Ovarian cancer in the elderly: outcomes with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary cytoreduction

Is increased chronological age a contraindication to debulking surgery for elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer?

We collected data of elderly patients aged 65 years and older who underwent debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer in order to explore the impact of old age on surgical outcomes and complications. A total of 120 patients were classified as follows: group 1, 65-69 years (n = 58); group 2, 70-74 years (n = 38); group 3, 75-79 years (n = 17); group 4, ≥80 years (n = 7). There were no differences in most of the characteristics, surgical extent and outcomes, and postoperative complications between the four groups, whereas polypharmacy was more common (6 vs. 5-16; p=.02) and operation time was shorter (median, 194 vs. 285-330 min; p=.02) in group 4. Factors related to frailty rather than age, polypharmacy, preoperative albumin level, estimated blood loss and transfusion increased the risk of postoperative complications. Thus, the impact of old age on surgical extent, outcomes and postoperative complications may be minimal in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Optimal debulking surgery is a significant factor in improving the prognosis of ovarian cancer but it is not easy to perform such radical surgery on elderly patients in fear of increasing surgical morbidity and mortality. Some studies suggest that underlying comorbidities may be a stronger contributing factor to increasing such risk rather than old age although there is not enough evidence yet.What do the results of this study add? Through this study, we could see that increased age is not the determining cause of increased morbidity and mortality in elderly patients who undergo optimal debulking surgery in ovarian cancer. There are other aspects describing a patient's health status that can predict prognosis better rather than age.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Old age need not be a contraindication when performing optimal debulking surgery in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Surgery in Advanced Ovary Cancer: Primary versus Interval Cytoreduction

Primary debulking surgery (PDS) has remained the only treatment of ovarian cancer with survival advantage since its development in the 1970s. However, survival advantage is only observed in patients who are optimally resected. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has emerged as an alternative for patients in whom optimal resection is unlikely and/or patients with comorbidities at high risk for perioperative complications. The purpose of this review is to summarize the evidence to date for PDS and NACT in the treatment of stage III/IV ovarian carcinoma. We systematically searched the PubMed database for relevant articles. Prior to 2010, NACT was reserved for non-surgical candidates. After publication of EORTC 55971, the first randomized trial demonstrating non-inferiority of NACT followed by interval debulking surgery, NACT was considered in a wider breadth of patients. Since EORTC 55971, 3 randomized trials—CHORUS, JCOG0602, and SCORPION—have studied NACT versus PDS. While CHORUS supported EORTC 55971, JCOG0602 failed to demonstrate non-inferiority and SCORPION failed to demonstrate superiority of NACT. Despite conflicting data, a subset of patients would benefit from NACT while preserving survival including poor surgical candidates and inoperable disease. Further randomized trials are needed to assess the role of NACT.

Outcomes for Elderly Ovarian Cancer Patients Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery Plus Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC)

BACKGROUND

Women 65 years of age or older with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are thought to have a worse prognosis than younger patients. However, no consensus exists concerning the best treatment for ovarian cancer in this age group. This report presents outcomes for patients treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

METHODS

A prospective database of EOC patients treated with CRS/HIPEC (1998-2019) was analyzed. Perioperative variables were compared by treatment including upfront CRS/HIPEC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus CRS/HIPEC (NACT + CRS/HIPEC), and salvage CRS/HIPEC, and by age at surgery (< 65 and ≥ 65 years). Survival analysis was performed, and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 148 patients identified, 42 received upfront CRS/HIPEC, 48 received NACT + CRS/HIPEC, and 58 received salvage CRS/HIPEC. Each group was subdivided by age groups (< 65 and ≥ 65 years). The median overall survival (OS) after the upfront CRS/HIPEC was 69.2 months for the patients < 65 years of age versus 69.3 months for those ≥ 65 years of age. The OS after NACT + CRS/HIPEC was 26.9 months for the patients < 65 years of age versus 32.9 months for those ≥ 65 years of age, and the OS after salvage CRS/HIPEC was 45.6 months for the patients < 65 years of age versus 23.9 months for those ≥ 65 years of age. The median progression-free survival (PFS) after upfront CRS/HIPEC was 41.3 months for the patients < 65 years of age versus 45.4 months for those ≥ 65 years of age. The PFS after NACT + CRS/HIPEC was 16.2 months for the patients < 65 years of age versus 11.2 months for those ≥ 65 years of age, and the PFS after salvage CRS/HIPEC was 18.7 months for the patients < 65 years of age versus 10 months for those ≥ 65 years of age. The median follow-up period for the entire cohort was 44.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 34.7-60.6 months].

CONCLUSION

Age and feasibility of complete cytoreduction should be considered when treatment methods are selected for elderly patients. A carefully selected elderly population can benefit significantly from aggressive treatment methods.

Interval Debulking Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer in Elderly Patients (≥70 y): Does the Age Matter?

BACKGROUND

Elderly ovarian cancer (OC) patients are more likely to be managed suboptimally, with worse clinical outcomes as a result. Strategies to decrease morbidity are lacking.Methodology: Consecutive patients with advanced stage OC (IIIC-IV) who were managed in our center between January 2016 and July 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) according to our institution protocol. We divided patients into two groups: Group 1 (age ≥ 70 years) and Group 2 (age < 70 years). The primary outcome of the study was assessment of peri-operative morbidity amongst two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients were referred during the study period. 114 patients underwent IDS after NACT (74.5%), 46 in Group 1 and 68 in Group 2. Elderly patients were more likely to receive more than three cycles of NACT prior to IDS compared to younger patients (39% vs. 19%, p = 0.03). Elderly patients were more frequently subjected to Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET) as pre-operative assessment (63% vs. 27%, p = 0.002). Optimal/complete resection was achieved in all patients in Group 1 (100%) and in 97% of patients in Group 2. With the exception of higher postoperative cardiac arrhythmias in Group 1 (11% vs. 1%, p = 0.04), no significant differences in 30-day morbidity were observed. No 90-day death in both groups was registered.

CONCLUSION

Older age should not preclude clinicians from offering ultra-radical resection to patients with advanced OC after NACT. In our series, elderly patients received the same treatment with similar outcomes to the younger group. Clinicians should be encouraged to use CPET for patients' selection following NACT.

Chemotherapy alone for patients 75 years and older with epithelial ovarian cancer-is interval cytoreductive surgery still needed?

BACKGROUND

Patients ≥75 years old with ovarian cancer experience high perioperative morbidity, but recruitment into prospective trials to assess the role of surgery continues to be challenging.

OBJECTIVE

To compare overall survival for patients ≥75 years old with ovarian cancer after chemotherapy alone vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy with interval cytoreductive surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Data were extracted from the National Cancer Data Base from 2004 to 2014. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Of 1661 patients (median age: 79 years), most were white (88%) and had stage III-IV disease (95%), and 51% had serous histology. Of those who did not receive primary surgery, 58% had chemotherapy alone and the remainder had neoadjuvant chemotherapy with interval cytoreductive surgery. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with interval cytoreductive surgery increased from 28% to 50% in years 2004-2007 to 2012-2014 (P<.001). Compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with interval cytoreductive surgery, chemotherapy-only patients were older (80 vs 78 years; P<.001) and had more advanced stage disease (98% vs 91%; P<.001). The 5-year overall survival of the entire study group was 14%; those who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with interval cytoreductive surgery had overall survival of 25% compared with only 7% in chemotherapy alone group (P<.001). In multivariable analysis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with interval cytoreductive surgery (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.54; P<.001) was an independent predictor for improved survival. Older (80-84 years) age (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.63; P=.002), advanced (stage III-IV) disease (hazard ratio; 2.06, 95% confidence interval, 1.37-3.09; P=.001), and clear cell histology (hazard ratio; 2.17, 95% confidence interval, 1.10-4.28; P=.03) portended for worse outcome.

CONCLUSION

Patients ≥75 years with ovarian cancer old have an overall poor prognosis. Receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval cytoreductive surgery is associated with greater overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone.

Early treatment modifications improve chemotherapy adherence in ovarian cancer patients ≥70 years

OBJECTIVE

Elderly ovarian cancer patients are underrepresented in clinical trials and disadvantaged with regard to therapeutic standards compared to other age groups. We explored the specific performance of a subset of patients aged ≥70 years in a large meta-data set of 3 phase III trials.

METHODS

3333 patients with advanced ovarian cancer recruited into 3 clinical phase III trials of the AGO & GINECO study groups were retrospectively analysed for age-specific prognostic and toxicity parameters.

RESULTS

Only 10% (359/3333) of the patients were aged ≥70 years. This subgroup presented with impaired performance statuses (ECOG 2 14.8 vs 10.1%) and higher FIGO-stages (FIGO IIIC-IV 78.5 vs 73.6%) compared to younger patients. Complete operative tumor resection was achieved less frequently (postoperative tumor burden >10 mm 46.7 vs 33.9%) and elderly received less cycles of platinum/taxane-based chemotherapies (>4 cycles 81.9 vs 90.7%). FIGO-stage, histology, postoperative tumor burden and number of chemotherapy cycles were independent prognostic factors in elderly patients. Elderly patients with ≤4 cycles of chemotherapy showed a median OS of 18.4 months compared to 30.9 months in elderly with 5-6 cycles (p < 0.001). This effect was accentuated in elderly patients after complete tumor resection (cumulative survival benefit of 33.8 months). Analyses of chemotherapeutic delivery revealed that elderly patients with at least one cycle delay had higher chances to complete >4 cycles of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Protocol defined treatment modifications might support completion of >4 cycles of standard chemotherapy in fit elderly OC patients.

Chemotherapy in older adult gynecologic oncology patients: Can a phenotypic frailty score predict tolerance?

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the ability of an office-administered phenotypic frailty assessment to predict chemotherapy tolerance in older adult gynecologic oncology patients, and describe practice patterns for chemotherapy administration in this population.

METHODS

Prospective, single-institution cohort study of gynecologic oncology patients 65 or older initiating chemotherapy. Phenotypic frailty testing at an office visit encompassed components of two validated frailty assessments: Fried Score (physical testing and patient response) and FRAIL Scale (patient response only). Patients were followed through three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Standard statistics examined the relationship of frailty to chemotherapy regimen, ability to complete chemotherapy, and complications.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were included, 65% with ovarian and 34% with endometrial cancer. On average 57% of patients were fit, 32% intermediately frail, and 11% frail. 68% received adjuvant chemotherapy versus 32% neoadjuvant. The majority (81%) received IV chemotherapy on a 21-day cycle and 81% initially received a regimen consistent with standard-of-care chemotherapy (SOCC). Age was not associated with receiving SOCC, or tolerance or completion of chemotherapy. Frailty was associated with non-initiation of SOCC in all patients and inability to complete SOCC in adjuvant patients. Complications and regimen alterations were common but were not associated with frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need to develop tools to help physicians predict chemotherapy tolerance among older adult gynecologic oncology patients in order to prevent both under- and over-treatment while minimizing morbidity. However, in this study phenotypic frailty assessment had limited predictive utility. Among adjuvant chemotherapy patients, frailty was associated with inability to complete SOCC and thus may be helpful in selecting patients appropriate for less aggressive chemotherapy regimens.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk ovarian cancer patients: Role of age

OBJECTIVE

To review a single-center clinical experience with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in a population of frail epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients and investigate the prognostic role of advanced age.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from 102 advanced EOC patients treated with NACT and presenting high perioperative risk. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group A, including patients aged 70 years or older; and group B, including patients below 70 years old. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare survival and prognostic factors for survival between the two groups.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients (41.2%) were older than 70 years. Elderly patients were more likely to present comorbidities ( p = 0.0001), poor performance status ( p = 0.04), and multiple indications for NACT ( p = 0.03). They showed a reduced response to NACT, since only 64% of elderly patients underwent surgical debulking (98.3% vs 64.3%, p = 0.001) and, among these, half of them were optimally debulked (79.3% vs 50%, p = 0.01). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly lower in group A (respectively, 9 vs 13 months, p = 0.005, and 21 vs 29 months, p = 0.01). Advanced age, IV stage, presence of ascites, and residual disease >1 cm were significantly associated with a lower PFS. However, when analyzing factors associated with OS, the only significant ones were higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score and residual disease >1 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

Age was not found to be a prognostic factor for survival. This highlights the necessity of validated geriatric assessment tools predicting functional age and treatment tolerability to avoid undertreatment of elderly patients.

Review of methodological challenges in comparing the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer in the United States

Randomized trials outside the U.S. have found non-inferior survival for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) versus primary debulking surgery (PDS) for advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). However, these trials reported lower overall survival and lower rates of optimal debulking than U.S. studies, leading to questions about generalizability to U.S. practice, where aggressive debulking is more common. Consequently, comparative effectiveness in the U.S. remains controversial. We reviewed U.S. comparative effectiveness studies of NACT versus PDS for AOC. Here we describe methodological challenges, compare results to trials outside the U.S., and make suggestions for future research. We identified U.S. studies published in 2010 or later that evaluated the comparative effectiveness of NACT versus PDS on survival in AOC through a PubMed search. Two independent reviewers abstracted data from eligible articles. Nine of 230 articles were eligible for review. Methodological challenges included unmeasured confounders, heterogeneous treatment effects, treatment variations over time, and inconsistent measurement of treatment and survival. Whereas some limitations were unavoidable, several limitations noted across studies were avoidable, including conditioning on mediating factors and immortal time introduced by measuring survival beginning from diagnosis. Without trials in the U.S., non-randomized studies are an important source of evidence for the ideal treatment for AOC. However, several methodological challenges exist when assessing the comparative effectiveness of NACT versus PDS in a non-randomized setting. Future observational studies must ensure that treatment is consistent throughout the study period and that treatment groups are comparable. Rapidly-evolving oncology data networks may allow for identification of treatment intent and other important confounders.

Factors Predicting Use of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Compared With Primary Debulking Surgery in Advanced Stage Ovarian Cancer-A National Cancer Database Study

OBJECTIVES

We performed a patterns-of-care study to characterize the types of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) versus primary debulking surgery (PDS) using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

METHODS

We identified patients with stages IIIC and IV EOC in the NCDB diagnosed from 2003 to 2011. Patients who received chemotherapy (CT) prior to surgery were classified as receiving NACT; if surgery preceded CT, then it was classified as PDS. Data collected from the NCDB included demographics, medical comorbidity index, cancer characteristics and treatment, and hospital characteristics. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed using χ test, logistic regression, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards modeling as indicated. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 62,727 patients with stages IIIC and IV EOC were identified. The sequence of surgery and CT was identified, of which 6922 (11%) had NACT and 31,280 (50%) had PDS. Neoadjuvant CT was more frequently done in stage IV than stage IIIC (13% vs 9%), and its use markedly increased over time. Variables associated with increased likelihood of NACT use were as follows: age older than 50 years and those with higher comorbidities, stage IV, and higher-grade EOC. Neoadjuvant CT use was also associated with hospitals that were adherent to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, high-volume facilities, those in the Midwest and West, and academic centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence suggests that patients with greater adverse risk factors are more likely to receive NACT instead of PDS. Use of NACT has significantly increased over the study period, especially in patients with stage IV ovarian cancer.

The Application and Outcome of Standard of Care Treatment in Elderly Women with Ovarian Cancer: A Literature Review over the Last 10 Years

The rising number and increasing longevity of the elderly population calls for improvements and potentially a more personalized approach to the treatment of cancer in this group. Elderly patients frequently present with a number of comorbidities, complicating surgery and chemotherapy tolerability. In the case of ovarian cancer, elderly women present with more advanced disease, making the issue of providing adequate treatment without significant morbidity critical. Most studies support the application of standard of care treatment to elderly women with ovarian cancer, yet it seems to be offered less frequently in the elderly. The objective of this review is to examine the application and outcome of standard of care treatment in elderly women with ovarian cancer. The aim is to ultimately improve the approach to treatment in this group.

Treating gynecologic malignancies in elderly patients

AIM

To determine the relative benefits of full and partial treatment for gynecologic malignancies in elderly patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients (n=169) aged 79 and older (median age 82 y; range, 79 to 94 y), diagnosed between 1971 and 2007 with various types of gynecologic malignancies (endometrial, 52%; ovarian, 26%; vulvar, 11%; cervical, 5%; other, 6%) was conducted. Stages were I to II (47%), III to IV (35.5%), and unknown (17.5%). Major comorbidities were hypertension (51%), diabetes (17%), cardiac diseases (34%), and other malignancy (12%). Regardless of age or chronic illnesses, patients were grouped on the basis of having been treated optimally (100 patients; 59.2%), defined as the accepted standard for each diagnosis and stage including surgery and adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy as indicated; or suboptimally (69 patients; 40.8%), that is, no or only partial treatment. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard models, univariate and multivariable were conducted.

RESULTS

For all patients with suboptimal treatment, the age-and-stage-adjusted hazard ratio for death was 1.76 (95% CI, 1.203-2.570; P=0.004) compared with optimal treatment. Age-adjusted hazard ratio was 2.15 (95% CI, 1.127-4.114; P=0.02) and 2.3 (95% CI, 1.415-3.779; P=0.001) for ovarian and endometrial cancer patients, respectively. Age-adjusted and stage-adjusted hazard ratio was 2.8 (95% CI, 1.099-5.157; P=0.028) and 1.53 (95% CI, 0.867-2.702; P=0.1420) for ovarian and endometrial cancer patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal treatment in patients with gynecologic malignancies evidently improves survival in elderly patients at any age, and in patients with ovarian cancer at any stage. Regardless of chronological age, the aim should be to deliver optimal treatment.

Epithelial ovarian cancer in older women: defining the best management approach

Epithelial ovarian cancer is a cancer of older women. In fact, almost half of women diagnosed with ovarian cancer will be older than age 64, and 25% will be older than age 74. Therefore, it is crucial to examine the available data in older populations to optimize the therapeutic approach without negatively affecting the quality of life permanently. Unfortunately, little prospective data are available in this under-represented population of women. Although ovarian cancer traditionally has been approached with aggressive cytoreductive surgery, older patients may benefit from a less aggressive surgical approach and, in some cases, may be candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by an interval cytoreduction. Modalities do exist for assessing an older woman's ability to tolerate surgery and chemotherapy, and these tools should be familiar to clinicians who are caring for this population of women in making treatment decisions. Ongoing planned trials to evaluate pretreatment assessment for older patients will provide objective, feasible, clinical tools for applying our treatment-based knowledge. Future trials of both surgery and chemotherapy, including a focus on the sequence of these two treatment modalities, are crucial to guide decision making in this vulnerable population and to improve outcomes for all.

HGF/c-Met axis drives cancer aggressiveness in the neo-adjuvant setting of ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. Recently, NACT (Neo Adjuvant Chemotherapy) has been tested as alternative approach for the management of ovarian cancer patients. A biological predictor helpful in selecting patients for NACT would be desirable. This study was aimed at identifying actionable mechanisms of resistance to NACT. Expression of a panel of microRNAs was screened in a discovery set of 85 patients. Analysis of the potential targets was conducted in the same RNAs by calculating significant correlations between microRNAs and genes. Quantitative fluorescent immunohistochemistry was employed in a validation set of 109 patients. MiR-193a-5p was significantly overexpressed in the NACT setting. Analysis of its potential targets demonstrated that this microRNA is also significantly correlated with HGF and MET genes. Analysis of protein expression in samples taken before and after NACT demonstrated that both HGF and c-Met are increased after NACT. Patients who relapse shortly after NACT exhibited the highest relative basal expression of both HGF and c-Met, while the opposite phenomenon was observed in the best responders. Mir-193a-5p, HGF and c-Met expression may help select eligible patients for this modality of treatment. Moreover, inhibitors of this pathway may improve the efficacy of NACT.

Breast and ovarian cancer in the older woman

Nearly half of all women diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer are age 65 years or older with the number of women diagnosed expected to increase as the population ages and life expectancy improves. Older women are less likely to be offered standard cancer treatments, are more likely to develop higher toxicity, and have higher mortality. Chronologic age should not be the only factor used for making treatment decisions. Functional dependence, organ function, comorbidity, polypharmacy, social support, cognitive and/or psychosocial factors, overall life expectancy, and patient's goals of care are equally vital and should be assessed before and during treatment. In this review, current evidence and treatment guidelines for older women with breast or ovarian cancer are outlined.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: latest results and place in therapy

Approximately 70% of women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are diagnosed with advanced stage disease, which is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The standard approach to treating patients with advanced EOC remains primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by chemotherapy. EOC is one of the most sensitive of all solid tumors to cytotoxic drugs, with over 80% of women showing a response to standard chemotherapy combined with taxane and platinum. Furthermore, residual disease is a major prognostic factor for survival. On the basis of the clinical features, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) is considered to be an alternative treatment option to standard treatment in patients unable to undergo complete resection during PDS. Noninferiority of NACT-IDS to PDS has been demonstrated in some randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. NACT would also lead to improved quality of life (QOL) of patients, however there are still problems to be solved in the treatment strategy. The uncertainty of perioperative visual assessment of tumor dissemination after NACT has been reported. In addition, several papers have shown the possibility that NACT induces platinum resistance. Furthermore, a notable risk associated with NACT is that patients with significant side effects and refractory disease will lose the opportunity for debulking surgery. Appropriate selection of the patient cohort for NACT is an important issue. Bevacizumab (Bev) is active in patients with advanced EOC. However, the use of Bev is not recommended in the neoadjuvant setting. Bev has a specific adverse event profile that needs to be considered, especially for surgical management, such as gastrointestinal perforation, hemorrhage, and thromboembolic events. NACT could be an alternative treatment option in patients with stage III or IV EOC. However, further studies are needed to clarify the precise role of NACT in the management of advanced EOC.

Serum HE4, CA125, YKL-40, bcl-2, cathepsin-L and prediction optimal debulking surgery, response to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer

Background

The most important prognostic factor in the ovarian cancer is optimal cytoreduction. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy, an only optional method of treatment in this case and is still the subject of debate. The object of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of markers: CA 125, HE4, YKL-40 and bcl-2 as well as cathepsin L in predicting optimal cytoreduction and response to chemotherapy.

Methods

Sera were secured preoperatively. The division into groups was performed retrospectively depending on the method of treatment (surgery vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy) as well as on response to chemotherapy (sensitive vs resistant vs refractory). Comparisons were made between groups, and the diagnostic usefulness of tested proteins was examined.

Results

We found that statistically significant differences between primary operated patients and patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy were applicable only to the tumour markers (CA125 1206.79 vs 2432.38, p = 0.000191; HE4 78.87 vs 602.45, p = 0.000004; YKL-40 108.13 vs 203.96, p = 0.003991). Cathepsin-L and Bcl-2 were statistically insignificant. The cut-off point values were determined for the CA 125 (345 mIU/ml), HE4 (218.43 pmol/L) and YKL-40 (140.9 ng/ml). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were as follows: CA125 (83.3%; 75%; 80.6%; 78.3%), HE4 (86.6%; 91.3%; 92.9%; 84%) and YKL-40 (75%; 83.3%; 84%; 74.1%).

Conclusion

Among the tested proteins the HE4 marker appears to be helpful in forecasting of optimal cytoreduction and possibly also of the prediction of response to platinum analogues used in first-line treatment of ovarian cancer.

Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy impair long-term survival for ovarian cancer patients? A nationwide Danish study

OBJECTIVE

In Denmark, the proportion of women with ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has increased, and the use of NACT varies among center hospitals. We aimed to evaluate the impact of first-line treatment on surgical outcome and median overall survival (MOS).

METHODS

All patients treated in Danish referral centers with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer from January 2005 to October 2011 were included. Data were obtained from the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database, the Danish National Patient Register and medical records.

RESULTS

Of the 1677 eligible patients, 990 (59%) were treated with primary debulking surgery (PDS), 515 (31%) with NACT, and 172 (10%) received palliative treatment. Of the patients referred to NACT, 335 (65%) received interval debulking surgery (IDS). Patients treated with NACT-IDS had shorter operation times, less blood loss, less extensive surgery, fewer intraoperative complications and a lower frequency of residual tumor (p < 0.05 for all). No difference in MOS was found between patients treated with PDS (31.9 months) and patients treated with NACT-IDS (29.4 months), p = 0.099. Patients without residual tumor after surgery had better MOS when treated with PDS compared with NACT-IDS (55.5 and 36.7 months, respectively, p = 0.002). In a multivariate analysis, NACT-IDS was associated with increased risk of death after two years of follow-up (HR: 1.81; CI: 1.39-2.35).

CONCLUSIONS

No difference in MOS was observed between PDS and NACT-IDS. However, patients without residual tumor had superior MOS when treated with PDS, and NACT-IDS could be associated with increased risk of death after two years of follow-up.

Considerations regarding the administration of systemic therapy for elderly patients with ovarian cancer

To improve the benefit and tolerability of cancer treatment, we must develop new geriatric-specific trials, better assessment tools, and encourage enrollment of older patients in clinical trials. Age is a strong predictor of survival in ovarian cancer and often influences the treatment plan. Elderly patients, broadly defined as older than age 65 years, are commonly not offered participation in clinical research or provided with substandard chemotherapy or surgical options. Because first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy with cytoreductive surgery is a potentially curative modality, all standard treatment options should be explored (intravenous, neoadjuvant, and/or intraperitoneal chemotherapy). However, one must balance the specific needs of the older patient and be aware of the increased risk of side effects. To be mindful and respectful, the oncologist should clearly define the goals (palliative vs. curative) and specific risks of treatment to patients and their families. As the field of geriatric oncology evolves and prospective trials tailored to older women with ovarian cancer are developed, specific guidelines will ultimately assist in these difficult decisions.

Risk-scoring model for prediction of non-home discharge in epithelial ovarian cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Identification of preoperative factors predictive of non-home discharge after surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) may aid counseling and optimize discharge planning. We aimed to determine the association between preoperative risk factors and non-home discharge.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients who underwent primary surgery for EOC at Mayo Clinic between January 2, 2003 and December 29, 2008 were included. Demographic, preoperative, and intraoperative factors were retrospectively abstracted. Logistic regression models were fit to identify preoperative factors associated with non-home discharge. Multivariable models were developed using stepwise and backward variable selection. A risk-scoring system was developed for use in preoperative counseling.

RESULTS

Within our cohort of 587 EOC patients, 12.8% were not discharged home (61 went to a skilled nursing facility, 1 to a rehabilitation facility, 1 to hospice, and there were 12 in-hospital deaths). Median length of stay was 7 days (interquartile range [IQR] 5, 10 days) for patients dismissed home compared with 11 days (IQR 7, 17 days) for those with non-home dismissals (p < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, patients with advanced age (odds ratio [OR] 3.75 95% CI [2.57, 5.48], p < 0.001), worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.43, 1.97] for ECOG performance status 1 vs 0 and OR 5.40 (95% CI 2.42, 12.03) for score of 2+ vs 0; p < 0.001), greater American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (OR 2.03 [95% CI 1.02, 4.04] for score ≥3 vs < 3, p = 0.04), and higher CA-125 (OR 1.28 [95% CI 1.12, 1.46], p < 0.001) were less likely to be discharged home. The unbiased estimate of the c-index was excellent at 0.88, and the model had excellent calibration.

CONCLUSIONS

Identification of preoperative factors associated with non-home discharge can assist patient counseling and postoperative disposition planning.

Evaluation of serum levels of sCD30L ligand in patients with ovarian cancer in terms of selected clinico-pathological factors

AIM OF THE STUDY

The CD30L ligand is a membrane-associated glycoprotein expressed by activated CD4(+)Th cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, and B lymphocytes. It binds to the CD30 receptor carried on activated and helper Th cells, inducing the immune response and apoptosis. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the level of sCD30L in the serum of patients at diagnosis of ovarian cancer and at relapse and to assess the potential association of this ligand with selected clinico-pathologic factors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We studied 69 patients with ovarian cancer allocated to two groups: A - ovarian cancer at diagnosis, B - relapse of ovarian cancer and active growth of the tumor.

RESULTS

We found high levels of sCD30L in ovarian cancer patients. Levels at relapse (21.48 ng/ml) were significantly higher than at diagnosis (11.81 ng/ml). Poor response to first-line chemotherapy was accompanied by higher levels of sCD30L and by several other findings: resistance to platinum analogs was common, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was needed, relapse and death during two-year follow-up were frequent.

CONCLUSIONS

Our present study might initially suggest that elevated concentration of sCD30L can be an important finding prognosticating a poor prognosis and is associated with platinum resistant and refractory cases of ovarian cancer. However, studies are needed on larger groups of patients.

Treatment and trials: ovarian cancer in older women

Ovarian cancer (OC) is a disease of elderly women. The disease spreads insidiously and presents at an advanced stage at initial diagnosis for most patients. Several groups reported at least a two-fold increased risk of death in women older than 65. Various theories have been proposed to explain this survival disparity in older women, including: (1) more aggressive cancer with advanced age, (2) inherent resistance to chemotherapy, (3) individual patient factors such as multiple concurrent medical problems, and (4) physician and health-care biases toward the elderly that lead to inadequate surgery, less than optimal chemotherapy, and poor enrollment in clinical trials. As a result of this high clinical variability, oncologists need to be more familiar with the comprehensive geriatric assessment to better identify vulnerable patients at higher risk of complications. Several geriatric tools are available to assess the physiologic and functional capacities of older patients and to better individualize treatment. This paper gives an overview of the management of elderly patients with OC, in particular the integration of chemotherapy, surgery, and geriatric assessment to improve treatment tolerance and survival outcomes.

Elderly and very elderly advanced ovarian cancer patients: does the age influence the surgical management?

BACKGROUND

To examine the surgical treatment and clinical outcome of elderly and very elderly advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed FIGO stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer patients, divided in elderly (Group A, >65 and <75 years) and very elderly patients (Group B, ≥ 75 years) treated by primary debulking surgery (PDS) or by interval debulking surgery (IDS) at the Catholic University at Rome and Campobasso, Italy.

RESULTS

164 patients were included: 123 (Group A) and 41 (Group B). Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 60 patients (60.6%) in Group A and in 20 patients (62.5%) in Group B (p = 0.75). In the remaining cases, optimal cytoreduction was performed (39 cases (39.4%) in Group A and 12 (37.5%) in Group B; p = 0.75). In Group A complete/optimal debulking was achieved in 53 patients (53.5%) at PDS and in 46 patients (46.5%) at IDS (p = 0.55). In the Group B a higher rate of patients was debulked at IDS with respect to PDS (10 (31.3%) vs. 22 patients (68.7%); p = 0.02). In Group A patients debulked at PDS showed better DFS (p = 0.007) and OS (p = 0.003) with respect to patients submitted to successful IDS, whereas in group B we did not observed any survival difference according to time of cytoreduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that elderly and very elderly patients may tolerate radical and ultra-radical surgery. These patients should be managed in a gynecologic oncology unit, with prudent but complete approach.

Disparities in the allocation of treatment in advanced ovarian cancer: are there certain patient characteristics associated with nonstandard therapy?

OBJECTIVE

To explore data from the National Cancer Database to identify pretreatment patient characteristics associated with receipt of nonstandard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Between 2003 and 2006, there were 47,390 patients with ovarian cancer registered with the National Cancer Database. Variables included demographics, insurance, Charlson comorbidity score, zip income, and facility characteristics. Multivariable log binomial regression analyses were performed to assess factors associated with nonstandard care.

RESULTS

Among the 47,390 patients, 27,045 (81%) were stage IIIC or IV. After excluding patients with missing treatment information (n=1,129 [2.38%]), 13,789 (53.21%) had received standard treatment. In multivariable analyses, uninsured and Medicaid-insured patients were less likely to receive standard treatment as compared with privately insured patients (relative risk 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-0.93 and relative risk 0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.95, respectively). African Americans and Hispanics were also less likely to receive standard treatment (relative risk 0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.92 and relative risk 0.89, 95% CI 0.84-0.94, respectively). Patients with a Charlson comorbidity score of 2+ were less likely to receive standard care (relative risk 0.74, 95% CI 0.68-0.80). Treatment at a community cancer hospital compared with a teaching hospital was also less likely to be associated with standard treatment (relative risk 0.83, 95% CI 0.80-0.87).

CONCLUSION

In this large multi-institutional cohort, approximately 47% of patients with stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer did not receive standard treatment. Pretreatment patient characteristics such as race, insurance status, age, Charlson comorbidity score, and facility type were associated with nonstandard treatment.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is an effective way of managing elderly women with advanced stage ovarian cancer (FIGO Stage IIIC and IV)

BACKGROUND

To compare outcomes in women ≥ age 70 who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) followed by cytoreductive surgery with those undergoing upfront cytoreductive surgery followed by the same chemotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed for women ≥ age 70 with Stage IIIC or Stage IV EOC from 1996 to 2009.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients who underwent upfront cytoreductive surgery and 42 patients who received NACT were eligible for analysis. Patients receiving NACT were significantly more likely to have Stage IV disease (P = 0.004). Cytoreduction to no macroscopic disease was achieved in 71.4% of women who received NACT and 28.1% of women undergoing upfront surgery (P < 0.001). NACT patients had significantly less blood loss at surgery (P = 0.01), required fewer small bowel resections (P = 0.009), had shorter ICU stays (P = 0.02) and fewer hospital days (P = 0.04). NACT patients experienced a trend toward an improved progression-free survival (P = 0.078); however, no statistically significant differences were found in either the progression-free or overall survival analyses.

CONCLUSION

NACT is associated with reduced perioperative morbidity in elderly patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer.

Frailty: an outcome predictor for elderly gynecologic oncology patients

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this pilot study was to determine if frailty predicts surgical complications among elderly women undergoing gynecologic oncology procedures.

METHODS

A cohort of gynecologic oncology patients age ≥ 65, undergoing surgery between March and December 2011 was identified. Frailty was evaluated using a validated assessment tool. The primary outcome measure was 30 day postoperative complication rate.

RESULTS

Forty women were approached for study entry and 37 (92%) enrolled. The mean age was 73 years (range 65-95). The majority of women had a malignancy and underwent a major abdominal surgical procedure. Twenty-one women (57%) were not frail, 10 (27%) were intermediately frail and 6 (16%) were frail. There was no difference in age or prevalence of medical comorbidities between groups. Frail women had a significantly higher BMI compared to intermediately frail and not frail women, (36.0, 31.5 and 26.1 kg/m(2), p=0.02). The rate of 30-day surgical complications increased with frailty score and was 24%, versus 67% for women who were not frail as compared to the frail (p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative frailty assessment is well accepted by gynecologic oncology patients and feasible in a clinic setting. Frail women had a higher BMI, indicating that low body weight is not a marker for frailty, and had a significantly higher rate of 30-day postoperative complications in this pilot study. Initial findings support the concept of measuring frailty as a possible predictor for postoperative morbidity that will allow for improved patient counseling and decision making.

Biological, clinical, and psychosocial correlates at the interface of cancer and aging research

In September 2010, the Cancer and Aging Research Group, in collaboration with the National Cancer Institute and the National Institute on Aging, conducted the first of three planned conferences to discuss research methodology to generate the highest quality research in older adults with cancer and then disseminate these findings among those working in the fields of cancer and aging. Conference speakers discussed the current level of research evidence in geriatric oncology, outlined the current knowledge gaps, and put forth principles for research designs and strategies that would address these gaps within the next 10 years. It was agreed that future oncology research trials that enroll older adults should include: (1) improved standardized geriatric assessment of older oncology patients, (2) substantially enhanced biological assessment of older oncology patients, (3) specific trials for the most vulnerable and/or those older than 75 years, and (4) research infrastructure that specifically targets older adults and substantially strengthened geriatrics and oncology research collaborations. This initial conference laid the foundation for the next two meetings, which will address the research designs and collaborations needed to enhance therapeutic and intervention trials in older adults with cancer.

Management of the Elderly Patient With Gynecologic Cancer: Report of the 2011 Workshop in Geriatric Gynecologic Oncology

Abstract

Reflecting the worldwide aging trend and close association of aging with cancer, geriatric oncology is now growing beyond its pioneer years. Nevertheless, geriatric oncology in the gynecologic field is in the beginning stage; indeed, there is no geriatric specialist who is trained in this particular field of gynecologic oncology. Therefore, we held the first workshop in geriatric gynecologic oncology. In this review, we summarize what we discussed at the workshop and provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of gynecologic cancer in elderly individuals.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the Medicare cohort with advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer has yet to be determined. While NAC may facilitate and simplify complete cytoreduction and reduce the risk of surgery, the delay of surgery related to NAC needs to be balanced against any potential benefit.

METHODS

Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results (SEER) data linked to Medicare claims were used to identify 6844 women with treated stage III/IV epithelial ovarian cancer (1995-2005). Patients were classified by primary treatment (surgery (PDS) or chemotherapy), and the primary chemotherapy group was characterized as having NAC or palliative chemotherapy (PC) based on whether there was documentation that surgery was recommended. We compared surgical complications and survival between the groups.

RESULTS

4827 (71%) of women were treated with PDS, 958 received NAC (14%) and 1059 (15%) had PC. Only 577 (60%) of women with NAC underwent surgery and they had fewer ostomies (8.5% vs. 19.2%, p<0.001) and fewer infections, gastrointestinal and pulmonary complications than PDS (all p<0.01). Comparing NAC to PDS there was a 16% increase in the risk of death at 2years (RR 1.16, 95%CI 1.01-1.34) for women with stage III disease and a 15% reduction in the risk for women with stage IV disease (RR 0.85, 95%CI 0.73-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

NAC followed by surgery was associated with fewer surgical complications than PDS. The direction and magnitude of the difference in survival between women receiving NAC and those receiving PDS differed according to the stage of disease and follow up time.