Upstaging pathologic stage I ovarian carcinoma based on dense adhesions is not warranted: A clinicopathologic study of 84 patients originally classified as FIGO stage II

Feasibility and safety of fertility-sparing surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer with dense adhesion: a long-term result from a single institution

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the feasibility and safety of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with dense adhesions.

METHODS

Patients were divided into cases with and without dense adhesions in this retrospective study.

RESULTS

Of the 95 eligible patients, 29 patients had dense adhesions. Mean age, proportion of staging procedure, distribution of histologic type, and co-presence of endometriosis were different (p=0.003, 0.033, 0.011, and 0.011, respectively). The median follow-up period was 57.8 (0.4-230.0) months. There were no differences in the rates of recurrence (21.2% vs. 20.7%, p=1.000) or death (16.7% vs. 6.9%, p=0.332) between the 2 groups. There was no difference in the pattern of recurrence or in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between the 2 groups. In multivariate analysis, pretreatment cancer antigen-125 >35 U/mL and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IC were significant factors of worse DFS and OS, while dense adhesion was not a prognostic factor for both DFS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.3-2.7; p=0.792) and OS (HR=0.2; 95% CI=0.1-1.8; p=0.142), nor were age, proportion of staging procedure, histologic type, and co-presence of endometriosis. Moreover, the distribution of those 2 significant prognostic factors was not different between the 2 groups. Dense adhesions were subgrouped into non-tumor and tumor associated dense adhesions for further analysis and the results were same.

CONCLUSION

FSS is feasible and safe in EOC, regardless of the presence of dense adhesions.

Ovarian Cancer, the Revised FIGO Staging System, and the Role of Imaging

OBJECTIVE

It is now recognized that ovarian cancer includes a heterogeneous group of malignant epithelial tumors originating from the ovaries, fallopian tubes, or peritoneum. This development has prompted the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) to issue a revised staging system that can provide prognostic information and guidance on personalized management of ovarian cancer.

CONCLUSION

We review the epidemiology of ovarian cancer, the new FIGO staging system, and the role of imaging in the assessment, staging, and follow-up of ovarian cancer.

Improvements to the FIGO staging for ovarian cancer: reconsideration of lymphatic spread and intraoperative tumor rupture

Objective

To evaluate the improvement in prognosis prediction with reassignment of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages for ovarian carcinoma.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of patients with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers. Sub-staging criteria used in stage reassignment were defined as follows: surgical spillage (IC1), capsule rupture before surgery or tumor on the surface (IC2), and positive cytology results (IC3); microscopic (IIB1) and macroscopic (IIB2) pelvic spread; microscopic extrapelvic spread (IIIA1) and retroperitoneal lymph node (LN) metastasis without extrapelvic spread (IIIA2); and supraclavicular LN metastasis (IVA) and other distant metastasis (IVB). Survival outcomes associated with the current and reassigned stages were compared.

Results

Overall, 870 patients were eligible for analysis. The median follow-up period was 45 months (range, 0 to 263 months). The 5-year overall survival rates (5YSRs) according to the current staging were 93.5% (IA), 82.5% (IC), 75.0% (IIB), 74.5% (IIC), 57.5% (IIIA), 54.0% (IIIB), 38.5% (IIIC), and 33.0% (IV). The 5YSRs of patients with IC1, IC2, and IC3 after sub-staging were 92.0%, 85.0%, and 71.0%, respectively (p=0.004). Patients who were reassigned to stage IIIA2 had a better 5YSR than those with extrapelvic tumors >2 cm (66.3% vs. 35.8%; p=0.005). Additionally, patients with newly assigned stage IVA disease had a significantly better 5YSR than those with stage IVB disease (52.0% vs. 28.0%; p=0.015).

Conclusion

The modified FIGO staging for ovarian carcinoma appears superior to the current staging for discriminating survival outcomes of patients with surgical spillage, retroperitoneal LN metastasis without extrapelvic peritoneal involvement, or distant metastasis to supraclavicular LNs.