P < 0.0001). Symptomatic lymphoceles were more frequent after open staging than after laparoscopy (P = 0.028). Lymphorrhea occurred in 1 and 4 patients after laparoscopic and open surgery (P = 0.19). No difference in the incidence of lymphedema was observed. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that laparoscopic endometrial cancer staging is associated with a lower occurrence of both asymptomatic and symptomatic lymphoceles compared to open surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Ghezzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Helm CW, Arumugam C, Gordinier ME, Metzinger DS, Pan J, Rai SN. Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: increasing body mass index does not impact postoperative complications. J Gynecol Oncol 2011; 22:168-76. [PMID: 21998759 PMCID: PMC3188715 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2011.22.3.168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2011] [Revised: 04/07/2011] [Accepted: 05/01/2011] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To determine the effect of body mass index on postoperative complications and the performance of lymph node dissection in women undergoing laparoscopy or laparotomy for endometrial cancer. Methods Retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing surgery for endometrial cancer between 8/2004 and 12/2008. Complications graded and analyzed using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events ver. 4.03 classification. Results 168 women underwent surgery: laparoscopy n=65, laparotomy n=103. Overall median body mass index 36.2 (range, 18.1 to 72.7) with similar distributions for age, body mass index and performance of lymph node dissection between groups. Following laparoscopy vs. laparotomy the percent rate of overall complications 53.8:73.8 (p=0.01), grade ≥3 complications 9.2:34.0 (p<0.01), ≥3 wound complications 3.1:22.3 (p<0.01) and ≥3 wound infection 3.1:20.4 (p=0.01) were significantly lower after laparoscopy. In a logistic model there was no effect of body mass index (≥36 and<36) on complications after laparoscopy in contrast to laparotomy. Para-aortic lymph node dissection was performed by laparoscopy 19/65 (29%): by laparotomy 34/103 (33%) p=0.61 and pelvic lymph node dissection by laparoscopy 21/65 (32.3%): by laparotomy 46/103 (44.7%) p=0.11. Logistic regression analysis revealed that for patients undergoing laparoscopy for stage I disease there was an inverse relationship between the performance of both para-aortic lymph node dissection and pelvic lymph node dissection and increasing body mass index (p=0.03 and p<0.01 respectively) in contrast to the laparotomy group where there was a trend only (p=0.09 and 0.05). Conclusion For patients undergoing laparoscopy, increasing body mass index did not impact postoperative complications but did influence the decision to perform lymph node dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C William Helm
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Oehler MK. Robotic surgery in gynaecology and gynaecological oncology: Program initiation and operative outcomes at the Royal Adelaide Hospital. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 51:119-24. [PMID: 21466512 DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2011.01293.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Martin K Oehler
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stang A, Merrill RM, Kuss O. Nationwide rates of conversion from laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomy to open abdominal hysterectomy in Germany. Eur J Epidemiol 2011; 26:125-33. [DOI: 10.1007/s10654-010-9543-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2010] [Accepted: 12/24/2010] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
16
|
Analgesic and antiemetic needs following minimally invasive vs open staging for endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204:65.e1-6. [PMID: 20869036 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2010] [Revised: 07/11/2010] [Accepted: 08/16/2010] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to assess perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive vs open endometrial cancer staging procedures. STUDY DESIGN A total of 181 consecutive patients underwent open or minimally invasive hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy. Perioperative outcomes, analgesic, and antiemetic use were compared. RESULTS In all, 97 and 84 women underwent open and minimally invasive staging procedures, respectively. In the open staging group, median anesthesia time was shorter (197 vs 288 minutes; P < .0001), but recovery room stay (168 vs 140 minutes; P = .01) and hospital stay (4 vs 1 day; P < .0001) were longer. Median narcotic (13 vs 43 mg morphine equivalents; P < .0001) and antiemetic (43% vs 25%; P = .01) use were lower for minimally invasive surgery in the first 24 hours postoperatively. Median estimated blood loss was lower for minimally invasive procedures (100 vs 300 mL; P < .0001). CONCLUSION Minimally invasive staging for endometrial cancer is associated with lower use of narcotics and antiemetics, and shorter hospital stay compared to open procedures.
Collapse
|
17
|
|